Bitcoin Forum
September 04, 2025, 12:10:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 34798 34799 34800 34801 34802 34803 34804 34805 34806 34807 34808 34809 34810 34811 34812 34813 34814 34815 34816 34817 34818 34819 34820 34821 34822 34823 34824 34825 34826 34827 34828 34829 34830 34831 34832 34833 34834 34835 34836 34837 34838 34839 34840 34841 34842 34843 34844 34845 34846 34847 [34848] 34849 34850 34851 34852 34853 34854 34855 34856 34857 34858 34859 34860 34861 34862 34863 34864 34865 34866 34867 34868 34869 34870 34871 34872 34873 34874 34875 34876 34877 34878 34879 34880 34881 34882 34883 34884 34885 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26835212 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 23, 2025, 10:01:14 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 6340



View Profile
August 23, 2025, 10:21:27 PM

Do you guys remember when it was 58k, 58k, 58k? It lasted for several years, I think. 58k.

Well, it just hit me. If we're going to be floating between like 112, and 122, that's right at 2 times 58k.

Think we'll get stuck around 232?

Yeah, I know it doesn't work like that, but perspective is still good.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12820


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
August 23, 2025, 10:25:59 PM
Merited by OutOfMemory (1)


what i see? bitcoin climbing the stairs.
the price increases by approximately 10-12% with each step it climbs. perhaps this bull market will be different from the others in this regard. we know that price volatility has decreased and market cap has increased. therefore, we may need to be prepared to change our definition of a “bull market.”

if the price continues to climb by two more steps, we could see an ath between 150-155k.

What is your definition of a bull market that is needing to be changed?

We are in a bull market until we are not, right?

We been in a bull market since about November 2022, yet we might not have had realized it until either mid-2023 or perhaps as late as October/November 2023.

Perhaps at some point, we will go back to being in a bear market?  Yet maybe the bear market is skipped this cycle? Is that your definition of a change in the bull market?

Maybe if the BTC price breaks below the 100-WMA?  or even comes within 25% of the 200-WMA those might be signs of a transition from a bull to a bear market?

I doubt that guys here agree on the definition anyhow.  Some guys seem to think something like a 10% correction constitutes a bear market, and sure others how other definitioins that might have both a quantity factor and a time factor.

For me, I tend to think that going from bear to bull and then from bull to bear could end up having errors so that by the time we might recognize that we had been in a bear market, for example, then we might end up transitioning back into a bull market.  I am not clear in my own definitions except to consider that there is both a time and a quantity element so it might not be easy to know which one we are in during a transitionary period or a potential transitionary period.

[edited out
OOM - Is there anything I can help you with ahead of time to assist in your deeper research?  Roll Eyes

Jay - Thanks for the smerit! Pics of my Ham stuff were indeed mine and not fake. Do you want to see my Ham license without my name/address or callsign?  Huh

For some reason I had not seen that I was addressed in this post. 

You don't have to listen to anything that I say.. and surely there is no expectations that guys post information that gives away their OPsec matters, yet if you post something that may either relate to OpSec matters or that maybe you had posted in other places (if that is the story), then you might need to say something about it before some forum member (seemingly OOM in this case) ends up having to spend time searching for the images that you had posted and to see that they had been used in other places.. which may or may not have had been your posts.

We are each individuals with our own opinions (to the extent that we are not bots), and one of the problem for me is that you spent time posting your price gatchet, in a way that seems to have had been an attempt to show a photo that has some time factor or even some factor that it was a photo that was unique (and timely) to you, which you could have had easily done the same in regards to your Ham set up or even to say this is what it used to look like, and this is what it looks like now or some other thing that better explains, and if you already explained and I overlooked it, then I don't claim to be able to catch all things that are posted, and it is possible that I overreacted.. Possible? possible? A lot of times several of us just go based on some level of trust or getting used to the styles of other members, yet if there is something that is posted that raises red flags (and/or the responses seem off), then sometimes the red flags do not easily get resolved.

