davidgdg (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2017, 03:38:28 PM Last edit: February 22, 2017, 07:42:56 PM by davidgdg |
|
THIS IS VERSION 1. FOR LATER VERSIONS SEE BELOW. In order to avoid the confusion caused by fluctuations in BTC values, I thought it might be useful to compile a list of numismatic dollar premium estimates for known Casasciuss issues. In other words, the premium excluding the BTC value. I have taken issue details from the very helpful Spotcoin list ( http://www.spotcoins.com/bitcoin/casascius). Comments/suggested valuations are all based on the coin still being funded. All comments/suggestions welcome. Some general remarks. In numismatics, critical factors are: (1) condition (2) face value (as a broad rule, higher demoninations tend to command a higher premium) (3) scarcity (4) other features affecting desirability such as historical importance, errors, material (silver and gold more desirable). I have tried to apply these considerations in my guestimates below. One thing which I have not taken into account is funding date. First funded coins in any series may command a further premium. Please feel free to rip into me and tell me that my suggested valuations are ridiculously low or high. That is the whole point of this thread: to try and get some sense via community input of where the premiums ought to be. 0.1 BTC Silver 2013 Funded 800 Redeemed 8 Active 792 Fairly scarce. At a guess I would say these should command something like a US$ 200 premium over the BTC content. 0.5 BTC Brass 2013 Funded 3055 Redeemed 139 Active 2916 Relatively common. US$ 150 0.5 BTC Silver, Series-2 2013 Funded 45 Redeemed 0 Active 45 Extremely rare. Must be be close to US$ 1,000 and perhaps more I would have thought. 0.5 BTC Silver, Series-3 2013 Funded 885 Redeemed 1 Active 884 Scarce. US$ 500. 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-1 2011 Funded 5993 Redeemed 892 Active 5101 Common but highly desirable because of the error. US$ 500 to US$ 1,000. This coins ought to be the easiest one to put a dollar premium on. 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-2 (2011) 2011 Funded 516 Redeemed 82 Active 434 Scarce but less desirable than the error issue. US$ 400-500 ? 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-2 (2012) 2012 Funded 6740 Redeemed 821 Active 5919 Common. US$ 300. 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-2 (2013) 2013 Funded 5407 Redeemed 297 Active 5110 Common. US$ 300. 1.0 BTC All-Silver 2013 Funded 1300 Redeemed 8 Active 1292 Scarce. US$750 1.0 BTC Silver with Gold Trim 2013 Funded 483 Redeemed 1 Active 482 Very scarce and desirable. US$ 1,000-US$ 1,500. 5 BTC, Series-1 2012 Funded 670 Redeemd 80 Active 590 Scarce. US$ 1,500. 5 BTC, Series-2 2012 Funded 572 Redeemed 123 Active 449 Scarce. US$ 1,500. 10 BTC, All-Silver 2012 Funded 250 Redeemed 35 Active 215 Rare. US$ 2,000 10 BTC, Silver with Gold Trim 2012 Funded 242 Redeemed 16 Active 226 Rare. US$ 2,000 25 BTC, Series-1 2011 Funded 338 Redeemed 132 Active 206 Rare. Hard to value the premium as the face value is already so high. Say US$ 5,000? 25 BTC, Series-2 2011 Funded 472 Redeemed 117 Active 355 Ditto. Rare. Hard to value the premium as the face value is already so high. Say US$ 5,000? 1000 BTC 1oz Gold 2012 Funded 5 Redeemed 2 Active 3 Impossible to value in the absence of any reported sales and in light of the very high face value.
|
"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
|
|
|
AT101ET
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1348
|
|
February 22, 2017, 04:11:53 PM |
|
There is no set premium. These premiums depend on numerous factors that include but are not limited to: supply/demand, if the coin is graded, coin grade, coin condition, PGP key availability, price of BTC and etc. The point is that there is no fixed premium per coin and trying to document it won't really yield accurate results.
|
|
|
|
biggzi
|
|
February 22, 2017, 04:14:06 PM |
|
There is no set premium. These premiums depend on numerous factors that include but are not limited to: supply/demand, if the coin is graded, coin grade, coin condition, PGP key availability, price of BTC and etc. The point is that there is no fixed premium per coin and trying to document it won't really yield accurate results.
+1 ...if anything it could end up with misleading information as there are lots of factors to consider.
|
|
|
|
chronicsky
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1222
Just looking for peace
|
|
February 22, 2017, 04:40:49 PM |
|
I would buy half the coins in the list if i get them at that price over face value!
The market isn't dependent and they do not have any fix value on it!
|
|
|
|
Lincoln6Echo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2461
Merit: 1058
Don't use bitcoin.de if you care about privacy!
|
|
February 22, 2017, 04:45:46 PM |
|
I would buy half the coins in the list if i get them at that price over face value!
