World War III ?

[bryant.coleman]

The next nuclear use as a weapon will probably be by a small group with a very good cause, unless governments start cleaning up their acts.

It is almost impossible for the marginal and fringe groups to obtain or assemble nuclear weapons. It needs advanced technological know-how in several sectors. That is why less than 10 nations own nuclear weapons right now. But then, I am worried by the possession of nuclear weapons by countries such as Pakistan and North Korea. No one can predict what the rulers of these countries will do in the future.

[1715348092]

1715348092

[1715348092]

1715348092

[1715348092]

1715348092

[1715348092]

1715348092

[1715348092]

1715348092

[1715348092]

1715348092

[PeterTheGrape]

The next nuclear use as a weapon will probably be by a small group with a very good cause, unless governments start cleaning up their acts.

It is almost impossible for the marginal and fringe groups to obtain or assemble nuclear weapons. It needs advanced technological know-how in several sectors. That is why less than 10 nations own nuclear weapons right now. But then, I am worried by the possession of nuclear weapons by countries such as Pakistan and North Korea. No one can predict what the rulers of these countries will do in the future.

Perhaps the greatest limiter on the proliferation of nukes is the limited interest among the general public in astronomy, ironically the one thing that would make nuclear proliferation less dangerous... /

[kodoll]

The next nuclear use as a weapon will probably be by a small group with a very good cause, unless governments start cleaning up their acts.

It is almost impossible for the marginal and fringe groups to obtain or assemble nuclear weapons. It needs advanced technological know-how in several sectors. That is why less than 10 nations own nuclear weapons right now. But then, I am worried by the possession of nuclear weapons by countries such as Pakistan and North Korea. No one can predict what the rulers of these countries will do in the future.

Perhaps the greatest limiter on the proliferation of nukes is the limited interest among the general public in astronomy, ironically the one thing that would make nuclear proliferation less dangerous... /

Why are you so sure about this? Is the way to the races will solve the problem of the world nuclear arsenal, which for the same reason will destroy the whole earth. And the planet has nothing to expect from the searches in the races.

[PeterTheGrape]

The next nuclear use as a weapon will probably be by a small group with a very good cause, unless governments start cleaning up their acts.

It is almost impossible for the marginal and fringe groups to obtain or assemble nuclear weapons. It needs advanced technological know-how in several sectors. That is why less than 10 nations own nuclear weapons right now. But then, I am worried by the possession of nuclear weapons by countries such as Pakistan and North Korea. No one can predict what the rulers of these countries will do in the future.

Perhaps the greatest limiter on the proliferation of nukes is the limited interest among the general public in astronomy, ironically the one thing that would make nuclear proliferation less dangerous... /

Why are you so sure about this? Is the way to the races will solve the problem of the world nuclear arsenal, which for the same reason will destroy the whole earth. And the planet has nothing to expect from the searches in the races.

50 years ago there were more nuclear weapons ready to be used then there are now. What has changed? Will the number of nuclear weapons ready to be used continue dropping until zero? It"s very unlikely.

Anybody can study astronomy and gather enough information about physics to help build a bomb, but nobody does. 

The trend toward less 'nuclear capable radicals', fewer dangerous people with nukes, is not sustainable. Either an effort has to be made to reduce basic education, reading and writing, or 'govts', have to civilize in such a way that nuclear use is less attractive to small groups.

[alexsamudra]

if war broke three world then the economy will increasingly fall apart for the cost of the war, if we had not come to terms again.

for what is life?

[Sithara007]

if war broke three world then the economy will increasingly fall apart for the cost of the war, if we had not come to terms again.

for what is life?

Look at the second world war. During the war, there was a huge spike in the steel production and some other sectors of the industry. So it is not all negative. There will be some positives, which can benefit the global economy.

[Eternu]

50 years ago there were more nuclear weapons ready to be used then there are now. What has changed? Will the number of nuclear weapons ready to be used continue dropping until zero? It"s very unlikely.

Anybody can study astronomy and gather enough information about physics to help build a bomb, but nobody does. 

The trend toward less 'nuclear capable radicals', fewer dangerous people with nukes, is not sustainable. Either an effort has to be made to reduce basic education, reading and writing, or 'govts', have to civilize in such a way that nuclear use is less attractive to small groups.