Geez, Do all newbies have to go through this shit?  Undecided Quite a nice welcome!!!  Sad

Sometimes members raise their own shit... and even longer term forum members might get themselves in a pickle from time to time.  Not all newbies go through shit... and sometimes, newbies, or other members will go through short periods of shit, yet they might have had contributed to the level of their shit in terms of their reaction(s)... and maybe some members have more of a victim mentality (and approach) than others which it does not really help the situation and may even contribute to their own worsening of their situation. None of us can really react for another person.. .. or instruct you how to react.

It would not be any fun if all members were to respond in the exact same ways... Sometimes buttons will be purposefully pressed, and some members deal with such button pressing in better ways than others.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 6245


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
August 23, 2025, 10:49:20 PM

Do you guys remember when it was 58k, 58k, 58k? It lasted for several years, I think. 58k.

Well, it just hit me. If we're going to be floating between like 112, and 122, that's right at 2 times 58k.

Think we'll get stuck around 232?

Yeah, I know it doesn't work like that, but perspective is still good.

I just think back to Vegeta and have a chuckle during Barts.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4228
Merit: 5304



View Profile
August 23, 2025, 10:54:07 PM

Do you guys remember when it was 58k, 58k, 58k? It lasted for several years, I think. 58k.

Well, it just hit me. If we're going to be floating between like 112, and 122, that's right at 2 times 58k.

Think we'll get stuck around 232?

Yeah, I know it doesn't work like that, but perspective is still good.

cATSLOCK is the name, right?
 Grin

That's said...we were floating at around 25-28K for a while, don't remember 58-well, there was a broad range between 54-70K, but no distinct 58K afair.
My "expected" btc top is still $210-216K later in the year, hopefully, but I might not even take profits then.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 23, 2025, 11:01:13 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4606
Merit: 10433

'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
August 23, 2025, 11:47:02 PM


Soon, everybody will be a millionaire in Dollars, not that they are going to like it, though.

the reputation of the term “millionaire” as we know it is rapidly declining. you can see the difference even if you watch movies and tv series made in the late 20th century. if you watch anything related to drugs, the mafia, or money from that time, you will understand how significant it was to be a “millionaire.”

every day, thousands of new people become dollar millionaires worldwide. while some increase is natural due to population growth, the proportion of millionaires in the total population is also quite high.

perhaps in the future, we'll refer to them as “bit-ionaires” instead of millionaires. maybe that is what we are going to tell a person who has more than a million satoshis, or the ones with a whole bitcoin. whole coiner sounds good.

hmm when i was a kid there was a tv show.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Millionaire_(TV_series)


it ran from 1955 to 1960.

my dad was earning about 10,000 a year in 1966. so a million was 100 years pay.


if I had a hundred years pay right now it would be over 10 million but under 20 million.


So for me a million usd is 10 to 20 times worse than when I was a kid.

my first home was 25k my parents and grand parents purchased it for 26k in 1955

that house is now 1,300,000 about 50x the price they paid.

Another 50-60 years (at most) and a billionaire would roughly equal a millionaire 50-60 years ago...if nothing drastic happens in between.
Just look at the companies: I remember when in 2000 MSFT and GE were at 500 bil market cap and everybody thought that it was a gigantic number for a single corporation valuation.
Now NVDA has an above $4 tril valuation and most people didn't bat an eye.
Yeah 8x in 25 years becomes 64x in 50 years.

or close to 3700x in 100 years

I see your 25 year and 50 year 8x and 64x respectively is predicated on ~8.66% annual growth rate. Is this compound annual growth rate something that is to be expected in future salary increases?

no but it did happen over prior years.

to say it will continue at 7 or 8 or be 15% not 8% is just a guess.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 12:01:15 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
vapourminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4816
Merit: 5031


what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 12:46:16 AM

Do you guys remember when it was 58k, 58k, 58k? It lasted for several years, I think. 58k.

