Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[inca]

I wouldn't be surprised if i wake up and its over 400 tomorrow morning

[1714973346]

1714973346

[1714973346]

1714973346

[hyphymikey]

those 2 k disappeared from the books, so someone just closed shorts.

nothing to see here, move along.

Shorts on bitstamp... yeah.

Haha. Don't rain on Tarmi's (false) parade

[tarmi]

those 2 k disappeared from the books, so someone just closed shorts.

nothing to see here, move along.

Shorts on bitstamp... yeah.

bitfinex goes through bitstamp.

[hyphymikey]

Oh look another mini ask wall. I hope they don't mind "loosing" those coins too

[JayJuanGee]

snip

Please explain to me how you think this applies, because I'm trying to figure it out, and I for the life of me can't.

WTF??   You want me to engage in a dialogue with you, but you snip out the topical reference - which I have pasted below.

In your earlier post, in case you cannot recall, you made an assertion that seems to be that bulltrolls are apparently nearly if not identically the same as beartrolls, and you did NOT back up that claim with any evidence, beyond your mere assertion of such.

 Accordingly, in your more recent post above, you did NOT respond to anything in my below referenced post, and only attempt to put the burden back on me, by asserting that you are confused by my post...

At best you are being delusional.. but more likely, you are merely attempting to engage in another logical fallacy.,. and that is obfuscation.

I respect and I like to have bears here. But trolls doesn´t apport nothing but crispation and noise. Please moderators, Blitz consider ban lambchop.

And the rest os us: PLEASE DONT QUOTE THE TROLLS. Thanks.

You mean don't quote the bear trolls, right? Because I see the bull-trolls aka marketers getting quoted all the time, and nobody seems to have a problem with that.

First:  Octaft just provided a good example of a false equivalence fallacy, by engaging in such...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence

Second:   Frequently, mostly by beartrolls are making claims about the existence of bull trolls in this thread, but in reality, NOT too many bull trolls are spotted in the wild.  I would suspect that they are just making this up, yet I would be curious, just for the sake of argument, to know who are the supposed bulltrolls, and maybe some examples of what it is that these alleged bulltrolls do, that is supposedly bulltroll-ish?

[ShroomsKit]

I wouldn't be surprised if i wake up and its over 400 tomorrow morning

Well, one day you will be right.

[derpinheimer]

those 2 k disappeared from the books, so someone just closed shorts.

nothing to see here, move along.

Shorts on bitstamp... yeah.

bitfinex goes through bitstamp.

Only when liquidity is too low on bitfinex. I dont think this is related. Only 600btc of shorts (cumulative) closed on BFX recently.

[JayJuanGee]

Seems we will not reach 400 tonight

That is one of the difficulties of the Adamesque polls, ambiguity as to when is "tonight?"  It is always night somewhere, and as time passes, it is always gonna be tonight.  It's like Alice in Wonderland?  Jam today, tomorrow or yesterday?  F@#$SPhFHT@#$CK!!!!!

[JayJuanGee]

^It's the same d00d

Don't be stupid, with this ongoing trollish comment.      Ridiculous on its face and repeated over and over and over for the past couple of months.   

TL; DR:   GTFO oh!!!

[JayJuanGee]

What is it with these goddamn dumpers!

WTF is with you, Shroomie?  You shorted at $404, no?  You said that you were leaving bitcoin.  You should be happy, no?

OH, you weren't really "leaving" bitcoin, you were just temporarily taking a break and talking your book, but NOW, you are back, and pumping.. oh?  I think I see.  Fucking idiot traders, they are the cancer of bitcoin, no?...        

[hyphymikey]

those 2 k disappeared from the books, so someone just closed shorts.

nothing to see here, move along.

Shorts on bitstamp... yeah.

bitfinex goes through bitstamp.

Actually they don't. They stopped this a few months ago.

[touhonoob]

Pump & Dump scheme is back 
It looks like one month ago that the price rise 10 dollars than drop 20 dollars every hour.
Traders who follow the scheme are making it even worse.

[derpinheimer]

Pump & Dump scheme is back 
It looks like one month ago that the price rise 10 dollars than drop 20 dollars every hour.
Traders who follow the scheme are making it even worse.

Its not pump and dump. Its natural market behavior. Price starts to rise, more people join in on rally. Price stagnates, unrelated people sell and enjoy the slightly higher price.

[octaft]

snip

I'm snipping you for the benefit of those who have you ignored.

So you completely miss my point, put words in my mouth (without telling me what they are), make assumptions based on those words, then proceed to get angry when I look at you funny and go "huh?"

Your problem is you're making a distinction between bear trolls and bull trolls, when they're all just trolls. Now I personally don't mind trolls, but I do find it a bit hypocritical that you never see anyone crying for bans in response to a bull-troll. If you want to avoid being hypocritical, you either are willing to ban all trolls, or none of them (which is my preferred approach).

Just in case I did not make this clear, there is no comparison because it's apples and apples, apples being trolls. With that in mind, how, exactly, does what you are arguing apply?

By the way, calling me names in no way strengthens your argument.

[criptix]

snip

I'm snipping you for the benefit of those who have you ignored.

So you completely miss my point, put words in my mouth (without telling me what they are), make assumptions based on those words, then proceed to get angry when I look at you funny and go "huh?"

Your problem is you're making a distinction between bear trolls and bull trolls, when they're all just trolls. Now I personally don't mind trolls, but I do find it a bit hypocritical that you never see anyone crying for bans in response to a bull-troll. If you want to avoid being hypocritical, you either are willing to ban all trolls, or none of them (which is my preferred approach).

Just in case I did not make this clear, there is no comparison because it's apples and apples, apples being trolls. With that in mind, how, exactly, does what you are arguing apply?

By the way, calling me names in no way strengthens your argument.

1.000.000 $ per BTC


(lets see if the post gets deleted)

 

[octaft]

1.000.000 $ per BTC


(lets see if the post gets deleted)

 

No one's posts are getting deleted for what could be perceived to be trolling (at least as far as I can tell), which is exactly the way I like it.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[bigdave]

What is it with these goddamn dumpers!

WTF is with you, Shroomie?  You shorted at $404, no?  You said that you were leaving bitcoin.  You should be happy, no?

OH, you weren't really "leaving" bitcoin, you were just temporarily taking a break and talking your book, but NOW, you are back, and pumping.. oh?  I think I see.  Fucking idiot traders, they are the cancer of bitcoin, no?...        

Shroomie is probably riding the Crimson tide right now... Don't pay any attention.

[adamstgBit]

bitcoin's ups and downs are wilder than my ups and downs, and thats saying something!

[Bagatell]

Shroomie is probably riding the Crimson tide right now... Don't pay any attention.

Poke them both with your sharpest jibes and see if they have anything new to say.