Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2026, 09:44:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Is the "bear market" over?
Yes - 14 (58.3%)
No - we need to sweep the low again - 3 (12.5%)
No - we need to set a new low first - 4 (16.7%)
No - other (explain below) - 3 (12.5%)
Total Voters: 24

Pages: « 1 ... 35713 35714 35715 35716 35717 35718 35719 35720 35721 35722 35723 35724 35725 35726 35727 35728 35729 35730 35731 35732 35733 35734 35735 35736 35737 35738 35739 35740 35741 35742 35743 35744 35745 35746 35747 35748 35749 35750 35751 35752 35753 35754 35755 35756 35757 35758 35759 35760 35761 35762 [35763]
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26968872 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4844
Merit: 11870


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
Today at 03:11:13 AM

The face that launched a thousand ships !!!




Give me a fucking break!

I've never even woken up drunk next to a chick this fugly.

Who is she?

BTW I would not call her fully. Edit: fugly

HER breasts look like they are decent.

I do prefer smaller cup sizes for my women.



She looks better here:


She's playing Helen of Troy!!!

You know the Chick that started the trojan war because of how hot she was.

Seriousness every chick I've ever been with is better looking than this ugly ass bitch.

I mean I couldn't get drunk enough!

99% of every chick walking down the street is better looking than this chick.

"THE FACE THAT LAUNCHED A THOUSAND SHIPS" is literally Helen of Troy's description.




Well I would not think she should be playing Helen of Troy, but she is not ugly.

the problem you have is this:

"AI Overview               In Greek mythology, Helen of Troy is consistently described as a white-skinned, fair-haired woman, often characterized as "white-armed" or having golden locks. As a mythological, half-divine figure from the Aegean region, her depiction fits the aesthetic ideals of ancient Greek literature and art, rather than modern racial categories.Key Details Regarding Helen's DescriptionLiterary Description: Homer describes her as "white-armed" and "lovely-haired" in the Iliad.Hair Color: The poet Sappho and later sources like Euripides describe her hair as xanthe (golden/blonde/light brown)."White-Armed" Meaning: In ancient Greek, describing a woman as "white-armed" was a common literary formula indicating high status and pale skin, implying she did not work outside, rather than indicating a specific modern racial category.Historical/Mythological Status: Helen is a figure of myth (daughter of Zeus and Leda) rather than a historical figure, though her appearance was intended to reflect an idealized, aristocratic Mediterranean woman.Artistic Representation: Ancient pottery and frescoes generally depict her with light skin, and in western art tradition, she has historically been portrayed as fair-skinned and blonde."

which I do think a black women playing a blond white women is a bit rude. So I will likely not watch the movie.


But I can tell you right now if I were single and closer to Lupita's age I would gladly date her. As I think she is attractive.

A very famous black actress from silent films Josephine Baker.

AI Overview
 How Women Worked in the US Silent Film Industry – Women Film ...
Josephine Baker (1906–1975) was the iconic American-born dancer and actress who moved to France, becoming a massive star in the 1920s to escape US racism. She was the first Black woman to star in a major motion picture, the 1927 French silent film Siren of the Tropics (La Sirène des Tropiques).

Wikipedia
 +1
Key Facts About Josephine Baker
Move to France: She moved to Paris in the 1920s, where she found immense success, fame, and freedom from American racial discrimination, becoming known as the "Black Venus" or "Black Pearl".
Silent Film Star: She starred as Papitou in the 1927 silent film Siren of the Tropics.
WWII Spy: During World War II, Baker worked as a spy for the French Resistance and was awarded the Croix de Guerre.
Activism: She was a prominent civil rights activist, working alongside Dr. Martin Luther King Jr..
Legacy: She became the first Black woman inducted into France’s Panthéon in 2021.

CIA (.gov)
 +4
She is the most prominent figure matching this description and revolutionized both performance and social perceptions in 1920s France.

