Walsoraj
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:01:25 PM |
|
Crash baby, crash!
You really are terrible at this ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) not his finest hour It did crash, for about an hour.
|
|
|
|
Walsoraj
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:02:16 PM |
|
Why do I get a sneaking feeling (after reading the recent posts) that we are entering the "new paradigm" stage..? I think I'll give it till 1100-1200 (Bitstamp price), probably earlier.
Naw. Closer to $1400 before we crash below $100 and possibly to single digits ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
kurious
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1643
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:02:21 PM |
|
Someone just stuck 650 BTC ask at 1039 on gox , looks like I can sleep soundly.
Stamp ain't going to climb that 1000 wall it seems, so we are where we are for a bit. Watching bots now - until the next drama.
Lately I realised I have started to dream of graphs.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:02:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
micalith
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:03:02 PM |
|
Why do I get a sneaking feeling (after reading the recent posts) that we are entering the "new paradigm" stage..? I think I'll give it till 1100-1200 (Bitstamp price), probably earlier.
The west just needs a few days to get over the $1000 giddiness
|
|
|
|
Walsoraj
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:03:14 PM |
|
Someone just stuck 650 BTC ask at 1039 on gox , looks like I can sleep soundly ...
^ must be new here.
|
|
|
|
kurious
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1643
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:04:23 PM |
|
Why do I get a sneaking feeling (after reading the recent posts) that we are entering the "new paradigm" stage..? I think I'll give it till 1100-1200 (Bitstamp price), probably earlier.
Naw. Closer to $1400 before we crash below $100 and possibly to single digits ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Only "possibly" now...? Losing the bear faith, are we?
|
|
|
|
Walsoraj
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:05:29 PM |
|
Why do I get a sneaking feeling (after reading the recent posts) that we are entering the "new paradigm" stage..? I think I'll give it till 1100-1200 (Bitstamp price), probably earlier.
Naw. Closer to $1400 before we crash below $100 and possibly to single digits ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Only "possibly" now...? Losing the bear faith, are we? No. What I meant is that single digits is coming, but might be a second crash immediately following the first to $100. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
electronrancher
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:06:39 PM |
|
Why not just si? Cbit, mbit, ubit, nbit, pbit, fbit, abit Ceebit, embit, youbit, enbit, peebit, effbit Hows about:
Bitcoin = Bits = 1 unit cents = cBits = 0.01 units millis or mills = mBits = 0.001 units micros or mics = μBits = 0.000001 units Satoshi or sats = 0.00000001 units nanos or nans = nBits = 0.000000001 units (for when 1 Bitcoin = 1 Mega dollar or BTC1 = M$1 = $1,000,000)
The logic being 100 cents in a Dollar/Euro but we don't say centidollar or centieuro, we just say cents.
"centi-bit" c BTC"milli-bit" m BTC"micro-bit" µ BTC "satoshi" s BTCprobably causes the least confusion or "cent-coin" "milli-coin" "micro-coin" or "ceebits" c BTC"embits" m BTC"mybits" µ BTC For me: First lot ok - but too many syllables Second lot - a little clunky 'cent-coin' yikes... Third - 'ceebits' / 'embits' /'mybits'.... actually - genius!
|
|
|
|
Aido
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 248
Merit: 252
1. Collect underpants 2. ? 3. Profit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:07:10 PM |
|
So, lets get a vote put up for the following naming conventions:
1. "ceebits" (cBTC) / "embits" (mBTC) / "mybits" (µBTC) 2. "centi-bit" (cBTC) / "milli-bit" (mBTC) / "micro-bit" µBTC / "satoshi" (sBTC) 3. "cents" (cBTC) / "mills" (mBTC) / "mics" µBTC / "sats (satoshis)" (sBTC)
Or will this all need a seperate thread of its own?
|
|
|
|
Coinseeker
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:07:23 PM |
|
Lol. Im not dead just yet Here comez $100 ltc +100 ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3276
Merit: 4522
diamond-handed zealot
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:08:17 PM |
|
standard notation; milli, micro
|
|
|
|
kurious
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1643
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:08:25 PM |
|
Why do I get a sneaking feeling (after reading the recent posts) that we are entering the "new paradigm" stage..? I think I'll give it till 1100-1200 (Bitstamp price), probably earlier.
Naw. Closer to $1400 before we crash below $100 and possibly to single digits ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Only "possibly" now...? Losing the bear faith, are we? No. What I meant is that single digits is coming, but might be a second crash immediately following the first to $100. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Single digits would be a catastrophic crash - can you really envisage that without a huge exchange scandal / theft or a systemic failure? We are talking BTC death at that rate - I can't see it (not impossible, of course) but barring a huge calamity inside the system itself - how?
|
|
|
|
kurious
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1643
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:11:40 PM |
|
So, lets get a vote put up for the following naming conventions:
1. "ceebits" (cBTC) / "embits" (mBTC) / "mybits" (µBTC) 2. "centi-bit" (cBTC) / "milli-bit" mBTC / "micro-bit" µBTC / "satoshi" (sBTC) 3. "cents" (cBTC) / "mills" mBTC / "mics" µBTC / "sats (satoshis)" (sBTC)
Or will this all need a seperate thread of its own?