The market isn't dependent and they do not have any fix value on it!
+1 especially the 0.5 BTC Silver, Series-2
|
|
|
|
Maicol792
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1010
|
|
February 22, 2017, 06:17:47 PM |
|
beatiful thread ... thanks for this information
|
|
|
|
notserp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 22, 2017, 06:24:36 PM |
|
wonder where are all the redeemed 10btc coins at i only seen one for sale
|
|
|
|
tothemoonsands
|
|
February 22, 2017, 06:40:31 PM |
|
I know this information isn't going to be completely accurate since the market price of things can move fast, but it is still very helpful for a rough estimate. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
davidgdg (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:13:15 PM |
|
I would buy half the coins in the list if i get them at that price over face value!
The market isn't dependent and they do not have any fix value on it!
Not sure how best the thread should be edited, but please do insert some alternative suggested figures. I did wonder whether some of my estimates were on the low side !
|
"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
|
|
|
davidgdg (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:15:32 PM |
|
There is no set premium. These premiums depend on numerous factors that include but are not limited to: supply/demand, if the coin is graded, coin grade, coin condition, PGP key availability, price of BTC and etc. The point is that there is no fixed premium per coin and trying to document it won't really yield accurate results.
Of course I agree. But the same is true for all numismatic coins. Even very rough ranges might be helpful to both buyers and sellers.
|
"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
|
|
|
davidgdg (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:20:12 PM |
|
In order to avoid the confusion caused by fluctuations in BTC values, I thought it might be useful to compile a list of numismatic dollar premium estimates for known Casasciuss issues. In other words, the premium excluding the BTC value. I have taken issue details from the very helpful Spotcoin list ( http://www.spotcoins.com/bitcoin/casascius). Comments/suggested valuations are all based on the coin still being funded. All comments/suggestions welcome. Some general remarks. In numismatics, critical factors are: (1) condition (2) face value (as a broad rule, higher demoninations tend to command a higher premium) (3) scarcity (4) other features affecting desirability such as historical importance, errors, material (silver and gold more desirable). I have tried to apply these considerations in my guestimates below. One thing which I have not taken into account is funding date. First funded coins in any series may command a further premium. Please feel free to rip into me and tell me that my suggested valuations are ridiculously low or high. That is the whole point of this thread: to try and get some sense via community input of where the premiums ought to be. Spotcoin list.... I wish people would stop using this. While it is a good "general" guide, it misses much. All corrections very welcome :-)
|
"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
|
|
|
davidgdg (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:26:53 PM |
|
Corrections below: In order to avoid the confusion caused by fluctuations in BTC values, I thought it might be useful to compile a list of numismatic dollar premium estimates for known Casasciuss issues. In other words, the premium excluding the BTC value. I have taken issue details from the very helpful Spotcoin list ( http://www.spotcoins.com/bitcoin/casascius). Comments/suggested valuations are all based on the coin still being funded. All comments/suggestions welcome. Some general remarks. In numismatics, critical factors are: (1) condition (2) face value (as a broad rule, higher demoninations tend to command a higher premium) (3) scarcity (4) other features affecting desirability such as historical importance, errors, material (silver and gold more desirable). I have tried to apply these considerations in my guestimates below. One thing which I have not taken into account is funding date. First funded coins in any series may command a further premium. Please feel free to rip into me and tell me that my suggested valuations are ridiculously low or high. That is the whole point of this thread: to try and get some sense via community input of where the premiums ought to be. 0.1 BTC Silver 2013 Funded 800 Redeemed 8 Active 792 Fairly scarce. At a guess I would say these should command something like a US$ 200 premium over the BTC content.