Wikipedia
 +2

Wikipedia
Josephine Baker - Wikipedia
Freda Josephine Baker (née McDonald; June 3, 1906 – April 12, 1975), also spelled Joséphine Baker, was an American and French danc...


CIA (.gov)
Josephine Baker: From Poverty to Stardom to Espionage - CIA
Mar 27, 2024 — “VIVE LA RESISTANCE!” Josephine Baker Becomes a Spy. France declared war on Nazi Germany in September 1939. Inspired by the love f...



Instagram
·
AfroGoth Aesthetic
afrogoth.com | Credit @blackdancehistory Josephine Baker ...
Sep 7, 2025 — you've heard the name and you've seen the face but did you know Josephine Baker was a by icon born in St louis Missouri in 1906 Ba...
0:40
Show all
Dive deeper in AI Mode


If she was played by Charlize Theron a well know white actress oh it would be a scandal lots of complaints

but Lupita playing a hot white legend is okay.

So I could see this complaint as a fair one.

But I do find both women attractive and if I were 40 and single I would date either one. (assuming they wanted to date me.)

El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3234
Merit: 15582


“They have no clue”


View Profile
Today at 03:13:56 AM

The face that launched a thousand ships !!!




Give me a fucking break!

I've never even woken up drunk next to a chick this fugly.

She wouldn’t be able to get me in her bed….
Not sober, not drunk and not an a black out

Also very dumb choice to let her play the roll…
Should be a white woman
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4844
Merit: 11870


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
Today at 03:20:37 AM

The face that launched a thousand ships !!!




Give me a fucking break!

I've never even woken up drunk next to a chick this fugly.

She wouldn’t be able to get me in her bed….
Not sober, not drunk and not an a black out

Also very dumb choice to let her play the roll…
Should be a white woman

I do agree that whites playing whites and blacks playing blacks makes more sense to me.

And as I said Charlize Theron as Helen of troy
and Lupita as Josephine Baker Make more sense to me.

But in the bedroom as my lady either one would be good for me.


John Henry a legendary steel driver on the railroad was a black a giant of a man and he had a battle against the railroad spike drive engine he won he beat the machine .

He was always told to be a black man so I don't think reacher should play John Henry



John Henry from a cartoon but if you look you can find a few other pictures I do not know if they made a movie with him in it as the story is short.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 14423


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
Today at 03:49:05 AM
Merited by AlcoHoDL (2), hypebrother (1)

Currently, at this rate, buying is ok, or waiting is better. Any solid suggestion.
If you are a newbie no coiner or low coiner, then waiting does not tend to be a good strategy.

If you are a newbie no coiner or low coiner, you need to start to turn yourself into a coiner by buying bitcoin regularly within the context of your discretionary funds.  I tend to like buying weekly and getting into a habit of buying every week.

If you want to save up to 20% of your regular BTC buys for buying dips that may or may not happen, that is up to you, yet it tends to take a decently long time to build up a bitcoin stash, and many guys are not really able to do it in a cycle or two unless they are able to front load their investment in some way, whether lump sum, DCA, buying on dip or a combination, and yeah, I am not much of a fan for buying on dip for newbies, since the dips might not end up happening, yet if you are buying every week, you will end up catching dips anyhow, and perhaps after buying a cycle or two you will figure out how many bitcoin you think that you need.. which come from ongoing buying, not fucking around with trading (which seems to be where your head is right now.. and trading tends to be a way more uncertain approach in regards to making sure that your bitcoin size is ongoingly growing.
I am a complete newbie with some knowledge of Bitcoin through friends, now learning and trying to understand. I want to buy weekly because this is going to help me in the long run.

If you have come to a conclusion that you are going to invest in bitcoin and not try to trade it, and also that you are not going to fuck around with shitcoins, then you likely have a reasonably good mental framework in regards to from where you are starting out.

