Looks like the paranoid, manic attention seeking whore ran out of meds again.
I don’t take any meds you absolute scumbag.
By the way, do you even know the etymology of the word “paranoid”?
It consists of two Greek words, and it essentially means the ability to observe between the lines - what cannot be seen at first glance.
I’m fine with that!
Was? Masks have been worn for the avoidance of disease since long before I was born, let alone you.
Nah.
Masks actually contributed to people being sick, so better get your facts straight, before you try pathetic misdirection tactics.
This is from the influenza pandemic of 1918:
As noted above, I’m fully aware about the 1918 mask charade [you see, we had only newspapers and radio back then], but I was referring to the most recent event - you know the one that you are all blissfully trying to ignore.
Political? The fact you even asked the question says a lot about you. Still having a tantrum about Covid-19 measures?
I can’t be fucked to search your post history, but your statement from 2020 is crystal clear in my mind: “wear your mask, it’s not political”.
What does that say about you?
And yeah, I’m only getting started.
#bumerang.effect
Grow up kid.
Thanks, I wish!
For a second there, I thought we were talking about Bitcoin.
We are.
But we are also talking about massive cunt sized sock-puppets, willingly serving the ruling class in the expense of humanity.
Knowledge does matter.
Bitcoin is nothing but a digital set of rules, that ultimately can be altered should the Core decide to. As it sits, Bitcoin is freedom to the people – and the Nemesis of the banking cartel – but current and past attributes do not guarantee future ones. It’s imperative to keep a close eye on any Core developments, with the main focus being on the privacy development. What is the point if the transactions per block reach mass adoption levels if there is no real privacy?
I will agree with you that in the bottomline it does not matter (much) how Bitcoin came to be and by whom. What does matter however – is whether its decentralised nature is controllable in any form, shape or aspect – that being its reliance on the internet services on a global scale (insert big tech cyberattack). I’m sure we can also agree that should the internet be disrupted on a massive scale (not world wide necessarily, could be just the US or Europe – definitely not China or Nigeria), Bitcoin would plunge by automated AI trading bots – then to probably exponentially recover – but only for the benefit of the few and at the expense of the majority of the people (thank you MSM). Then we can have our mass adoption.
Although I’m a huge fan of the concept of abolishing taxes for the plebs, I can’t help wonder if this is the vehicle that enables TPTB to “erase” and handle their ballooned trillion dollar debt deficits, and reset the world economy onboard the Bitcoin standard (hyper-Bitcoinization). In this (un?)realistic scenario, Bitcoin would have failed on almost all counts it stands by today, especially if there is no privacy involved.
Such moon!
Bitcointalk is part of Bitcoin. Trolls are a part of Bitcointalk.
Therefore, trolls are part of Bitcoin.
Yada, yada, yada, go cry a river to your handler, yo.
Watched
Cyberbunker.Not one word about Bitcoin, not one. Obviously they were not allowed, and even if they did while in production - it was left out of the final product.
Interesting.
I just love
Monkey Safari!
Poll
