Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4332
|
.. so it seems to me that shaving off some lil corns along the way or just consuming goods and services here and there does not really seem like a bad thing.. including the considerations of consuming some other kinds of investments if anything strikes the fancy of the HODLER who happens to have way more than 90%+ in bitcoin, largely due to BTC price appreciation rather than being irresponsible in any kind of way related to how such BTC HODLer had acquired such BTC in the earlier years.
Yes, but it is just strategic thinking 101. For a more advanced course consider that rich rarely sell their assets and btc is precisely that-an asset. When you sell an asset, you get hit with the cap gains tax (at least in US), I think that at least Germany and Portugal (maybe Denmark as well-not sure) don't have cap gains on btc sells. What do rich (like Musk) do? They borrow against the asset in $$. Let's say that instead of selling 20% of btc at 20K (for easier calc) you borrow 20% of the net current value at yearly 5% (realistic numbers). So, essentially, you got cash equal to 20% of your stash without selling anything. If btc goes down, you keep paying the loan from your fiat cash flow (it has to be significant and positive, of course). If btc goes up, for example 100%(to 40k, quite realistic), you sell 10% to buy back your loan (note that you only need to sell 10%, not 20). The end result-you have 90% of the original stash, was able to do something with 20% of the original value (invest, buy a house, etc), paid only less than half tax (comparing to the original tax) with less than half because you can possibly deduct something of the loan interest, not 100% sure about that.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:00:40 PM Merited by BobLawblaw (1) |
|
Ok I’m calling the top for 2020 at $23,777.
Let’s see how well this comment ages. I am not trading this (hodl only) but just calling the top for fun. YMMV.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3290
Merit: 4534
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:03:23 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Ok I’m calling the top for 2020 at $23,777.
Let’s see how well this comment ages. I am not trading this but just calling the top for fun. YMMV.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:03:34 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
.. so it seems to me that shaving off some lil corns along the way or just consuming goods and services here and there does not really seem like a bad thing.. including the considerations of consuming some other kinds of investments if anything strikes the fancy of the HODLER who happens to have way more than 90%+ in bitcoin, largely due to BTC price appreciation rather than being irresponsible in any kind of way related to how such BTC HODLer had acquired such BTC in the earlier years.
Yes, but it is just strategic thinking 101. For a more advanced course consider that rich rarely sell their assets and btc is precisely that-an asset. When you sell an asset, you get hit with the cap gains tax (at least in US), I think that at least Germany and Portugal (maybe Denmark as well-not sure) don't have cap gains on btc sells. What do rich (like Musk) do? They borrow against the asset in $$. Let's say that instead of selling 20% of btc at 20K (for easier calc) you borrow 20% of the net current value at yearly 5% (realistic numbers). So, essentially, you got cash equal to 20% of your stash without selling anything. If btc goes down, you keep paying the loan from your fiat cash flow (it has to be significant and positive, of course). If btc goes up, for example 100%(to 40k, quite realistic), you sell 10% to buy back your loan (note that you only need to sell 10%, not 20). The end result-you have 90% of the original stash, was able to do something with 20% of the original value (invest, buy a house, etc), paid only less than half tax (comparing to the original tax) with less than half because you can possibly deduct something of the loan interest, not 100% sure about that. How do you propose to manage margin calls?
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4332
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:05:45 PM |
|
Ok I’m calling the top for 2020 at $23,777.
Let’s see how well this comment ages. I am not trading this but just calling the top for fun. YMMV.
blasphemy... I kind of agree, comparing to 2017 except to "bottom" at either 20.8K (if Nov repeats) or maybe even 16500-18800 in March 2017 scenario. I don't root for the dip, but we are a bit exuberant right now.