Investing comes from your discretionary funds, so if you are making enough money that you are able to pay for all of your basic expenses, then whatever that you have remaining would  be your discretionary funds, and you can use discretionary funds to invest in bitcoin, and also to build up back up funds and to engage in whatever discretionary consumption you are going to continue to do.  

The more discretionary funds you can generate by increasing your income and/or cutting your expenses will give you more funds to work with in regards to your bitcoin investment, and I frequently suggest that guys should try to invest into bitcoin as much as they can without overdoing it, and if you overdo it by spending beyond your discretionary funds and/or not building and maintaining enough back up funds, then you will be the one to pay for it, and maybe if you had been investing 10 years or longer, and you consider your mistakes, you are not able to turn back the clock to make up for any mistakes that you might have had made 5 or 10 years earlier.

So, there is value in not overdoing it, starting out slow to get used to the process and then to increase your level of aggressiveness as you become more comfortable, including making sure that your back up funds are shored up, which allows you to make mistakes and have back up funds to help you to recover from mistakes, as long as your mistakes are small in size rather than being large mistakes.

I presume that most beginner investors are building their bitcoin portfolios only from their regular income and therefore the discretionary income from their regular income.  Of course, some guys do have other investments and other resources that they can draw upon in order to be able to invest at higher levels than their peers, yet if you don't have those kinds of extra resources, then you just have to work with your discretionary income from your regular work... so whether your discretionary income rises to the level of your being able to invest 5% to 25% of your income into bitcoin, the progress can differ depending on how much you are able to invest, so for example, any guy who might be investing 10% of his income into bitcoin, it is going to take him 10 years to put 1 year worth of income into bitcoin, yet some guys are not in a position to be more aggressive than that, unless they figure out ways to increase their income and/or to cut their expenses.

Ultimately newbie bitcoiners are likely best off to try to tailor their own individual particulars and to at least consider their 9 factors.  They do not have to have their 9 individual factors figured out when they start, except to just be able to determine that they are investing within discretionary funds and they are not using non-discretionary funds to invest in bitcoin .., and I, personally, consider investing in bitcoin to be a 4-10 year or longer timeline, and I consider guys who have a less than 4 year timeline as traders rather than investing, and I consider bitcoin to be a good investment, which also means I don't agree with ideas to try to trade it.

Hopefully in the near future I will again join here for more understanding because it's looking promising for savings and long-run investments.

If you are a beginner who is feeling overwhelmed by how much time it takes to look into matters and to get everything figured out, then surely it is better to not invest beyond your comfort level, so even if you were to spend a few hours and assess your income and your expenses, and maybe you come to a tentative conclusion that you could fairly easily put $100 per week into bitcoin without really suffering in terms of how much you would be taking out of your discretionary funds and locking up into bitcoin.  Maybe since you are a beginner, it might be better to start out with $30 per week and then ONLY increase your weekly amount as you become more comfortable with both the process of buying and holding bitcoin but also getting used to not having that money in your available to spend funds.

Of course, you can also create your own list of priorities in regards to which matters you might want to research into first... for example, I have always created Excel spreadsheets for myself in order to project out my cashflows, so I have a pretty good ideas about my income verus my expenses and how much extra I would likely have available each month (or week), and so maybe you might feel that you need to go through your own finances before you would become more comfortable to increase your investment level into bitcoin.. and maybe you want to look at specific expenses and figure out if they are needs or wants, and sometimes, guys might be able to discover some extra funds that they are able to put into bitcoin based on some of the ways that they are spending money while knowing that some expenses have to be paid each month and other expenses are optional.

[edited out]
Yes. We (two) more or less agree on this. I also don't see a serious bull forming. As I posted earlier, this "bull" is just a baby calf throwing temper tantrums and producing a ton of manure in the process...

Hahahaha  

There is no such thing as a baby bull throwing a temper tantrum.