I don't know exact number of nuclear weapon 50 years ago, but in time people understood devastating power of nuclear weapon, and if its used massively what would it do to earth. People want power, and they tend to make nuclear bombs to show that "power" to other people. But it could come to nuclear war, we just need one fool to start it.

[Kotone]

World war III is around the corner after trump done his bad side about Syria bump strike around the Syria and other country warned US and other country that if they will not stop maybe there will be world war 3 happen on this earth hoping that this will be canceled make peace not war.

[E-shipper]

It has already begun. Constantly some acts of terrorism, someone is bombing, spreading false rumors.

[molsewid]

My father told me that world war III is possible and it will be declared anytime if leader of the countries are going to priority their pride even their are lots of innocent people will be killed when this happen i read the news earlier and some of them drop off some bomb to kill.

[Marcus_2017]

It has already begun. Constantly some acts of terrorism, someone is bombing, spreading false rumors.

I agree with you. The third world war is a long time. Just people don't want or are afraid to admit it. Our world is so constituted that in order to begin to build something new you must first destroy the old.

[popcorn1]

China why on earth would you let north korea have a nuke BOMB .

If he get a bomb your in danger you dumb asses ..

You are the super power of that region and you would put your own people in danger to let him have a bomb..WOW..

Have you seen how he treats his people?.
Man one day he will start on you CHINA..He got nukes he will do what he likes..

China i don't care we are going to bomb the shit out of NORTH KOREA..
He is one dangerous man..

ARE YOU THAT STUPID CHINA..

1 man with power can kill everybody because he cannot have his own way..

Now AMERICA ASK china 1 more time will they help us NOW NOT TOMORROW NOW.
Get shut of the north korean leader ..

I have seen with my own eyes what he does to his own people ..

So if he gets a bomb whats to say he wont try flex his muscles on anyone else I.E CHINA..

So even if we have a all out war SO BE IT ..I would rather die than have a fat little shit like that in power..

NOW YOU GET THAT FUCKER OUT OR WE WILL..THIS WEEK ..

I DON'T CARE IF WE ALL DIE ..BUT that shit face ain't staying in power..RATHER DIE..

[popcorn1]

CHINA my 2 uncles got tortured and killed by the Japs to help your country out ..UK

Could you please help all us out PLEASE ..

Get shut of the north korean leader before we have all out war..

NO MATTER WHAT HE IS GOING..

NO MORE DICTATORS WILL RUN ANY COUNTRY ..

WE WILL ALL DIE . Get him out    OR  Blow his nuke capability up ..

America don't stop get shut no matter the cost..
It makes no difference he gets a bomb life will be shit with him in power..

Man he thinks he can get a hole in one  on every tee shot ..

[popcorn1]

If the World War III is imminent. Foreign policy of 1 country against other will probably start it. If UN can't resolve can't or will not intervene then this will probably start a new World War. Russia China vs US and its allies.

And whether the US allies? You can see how Trump fights with everyone except Putin. If this old senile is not stopped, America will be at war itself. Do the Americans have not yet understood?

I think world war 3 would soon happen.This time,only Trump would be sole responsible for the war because of his immature foreign policies.

Do you believe a man should have sole power and then his children's children after him..

Or do you believe in people voting to change things?..

Well we have waited far to long for people in the  FAR east to stop this mad man  But to no avail ..
                                                                   
The north korean people are pussies EAT THEM FOR BREAKFAST..

Well they must be pussies ?..
No way would we let our leaders treat us like the way he treat his own people..

NO CHANCE..So they must be BIG PUSSIES.. REALLY BIG PUSSIES..

LITTLE  FAT SHIT LIKE THAT ..DON'T MAKE ME FUCKING LAUGH   ..

[ValeryBark]

if war broke three world then the economy will increasingly fall apart for the cost of the war, if we had not come to terms again.

for what is life?

Look at the second world war. During the war, there was a huge spike in the steel production and some other sectors of the industry. So it is not all negative. There will be some positives, which can benefit the global economy.

