What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ?

[marlboroza]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

I was thinking a lot about this. I think sport bet is more risky because 95% on dice means 95%, and there are lots of factors that will effect on sport game such as injuries, weather, fans, bad day etc, not to mention bookie can make mistake.

I don’t think that makes it more risky it makes it more variable, while events could happen that could reduce your chances of winning the opposite can also happen, the star player of the other team may get injured, or the referee makes a mistake in your favor.

Sport based gambling sites is much less riskier since you may know how and what will happens depending on the stats of each players involved in it. So I have to agree to you. While in dice based gambling sites, you can control your chances on winning by changing your multiplier. But in dice the bets can be made a lot unlike in sport which is seasonal. By the way, I somehow don't trust the dice probably fair since I have bet at a 90% winning rate but ended up losing at a 10 losing streak. So something might be wrong unto those things.
So I rather gamble slow on sports and on this way I can support my favorite team for example is Golden State.

And when you bet at 1.1X in sports you can't lose 10 times in row? Interesting.
Do a simple test. Play 100 sport bets at 1.1X multiplier and then roll dice 100 times at the same multiplier and compare results.

[AntoCokbun]

In my opinion, sport is much more risky than casino. Because, in sport hard to do martingale. While at casino we can, so that when we lose, we can increase the amount of bets from before.

[whizter]

In my opinion, sport is much more risky than casino. Because, in sport hard to do martingale. While at casino we can, so that when we lose, we can increase the amount of bets from before.

how can you say that? to me i think casino is risky as compare to sports gambling, because in casino we are totally depending on our luck and there no role of our skill and experience, while in sports gambling we can use our experience and skill also.  therefore if you have some good skill in sports gambling then it snot so risky as compare to casino games. where you cannot use your skill and experience.

[klf]

In my opinion, sport is much more risky than casino. Because, in sport hard to do martingale. While at casino we can, so that when we lose, we can increase the amount of bets from before.

how can you say that? to me i think casino is risky as compare to sports gambling, because in casino we are totally depending on our luck and there no role of our skill and experience, while in sports gambling we can use our experience and skill also.  therefore if you have some good skill in sports gambling then it snot so risky as compare to casino games. where you cannot use your skill and experience.

I do agree that we can't use skill and experience in a dice game or other casino games but in sports, you can use your skills to guess more accurate results. But still, at the end, you must need a luck to support your bet to win those sports picks because there are chances that these can be fixed and your prediction can go wrong. As per more all these gambling games are equally risky.

[Skarner21]

In my opinion, sport is much more risky than casino. Because, in sport hard to do martingale. While at casino we can, so that when we lose, we can increase the amount of bets from before.

how can you say that? to me i think casino is risky as compare to sports gambling, because in casino we are totally depending on our luck and there no role of our skill and experience, while in sports gambling we can use our experience and skill also.  therefore if you have some good skill in sports gambling then it snot so risky as compare to casino games. where you cannot use your skill and experience.

I do agree that we can't use skill and experience in a dice game or other casino games but in sports, you can use your skills to guess more accurate results. But still, at the end, you must need a luck to support your bet to win those sports picks because there are chances that these can be fixed and your prediction can go wrong. As per more all these gambling games are equally risky.

But in sports betting you also need to be luck in order to win not only skills for choosing if what is the best team to bet your money..
Dice game or other simple games those games are good only for those who wants fast result..

[FasTroy]

In my opinion, sport is much more risky than casino. Because, in sport hard to do martingale. While at casino we can, so that when we lose, we can increase the amount of bets from before.

how can you say that? to me i think casino is risky as compare to sports gambling, because in casino we are totally depending on our luck and there no role of our skill and experience, while in sports gambling we can use our experience and skill also.  therefore if you have some good skill in sports gambling then it snot so risky as compare to casino games. where you cannot use your skill and experience.

I definitely agree with you, Casino bets are too risky than sports betting. As you said, because casino games is are depend only in luck. So you can't control yourself and use your brain. It's a random result which you chance of winning  depend on how much you are lucky, by the ways in sports betting, you need your skills and experience. by knowledge, you can increase your chance of winning so much.

[rytyr]

They are both have the same amount of risk involved.
Especially in the playoffs time for sports games.
Because both teams are trying their best of the season but are tired so their performance is lacking and are really fighting for their sports lives.
So it is not like when in the regular season when they are just building up their sports team performance at trying to get to that point.