Either we have a bull or we don't.. and sure, I will acknowledge that sometimes we might transition from a bear to a bull, but we might not realize that we are in a bull until many months later, perhaps even a year or more in some instances.

Let me describe our most recent transition.  Recall in about May or June 2022 we had confirmed that we had gone into a bear market (largely the earliest of signs related to the fall out from the Terra/Luna matter that droped the BTC price fairly quickly from the upper $30ks to the lower $30ks with further downfalls to follow. .which more or less took us to the sub $20k and bouncing around $20k in June but then correcting further another several thousand below $20k in the later part of the year culminating in the largest dip right after the FTX bancrupcy fallout that brought the low down to $15,479 in November 2022.

So, most folks conceded that we were then in a bear market from mid to late 2022, and even when we started to recover to get back above $20k in late December 2022 and even got into the mid $20ks by January 2023, the trickle of the price upwards and even various times getting into the lower $30ks at various points in 2023 were not really strong enough for us to confirm that we were out of the bear market until late 2023 when the BTC price finally broke above the mid-$30ks, and that coincided with both rumors of the Bitcoin spot ETF getting approved through late 2023 and the actual approval and going live in mid January 2024.

There were likely guys proclaiming a bull market through 2023, yet I personally did not start to proclaim that we had transitioned into a bull until October or November 2023, even though maybe there was enough evidence and/or information to call it earlier. .and that wasn't any kind of a baby bull... it was either a bear or a bull. .and no such thing as a baby bull.

My sell order hasn't even gone through yet. FFS, someone, take my 0.1 BTC @ $83.5k!

Maybe that is a sign from a higher order that you might not need to be selling so low?

Hey, don't get me wrong.  I have been selling since $250 in 2015, so I am not a very good role model in regards to convicted HODLing.  I probably would have had to either cut down on my bitcoin exposure or go crazy if I had not been skimming off some bitcoin at various points along the way since 2015.

Whatever I have been doing may have had been cosmetic, even though it has made me feel better through the years..

Look and weep the current status:
64.3% saying that we are out.

Hardly a large enough sample to have any meaningful statistical significance, in an already biased population, but yes, it's a math-&-sciencey result for sure. Let's go all-in and wait for the ATH this year.

No need to get all technical.   Tongue Tongue

BTW, going all-in is still OK (although I would suggest DCA).

I don't really like the idea of "going all in," even though it might work for the finances of some guys.  Most guys need some dollar (or their local fiat) balances to take care of their expenses that are in dollars (or their local fiat).

Because the ATH will come. This year? I don't think so. In late 2029? More likely.

You might be right that even if we were to start to go up, we still might not get a new ATH in this calendar year.

The trend is your friend, which also means that many times it can take time to regain lost ground.

Your suggestion of 2029 seems overly bearish, even though it does not hurt to take an overly conservative approach that ends up allowing for a pleasant surprise if overperformance ends up playing out.

Just getting back to $126.3k is right around a 60% price appreciation from our current $79.5k prices.  

[...]
Only time will tell us where it's going.
Earlier, you told us that it was going down.
Now you're talking semantics.

Aren't "we" all about lame and petty arguments that might also have some deeper substantive meanings?

Many times I will read your posts, and then say to myself,  "that seems reasonable."   Yet, every once in a while, I will read your posts, and say to myself, "holy shit, what has he been smoking?"  hahahahahaha

I said that "I'm guesstimating it's going down". Which is different from "It's going down".

Fair point.

Even if I get a sense that it is going down, I usually don't want to say it, since it is not like I am going to sell in advance.

The most that I usually do is cancel some buy orders so that I can potentially buy at lower prices in those cases that I really become convinced it is going down, and usually I don't even do that since I already tend to have reasonable buy orders that are sufficiently spread apart.  

Also, I have witnessed so many times that I had envisioned (deep, deep on the inside) that for sure the BTC price is going to go down to a certain level.. like I know it in my knower, yet even in those situations, I tend to just keep all of my buy orders in place, and sometimes the BTC prices end up going down and sometimes they do not.