Yes - if there's a Satoshi for No. 1 sBTC too? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
kurious
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1643
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:15:30 PM |
|
So, lets get a vote put up for the following naming conventions:
1. "ceebits" (cBTC) / "embits" (mBTC) / "mybits" (µBTC) 2. "centi-bit" (cBTC) / "milli-bit" mBTC / "micro-bit" µBTC / "satoshi" (sBTC) 3. "cents" (cBTC) / "mills" mBTC / "mics" µBTC / "sats (satoshis)" (sBTC)
Or will this all need a seperate thread of its own?
Yes - if there's a Satoshi for No. 1 sBTC too? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Let's pester for a vote - I think it actually matters in terms of adoption and the future. Maybe we will then be voting (as you suggested) for a next target of $2 / m BTC ! EDITED doh...
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:18:37 PM |
|
After the $1K mark today; I've been -literally- bombarded with questions about the "roof" the price will be "landed". I know that bitcoin is nothing like anything we know up until today; but still; we can estimate a projected value regarding something similar. Gold. This is a rough estimation I did back in March (before the April crash). I think it remains pretty accurate to give you an idea. It's also posted at www.bitcoinvest.eu for Greek readers. The money in circulation today ($USA) is 1,18 trillion dolars (data 20.03.2013, Federal Reserve). Gold minted during our presence here is now 171,300 metric tons. Therefore there's $6,888.5 per kilo of gold. The current (27.03.2013) gold value per kilo is $51,267 ( http://goldprice.org/) which means this is overpriced about a factor of circa 7.5. That's because NOT ALL of gold is available for trading. If the total lot of bitcoins reaches 21M (it comes @ 2140) and NO EXTRA DOLARS are being "cut" (unlikely, but say it is so), the projected theoretical value is 1,18 trillions of $ /21 Million Bitcoins= $56,190.47 per bitcoin. If you now take in mind the overpriced hypothesis of gold; then you get the idea... PS: It's also posted here answering (guess) the same question... http://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rloww/serious_question_do_we_have_any_reasonable_idea/If you have any objections; please let me know.
|
|
|
|
maz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:20:36 PM |
|
After the $1K mark today; I've been -literally- bombarded with questions about the "roof" the price will be "landed". I know that bitcoin is nothing like anything we know up until today; but still; we can estimate a projected value regarding something similar. Gold. This is a rough estimation I did back in March (before the April crash). I think it remains pretty accurate to give you an idea. It's also posted at www.bitcoinvest.eu for Greek readers. The money in circulation today ($USA) is 1,18 trillion dolars (data 20.03.2013, Federal Reserve). Gold minted during our presence here is now 171,300 metric tons. Therefore there's $6,888.5 per kilo of gold. The current (27.03.2013) gold value per kilo is $51,267 ( http://goldprice.org/) which means this is overpriced about a factor of circa 7.5. That's because NOT ALL of gold is available for trading. If the total lot of bitcoins reaches 21M (it comes @ 2140) and NO EXTRA DOLARS are being "cut" (unlikely, but say it is so), the projected theoretical value is 1,18 trillions of $ /21 Million Bitcoins= $56,190.47 per bitcoin. If you now take in mind the overpriced hypothesis of gold; then you get the idea... PS: It's also posted here answering (guess) the same question... http://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rloww/serious_question_do_we_have_any_reasonable_idea/If you have any objections; please let me know. Taking into consideration the hash rate, what are we talking coins in existence that we will see in our average life time? minus a small percentage for lost coins.
|
|
|
|
simonk83
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:22:27 PM |
|
Crash baby, crash!
You really are terrible at this ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) not his finest hour It did crash, for about an hour. If your definition of a crash is less than 10%, then sure. But no.
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:24:45 PM |
|
Taking into consideration the hash rate, what are we talking coins in existence that we will see in our average life time? minus a small percentage for lost coins.
It's projected accordingly the mining procedure of minerals like gold. It's now based over an exponential equation that degrades since it's scarcity develops as we go further in time. So; unless a new ''golden'' planet is found (with more reserves) then, the hashrate increase (thus btc mining) may very well imitate the gold mining procedure (minus a small percentage for lost coins.)
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3276
Merit: 4522
diamond-handed zealot
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2013, 10:25:11 PM |
|
After the $1K mark today; I've been -literally- bombarded with questions about the "roof" the price will be "landed". I know that bitcoin is nothing like anything we know up until today; but still; we can estimate a projected value regarding something similar. Gold. This is a rough estimation I did back in March (before the April crash). I think it remains pretty accurate to give you an idea. It's also posted at www.bitcoinvest.eu for Greek readers. The money in circulation today ($USA) is 1,18 trillion dolars (data 20.03.2013, Federal Reserve). Gold minted during our presence here is now 171,300 metric tons. Therefore there's $6,888.5 per kilo of gold. The current (27.03.2013) gold value per kilo is $51,267 ( http://goldprice.org/) which means this is overpriced about a factor of circa 7.5. That's because NOT ALL of gold is available for trading. If the total lot of bitcoins reaches 21M (it comes @ 2140) and NO EXTRA DOLARS are being "cut" (unlikely, but say it is so), the projected theoretical value is 1,18 trillions of $ /21 Million Bitcoins= $56,190.47 per bitcoin. If you now take in mind the overpriced hypothesis of gold; then you get the idea... PS: It's also posted here answering (guess) the same question... http://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rloww/serious_question_do_we_have_any_reasonable_idea/If you have any objections; please let me know. nobody is getting my BTC for a mere $56,000 each...no way
|
|
|
|
|