kentt
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
May 19, 2013, 11:56:25 PM |
|
Has anyone besides me gotten a refund yet?
I don't think so. Not me anyway. How did you get a partial refund again?
|
|
|
|
blueblade123
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2013, 01:47:22 AM |
|
I got it before the hack. He sent me an email saying they were being hacked and sent 1 btc as an emergency refund.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
May 20, 2013, 02:03:17 AM |
|
I call bs
|
|
|
|
|
DBG
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 100
Digital Illustrator + Software/Hardware Developer
|
|
May 20, 2013, 02:18:22 AM |
|
Well it is the weekend (not that people stop working on the weekend, but less stuff seems to get done), but I would like to at least see an update on their website this week. Also I don't think I ever said that it couldn't possibly be a scam, but I did keep an open mind and have BTC3 lost or in-limbo (depending on your point of view) at the moment. Also it would be nice to have a formal announcement on here from the user "miningunited", which we know actually ran the site (maybe it's been posted and I missed it). I guess I actually feel a bit hurt more than scammed, since I had previous positive conversations over GMail with MU and was in the process of tracking down the owners of BTCCheap when this all went down. It's far from the end of the world, but I could have been paid $300 USD for the work I did but decided to go ahead and take the offer of BTC3 and invest it back into the Bitcoin community, so even that in itself was a risky move. This is why you should always listen to Squidbillies!
|
Bitcoin - 3DTcMYT8SmRw4o4Lbq9cvm71YaUtVuNn29 Litecoin - MAoFYsBf7BzeK86gg6WRqzFncfwWnoYZet /* Coins are never required but always appreciated if feeling generous! */
|
|
|
TheUnk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2013, 02:22:03 AM |
|
I got it before the hack. He sent me an email saying they were being hacked and sent 1 btc as an emergency refund.
The same MiningUnitedSales@Gmail.com ?
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 20, 2013, 03:11:07 AM |
|
Blueblade, you're full of crap. You can see here that you send 0.25 BTC and here you can see that you recieve 0.2811 BTC. Again, you send 0.25 BTC as shown here and then send another 0.05 as shown here. You then recieve 0.25 BTC as shown here. They're the only transfers to and from your address, 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx (excluding that final 1 BTC). That would mean you never received a return for that 0.05 payment and the last payment you received was the same amount as what you sent. So why would you receive 1 BTC when you were only owed 0.05? Yet you clearly was sent 1 BTC, which only makes sense if you were complicit in the scam. Now, if we look at your posting history, your first post here was to promote MiningUnited as shown here. It's my opinion that you are the scammer who was running the site.
|
|
|
|
ctrent76
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2013, 04:04:55 AM |
|
Blueblade, you're full of crap. You can see here that you send 0.25 BTC and here you can see that you recieve 0.2811 BTC. Again, you send 0.25 BTC as shown here and then send another 0.05 as shown here. You then recieve 0.25 BTC as shown here. They're the only transfers to and from your address, 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx (excluding that final 1 BTC). That would mean you never received a return for that 0.05 payment and the last payment you received was the same amount as what you sent. So why would you receive 1 BTC when you were only owed 0.05? Yet you clearly was sent 1 BTC, which only makes sense if you were complicit in the scam. Now, if we look at your posting history, your first post here was to promote MiningUnited as shown here. It's my opinion that you are the scammer who was running the site. Brilliant deduction. Blueblade give me back my .20 1JqsdYWZeGS9MknSQC6faT7HAwMfizUY2t
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:02:18 AM |
|
The criminal is always at the crime scene. One of these accounts is him watching and laughing at us. While also scared someone might find his home address.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:04:02 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:15:59 AM |
|
Blueblade, you're full of crap. You can see here that you send 0.25 BTC and here you can see that you recieve 0.2811 BTC. Again, you send 0.25 BTC as shown here and then send another 0.05 as shown here. You then recieve 0.25 BTC as shown here. They're the only transfers to and from your address, 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx (excluding that final 1 BTC). That would mean you never received a return for that 0.05 payment and the last payment you received was the same amount as what you sent. So why would you receive 1 BTC when you were only owed 0.05? Yet you clearly was sent 1 BTC, which only makes sense if you were complicit in the scam. Now, if we look at your posting history, your first post here was to promote MiningUnited as shown here. It's my opinion that you are the scammer who was running the site. Brilliant deduction. Blueblade give me back my .20 1JqsdYWZeGS9MknSQC6faT7HAwMfizUY2t So, you just made a new account to post that and just happened to receive a payment from CoinAd.com with that address in the same transaction as Blueblade. Nice try Blueblade, but you just managed to make yourself look even guiltier.