Historically, I tried to be a bit more of an activist in moving around my buy orders (and my sell orders, too), and fairly often, my movement of my buy/sell orders would end up not really working to my advantage.  From those experiences, I have learned that it tends to be be better to just leave my orders in place and allow the chips to fall where they will and to allow them to mechanically get filled or not based on already preset intervals.

BTW we (two) know it's going down. Cheesy

Since I am accepting my own assessment that we have not gotten out of the bear market, which means that we are still in a bear market, so then the results of any calculation has to slightly favor down over up.. and that would include us going to $75k, $65k, $59.9k and even lower price levels.  At the same time, any amount of down is harder to reach when it is further down the chain, so I tend to enjoy a certain level of "wait and see" (trepidation).... which is part of my ongoing annoying personality that tends to not want to commit, even if I might see slight leanings in one direction or another.

Nice bear trap then higher again is what seems the most likely

You see, @AlcoHoDL.

This is a more than reasonable interpretation of current BTC price dynamics, too... and I like it more than thoughts of DOWNity (downity is less fun), even if I, personally, would not have had used such a description of "seems the most likely".. even though I like the way those words, when put together,  sound.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 04:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Vompola
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 12


View Profile
Today at 04:21:27 AM


The bear is tired.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4480
Merit: 6176



View Profile
Today at 04:40:45 AM

The face that launched a thousand ships !!!




Give me a fucking break!

I've never even woken up drunk next to a chick this fugly.

Who is she?

BTW I would not call her fully. Edit: fugly

HER breasts look like they are decent.

I do prefer smaller cup sizes for my women.



She looks better here:


She's playing Helen of Troy!!!

You know the Chick that started the trojan war because of how hot she was.

Seriousness every chick I've ever been with is better looking than this ugly ass bitch.

I mean I couldn't get drunk enough!

99% of every chick walking down the street is better looking than this chick.

"THE FACE THAT LAUNCHED A THOUSAND SHIPS" is literally Helen of Troy's description.




Well I would not think she should be playing Helen of Troy, but she is not ugly.

the problem you have is this:

"AI Overview               In Greek mythology, Helen of Troy is consistently described as a white-skinned, fair-haired woman, often characterized as "white-armed" or having golden locks. As a mythological, half-divine figure from the Aegean region, her depiction fits the aesthetic ideals of ancient Greek literature and art, rather than modern racial categories.Key Details Regarding Helen's DescriptionLiterary Description: Homer describes her as "white-armed" and "lovely-haired" in the Iliad.Hair Color: The poet Sappho and later sources like Euripides describe her hair as xanthe (golden/blonde/light brown)."White-Armed" Meaning: In ancient Greek, describing a woman as "white-armed" was a common literary formula indicating high status and pale skin, implying she did not work outside, rather than indicating a specific modern racial category.Historical/Mythological Status: Helen is a figure of myth (daughter of Zeus and Leda) rather than a historical figure, though her appearance was intended to reflect an idealized, aristocratic Mediterranean woman.Artistic Representation: Ancient pottery and frescoes generally depict her with light skin, and in western art tradition, she has historically been portrayed as fair-skinned and blonde."

which I do think a black women playing a blond white women is a bit rude. So I will likely not watch the movie.


But I can tell you right now if I were single and closer to Lupita's age I would gladly date her. As I think she is attractive.

A very famous black actress from silent films Josephine Baker.

AI Overview
 How Women Worked in the US Silent Film Industry – Women Film ...
Josephine Baker (1906–1975) was the iconic American-born dancer and actress who moved to France, becoming a massive star in the 1920s to escape US racism. She was the first Black woman to star in a major motion picture, the 1927 French silent film Siren of the Tropics (La Sirène des Tropiques).

