move_zig (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:06:09 PM |
|
The rally we experienced at the start of this year is nothing like the 2011 bubble. From the start of April to the end of May, 2011 BTC/USD rose by 41% per week (or about 5700000000% per year). The rally that started in January has risen about 14% per week. We started rising too fast near the end of March and we experienced a correction. I think we're back to the 14% weekly growth trend now.
|
|
|
|
MAbtc
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:08:47 PM |
|
No. Don't think so.
|
|
|
|
blackreplica
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:09:46 PM |
|
Based on those number's i'd agree. 14% a week is still a massive amount though.
Just out of curiousity, do you have the % growth for the weeks after the Cyprus incident leading up to the correction?
|
www.sgBitcoin.net - The Premier News, Discussion & Marketplace Destination for the Singaporean Bitcoin Community
|
|
|
move_zig (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:14:28 PM |
|
Based on those number's i'd agree. 14% a week is still a massive amount though.
Just out of curiousity, do you have the % growth for the weeks after the Cyprus incident leading up to the correction?
It depends on how I draw the lines, but if I go from the trough to peak for the four-week period leading up to the correction I get 62% weekly growth.
|
|
|
|
blackreplica
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:17:05 PM |
|
Thanks for that. This would make a good bubble meter. History tells us that anything more than 41% is bubble territory. That would make a great upper limit. The price movement in the next few weeks should tell us if 14% is the lower limit, or if in fact it is something even lower (I don't think it could be less than the % change from Jan '12 to Jan '13 though, just eyeballing it, it looks like 2-3% per week?)
|
www.sgBitcoin.net - The Premier News, Discussion & Marketplace Destination for the Singaporean Bitcoin Community
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:20:22 PM |
|
Thanks for that. This would make a good bubble meter. History tells us that anything more than 41% is bubble territory. That would make a great upper limit. The price movement in the next few weeks should tell us if 14% is the lower limit, or if in fact it is something even lower (I don't think it could be less than the % change from Jan '12 to Jan '13 though, just eyeballing it, it looks like 2-3% per week?)
Uhh 14% a week is 91000% a year. (910 times) Even pirate didn't pay that much.
|
|
|
|
move_zig (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:24:08 PM |
|
Uhh 14% a week is 91000% a year. (910 times) Even pirate didn't pay that much.
No one said it was a small amount. I think we're back to following that trend now though.
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:26:20 PM |
|
Uhh 14% a week is 91000% a year. (910 times) Even pirate didn't pay that much.
No one said it was a small amount. I think we're back to following that trend now though. You can think whatever you like.
|
|
|
|
blackreplica
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:26:52 PM |
|
Thanks for that. This would make a good bubble meter. History tells us that anything more than 41% is bubble territory. That would make a great upper limit. The price movement in the next few weeks should tell us if 14% is the lower limit, or if in fact it is something even lower (I don't think it could be less than the % change from Jan '12 to Jan '13 though, just eyeballing it, it looks like 2-3% per week?)
Uhh 14% a week is 91000% a year. (910 times) Even pirate didn't pay that much. I'm not advocating 14% ad infinitum. The sharper the growth rate, the faster the bubble rise and pop. the 2011 bubble, at 41% took about 3 months to pop. The recent 62% bubble popped in one month, or 1/3 the time. Assuming the relationship is between bubble magnitude and time-to-pop follows these parameters in a linear fashion, we're looking at a time window of as long as a year before we see some sort of change in the long term growth pattern. It may not be going on forever but if this rate holds we may see it for some time, and that means there is money to be made for quite a while *insert standard ceteris paribus disclaimer here
|
www.sgBitcoin.net - The Premier News, Discussion & Marketplace Destination for the Singaporean Bitcoin Community
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:32:47 PM |
|
I don't even have to post that bubble anatomy chart anymore. If it looks like a bull trap, smells like a bull trap it is probably a bull trap.
|
|
|
|
MAbtc
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:38:56 PM |
|
14% weekly growth? Sustainable for what period? LOL!
|
|
|
|
lebing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:40:49 PM |
|
I don't even have to post that bubble anatomy chart anymore. If it looks like a bull trap, smells like a bull trap it is probably a bull trap. log. scale.
|
Bro, do you even blockchain? -E Voorhees
|
|
|
ManBearPig
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:42:12 PM |
|
The trend you talk about is what I've been charting and discussing. Here's my latest: Subsuming the April Crash into the trend is a little difficult but the current price action (or lack of it) almost looks as if it might want to rejoin the Jan-Mar 10 week period of 1.8% daily growth. You are right in that there was an inflection point late in March which set us on unsustainable growth but it's amazing how stable the 1.8% daily trend was.
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:42:41 PM |
|
log.
scale.
un- sus- tain- able.
|
|
|
|
lebing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:47:31 PM |
|
log.
scale.
un- sus- tain- able. why, exactly?
|
Bro, do you even blockchain? -E Voorhees
|
|
|
move_zig (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:48:45 PM |
|
un-
sus-
tain-
able.
why, exactly? Not to put words in anyone's mouth, but I assume it's because the linear-scale chart looks scary.
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:49:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
blackreplica
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:50:01 PM |
|
14% weekly growth? Sustainable for what period? LOL! Look at ManBearPig's post. It has sustained itself since 9 Jan 2013, almost 5 months.
|
www.sgBitcoin.net - The Premier News, Discussion & Marketplace Destination for the Singaporean Bitcoin Community
|
|
|
SlipperySlope
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:59:54 PM |
|
Yes the long term trend is up and its awesome. Short term, I believe is the collapse of bubble 2. The chart shows that optimal purchases are not made on the way up in a bubble. Buy and hold investors should be patient if there is a bubble and buy months after the peak, IMO.
|
|
|
|
Rygon
|
|
April 22, 2013, 07:23:06 PM |
|
OTC markets trading in Facebook shares were probably just as crazy in value appreciation in the early years. Facebook went from not existing to being worth $15B in less than four years.
|
|
|
|
|