|
|
|
|
condor335
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:19:37 AM |
|
Blueblade, you're full of crap. You can see here that you send 0.25 BTC and here you can see that you recieve 0.2811 BTC. Again, you send 0.25 BTC as shown here and then send another 0.05 as shown here. You then recieve 0.25 BTC as shown here. They're the only transfers to and from your address, 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx (excluding that final 1 BTC). That would mean you never received a return for that 0.05 payment and the last payment you received was the same amount as what you sent. So why would you receive 1 BTC when you were only owed 0.05? Yet you clearly was sent 1 BTC, which only makes sense if you were complicit in the scam. Now, if we look at your posting history, your first post here was to promote MiningUnited as shown here. It's my opinion that you are the scammer who was running the site. I was leaning this way too, but didn't want to be the first to say it. Also how he tried to dissuade people from reporting the scam to the FBI. I think he really is afraid of the law. Can't a mod or admin just tell us his IP address? Remember, there is a 50BTC bounty on his ass/head.
|
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
May 20, 2013, 06:47:04 AM |
|
Gmail only sends one auto reply every so often.
|
|
|
|
blindfaith
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
www.coincloud.tk :)
|
|
May 20, 2013, 06:49:45 AM |
|
Blueblade, you're full of crap. You can see here that you send 0.25 BTC and here you can see that you recieve 0.2811 BTC. Again, you send 0.25 BTC as shown here and then send another 0.05 as shown here. You then recieve 0.25 BTC as shown here. They're the only transfers to and from your address, 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx (excluding that final 1 BTC). That would mean you never received a return for that 0.05 payment and the last payment you received was the same amount as what you sent. So why would you receive 1 BTC when you were only owed 0.05? Yet you clearly was sent 1 BTC, which only makes sense if you were complicit in the scam. Now, if we look at your posting history, your first post here was to promote MiningUnited as shown here. It's my opinion that you are the scammer who was running the site. Brilliant deduction. Blueblade give me back my .20 1JqsdYWZeGS9MknSQC6faT7HAwMfizUY2t So, you just made a new account to post that and just happened to receive a payment from CoinAd.com with that address in the same transaction as Blueblade. Nice try Blueblade, but you just managed to make yourself look even guiltier. His forum sig isn't helping his 'innocence' either: I was young, and needed the Bitcoins... Ohh the things I had to do for those tasty, tasty, Bitcoins... Send a donation: 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx also when you follow BTC transactions related to 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx - there are very close links to 'accounts' with ' a lot' of btc... another suspicion!
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
May 20, 2013, 06:56:20 AM |
|
But then again blind faith was also a strong supporter
|
|
|
|
blueblade123
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2013, 10:40:19 AM |
|
Holy Witchhunt Batman! Well that took a left turn real quick. Even though I don't have to, I will respond to these accusations. There is no doubt I was a big supporter of Mining United. I've sent many emails back and forth with "owner" and have supported his website. I jumped to defend it due to the fact that it was something brand new that hadn't been done before, and people were calling it a scam right away, with NO proof that it was. The idea behind it was plausible, and could work. On my very first post, moderator tysat edited my first post and put a scam warning on it. I took offense to it because there was no proof that it was a scam, and I was getting a return on my investments. Now, to answer some questions, and get things straightened out. I got it before the hack. He sent me an email saying they were being hacked and sent 1 btc as an emergency refund.
The same MiningUnitedSales@Gmail.com ? Yes, email was from that email address. Blueblade, you're full of crap. You can see here that you send 0.25 BTC and here you can see that you recieve 0.2811 BTC. Correct. I purchased a 0.25 package on 4-28-13, and got paid for it on 5-4-13, and the amounts you quoted were correct. Again, you send 0.25 BTC as shown here and then send another 0.05 as shown here. You then recieve 0.25 BTC as shown here. Also correct. on 5-8-13 I purchased 2 mining packages. a 0.25, and a 0.05 package. I never did get paid out on them. The last official payment on the mining packages, was the 0.2811 payment you quoted. You then recieve 0.25 BTC as shown here. That was a totally seperate payment, not for a mining package. That 0.25 was from Mining United in response to a forum post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=189872.20 Post #26. This was when he was questioned about gambling on Satoshidice. They're the only transfers to and from your address, 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx (excluding that final 1 BTC). That would mean you never received a return for that 0.05 payment and the last payment you received was the same amount as what you sent. Again, not really. There are some small transfers in my wallet. For a while I was doing the bitcoin faucets, and I did receive another bonus on 5-11-13 from Mining United for another forum post, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=201778.msg2106728#msg2106728 Post # 4. Payment was 0.0125, and also paid for a Mining United Premium Membership, 0.3 bitcoins on 5-11-13. Made a sale on Bitcointalk forum, 0.4 bitcoins on 5-18-13, and finally spent 0.32403 on Bitmit on 5-18-13.So why would you receive 1 BTC when you were only owed 0.05? Yet you clearly was sent 1 BTC, which only makes sense if you were complicit in the scam. Actually, I never got paid for 4 packages. A 0.25 on 5-8-13, a 0.05 on 5-8-13, a 0.05 on 5-11-13, and a 0.05 on 5-12-13. Why I got a full 1 BTC, I don't know. Brilliant deduction. Blueblade give me back my .20
Sorry, Barking up the wrong tree. Wasn't me.Turd
Cow PattySo, you just made a new account to post that and just happened to receive a payment from CoinAd.com with that address in the same transaction as Blueblade.
