Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[WatChe]

Satoshi idea about Bitcoin is peer-to-peer electronic cash transfer without any middlemen. Regulations just kill the original idea proposed by Satoshi.
If government is given the liberty to regulate Bitcoin then whats the benefit of creating Bitcoin? There is no way government can control decentralized Bitcoin but the one residing on centralized exchanges.

The fact that the government cannot really control bitcoin in total does not prevent them to proclaim that they are controlling it, even if they aren't.

Government only have a grip when decentralization meet centralization i.e. when you try to convert your Bitcoins to fiat or vice versa through centralized exchanges or platforms where your IDs are exposed. I live in country where Bitcoin is totally banned and I don't feel any threat as long as I keep my Bitcoins in my decentralized wallets.

[AlcoHoDL]

[...]

The current system is such that if you don't have good income, good character, good manners, good mentality, etc., you can't get a good wife, but corruption-prone rich people get good girls because By any means more earning will lead to better family and better wife.

The "current system" has been on this planet since the beginning of time. It's called "evolution" and there is one rule: "survival of the fittest." And it is brutal. And it applies to all living things.

“Human female choosiness is also why we are very different from the common ancestor we shared with our chimpanzee cousins, while the latter are very much the same. Women’s proclivity to say no, more than any other force, has shaped our evolution into the creative, industrious, upright, large-brained (competitive, aggressive, domineering) creatures that we are. It is Nature as Woman who says, “Well, bucko, you’re good enough for a friend, but my experience of you so far has not indicated the suitability of your genetic material for continued propagation.”

― Jordan B. Peterson, 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos

[Negotiation]

27907 to 28024

that is a very tight range buddy.

Yeah.. more or less floating around the 200-week average price.

Who would-a-thunk? 

And what does the 200-week moving average mean?


Anyone?


Anyone?



 

I'confused 200-week mean $200k, somehow that is connected to filled?

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[SamReomo]

I believe that JJG write long posts because he have enough information to share with us and he might be a firm believer of sharing is caring thing.

I write long posts because I feel that I don't have enough time to write shorter posts.

That's a pretty bold statement man! I agree that someone like you can be very busy but still you give time to the forum which an amazing thing. We love your posts and once again I would say that they aren't only long but long with a lot of information. JJG, I'm sure if someone goes through all of your posts then that person can write an awesome book, especially related to economics and Bitcoin speculation.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Pingrapole]

Is the regulation good? Because I don't agree, BTC was made to not pay anything to governments, banks or something similar, because it is not fiat money, having BTC is to manage our money as we want, not to declare to governments or banks.

Satoshi idea about Bitcoin is peer-to-peer electronic cash transfer without any middlemen. Regulations just kill the original idea proposed by Satoshi.
If government is given the liberty to regulate Bitcoin then whats the benefit of creating Bitcoin? There is no way government can control decentralized Bitcoin but the one residing on centralized exchanges.

Bitcoin is a free digital currency because the currency is created independently of birth so if the government controls it, it will be subject to it like any other currency and since free currency is controlled by the government Whatever centralization or control you do, this currency will lose its digital concept set.If the above mentioned point is correct then the currency will be killed directly then this currency will not be needed in the world.No one can enjoy smart currency alone. Smart currency is independent. No one can control anyone. This is the characteristic of smart currency The US is controlling the state, so the dollar is presented as not a digital currency but a tool of exploitation Cryptocurrency is a smart currency created by the founders because no one can control it. It is everyone's currency. It is free and independent So government regulation of this currency would be considered a good plan to make the currency disappear from the world.Governments never follow the decentralization principle in the case of currency because the government cannot control this currency, or it will fail if it tries to because it allows people to transact freely with this currency which is not possible with other currencies I agree with your stated opinion, so I expressed my opinion.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[pixie85]

I am surprised, though, that nobody "knew", apparently.
This is strange.

It would take Hamas months and months, if not a year, to plan such a coordinated attack operation. Months and months of soldiers, supplies and artillery moving around. Millions in funding on the move. Months of planning and coordinated communications.

And Mossad didn't have a clue?

And U.S. and Foreign Intel didn't have a clue?

Really? Who's buying this?

Pretty much like they "didn't know" about the incoming attack on Pearl Harbor and the same way they didn't know about incoming jets on 9.11 and had no air defense because NORAD conveniently started exercise that morning.

The things allow to go public are usually the things they want to go public.

[hisslyness]

I am surprised, though, that nobody "knew", apparently.
This is strange.

It would take Hamas months and months, if not a year, to plan such a coordinated attack operation. Months and months of soldiers, supplies and artillery moving around. Millions in funding on the move. Months of planning and coordinated communications.

And Mossad didn't have a clue?

And U.S. and Foreign Intel didn't have a clue?

Really? Who's buying this?

Not me mate!.. it is all part of their plan!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg62705081#msg62705081

I thought i would be another 18 -36 months way... but it looks like it could be sooner!

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Who is John Galt?]

Is the regulation good? Because I don't agree, BTC was made to not pay anything to governments, banks or something similar, because it is not fiat money, having BTC is to manage our money as we want, not to declare to governments or banks.

Regulation is inevitable. As long as the state exists, it will strive to take control of everything it can. In all other cases of regulation, is what the state regulates and what it collects taxes from done by the state? Obviously, in many cases this is not the case.

You are right that Satoshi has created a beautiful thing that does not depend on states or banks because it is decentralized. And the state has no control over the blockchain. But as soon as you spend your bitcoins on something, as soon as you exchange them for fiat money, you enter into a state-controlled space, and in this space the state regulates. Stay in Bitcoin and you can ignore the government for this part.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Who is John Galt?]

Bored of less 30,
Waiting for more than 100,
Soon, John, very soon!

Stop 27,
Buddy, it's all in your hands,
Give us a hundred!

Some want a mil soon,
I know it's hard for Buddy,
100 good for now!

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[xhomerx10]

So I don't know how you guys managed to do this by simply starting up the marriage conversation a few days ago but yesterday we were surprised by one of my nieces showing up with her boyfriend and a really nice diamond ring to let us know that they had gotten engaged. 

[PytagoraZ]

So I don't know how you guys managed to do this by simply starting up the marriage conversation a few days ago but yesterday we were surprised by one of my nieces showing up with her boyfriend and a really nice diamond ring to let us know that they had gotten engaged. 

Actually it's simple, you just need to ask someone to marry you, if it's not suitable you can get a divorce. Talking too much makes it more difficult for that to happen

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com