What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ?

[BitMaxz]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

Well base in my own experience in sports betting even the odds is 1.05 high chance to win there are still possibility that you will be lose but if we compare it in dice game i think dice game is more risky than sports betting because if you know how to analyze their previous game  you have more chance to win in sports betting than dice game.

[xuan87]

I think it depends on your analyzing skill and your experience in sport betting, even though your winning chances is 95%, but that is the bookie prediction not yours, who knows you can predict better than the bookie, and in the dice games, if it says 95% winning chance then just pray and roll hope to win because it based on your luck, but if you are not good in sport betting, playing in dice will be better even though the winning chance is the same

[fullypak]

I think it depends on your analyzing skill and your experience in sport betting, even though your winning chances is 95%, but that is the bookie prediction not yours, who knows you can predict better than the bookie, and in the dice games, if it says 95% winning chance then just pray and roll hope to win because it based on your luck, but if you are not good in sport betting, playing in dice will be better even though the winning chance is the same

Yup in sports betting it depends on how we are strong in sports and sometimes we got unexpected results it's all common in gambling. Before starting the game if we choose 95% of chances to bet it may be anything can happen after the finish that game. But in live betting, this will work because the results will in front of us and based on the game we will choose bets. Slot games no option head and tail game. Here only luck matter.

[grermezter]

I actually prefer sports betting, with that, you can analyse and pick the type of bet and team you want and with this info you have a 80% chance of winning a bet, but with casino the odds of winning a bet is low and dont forget the saying that the house always wins when it comes to betting.

[klf]

I actually prefer sports betting, with that, you can analyse and pick the type of bet and team you want and with this info you have a 80% chance of winning a bet, but with casino the odds of winning a bet is low and dont forget the saying that the house always wins when it comes to betting.

Basically, for all casino games we need the luck to win money, and without that luck, we can't win. But we all feel and think that in sports bet we can analyse better since we know the game and players performance. At the end, we need still luck to support our analysis and to make some money from gambling.

[tungaqhd]

i think sport bet is less risky because if you like a sport team and alway follow them, you have more chance to win, and it's more fair

[ubercool]

I actually prefer sports betting, with that, you can analyse and pick the type of bet and team you want and with this info you have a 80% chance of winning a bet, but with casino the odds of winning a bet is low and dont forget the saying that the house always wins when it comes to betting.

Casino is riskier than sportsbook for sure. You can make some plannings on the team and management in all types of sports but casino is just luck, so sports is better compared to casino.

[absy]

Casino bets are more risky when compared to Sports betting . You can analyze and bet while betting on sports but its just waste when you do the same on Casino games because its provably fair . Just a simple example :

You can get 5-6 continuous 99 and over in dice but Barcelona doesn't loose 5-6 games continuously . It may happen though , Barcelona or Madrid may loose 5-6 matches but I bet that the probability is less than getting 5-6 continuous 99 and over in dice.

[btcdiggingmaster]

There is no big difference between when it comes to risk because in sports betting you can easily make money if you thoroughly know their previous talent, whereas in the casino you need to be very lucky in order to win the jackpot.

[KennyR]

In my view both needs luck, but sports betting is quite easy to make closer prediction and have increase the chance of winning. With casino it is quite hard to make prediction, because it is completely based on luck. Possibly casino bets are preferred by very few as it entirely depends upon luck.

[jorneyflair]

It is not an easy question at all, it mostly depends on the experience and education of the gambler that have chosen to bet only on sport games.
I know many people who are actually really successful in doing sport betting, it is all about watching the games and knowing which teams are the best, but it is still not enough.
You need to make good bets, where the rates are good enough to enter, but the odds are also decent. Many sports betting websites offer some stupid payouts for a match that is pretty much not possible to predict at all.

The best advice I have heard from my friend, doing really good sports betting? Dont bet on the teams you don't know, reduce the risk as hard as you can.

[ralle14]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

Casino games are more risky imo because the results could be random compared to sports betting where you could track teams like knowing a key player that won't play and use that to your advantage when making a prediction. Sometimes even if a team is so much favored it's not worth it to risk your money because they still have a chance to lose.

[asu]

Well, definitely both are too risky its just based on you in how much woukd you spend or how much would you will bet. If you higher amount in sprotsbetting and also you play higher amount in casino so definitely its still both to risky whenever you see. You just need to trully pray for your luck

[safari88]

for me both have the same risk. nothing is more risky. because I think the sports betting with the odds of the smallest that is not a guarantee to win, and the result will be the same as the dice game when you bet on a 95% chance the results will be random.

[Fredomago]

For me, casino bets is more risky. I mean risk to lose more money. In sports betting, its like worth if you lose since you win with the experience, the thrill during the play or games and so forth. Also, sports betting is long time play like basketball meaning risk is minimize unlike in casino bets in minutes your money is gone if you are not lucky enough.

that's right mate casino games are really tempting so won't even control yourself when you started to roll your bank unlike sports betting
you have some spare time to relax and enjoy watching you favorite games and wait for a much better results if you are just playing for
enjoyment.

[pixie85]

Casino bets are much more risky because you just can't predict the outcome. The only games where you have a chance at that are poker and blackjack, the rest is pure luck.
When you bet on sports you can analyse previous matches of both teams or players and predict their chances. Sometimes it's very difficult when the level is more or less the same, but sometimes a very weak team faces a very strong one and the whole thing gets easy.

[chaser15]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

Are you serious with this kind of question?

A random generated bet result will always be more riskier than a bet that will goes first into process.

[joshy23]

We all know the answer here. Casino bets is riskier no doubt about it. House edge, luck plays a factor that made casino betting the riskier of the two. In sport betting, you used analysis in you favor to bet the winning team. Meaning you have a a high percentage of getting a win. So its better to choose sports betting than casino betting.

[agustina2]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

Obviously the dice is the riskier.

But for that comparison, let's take a look at the profit. In @1.05 odds in a basketball game, the profit is really terrible but chances is really high. So to feel for a profit, the bet should be decent for let's say for BTC1 bet. The only return here is BTC0.05 but it will goes in a process and not just you will clicked something. Unlike in dice, that 95% chance is still under the provably fair system.

[kodes88]

I think the risks to sport betting can be greatly minimized, as long as you really know the realm of sport, as long as you really know the teams that are going to compete, really know the conditions of the teams that will compete, you can minimize the risk as little as possible. Because you can analyze well so you get a convincing option. So I guess casinos are more at risk than sport betting.