Wikipedia
 +1
Key Facts About Josephine Baker
Move to France: She moved to Paris in the 1920s, where she found immense success, fame, and freedom from American racial discrimination, becoming known as the "Black Venus" or "Black Pearl".
Silent Film Star: She starred as Papitou in the 1927 silent film Siren of the Tropics.
WWII Spy: During World War II, Baker worked as a spy for the French Resistance and was awarded the Croix de Guerre.
Activism: She was a prominent civil rights activist, working alongside Dr. Martin Luther King Jr..
Legacy: She became the first Black woman inducted into France’s Panthéon in 2021.

CIA (.gov)
 +4
She is the most prominent figure matching this description and revolutionized both performance and social perceptions in 1920s France.

Wikipedia
 +2

Wikipedia
Josephine Baker - Wikipedia
Freda Josephine Baker (née McDonald; June 3, 1906 – April 12, 1975), also spelled Joséphine Baker, was an American and French danc...


CIA (.gov)
Josephine Baker: From Poverty to Stardom to Espionage - CIA
Mar 27, 2024 — “VIVE LA RESISTANCE!” Josephine Baker Becomes a Spy. France declared war on Nazi Germany in September 1939. Inspired by the love f...



Instagram
·
AfroGoth Aesthetic
afrogoth.com | Credit @blackdancehistory Josephine Baker ...
Sep 7, 2025 — you've heard the name and you've seen the face but did you know Josephine Baker was a by icon born in St louis Missouri in 1906 Ba...
0:40
Show all
Dive deeper in AI Mode


If she was played by Charlize Theron a well know white actress oh it would be a scandal lots of complaints

but Lupita playing a hot white legend is okay.

So I could see this complaint as a fair one.

But I do find both women attractive and if I were 40 and single I would date either one. (assuming they wanted to date me.)



Charlize Theron (50 y.o) is a bit "old" for the Helen of Troy.
Of course, she is not really old, just a bit old for the role.
Her type would be a good fit, sure.
That lady from the Gladiator (Connie Nielsen, with also a few years back from when she played there-she as 35 back then) would be a good fit, too.
A side note: apparently, she dated Lars Ulrich (Metallica) for a while with one child together.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 05:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3094
Merit: 7043


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
Today at 05:14:11 AM

The face that launched a thousand ships !!!



Give me a fucking break!

I've never even woken up drunk next to a chick this fugly.

She wouldn’t be able to get me in her bed….
Not sober, not drunk and not an a black out

Also very dumb choice to let her play the roll…
Should be a white woman

Looks like Helen of Troy fell victim to the woke mind virus.

The next film will likely feature a MAN as Helen of Troy. Cheesy


[...]

I do agree that whites playing whites and blacks playing blacks makes more sense to me.

[...]

Not to mention men playing men and women playing women. Cheesy
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 14423


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
Today at 05:27:45 AM

If you can buy 50usd or 100usd a week or more you will stack a pile of btc.
Your age matters. I am 69 so time is not on my side.

But if you are 35 and buy 100 a week for 10 years  never selling just buy the 100 a week and hold.
Past history says you will do well.

Always remember past history does not always get it right. So you could do 100x52x10=52000 usd after 10 years and not be ahead.
That's life for us all risk is there.
I noted all your views in my personal notebook because these are going to be work for me in the long run. Currently I am 22 years old and have no responsibility, so I can invest between $50 and $75 weekly. I will try to manage things for a good future and have good faith in Bitcoin because it's still worth investing in.

My friend has been doing this for the last 7 years, and now I am joining him. He has achieved many good things in life due to Bitcoin. Maybe I will also be able to have a few like him, but your suggestions are great. Thanks.

For your age, $50 to $75 per week is good, and surely it may be possible for you to increase your income, too.

If you are talking about the "good things" of your friend, due to being in bitcoin for 7 years, you seem to be talking about someone who has cashed out of some of his BTC, which might not be a great approach to bitcoin..

