Wolf-Dagger
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
February 21, 2017, 06:59:39 PM |
|
I'm a founder motherfuckers and I'm holding strong. 3 dollars each might change my mind but not until then. Wolf-Dagger out.
|
|
|
|
Enjorlas
|
|
February 21, 2017, 07:23:05 PM |
|
Question. 100% of all ICN represent ownership of 100% of all profits From the Iconomi platform. Wallets less than 42 ICN will not receive any profits however. But the profits do not disappear. So where do they go?
Say I break down all of the ICN that I own into hundreds of wallets each containing 41 ICN. I will not receive any dividends, but where do those dividends end up?
I am a whale by the way, and am HODLING.
|
|
|
|
xtyling
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
Crypto is Life!
|
|
February 21, 2017, 07:24:01 PM |
|
xtyling is holding his ICNs strong! Just like Wolf-Dagger!
|
|
|
|
Daparski
|
|
February 21, 2017, 07:29:03 PM |
|
Question. 100% of all ICN represent ownership of 100% of all profits From the Iconomi platform. Wallets less than 42 ICN will not receive any profits however. But the profits do not disappear. So where do they go?
Say I break down all of the ICN that I own into hundreds of wallets each containing 41 ICN. I will not receive any dividends, but where do those dividends end up?
I am a whale by the way, and am HODLING.
I assume in case of less than 42 ICN wallets, the dividends will go back to the platform and will be redistributed on the next cycle. Just my opinion, nothing official. If you are a whale, why would you think about 41 ICN?
|
|
|
|
|
rgornik
|
|
February 21, 2017, 08:15:30 PM |
|
Weekly reminder for Iconomi team: you should invest in WeTrust ICO convience me why Rgornik is just another bounty whore daparski, BAN this FUDDER!
|
|
|
|
Crypto23
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2017, 08:29:22 PM |
|
How much ICN holdings must one have to be considered a "Whale"?
|
|
|
|
Daparski
|
|
February 21, 2017, 08:38:01 PM |
|
How much ICN holdings must one have to be considered a "Whale"? look here for token distribution: https://etherscan.io/token/ICONOMI#balancesfirst 2 addresses are Iconomi and Kraken. I'd say anything in the top 30 is a whale/big fish
|
|
|
|
MoveCrypto
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
move that crypto
|
|
February 21, 2017, 08:38:50 PM |
|
How much ICN holdings must one have to be considered a "Whale"? 'bout tree fiddy https://medium.com/iconominet/state-of-digital-asset-management-platforms-79477de7575e#.y37e9yblmGoing forward, it is important that different concepts are developed and tested. We will have faster-developed platforms — more centralized but using the current state of blockchain stability and capabilities and those fully exploiting the potential of smart contracts. The first ones will develop the market while the others will bring new paradigms to the world of asset management that will be beneficial for everyone. The new economy needs them all.
|
|
|
|
Enjorlas
|
|
February 21, 2017, 09:28:37 PM |
|
How much ICN holdings must one have to be considered a "Whale"? look here for token distribution: https://etherscan.io/token/ICONOMI#balancesfirst 2 addresses are Iconomi and Kraken. I'd say anything in the top 30 is a whale/big fish Does anyone know which adress belongs to Liqui?
|
|
|
|
Enjorlas
|
|
February 21, 2017, 09:33:51 PM |
|
This is Liqui's adress: 0xea133a07880b99ceb7a973e64dd3ac18f7a20888
They have 203,000 ICN.
|
|
|
|
Nachbar90
|
|
February 21, 2017, 09:39:35 PM |
|
This is Liqui's adress: 0xea133a07880b99ceb7a973e64dd3ac18f7a20888
They have 203,000 ICN.
LOL a baby whale
|
|
|
|
Enjorlas
|
|
February 21, 2017, 09:40:34 PM |
|
200,000 is a very respectable amount for a new exchange. Also, I am assuming Liquid only owns one address.
|
|
|
|
vasdav
|
|
February 21, 2017, 10:16:25 PM |
|
Only 6 days before the end of February, so beta test very soon!!
|
|
|
|
Wapinter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1026
Hire me for Bounty Management
|
|
February 21, 2017, 10:39:51 PM |
|
You forgot to mention TaaS also I think they have ICONOMI competitors. They will also launch their ICO next month but by then ICONOMI will have its platform ready.
|
|
|
|
vasdav
|
|
February 21, 2017, 11:36:08 PM |
|
Now I understood - CryptoInsiders is Melonport's whore
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
February 21, 2017, 11:39:20 PM |
|
You forgot to mention TaaS also I think they have ICONOMI competitors. They will also launch their ICO next month but by then ICONOMI will have its platform ready. TaaS is a closed-end fund so it is not really the same as ICN etc. I gotta say, equibit's ICO setup is even more frightening than Melonport's... Only selling 1 mil tokens out of 22 million and the price scheme is based on the assumption they will achieve a 100 million USD market capitalization within the first year... Both Melonport and Equibit look great from an end-user perspective but man do their initial distribution structures suck for ICO investors. ICN had such a successful ICO in part because they didn't pull any of that bullshit, investors don't have to worry about constant inflation like they will with those projects.
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
February 21, 2017, 11:40:45 PM Last edit: February 21, 2017, 11:52:05 PM by stormia |
|
Now I understood - CryptoInsiders is Melonport's whore
Cryptoinsiders is mentally ill. When you repeatedly say or do the same thing over and over again expecting a different result, that is the definition of insanity. It is sad, really. Also, apparently he is so new to the cryptocurrency scene that he thinks the SEC is a legitimate threat to a foreign-based cryptocurrency entity... and he is dumb enough to think your average cryptocurrency investor in the US gives a damn what the SEC thinks. Why the hell do you think US investors moved to cryptocurrnecies in the first place? Hint: it is definitely not because of how regulated they are.
|
|
|
|
MalReynolds
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 21, 2017, 11:54:42 PM |
|
Now I understood - CryptoInsiders is Melonport's whore
Cryptoinsiders is mentally ill. When you repeatedly say or do the same thing over and over again expecting a different result, that is the definition of insanity. It is sad, really. Also, apparently he is so new to the cryptocurrency scene that he thinks the SEC is a legitimate threat to a foreign-based cryptocurrency entity...
Nope. I don't own any MLN and I don't give a fuck about MelonPort or others. I'm only interested in exposing Iconomi Devs bait & switch Scam for breaking US SEC laws by advertising & soliciting money from US investors during the ICO, so they can promote ICNX afterwards & block US citizens from using Iconomi after they received their funds. Sigh. You are starting to convince me that ICONOMI may have some issues they may need to address. https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/u-s-law-enforcement-actions-cryptocurrency-businesses-review-suggested-guidance/https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/fincen-clarifies-virtual-currency-payment-systems-trading-platforms-money-transmitters/Can we get an answer to my previous question about where exactly "ICONOMI Inc." is incorporated?
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
February 21, 2017, 11:55:28 PM |
|
Mal you can post your questions without quoting the troll. Also going through that list of entities the SEC has taken action against, I can't find a single one that is not US based. Did I miss something?
|
|
|
|
|