[hahay]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

I think any type of gambling has varying risks, but if compared as you say I prefer to bet on sportsbooks compared to dice, because if we bet on sportbooks with odds 1.05 I think it's 100% won, but if you bet on dice With a 95% winning chance we can still suffer loss and this often happens to me, lol.

[crwth]

With the both same chances, 95% it has both chances of winning. The only thing that is variable against them with sports is the players, the condition of them, are they willing to play, or something like that whether as to casino games, it's constant because it's programmed, whether or not they have 0.5 edge - 5% edge, it's constant and will never change unless they do something about the programming.

[ufaiz50]

obviously the most risky is the casino is because the house edge that makes you always lose different from sprots betting is we bet on the team/people and casino bet on the program which could possibly be rigged easily.

[Cactushrt]

obviously the most risky is the casino is because the house edge that makes you always lose different from sprots betting is we bet on the team/people and casino bet on the program which could possibly be rigged easily.

You're right that's why i stop playing on casion because there is a possibility that it can be rigged easily unlike on sports bettinhgif you have a good analysis there is a high chance you can profit.

[iqlimasyadiqa]

I think casino bets are more risky. For sport gambling is easier because everything we can see with the eyes.
While casino bets are a bet that takes advantage of luck as a victory. Everyone has a different opinion, for me the result is like that.

[micher143]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

The more risky is the casino bet because the system holds your win and loss and in the sports bet that is the real pure luck because it is depends on the team that is winning. So for me the more risky is the casino bets because if they want you to loss you will loss but that is based only in my experience.

[novemberwoah]

Casino is more at risk because there is a house edge. If you play long term it will certainly lose. That's very different from sports betting, as long as you can guess the match well it can continue to win. That's because sports betting also depends on your knowledge. Actually any gambling must have risks, but if asked which is more risky between casino and sports betting certainly I think more at risk of casino.

[BlockEye]

I think casino bets are more risky. For sport gambling is easier because everything we can see with the eyes.
While casino bets are a bet that takes advantage of luck as a victory. Everyone has a different opinion, for me the result is like that.

There is no more riskier on the two. They are just different kind of gambling but still a gambling too. The risk depends on the amount of bet and odds that you choose for it. Considering that we are pertaining to dice game as casino bets. I think the title of OP is a little bit right for discussion since the two is just safe risky and very hard measure the risk level.

[Young_Croatian]

casino bets are more risky, couse in sports you have form of teams to bet on, and in casino you have nothing. In casino bets are bigger

[crwth]

casino bets are more risky, couse in sports you have form of teams to bet on, and in casino you have nothing. In casino bets are bigger

I think it's almost the same knowing that you have the same odds but definitely not the same game. The risk are high with sports because of the conditions of the people that plays the sport, it can't be controlled while casino games are programmed unless rigged.

[Pettuh4]

casino bets are more risky, couse in sports you have form of teams to bet on, and in casino you have nothing. In casino bets are bigger

I believe you risk more on sports betting than casinos because sports normally involves a team and team sports are very unpredictable unlike the casino where you are responsible for your fate assuming it is balanced and unbiased.

[Gameroid]

In my opinion, sport is much more risky than casino. Because, in sport hard to do martingale. While at casino we can, so that when we lose, we can increase the amount of bets from before.

how can you say that? to me i think casino is risky as compare to sports gambling, because in casino we are totally depending on our luck and there no role of our skill and experience, while in sports gambling we can use our experience and skill also.  therefore if you have some good skill in sports gambling then it snot so risky as compare to casino games. where you cannot use your skill and experience.

I do agree that we can't use skill and experience in a dice game or other casino games but in sports, you can use your skills to guess more accurate results. But still, at the end, you must need a luck to support your bet to win those sports picks because there are chances that these can be fixed and your prediction can go wrong. As per more all these gambling games are equally risky.

But in sports betting you also need to be luck in order to win not only skills for choosing if what is the best team to bet your money..
Dice game or other simple games those games are good only for those who wants fast result..

although luck is too much important in all field of life but i think still if you have some experience and skill in sports gambling then the chance of making money from sports gambling increasing.

[mobilestrike]

For me casino bet is interesting games but it is hard for me to earn at there because at there my skills do not work and all depend on luck while in sports betting my skills work and I am able to win on these bets so I will prefer for sports betting and I will say that for me casino betting is more risky.