[edited out]
AI is a great tool that can help us, but it acts very differently depending on who is pulling the strings... For example, I simulated centuries of trading data that NO OTHER PERSON on earth has.
Holy shit you are arrogant. Not that many of us didn't know that.
Bitcoin has only been around for slightly less than 18 years, and golly gee whiz, it's markets are probably having only some semblance of trading capacity since early 2012 - maybe getting close to 15 years.
I would not deny that aspects of human behavior are not relevant centuries back, yet there are likely aspects of modern human behavior intertwined with bot dynamics (as you surely recognize) that contributes to market behaviors, too.
And, yeah, when I read ahead, I saw that Richy_T had already mentioned that there were all kinds of resources being put into market analysis, yet still you want to proclaim that you are special, even though sure, you are suggesting that you only want to do better than normies and you are not necessarily wanting to kick the asses of the BIGGER players.. so whatever, you are doing, your ongoing lack of humbleness and inclinations to brag come off as blind points rather than the enlightenedness and learnedness that you seem to be wanting to ongoingly portray with your projects.
So nobody's bot will come to the same conclusions as mine.
Sure there might be some value in that, if true.
I also have more than 60 trading rules in place all working together with more being added and customized every day. The odds of someone coming up with the same trading rules is not even worth contemplating not to mention AI traders are still probably less than 0.01% of market trades so the idea that they are moving markets is ridiculous.
Ok. You are going to end up being wrong in a very unique way, which seems like a BIG so what. You have found some new ways to lose money in attempt to make up for your lack of investing into bitcoin for the past 15.5-ish years.
Of course, historically erroring on the side of buying bitcoin and HODLing it have paid off quite well, and historically, you have failed/refused to engage in buying/HODLing practices because you have always been "too smart" for that, yet at the same time, you supposedly learned that bitcoin has cycles in 2018, yet that did not cause you to convert into buying and HODLing, but instead, it provided you with excuses to try to trade bitcoin's cycles to the extent that they exist and to the extent that there are ways to actually potentially identify them in advance, which seems a wee bit doubtful..and by the way, supposedly selling a good amount of your stash in the $115k to $120k-ish region in late 2025 would have had ONLY been half of the trade, and it may not even be smart if you failed/refused to buy back, and you have been fucking around trading to lose whatever supposed extra cash that might have had been generated by your sale of your 5.32693214 BTC stash size (giving you some benefit of the doubt that you might not deserve.. hahahahaha).
Even the rule I just posted is currently being backtested with several variations on my custom data... AI isn't some magic tool that you say trade and make me money and it does. You still have to build things and know what you're doing. You should give it a try. Maybe you'll learn a better way to trade than, "predict the opposite of what we expect."
I will even grant you that there can be some fun (and learning) in fucking around with bots, and there was a lot of "fun" (and learning) with trading in the last 15.5 -ish years, yet you have been dumb as fuck for failing/refusing to build a bitcoin stash (through buying only techniques) during that time.
By the way, I am nearly at my 13 year anniversary in bitcoin, so yeah, I am a couple years junior to you in terms of being aware and/or involved in bitcoin, yet of course, my approach to bitcoin ended up focusing in on ongoing buying and holding rather than fucking around with trying to increase or decrease my bitcoin stash based on BTC price movements, and I am not even going to deny making mistakes along the way.. because I also have some inclinations to experiment and/or learn, so I am not really opposed to the idea of learning and even playing around with bitcoin to learn - even though surely if I were to be playing around with bitcoin in the ways that you currently proclaim yourself to be doing, I would surely limit my exposure to no more than 10% of my holdings, yet gamblers (like yourself - and even several others who get into trading, there can be real challenges in limiting the "playing around" behaviors).... so yeah, gambling tends to be a slippery slope, even for guys who might have some abilities to put limits on their playing around activities.
The trading versus investment dilemma remains an ongoing theme, so I am not merely responding to your post based on my irritation of your arrogance, since there are still some sub-themes of your post that can be challenging for many members whether they are new to bitcoin or intermediaries or even supposedly advanced like you.. hahahahaha.. funny referring to you as advanced, except it makes sense in terms of the amount of time that you have been in bitcoin. but maybe not in terms of your ongoing inabilities to resist gambling.. while characterizing it as a fun learning experience. A lot of dumb twat degenerate gamblers have lost a lot of money while having fun and supposedly learning at the same time...and perhaps your lecturing style helps to inspire my own tone to refer to you in such a way.
We are in a time period where companies are burning money like crazy to try and be the one that wins the AI race. Anthropic burned 80 billion dollars in the first half of the year... I think we are in a period where AI popularity will grow and prices will rise until these companies are making money instead of burning 10s of billions per month. In other words, you are able to get $5,000 a month in AI compute for $200 right now and shareholders are footing the bill. Take advantage.
Just because you know about some amazing AI dynamics that are currently happening in the world and you think that you can see a trend, that does not mean that it is a good idea to try to trade it. But hey, of course, you think that you have identified some ways to prosper in trying to trad such, and you also consider it relevant to be posting your supposed smartness in this here bitcoin thread... bordering on shitcoining, yet I am not going to go so far as to proclaim
Edit: Backtesting results against my data are in and it suggested this addition to the previously posted rule in order to have caught today's dip while profiting in more trading windows and eliminating loss windows over the previous rule alone: **S1-hack** buys at 6% below the 24-hour high instead of 8%, but only on a volume spike of at least 8 times normal, double what the live rule needs.
Sounds like you have it all figured out...
hahahaha
I wanna add my sincere congratulations to everybody here not being dismembered from scams ore hacks in all those years while being an active Bitcoin holder.
What a ride, isn’t it?
Aren't you assuming a lot?
I think that there has been variations or reckedness in this here thread through the years, and I am not sure if some guys might not talk about some of their reckedness through the years. Of course, it would be better to lose 10% to 25% of your stash than to lose 50% of it, and so perhaps a lot of the matter is relative to the extent that guys are disclosing or even if the topic might be good.. Can you imagine the backlash to admitting certain kinds of losses?
They are not bad topics but they can become overly personalized..
Otherwise, I will agree with the "what a ride?" part.. even though the nature of the various attacks seem to be getting a bit crazy and discombobulating in some ways.
Whoaza!!!
Long time no see Torquey porkey.
Poll