Nice try Blueblade, but you just managed to make yourself look even guiltier.
No idea what you're even talking about... Didn't make any new accounts.I was leaning this way too, but didn't want to be the first to say it. Also how he tried to dissuade people from reporting the scam to the FBI. I think he really is afraid of the law. Can't a mod or admin just tell us his IP address? Remember, there is a 50BTC bounty on his ass/head.
Hell, if needed, I can give you my IP address. I wasn't trying to dissuade people from contacting the FBI. I was simply pointing out that it was STUPID to think the FBI would want to jump in and work on a bitcoin case for the reasons I pointed out. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=179917.msg2182005#msg2182005 Post 501.His forum sig isn't helping his 'innocence' either: I was young, and needed the Bitcoins... Ohh the things I had to do for those tasty, tasty, Bitcoins... Send a donation: 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx Really?!? It's a play off of a t-shirt I found online. Now, does anyone need a screenshot of my Wallet to compare everything to?
|
|
|
|
mumuhead
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2013, 01:20:28 PM |
|
The individual registered MiningUnited with domainsbyproxy.com, which is private to the public but not to DomainsByProxy. There are so many digital trails left by this fool, you could easily track him/her down if it's worth your time. I lost a little under 4 BTC (1.5 of which was returned through MU) and completely invested knowing I was gambling that BTC; it was my best option at mining free BTC and I took the risk... and lost. I filed through ic3.gov and have done my own research to track the individual. If the FBI were to actually get on this case, which could happen if enough people file at ic3.gov, they could catch them in a day of work, easily.
|
|
|
|
blindfaith
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
www.coincloud.tk :)
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:11:55 PM |
|
But then again blind faith was also a strong supporter
As with Blueblade, I was supporting the site as I had a positive experience with them myself but this was before the "promo's" etc. started appearing.. & @ Blueblade, apologies for the suspicion, - the t-shirt quote would have fitted perfectly if it was you!
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 20, 2013, 05:33:08 PM |
|
That was a totally seperate payment, not for a mining package. That 0.25 was from Mining United in response to a forum post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=189872.20 Post #26. This was when he was questioned about gambling on Satoshidice. Ok, the reason for that payment checks outs and the times do match up. Again, not really. There are some small transfers in my wallet. For a while I was doing the bitcoin faucets, and I did receive another bonus on 5-11-13 from Mining United for another forum post, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=201778.msg2106728#msg2106728 Post # 4. Payment was 0.0125, and also paid for a Mining United Premium Membership, 0.3 bitcoins on 5-11-13. Made a sale on Bitcointalk forum, 0.4 bitcoins on 5-18-13, and finally spent 0.32403 on Bitmit on 5-18-13. Those payments are irrelevant to what MiningUnited would owe you. Actually, I never got paid for 4 packages. A 0.25 on 5-8-13, a 0.05 on 5-8-13, a 0.05 on 5-11-13, and a 0.05 on 5-12-13. Why I got a full 1 BTC, I don't know.
As you said the last official payment for service was at 2013-05-04 16:03:55. Here's the list of payment you've made from the address, 1PSnLUwMqAa6qXb9XkMcFekAsntJbHwNNx. As you can see, that next service you bought was paid for at 2013-05-08 03:55:47 for 0.25 BTC, then 2013-05-08 03:57:02 for 0.05 BTC, the only other possible payments you could have made to MiningUnited were the 2 for 0.05 BTC to address 1Q8wC2Z2CkqMB6h9LwXVnKpnsWv9G3DiX8. By using your payment address and checking your position in MiningUnited's queue, we can see that your orders number were 2730 for 0.25, 2734 for 0.5. That's the 2 known unpaid orders. The next orders are 3114 and 3135. If we check the address of order 3134, which is 1NZkyjA8qhsxAPRegZCNCJYrUkJHYenHfe, then there should be a 0.05 payment to 1Q8wC2Z2CkqMB6h9LwXVnKpnsWv9G3DiX8 just before your last one at 2013-05-12 13:51:15. There was no such payment. Even if there was such a payment, that would mean that you had 0.4 BTC in orders not yet paid out. So, why would you get 1 BTC? The facts speak for themselves.
|
|
|
|
|