War is always destruction. As you know sooner or later, any war ends. Then the economic recovery should stimulate demand for all. This leads to the development of the country. The way of the world.

[Oppolee]

if war broke three world then the economy will increasingly fall apart for the cost of the war, if we had not come to terms again.

for what is life?

Look at the second world war. During the war, there was a huge spike in the steel production and some other sectors of the industry. So it is not all negative. There will be some positives, which can benefit the global economy.

War is always destruction. As you know sooner or later, any war ends. Then the economic recovery should stimulate demand for all. This leads to the development of the country. The way of the world.

If you look at what's happening in the world, then before the war is not so far away. Because what can only bring North Korea, with its nuclear missiles.

[Eternu]

if war broke three world then the economy will increasingly fall apart for the cost of the war, if we had not come to terms again.

for what is life?

Look at the second world war. During the war, there was a huge spike in the steel production and some other sectors of the industry. So it is not all negative. There will be some positives, which can benefit the global economy.

War is always destruction. As you know sooner or later, any war ends. Then the economic recovery should stimulate demand for all. This leads to the development of the country. The way of the world.

I agree with you. In history people have always fight one another, and developed new technology of killing one another. That is in human nature i think. But after all wars people have survived, and i think people will always find a way to survive some new war. Even if it would be nuclear war, i think that there would be people who would survive and continue human kind...

[kodoll]

if war broke three world then the economy will increasingly fall apart for the cost of the war, if we had not come to terms again.

for what is life?

Look at the second world war. During the war, there was a huge spike in the steel production and some other sectors of the industry. So it is not all negative. There will be some positives, which can benefit the global economy.

War is always destruction. As you know sooner or later, any war ends. Then the economic recovery should stimulate demand for all. This leads to the development of the country. The way of the world.

I agree with you. In history people have always fight one another, and developed new technology of killing one another. That is in human nature i think. But after all wars people have survived, and i think people will always find a way to survive some new war. Even if it would be nuclear war, i think that there would be people who would survive and continue human kind...

People will always remain people. It will not even be affected by war. That's just how we will live, this is another conversation. After a nuclear strike, few will act in accordance with conscience.

[Lancusters]

if war broke three world then the economy will increasingly fall apart for the cost of the war, if we had not come to terms again.

for what is life?

Look at the second world war. During the war, there was a huge spike in the steel production and some other sectors of the industry. So it is not all negative. There will be some positives, which can benefit the global economy.

War is always destruction. As you know sooner or later, any war ends. Then the economic recovery should stimulate demand for all. This leads to the development of the country. The way of the world.

I agree with you. In history people have always fight one another, and developed new technology of killing one another. That is in human nature i think. But after all wars people have survived, and i think people will always find a way to survive some new war. Even if it would be nuclear war, i think that there would be people who would survive and continue human kind...

People will always remain people. It will not even be affected by war. That's just how we will live, this is another conversation. After a nuclear strike, few will act in accordance with conscience.

It is not a fact. During the war, all human qualities are manifested. Those who skillfully hide their flaws will be exposed. A lot of people are willing to sacrifice themselves for the sake of saving the life of a stranger. I know I was in the war.

[SameHow]

if war broke three world then the economy will increasingly fall apart for the cost of the war, if we had not come to terms again.

for what is life?

Look at the second world war. During the war, there was a huge spike in the steel production and some other sectors of the industry. So it is not all negative. There will be some positives, which can benefit the global economy.

War is always destruction. As you know sooner or later, any war ends. Then the economic recovery should stimulate demand for all. This leads to the development of the country. The way of the world.

I agree with you. In history people have always fight one another, and developed new technology of killing one another. That is in human nature i think. But after all wars people have survived, and i think people will always find a way to survive some new war. Even if it would be nuclear war, i think that there would be people who would survive and continue human kind...

People will always remain people. It will not even be affected by war. That's just how we will live, this is another conversation. After a nuclear strike, few will act in accordance with conscience.

It is not a fact. During the war, all human qualities are manifested. Those who skillfully hide their flaws will be exposed. A lot of people are willing to sacrifice themselves for the sake of saving the life of a stranger. I know I was in the war.

Yes, the war will show whether you really have real friends who will help in a difficult situation and what you can do yourself.