Well, it just hit me. If we're going to be floating between like 112, and 122, that's right at 2 times 58k.

Think we'll get stuck around 232?

Yeah, I know it doesn't work like that, but perspective is still good.

i like your maths


mucho better than  proudhons
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 01:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12820


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 01:17:45 AM

Of course your investment portion is going to be doing fine.  I doubt that you are really benefiting as much as you have convinced yourself into believing with the trading portion, and you likely could reduce that trading portion to much smaller numbers, perhaps less than 10% of the size of your bitcoin investment stash, or maybe you could go a bit higher with the percent that you allow for fucking around.. but not 50%.. that is too much... since it seems to be a likely losing proposition the way you seem to be currently doing it and just assuming that you are benefiting from it...even though you seem to be fantasizing otherwise with your likely sales through the years that would have had been way better off to just let them ride in bitcoin (and to compound in value.. .) .
Well said, and to be honest I can't disagree but fully agree with whatever you said in the post. Although, I've been taking some profits here and there from trading but surely they reward from accumulating Bitcoin and holding it for years is always going to win no matter if I make whatever from trading. DCA+DIP buying is safe as compared to trading but to be honest I've done DCA with the trading part as well when my trades went negative, however to be honest, Bitcoin always recovers and that's the best thing about it.

For sure with bitcoin investing, I am suggesting 4-10 years or longer, so measuring over short periods you might have some of those short periods where your trading had played out better than investing, yet it still is not likely to outperform bitcoin investing that just involves ongoing buying, weekly or whenever you get your income to mostly be erroring on the side of accumulating and building up your stash.  

There could be times where you hold back some of your weekly buys for buying dips, since you might consider the BTC prices to be too frothy, and sure it could b possible that soe of those kinds of tailored buys end up getting you more BTC for the same quantity of dollars.. and yeah, you might even have large proportion of your trades that are profitable, yet if you are trading, inevitably you likely end up selling too much too soon and the BTC price keeps going up, even after you seld several times expecting to buy back and maybe you even do not buy back in ways that make substantial profits, so you also might end up not buying as much as you would if you were more focused on ongoing buying.

I have no clue about your actual budget to be able to try to show you with numbers, so you just have to work out those calculations yourself, including what I had mentioned about holding back from some of your budget in order to get the money that you need or want to spend rather than buying too much bitcoin with money that you want to use for your expenses and then selling them when the pump is sufficient enough for you to feel that you got enough profits from such trades.

Sometimes it can be difficult to measure the difference since you might have been in and out and in several times, and then you might not be keeping very close track of how much you put in and how much you took out for spending versus rolling that money back into your trades.

Many of us were here when Bitcoin was in its $20k's and I remember when it went to $40k some people got surprised while some people had firm beliefs that it could do much better in years than that $40k or $50k whatsoever. And, the later ones were perfectly right because the ones who bought the crazy dip of previous bear run which took Bitcoin's price all the way down to $16k's were the people who really had saved money for that DIP. I believe most of people who are into investing had started their accumulation when Bitcoin went to $28k or below that, and those type of dips will not come now unless someone is just dreaming.

I am not sure if I buy your way of framing these matters.

Even highly convicted people either run out of money and the have to buy by either scrambling  to go through other resources, or they just wait for more income to come in or they just HODL through the low price periods.  I think that many of them largely ran out of money by the time the sub $28k prices start to come..   Many were expecting $100k and then we are stuck at $28k that came initially from the Tera Luna blow up, yet contagion kept blowing up.

Yeah, sure there are still some guys with money left, but they are also afraid and not wanting to buy when they are not sure that the falling knife is done falling, and the BTC price was not even supposed to hit the 200-WMA - which was then at $22k, but it hit $22k and kept going down.  It took a couple of months for the momentum to reverse, even once it got below $22k.. it just stayed below $22k - for several months.. largely starting in June 2022.. and then getting even worse in November 2022 when FTX revealed that it did not have hardly any BTC.  