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4332
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:08:12 PM |
|
.. so it seems to me that shaving off some lil corns along the way or just consuming goods and services here and there does not really seem like a bad thing.. including the considerations of consuming some other kinds of investments if anything strikes the fancy of the HODLER who happens to have way more than 90%+ in bitcoin, largely due to BTC price appreciation rather than being irresponsible in any kind of way related to how such BTC HODLer had acquired such BTC in the earlier years.
Yes, but it is just strategic thinking 101. For a more advanced course consider that rich rarely sell their assets and btc is precisely that-an asset. When you sell an asset, you get hit with the cap gains tax (at least in US), I think that at least Germany and Portugal (maybe Denmark as well-not sure) don't have cap gains on btc sells. What do rich (like Musk) do? They borrow against the asset in $$. Let's say that instead of selling 20% of btc at 20K (for easier calc) you borrow 20% of the net current value at yearly 5% (realistic numbers). So, essentially, you got cash equal to 20% of your stash without selling anything. If btc goes down, you keep paying the loan from your fiat cash flow (it has to be significant and positive, of course). If btc goes up, for example 100%(to 40k, quite realistic), you sell 10% to buy back your loan (note that you only need to sell 10%, not 20). The end result-you have 90% of the original stash, was able to do something with 20% of the original value (invest, buy a house, etc), paid only less than half tax (comparing to the original tax) with less than half because you can possibly deduct something of the loan interest, not 100% sure about that. How do you propose to manage margin calls? 20% LTV means margin calls are unlikely. It has to drop more than 80% from the current price. For more-You can buy crazy puts on ledger X or Deribit-it should not be too expensive.
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 12962
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:14:20 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Ok I’m calling the top for 2020 at $23,777.
Let’s see how well this comment ages. I am not trading this (hodl only) but just calling the top for fun. YMMV.
Me = JJG ..... Hairybeary.... Only shorter text
|
|
|
|
OutOfMemory
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 3336
Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:29:40 PM |
|
^ LOL EDIT: Sorry, that was too short. Rules and all... We're on the way through $23k again.
|
|
|
|
serveria.com
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1189
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:40:02 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
kurious
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1643
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:41:56 PM |
|
I'm with Bob that he started the breakthrough beyond 20K. period.
Confirmed. I think December 16th from now on should be Gay Christmas Card Day in Bob's honour.
|
|
|
|
serveria.com
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1189
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:44:02 PM |
|
I guess we're going down now, after traditional AYH on Dec 17.
No way! Because... reasons... and gay cards! We can go down a bit but only from $28-30k area. And only in case there will be some actual sellers.
|
|
|
|
serveria.com
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1189
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:46:57 PM |
|
Unbelievable, but the card worked this time too!
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3290
Merit: 4534
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:55:10 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
bullrun2024bro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 4496
|
|
December 17, 2020, 11:03:05 PM Merited by DaRude (1), ivomm (1) |
|
Grayscale just updated their info sheet. Almost 13 billion in BTC. And this is just the beginning... 12/17/20 UPDATE: Net Assets Under Management, Holdings per Share, and Market Price per Share for our Investment Products.
Total AUM: $15.3 billion Source: https://twitter.com/Grayscale/status/1339689307351756802
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
December 17, 2020, 11:03:55 PM |
|
I voted 27000+ why not?
I would prefer a lot of sideways movement but I am think it may jump to 30k before years end.
Wouldn't surprise me a bit, now that we are back in the groove. Not that <20k is totally dead, yet...
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
December 17, 2020, 11:09:46 PM |
|
I guess this feels similar to when we busted our 1k ATH... Feels nothing like when we hit 20k last time. ........ #HODL' good times!