A person who would have had invested $50 per week into bitcoin over the past 7 years would have accumulated close to 1 BTC, with about $19k invested... which would not be a bad place to be (in terms of how much had been invested and the amount of BTC that he would be currently holding).

Also, who authorized the price to perform this recent abomination we are seeing?
-$50,000 per coin by Tuesday

Previously you were seeming to be bullish.

What happened?  Maybe you entered into some (dumbass) trade that you are now regretting?**

Perhaps?

Perhaps?


hahahahaahahaha
 
**Protip:  Don't be fucking around with dee cornz.. It does not tend to be helpful to the psychology or finances (of a true bitcoiner), especially if the price ends up moving contrary to expectations.


-snip-
I think it's awesome that no one can stop Bhutan from doing this. They can sell. They can take the money they need.  It may not be bullish for the price of Bitcoin, and the story is kind of sad... But there will always be sellers and buyers, I guess.  Would I rather that sovereign nation hold the Bitcoin than Coinbase on behalf of BlackRock on behalf of their customers?  Yeah.
But this is what it is.
When you look at it from governance point of view, I think they took a bold step of liquidating 54% or so of their holdings.
Atleast, it would make zero sense to just hoard BTC and boast about it while doing nothing for national development, yes?
Agreed. In fact, one could argue that Bhutan was both a leader in using Bitcoin to store the wealth of the country, but an example of how to unleash that stored wealth. Bitcoin is intended to be transactional.  It would be fantastic to see them buying again down the road.
People like Peter Schiff, likes to point out that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. You can use gold in a circuit. If you collect wheat, you can eat it.

But that's the thing... Bitcoin doesn't toy around with a backup plan for where it derives its value.
The only reason to hold Bitcoin is with the intent to use it for something later.

I think that Buhtan shows that a country, or perhaps any entity that is able to get access to relatively cheap and/or reliable energy are able to put themselves into a much better financial position by getting involved in bitcoin mining (and perhaps related activities).

In the case of Buhtan, they were not forthright about their activities, so they might have had not been being a good actor in terms of mining (or getting involved in bitcoin) through the use of public resources, since their bitcoin mining activities were ONLY found out based on bankruptcy filing disclosures related to names released to the public... which it could well be the case that "we" would have had never found out about Buhtan's bitcoin mining activities were it not for those public filings.

You can use gold in a circuit.
But that's the thing Bitcoin doesn't toy around with a backup plan for where it derives its value.

The only reason to hold Bitcoin is with the intent to use it for something later.
Bit Coin is best used in a monetary circuit

I remember when a lot of shitcoiners and trolls would spell "BitCoin" like that with a capital "C", and frequently they seemed to engage in such seemingly shit-stirring conduct just to be annoying.

$80k longs cleanly wiped out.
The $77.5k to $76k zone is next (or bounce from here, but if the wick down on the current 4h candle gets shortened too much, we would likely hit the $77k zone(s).
I will set a buy right there and we'll see.

OT:
Got bad news in the mail today. Some of you know about my struggles with health insurance and my occupational disability issues. That's why i have to go to court every few years and prove that i didn't become spontaneously healthy and still can't work in my original profession anymore. That journey lasted 14 years and five times at the court. Now they want to retire me. Which is quite a shock, because i'm not that old, nor i'm nearly dead, but i'm haunted by that "senior specialist" profession in IT and that's why i don't have to do less qualified work. I switched to the electronics department by myself, because i'm not the type of dude that doesn't want to work despite being able to do so. The problem is, if i get retired in the mid 50's (and that's fucking depressing me right now) because of this, i can't get employed as easily and i would also suffer from tax and insurance disadvantages. The social insurance/pension institution doesn't want people to work longer than necessary, and their conditions are reflecting that. And retiring 20 years early means low income. I can earn money to a low degree, but if i exceed the threshold, any amount i earn will be cut off the pension payments.