Almost every crash is like that, and yeah, sure there are some folks holding both BTC and dollars, but if they are convicted in BTC, they had largely already bought back when the prices were in the upper $30ks, prior to the Tera Luna news drop.. and .. yeah, there had been a similar drop in mid-2021.. the first rise to $64k-ish and then a drop to around $28k-ish, and that one held and so then  the second testing of $69k was supposed to bring us to $100k.. and sure maybe not $100k but also not ONLY to $69k.. so there were quite a few expectations that they run was not over yet.. and perhaps folks were not really convinced that it was over until the Tera Luna news.. .. but yeah sure there were a few, such as LFC (shout out), who sold in the $50ks on the way down the second time, but even he ONLY sold 25% based on a certai lacking of confidence in regards to his own making a mistake with selling too much of us stash if the BTC price had resumed up rather than actually correcting yet even he probably did a vast majority of his buying back before the price even touched on $22k, even though he may well held some back for further buys based on how crazy the drop ended up being and based on cascading exchange (3rd party custodian) failings, who had been gambling with BTC that were supposed to be custodied for clients.. but clients were also wanting yield.. and yeah whatever a bunch of messed up situations in which there were not enough BTC to go around.

I'm pretty sure the market will be bearish after a few months and then there's chance that Bitcoin might go down again but not to the levels of $20k's or not even to $50k's again but possibly there's chance that it might dip back to $70k's and that's going to be the best place to buy the dips again and accumulate more than what one can at the current market value of Bitcoin when it's over $115k.


I suppose that you have to have that kind of thinking about downside scenarios if you are going to trade.

I would be willing to bet that BTC prices are never going below $75k again, even though right now the 200-WMA is at $51,760 and during a bull market the BTC price does not tend to get within 25% of the 200-WMA, and during a bear market the 200-WMA can be breached and even gone below for quite a while, so surely it is possible that the 200-WMA might not move up fast enough to cause sub $75k to be out of the question... yet I still would be willing to bet, for funzies.

Regarding other trading scenarios, sure it is likely that you could be correct 80% of the time or greater, and still end up in a worse position due to your trading...

And, you might even be very good at various calls... . which remains a big so what for me  in terms of my ongoing thought that you (and others similarly situated) are likely way better off to not be playing roulette with the best asset known to mankind.. even though sure, you can do what you like.

By the way, I do fuck around calling various prices that I think will or will not happen, yet my system does not change very much (except slightly on the margins) based on what I think that BTC price may or may not do.. If it is going up I am making relatively small sells.. less than 3% for every doubling of the price, and if it drops I am using the money that I had generated in the sales to buy back.  Yeah, I might mess around with whether the sells are larger than the buys or the buys are larger than the sells or I might mess around with the spreads and/or the increments, but overall they are non-emotional and non-predictive.. .either the buy/sell orders get filled or they don't... and yeah if we are sitting in the same price range for 6-12  months and I get antsie about wanting to make some kind of a purchase, but I don't have enugh cash, I will just shave off whatever I need, whether the price was $55k in late 2024 or whether it is $115k right now or if it happens to be $185k in 9 months from now.

I know there's much possibility that Bitcoin might not go below $100k's again even in the worst phase of the bear market but again the ones who're into investing know the power of patience and they really wait for the right moment and right opportunity.
 

The odds for sub $100k are way greater than the odds for sub $75k.. so the level of unrealism in regards to prices that guys are expecting to buy can be really unrealistic and even if they are realistic, they still might not end up happening, then the guy had either sold too much too soon or he failed to buy enough... so he is spending a lot of time waiting rather than buying bitcoin and getting his holdings to a place that he can get ahead of the ratt race and stop fucking around trying to guess the direction of the price.
 