.... I agree with you -- For the most part I was referring to the current sentiment. I feel like this 20k is closer to when we broke 1k ATH and we have much more room to grow. Let's say we remove the need to sell for living expenses and the original goal was to one day exchange corn to fiat. I feel that as BTC continues to grow, people's urge to swap to fiat will drop. Years ago or just asking a nocoiner what they think they need to retire, the typical answer is in fiat terms. I see this changing over time as BTC grows. Still far from that at the moment but that is the direction I see things moving. I assume it won't be in BTC terms either... maybe a basket of digital assets that return a predictable rate. tdlr; hodl. Anything quantified in dollars beyond a couple years seems foolish, to me.
|
|
|
|
samson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 17, 2020, 11:15:52 PM |
|
.. so it seems to me that shaving off some lil corns along the way or just consuming goods and services here and there does not really seem like a bad thing.. including the considerations of consuming some other kinds of investments if anything strikes the fancy of the HODLER who happens to have way more than 90%+ in bitcoin, largely due to BTC price appreciation rather than being irresponsible in any kind of way related to how such BTC HODLer had acquired such BTC in the earlier years.
Yes, but it is just strategic thinking 101. For a more advanced course consider that rich rarely sell their assets and btc is precisely that-an asset. When you sell an asset, you get hit with the cap gains tax (at least in US), I think that at least Germany and Portugal (maybe Denmark as well-not sure) don't have cap gains on btc sells. What do rich (like Musk) do? They borrow against the asset in $$. Let's say that instead of selling 20% of btc at 20K (for easier calc) you borrow 20% of the net current value at yearly 5% (realistic numbers). So, essentially, you got cash equal to 20% of your stash without selling anything. If btc goes down, you keep paying the loan from your fiat cash flow (it has to be significant and positive, of course). If btc goes up, for example 100%(to 40k, quite realistic), you sell 10% to buy back your loan (note that you only need to sell 10%, not 20). The end result-you have 90% of the original stash, was able to do something with 20% of the original value (invest, buy a house, etc), paid only less than half tax (comparing to the original tax) with less than half because you can possibly deduct something of the loan interest, not 100% sure about that. What he said ^ This is the way..........When BTC becomes collateral held in an escrow operated by a bank then there really will be no limit........
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
December 17, 2020, 11:20:42 PM |
|
.. so it seems to me that shaving off some lil corns along the way or just consuming goods and services here and there does not really seem like a bad thing.. including the considerations of consuming some other kinds of investments if anything strikes the fancy of the HODLER who happens to have way more than 90%+ in bitcoin, largely due to BTC price appreciation rather than being irresponsible in any kind of way related to how such BTC HODLer had acquired such BTC in the earlier years.
Yes, but it is just strategic thinking 101. For a more advanced course consider that rich rarely sell their assets and btc is precisely that-an asset. When you sell an asset, you get hit with the cap gains tax (at least in US), I think that at least Germany and Portugal (maybe Denmark as well-not sure) don't have cap gains on btc sells. What do rich (like Musk) do? They borrow against the asset in $$. Let's say that instead of selling 20% of btc at 20K (for easier calc) you borrow 20% of the net current value at yearly 5% (realistic numbers). So, essentially, you got cash equal to 20% of your stash without selling anything. If btc goes down, you keep paying the loan from your fiat cash flow (it has to be significant and positive, of course). If btc goes up, for example 100%(to 40k, quite realistic), you sell 10% to buy back your loan (note that you only need to sell 10%, not 20). The end result-you have 90% of the original stash, was able to do something with 20% of the original value (invest, buy a house, etc), paid only less than half tax (comparing to the original tax) with less than half because you can possibly deduct something of the loan interest, not 100% sure about that. What he said ^ This is the way..........When BTC becomes collateral held in an escrow operated by a bank then there really will be no limit........ It all comes back around to Not Your Keys... But perhaps a worthwhile risk for a small serving of corn, for some people.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2370
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
|
|
December 17, 2020, 11:22:31 PM |
|
Brace
|
|
|
|
BobLawblaw
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1861
Merit: 5670
Neighborhood Shenanigans Dispenser
|
|
December 17, 2020, 11:38:36 PM |
|
You just had to go there. Spoil the party for everyone. Bastard. -10 WO Merits
|
|
|
|
|