In essence, the more you earn, the more you pay to them, while you were paying them in the past for paying you in the future which has become the "now".
You can't make this shit up.

So, where do we get from here, and to where?
There are some options, but the currently top pick is going to court against them, again.
This time it's different, though. Unfortunately it's not going to be as "easy" as the trials from the past. And it could be a pretty new thing to the court as well, because usually the people take the pension money and make cash, in a private, not registered way, offering similar services as in their jobs throughout their working life.
Well, it's just a big surprise for now, but not in a pleasant way*.

EDIT: * Yup. It's even a bit concerning.

How are taxes and/or income from bitcoin treated?  I know that some guys will do "official income" and then sometimes "off the book" income, yet it may not be a good idea to talk frankly about "off the book" income when "being recorded."
OutOfMemory
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 5105


Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)


View Profile
Today at 05:58:39 AM


Also, haven't read from vapourminer for 2 days now and I wonder if the squirrels felt it was their time to make a move on him..

Great, there's more concerning...
Thanks for the tip, though.

Well, sorry to hear about your troubles mate, but one thing I don't really get right:
You say you are mid-50 which I take as something like 55 and you talk about retiring 20 yrs early.
Isn't the official retirement age in A like 65 (as currently in CH)?


Correct. 65 is the minimum age. I never saw myself ready to be retired before the age of 75, though.

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 06:01:15 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 07:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
joker_josue
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2380
Merit: 6971


**In BTC since 2013**


View Profile WWW
Today at 07:02:10 AM
Merited by AlcoHoDL (1)

Looks like Helen of Troy fell victim to the woke mind virus.

The next film will likely feature a MAN as Helen of Troy. Cheesy

They've been trying to cast a woman as 007 for a few years now. So, I wasn't surprised at all.

This "virus" is killing the creative quality of cinema.

If they want women to be the protagonists, which I think is good, then they should create new stories with them.
However, they can't expect to become famous right away, as these are stories that are over 50 years old.

Unfortunately, you have to take a longer route. There's no point in creating shortcuts and ruining years of film history.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 08:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3094
Merit: 7043


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
Today at 08:22:27 AM
Last edit: Today at 08:39:07 AM by AlcoHoDL

Looks like Helen of Troy fell victim to the woke mind virus.

The next film will likely feature a MAN as Helen of Troy. Cheesy

They've been trying to cast a woman as 007 for a few years now. So, I wasn't surprised at all.

This "virus" is killing the creative quality of cinema.

If they want women to be the protagonists, which I think is good, then they should create new stories with them.
However, they can't expect to become famous right away, as these are stories that are over 50 years old.

Unfortunately, you have to take a longer route. There's no point in creating shortcuts and ruining years of film history.

They already (almost) did, in the last Bond film. In No Time to Die, Lashana Lynch plays Nomi, a new agent with the same 007 designation, following Bond's retirement. But she soon returns the 007 title to him and helps him in his mission.

In fact, I enjoyed this film, and found the role-play between Bond and Nomi enjoyable and fitting to the plot, as Bond eventually reclaims the 007 code and has Nomi on his side. To my eyes as a man, Bond remains the original, strong, confident, masculine character that he always has been, and Nomi is the powerful, feminine character, who starts off in a competitive role, but eventually recognizes and respects Bond's authority, while maintaining her status as an equal agent who can handle the pressure in the field. In the end, she honors his memory after he is killed. It's a good watch, I recommend it.

If there was no Bond, and only a female as a 007, it would be a disaster, and they know it.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 09:01:20 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Pages: « 1 ... 35713 35714 35715 35716 35717 35718 35719 35720 35721 35722 35723 35724 35725 35726 35727 35728 35729 35730 35731 35732 35733 35734 35735 35736 35737 35738 35739 35740 35741 35742 35743 35744 35745 35746 35747 35748 35749 35750 35751 35752 35753 35754 35755 35756 35757 35758 35759 35760 35761 35762 [35763]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!