I really want to see Bitcoin at $200k in this cycle and if that happens then I'll be very happy but even then I won't be selling that 50% which I've accumulated with the help of DCA+DIP buying. In fact I won't be selling those for at least 10 to 20 years depending on my patience or value of Bitcoin after 10 years.

I already know that.  You already told me that you were only selling with the trading portion.  So you largely did not answer my question and you perhaps even evaded it.

My question was in regards to your trading stash.  How much bitcoin you till going to have in your trading stash if the BTC price goes to $300k?

If you have less than 50% of the 50%, then that means you sold more than 25% of your stash. I am imagining that you are not going to have any left to sell if the BTC price goes to $300k... because you would have sold most of them and perhaps even all of them on the way up to $200k, so largely between $200k and $300k you don't got jack shit in your trading stash, and you are largely telling yourself, at least I have my investment stash... And, sure, it is better than nothing to still have 50% of your stash rather than having had sold it, and like I said with me.. I have my own faults, I will probably have something close to 97% of my stash when we get to $500k.. even thoug surely I know that I have already preauthorized myself to be able to sell 10% for every doubling, but I have not employed that option ever, even though I was probably quite a bit closer in 2015/2016 when I started, but even then, I had issues in regards to my ongoing reluctance to sell too much cornz too soon.
 
Let's say if in 10 years Bitcoin reaches $5M per coin then surely I'll sell 20-30% of my stash,
 

 You are referring to your investment stash.

That is a lot to sell, since you already have been being whimpy in buying (meaning the portion that you have been putting into your investment versus trading it).

But, yeah, if you have already worked out your math, then you are likely in a much better position than folks who still are not even buying bitcoin...or those who are trading more than you or even buying more whimpy than you.  I know that you don't consider yourself to be whimpy, and that is fine.  Whimpy is a relative term.

and by then I might not need to do any type of DCA or dip buying but as long as Bitcoin is under $1M there's always going to be opportunity of buying the dips.
 

I hate to argue about the past, but you can change your ways at any time and start focusing on investing into bitcoin rather than fucking around trading.. (or at least cutting down your trading amount to less than 10% the size of your bitcoin holdings so that you can still gamble and have fun, since that seems to be what you want to do).  In other words, there is no need to be fucking around with inferior practices, such as trading.

Even for yourself, a fairly conservative investment into bitcoin of [urlhttps://dcacryptocalculator.com/bitcoin/?start_date=2016-08-05&finish_date=2025-04-11&regular_investment=100&currency_code=USD&investment_interval=weekly&exchange_fee=2]$100 per week for the past 8-ish years since your forum registration date until present would have resulted in right around less than $47.4k invested and about 8.82 BTC.[/url]

Currently that 8.82 BTC would be a bit more than $1 million spot price value and more importantly a $456,519 200-WMA valuation.. which would mean a withdrawal rate of about $45.6k per year or $3,800 per month into perpetuity... and yeah you could keep adding to that stash or you could just let time pass, and [urlhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376945.msg65653923#msg65653923]by about late 2026, that 8.82-ish BTC would be enough to support an income of $80k per year in perpetuity[/url].  

Of course, you can do whatever you like, yet with bitcoin, I don't see why there are needs for any of us to be cashing out large chunks of our BTC at a time, sine we can largely just figure out a way to withdraw from it in perpetuity at a sustainable rate and at an amount that is comfortable to us.. once we get our BTC to that size...

And, yeah if you have not been stacking enough BTC, it is largely due to your fucking around with trading and interferring with your own abilities to empower yourself because you are using inferior techniques.

I'm not talking about small dips but the major dips, I don't really give much attention to small dips as market can recover from those dips within days to weeks but mostly I wait for major dips that take place once in a week rarely, sometimes once in a month, and most probably once in 2-4 months, and that approach is a working approach. I know there's no alternative of what you've said, if I had followed your advice and strategy the way you shared here then that might have given me more accumulation and profits, but I hope in future or from now on I will think about going for DCA+DIP buying for long term holding and let that 50% for trading as those are enough for my trading needs and going 100% into investing from now own can be much helpful for me.