Looking at recent auction results on this forum, the premium is more like US$350 to 5000.5 BTC Brass 2013 Funded 3055 Redeemed 139 Active 2916 Relatively common. US$ 150 0.5 BTC Silver, Series-2 2013 Funded 45 Redeemed 0 Active 45 Extremely rare. Must be be close to US$ 1,000 and perhaps more I would have thought. 0.5 BTC Silver, Series-3 2013 Funded 885 Redeemed 1 Active 884 Scarce. US$ 500. 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-1 2011 Funded 5993 Redeemed 892 Active 5101 Common but highly desirable because of the error. US$ 500 to US$ 1,000. This coins ought to be the easiest one to put a dollar premium on. 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-2 (2011) 2011 Funded 516 Redeemed 82 Active 434 Scarce but less desirable than the error issue. US$ 400-500 ? 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-2 (2012) 2012 Funded 6740 Redeemed 821 Active 5919 Common. US$ 300. 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-2 (2013) 2013 Funded 5407 Redeemed 297 Active 5110 Common. US$ 300. 1.0 BTC All-Silver 2013 Funded 1300 Redeemed 8 Active 1292 Scarce. US$750 1.0 BTC Silver with Gold Trim 2013 Funded 483 Redeemed 1 Active 482 Very scarce and desirable. US$ 1,000-US$ 1,500. 5 BTC, Series-1 2012 Funded 670 Redeemd 80 Active 590 Scarce. US$ 1,500. 5 BTC, Series-2 2012 Funded 572 Redeemed 123 Active 449 Scarce. US$ 1,500. 10 BTC, All-Silver 2012 Funded 250 Redeemed 35 Active 215 Rare. US$ 2,000 10 BTC, Silver with Gold Trim 2012 Funded 242 Redeemed 16 Active 226 Rare. US$ 2,000 25 BTC, Series-1 2011 Funded 338 Redeemed 132 Active 206 Rare. Hard to value the premium as the face value is already so high. Say US$ 5,000? 25 BTC, Series-2 2011 Funded 472 Redeemed 117 Active 355 Ditto. Rare. Hard to value the premium as the face value is already so high. Say US$ 5,000? 1000 BTC 1oz Gold 2012 Funded 5 Redeemed 2 Active 3 Impossible to value in the absence of any reported sales and in light of the very high face value.
|
"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
|
|
|
Blaater
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:31:34 PM |
|
I thought Goat sold his 1000BTC bar for 1M? Furthermore, the premium for the 25 BTC, 10 BTC and 5 BTC should be higher I think. There is no set premium. These premiums depend on numerous factors that include but are not limited to: supply/demand, if the coin is graded, coin grade, coin condition, PGP key availability, price of BTC and etc. The point is that there is no fixed premium per coin and trying to document it won't really yield accurate results.
Dont forget, date it what funded. A 2011 coin could be funded in 2013 making it just slightly less desirable opposed to a 2011 one.
|
|
|
|
davidgdg (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:33:53 PM Last edit: February 22, 2017, 07:47:31 PM by davidgdg |
|
VERSION 2In order to avoid the confusion caused by fluctuations in BTC values, I thought it might be useful to compile a list of numismatic dollar premium estimates for known Casasciuss issues. In other words, the premium excluding the BTC value. I have taken issue details from the very helpful Spotcoin list ( http://www.spotcoins.com/bitcoin/casascius). Comments/suggested valuations are all based on the coin still being funded. All comments/suggestions welcome. Some general remarks. In numismatics, critical factors are: (1) condition (2) face value (as a broad rule, higher demoninations tend to command a higher premium) (3) scarcity (4) other features affecting desirability such as historical importance, errors, material (silver and gold more desirable). I have tried to apply these considerations in my guestimates below. One thing which I have not taken into account is funding date. First funded coins in any series may command a further premium. Please feel free to rip into me and tell me that my suggested valuations are ridiculously low or high. That is the whole point of this thread: to try and get some sense via community input of where the premiums ought to be. NB All figures assume coins in good but not perfect condition i.e. UK grade good extremely fine / US grade MS64 - very slight wear visible on close inspection. Better coins will command higher premiums (and vice versa)
0.1 BTC Silver 2013 Funded 800 Redeemed 8 Active 792 Fairly scarce. At a guess I would say these should command something like a US$ 200 premium over the BTC content.
Looking at recent auction results on this forum, the premium is more like US$350 to 5000.5 BTC Brass 2013 Funded 3055 Redeemed 139 Active 2916 Relatively common. US$ 150 2000.5 BTC Silver, Series-2 2013 Funded 45 Redeemed 0 Active 45 Extremely rare. Must be be close to US$ 1,000 and perhaps more I would have thought. 0.5 BTC Silver, Series-3 2013 Funded 885 Redeemed 1 Active 884 Scarce. US$ 500. 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-1 2011 Funded 5993 Redeemed 892 Active 5101 Common but highly desirable because of the error. US$ 500 to US$ 1,000. This coins ought to be the easiest one to put a dollar premium on. 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-2 (2011) 2011 Funded 516 Redeemed 82 Active 434 Scarce but less desirable than the error issue. US$ 400-500 ? 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-2 (2012) 2012 Funded 6740 Redeemed 821 Active 5919 Common. US$ 300. 1.0 BTC Brass, Series-2 (2013) 2013 Funded 5407 Redeemed 297 Active 5110 Common. US$ 300. 1.0 BTC All-Silver 2013 Funded 1300 Redeemed 8 Active 1292 Scarce. US$750 1.0 BTC Silver with Gold Trim 2013 Funded 483 Redeemed 1 Active 482 Very scarce and desirable. US$ 1,000-US$ 1,500. 5 BTC, Series-1 2012 Funded 670 Redeemd 80 Active 590 Scarce. US$ 1,500 -2000. 5 BTC, Series-2 2012 Funded 572 Redeemed 123 Active 449 Scarce. US$ 1,500 -2,000. 10 BTC, All-Silver 2012 Funded 250 Redeemed 35 Active 215 Rare. US$ 2,000 10 BTC, Silver with Gold Trim 2012 Funded 242 Redeemed 16 Active 226 Rare. US$ 2,000 25 BTC, Series-1 2011 Funded 338 Redeemed 132 Active 206 Rare. Hard to value the premium as the face value is already so high. Say US$ 5,000? 25 BTC, Series-2 2011 Funded 472 Redeemed 117 Active 355 Ditto. Rare. Hard to value the premium as the face value is already so high. Say US$ 5,000? 1000 BTC 1oz Gold 2012 Funded 5 Redeemed 2 Active 3 Impossible to value in the absence of any reported sales and in light of the very high face value. [/quote]
|
"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
|
|
|
Lincoln6Echo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2461
Merit: 1058
Don't use bitcoin.de if you care about privacy!
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:36:18 PM |
|
For example those 2011 error Coins. The mintage might be on the higher range but because bitcoin value was so low at that time those coins were not treated very well although they have the most historic value. So it is might be easy to find one of those coins but finding one in nearly mint conditions is difficult.
This explains the high premium for an Error Coin in good conditions. So stating a general premium for those coins ist pointless imho.
|
|
|
|
davidgdg (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:37:49 PM |
|
I thought Goat sold his 1000BTC bar for 1M? Furthermore, the premium for the 25 BTC, 10 BTC and 5 BTC should be higher I think. There is no set premium. These premiums depend on numerous factors that include but are not limited to: supply/demand, if the coin is graded, coin grade, coin condition, PGP key availability, price of BTC and etc. The point is that there is no fixed premium per coin and trying to document it won't really yield accurate results.
Dont forget, date it what funded. A 2011 coin could be funded in 2013 making it just slightly less desirable opposed to a 2011 one. 1M for 1000 BTC would be a negative premium! Re. the 25BTC, I'm not sure that you could justify more than a US$ 5,000 premium. They are scarce but not extremely rare. That said, if you can point to an auction ..... Not sure about the 10 and 5s so I'll leave it for the moment. I agree that funding dates make some difference but as I said in the original post, I am disregarding that. It just gets too complicated!
|
"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
|
|
|
davidgdg (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:41:54 PM |
|
For example those 2011 error Coins. The mintage might be on the higher range but because bitcoin value was so low at that time those coins were not treated very well although they have the most historic value. So it is might be easy to find one of those coins but finding one in nearly mint conditions is difficult.
This explains the high premium for an Error Coin in good conditions. So stating a general premium for those coins ist pointless imho.
I agree that condition will make a difference (like any coins). I did state a range to try to allow for that, but of course to do the job properly you would need to give estimates for each issue for all grades. But I'll edit the post to make it clear that the premiums assume good but not perfect condition and that pristine coins will command a higher premium.
|
"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:43:05 PM |
|
I thought Goat sold his 1000BTC bar for 1M? Furthermore, the premium for the 25 BTC, 10 BTC and 5 BTC should be higher I think. There is no set premium. These premiums depend on numerous factors that include but are not limited to: supply/demand, if the coin is graded, coin grade, coin condition, PGP key availability, price of BTC and etc. The point is that there is no fixed premium per coin and trying to document it won't really yield accurate results.
Dont forget, date it what funded. A 2011 coin could be funded in 2013 making it just slightly less desirable opposed to a 2011 one. 1M for 1000 BTC would be a negative premium! if i recall, that sale was in early 2014 when price was around $750/BTC
|
|
|
|
Lincoln6Echo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2461
Merit: 1058
Don't use bitcoin.de if you care about privacy!
|
|
February 22, 2017, 07:48:22 PM |
|
I thought Goat sold his 1000BTC bar for 1M? Furthermore, the premium for the 25 BTC, 10 BTC and 5 BTC should be higher I think. There is no set premium. These premiums depend on numerous factors that include but are not limited to: supply/demand, if the coin is graded, coin grade, coin condition, PGP key availability, price of BTC and etc. The point is that there is no fixed premium per coin and trying to document it won't really yield accurate results.
Dont forget, date it what funded. A 2011 coin could be funded in 2013 making it just slightly less desirable opposed to a 2011 one. 1M for 1000 BTC would be a negative premium! if i recall, that sale was in early 2014 when price was around $750/BTC That's what I call a nice premium!
|
|
|
|
FFrankie
|
|
February 22, 2017, 09:18:24 PM |
|
I was under the impression that the 25 BTC coin cost around 26-28 btc
|
|
|
|
|