Waiting for lower dips is just waiting for something that might not happen, as compared to just regularly buying...

and, second, I am not sure about your second point about going 100% into investing?  You could go from 50% t0 90% and still play around with 10%.. but yeah, I hardly recommend trading as a way to get to overaccumulation status.  Once you get to over accumulation status, then you likely increase your options.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 02:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 03:01:16 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Liocen
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 16


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 03:14:17 AM


Soon, everybody will be a millionaire in Dollars, not that they are going to like it, though.

the reputation of the term “millionaire” as we know it is rapidly declining. you can see the difference even if you watch movies and tv series made in the late 20th century. if you watch anything related to drugs, the mafia, or money from that time, you will understand how significant it was to be a “millionaire.”

every day, thousands of new people become dollar millionaires worldwide. while some increase is natural due to population growth, the proportion of millionaires in the total population is also quite high.

perhaps in the future, we'll refer to them as “bit-ionaires” instead of millionaires. maybe that is what we are going to tell a person who has more than a million satoshis, or the ones with a whole bitcoin. whole coiner sounds good.

hmm when i was a kid there was a tv show.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Millionaire_(TV_series)


it ran from 1955 to 1960.

my dad was earning about 10,000 a year in 1966. so a million was 100 years pay.


if I had a hundred years pay right now it would be over 10 million but under 20 million.


So for me a million usd is 10 to 20 times worse than when I was a kid.

my first home was 25k my parents and grand parents purchased it for 26k in 1955

that house is now 1,300,000 about 50x the price they paid.

If you had only bought a house with your father's 19 years of income at the current dollar value, you would be a millionaire in dollars today. That is, the value of this million dollars of someone who has a million dollars now is equal to the value of your father's 19 years of income at your father's time. Again, if you also save only 19 years of income from your current income in property or Bitcoin, then your children and grandchildren may someday receive this money as 100-150 million dollars.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12820


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 03:21:12 AM
Last edit: August 24, 2025, 05:32:02 AM by JayJuanGee

[edited out]
one of the benefits of making a few bucks but not millions is I do not worry much about 5 dollar wrench attacks.

Yeah.. I love losing money and/or not making any money so that I don't have to pay taxes and/or to suffer all the difficulties of dealing with hookers, lambos and blow.

Not to glorify trading, but there are likely ways to learn too, as long as we do not get too greedy, and personally I could not justify more than 10% of my BTC holdings being employed in such direction, yet there are likely some guys (based on their skill set) who might be able to reasonably justify 30% or more of the size of their BTC holdings getting deployed in such trading/hedging plays.
pit pat piffy wing wong wang
Nice to see an ole curmudgeon still alive and kicking.  Wink

Are you saying that you agree or no?
I'm saying thinking you're superskilledtrader (that's the rhetorical 'you', not accusatorially being the JJG you) and risking 30% on any single trade is more likely than not gonna backfire. Maybe not the first time, but certainly at some point. And likely kill you in the end.

OTOH, I'm still selling the rip and buying the dip. Like clockwork.

I thought that I pretty much said that I preferred to suggest no more than 10% of the size of our BTC holdings being allowed for trading and/or shitcoins, and that would be for those who could not risk the temptation of trading/gambling.

Since in recent times there had been some guys claiming to be able to trade higher portions of their bitcoin holdings, I was willing to go along with some compromise, even though I personally don't recommend such.


By the way jbreher, recently I had mentioned you as a guy who seemed to be having difficulties with unit bias, so hopefully you have recently gotten over gifting bitcoin in 1 coin increments.  Any kids who received several firts of 1 BTC or more, they surely would be set for life, and also might not have any incentive to work.. - surely one of the difficulties that come in any situation of over gifting.. but also problems that rich folks have when they are contemplating how much of their wealth to pass onto their heirs.

Soon, everybody will be a millionaire in Dollars, not that they are going to like it, though.
the reputation of the term “millionaire” as we know it is rapidly declining. you can see the difference even if you watch movies and tv series made in the late 20th century. if you watch anything related to drugs, the mafia, or money from that time, you will understand how significant it was to be a “millionaire.”

every day, thousands of new people become dollar millionaires worldwide. while some increase is natural due to population growth, the proportion of millionaires in the total population is also quite high.

perhaps in the future, we'll refer to them as “bit-ionaires” instead of millionaires. maybe that is what we are going to tell a person who has more than a million satoshis, or the ones with a whole bitcoin. whole coiner sounds good.

Yep.  Accounting in bitcoin is going to have more meaning than accounting in dollars, even though right now we need to do both.

We are also already getting the sense that whole coiner status is not very realistic,  so we might need to consider even 21 million satoshis is becoming difficult to acquire, and surely in the future 1 million satoshis is likely going to be a pretty good sum of value... depending on how far in the future we might be projecting.

I frequently find it better to try to not project out too far into the future since it is likely better to go with what we have rather than projecting too far into the future, but yeah, when we are building a bitcoin holdings we are constantly trying to be realistic to work with what we have to try to build as much bitcoin as we can, even though we might not be 100% certain how many that is going to be.

so i put buddy on ignore.
i am pissed that he has the power to show us numbers like 114k or 115k.

but fails to show us 130.2k or 140k
so I will ignore he or she  or we or us  or them until I see bigger numbers.

as it is I am grinding away with the mining ⛏️ host.
just stacking 0.001 a day every day.

Only 1,000 days and you will have a whole bitcoin.

Do you guys remember when it was 58k, 58k, 58k? It lasted for several years, I think. 58k.

Well, it just hit me. If we're going to be floating between like 112, and 122, that's right at 2 times 58k.

Think we'll get stuck around 232?

Yeah, I know it doesn't work like that, but perspective is still good.

We have hardly been at $112k to $122k to even be meaningful yet.

My "expected" btc top is still $210-216K later in the year, hopefully, but I might not even take profits then.

I don't see anything wrong with shaving off some BTC at various points on the way up.  

I would not really call it profits, but still, it can come in handy to have a little insurance at various price points.. just don't overdo it.

I see your 25 year and 50 year 8x and 64x respectively is predicated on ~8.66% annual growth rate. Is this compound annual growth rate something that is to be expected in future salary increases?
no but it did happen over prior years.

to say it will continue at 7 or 8 or be 15% not 8% is just a guess.

It is not completely a guess.  Historically the 200-WMA has not failed to appreciate at least 20% annually, so it seems likely to continue, and surely there is a bit of a cushion so we can see if spot price is not staying at least 20% above the 200-WMA for extended periods of time, then that could be problematic in terms of dragging it down to lower levels of appreciation.. and yeah of course, the past does not guarantee the future, but there still is likely some reason that the 200-WMA continues to appreciate, beyond the existence of mere guesses..
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 04:01:12 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 05:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 06:01:16 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 24, 2025, 07:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3472
Merit: 9943



View Profile WWW
August 24, 2025, 07:17:10 AM

wen page/price parity?  Grin   Kiss

"Boo, your post sucks, -1 WOmerit"
Pages: « 1 ... 34798 34799 34800 34801 34802 34803 34804 34805 34806 34807 34808 34809 34810 34811 34812 34813 34814 34815 34816 34817 34818 34819 34820 34821 34822 34823 34824 34825 34826 34827 34828 34829 34830 34831 34832 34833 34834 34835 34836 34837 34838 34839 34840 34841 34842 34843 34844 34845 34846 34847 [34848] 34849 34850 34851 34852 34853 34854 34855 34856 34857 34858 34859 34860 34861 34862 34863 34864 34865 34866 34867 34868 34869 34870 34871 34872 34873 34874 34875 34876 34877 34878 34879 34880 34881 34882 34883 34884 34885 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!