What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ?

[fujyo86]

Yes the sports players and sports likers will guess the game result easily. And for them, it is easy to make money in sports betting. Casino games are more riskier than sports betting. Here we can not guess the results, and there is no hope that we will win our bet. Casino games are a dead investment and unprofitable.

If it was so easy, why are they not super rich yet? I haven't heard of a millionaire who can say that he was rich because of sports gambling. Of course the bookies will try their very best to prevent people from winning all the time, or be on the losing end.
[/quote]

Sports that I think are more risky than casino slots. Because it really relies on luck. Expert analysis or prediction can be mistaken.

[hajimasan]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

According to me the Casino Bets are More Risky as Compared to Sports Betting Because In Sports Betting you can Use Your Own Knowledge and Experience to Increase Your Chances of Winning But it Doesn't Possible to Use Your Knowledge in Casino Games Because We all Know that all the Casinos in the World Based Upon Probability.
So If Someone Wants to Bet their Money on Gambling then I Suggest him to do Only Sports Betting and Don't Be Greedy For Money in Gambling.

[Gastotade]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

According to me the Casino Bets are More Risky as Compared to Sports Betting Because In Sports Betting you can Use Your Own Knowledge and Experience to Increase Your Chances of Winning But it Doesn't Possible to Use Your Knowledge in Casino Games Because We all Know that all the Casinos in the World Based Upon Probability.
So If Someone Wants to Bet their Money on Gambling then I Suggest him to do Only Sports Betting and Don't Be Greedy For Money in Gambling.

Sports betting is the only way we can used our idea or knowledge since it can have basis,like researching players or track their records to have idea whom to choose.

[Strongkored]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

According to me the Casino Bets are More Risky as Compared to Sports Betting Because In Sports Betting you can Use Your Own Knowledge and Experience to Increase Your Chances of Winning But it Doesn't Possible to Use Your Knowledge in Casino Games Because We all Know that all the Casinos in the World Based Upon Probability.
So If Someone Wants to Bet their Money on Gambling then I Suggest him to do Only Sports Betting and Don't Be Greedy For Money in Gambling.

casino bets more risky yes because for me casino bets is pure of luck, not same like sports betting we do bets base our knowledge, though our bets can be wrong too, both of them still have risky.

[densuj]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

According to me the Casino Bets are More Risky as Compared to Sports Betting Because In Sports Betting you can Use Your Own Knowledge and Experience to Increase Your Chances of Winning But it Doesn't Possible to Use Your Knowledge in Casino Games Because We all Know that all the Casinos in the World Based Upon Probability.
So If Someone Wants to Bet their Money on Gambling then I Suggest him to do Only Sports Betting and Don't Be Greedy For Money in Gambling.

Sports betting is the only way we can used our idea or knowledge since it can have basis,like researching players or track their records to have idea whom to choose.

Yes, sports gambling are good chance to getting winnings in gambling because of it can be analyzed
but actually between casino and sports gambling are huge risk losing money,
they are gambling game and the winnings depend on our lucky but the more risky in gambling
in my opinions is casino gambling.

[PhucS]

I think casino gambling games like dice are more risky than sports betting. Dice games, casinos often rely heavily on luck, only a few need skills. If you are lucky you will get a lot of money but if you are unlucky you can lose everything. So its risk ratio is quite high. Sports betting seems less risky, but you need to have some knowledge of sports, the ability to analyze the game to make the best choice, minimize risk and be profitable. If you bet blindly, the risk of sports betting is similar to dice

[blockman]

For me they are both risky, I don't think about those which is more risky. But as long as there is a risk involve they are qualified for it, so for me whether you do casino bets it is risky or sports bet.

Both are risky, but playing casinos is more risky than betting on sports, we can stay away from the risk of losing on sports betting by looking for small odds, I think in this way we can stay away from the risk of losing.

I guess so you are right, I just realized that sports betting is a game where the advantage will be on the bettor. As long he will do good analysis, the chance of winning is very big. He only needs to apply what he has learned for being a sports bettor but in casino bets. There will be hard time to know and predict that you are going to win.

[South Park]

Fixed matches are possible but identifying them would really be hard which means we dont really have an idea which team would win even underdogs do sometimes win in the end.There are really some instances on which weak teams do defeat strong teams which means game do still rely on luck.If its not on our side then we would definitely lose no matter what.

You know in reality, fixed matches are sometimes just an assumption of those gamblers who lose their bet and can't accept it. Even the output is clear that it's really a lose, still they will stand to their feet strongly that the game is rigged. That's why sometimes it's shit to believe that most of games are rigged. And if we really know the sports, even at 1% we can detect it if there's something wrong.

If we to take the games being rigged at international events, I doubt that is really happening. There are lots of sports bodies who can sue them for doing shit.

While many gamblers throw that accusation without any kind of proof to deny that some matches are fixed is lo lie to ourselves, there have been many scandals in recent years about fixed matches especially in soccer so I will not be surprised if that was only the tip of the iceberg.

[Colt22]

Any game of chance consists of risks, and despite the fact that these are betting on sports games or betting in a casino. What can be lost there or there.

Not just any, all games and gambling games consist risks, even a sports betting or a bet in a casino. But betting in a casino is more risky than betting on a sports game, analysis and experience can help you win your bet, in casino bets, there may be some games that requires skill, but mostly it requires luck.

But in sports bet if a person is much experienced in sports and he is well aware with sports then he will not lose any chance to win the bet . I have saw that type of people who do not lose in sports betting and lose only when the match is fixed which do not occur mostly.

[Winner]

I think casino gambling games like dice are more risky than sports betting. Dice games, casinos often rely heavily on luck, only a few need skills. If you are lucky you will get a lot of money but if you are unlucky you can lose everything. So its risk ratio is quite high. Sports betting seems less risky, but you need to have some knowledge of sports, the ability to analyze the game to make the best choice, minimize risk and be profitable. If you bet blindly, the risk of sports betting is similar to dice

I am pretty sure that it depends on the Gambling Casino if their Dice games and other gambling games are riskier than Sports Betting. The gamblers that already know the Dice algorithm within the Casino could make money from it, that result will be the same if they even had a small part of the gambling algorithm.
Sports Betting could get rigged as well so the odds are not set in place like how people usually think it is.

[Superways]

I think casino gambling games like dice are more risky than sports betting. Dice games, casinos often rely heavily on luck, only a few need skills. If you are lucky you will get a lot of money but if you are unlucky you can lose everything. So its risk ratio is quite high. Sports betting seems less risky, but you need to have some knowledge of sports, the ability to analyze the game to make the best choice, minimize risk and be profitable. If you bet blindly, the risk of sports betting is similar to dice

I am pretty sure that it depends on the Gambling Casino if their Dice games and other gambling games are riskier than Sports Betting. The gamblers that already know the Dice algorithm within the Casino could make money from it, that result will be the same if they even had a small part of the gambling algorithm.
Sports Betting could get rigged as well so the odds are not set in place like how people usually think it is.

the dice and other games like that may benefit if they choose the good one but still it is the most risky way to gamble as it is not all depend on the experience or skill f the person but it all depend on the luck of the gambler. Sports bet also having some sort of risk especially if the gambler do not know about the sports and bet on that.

[equator]

I think casino gambling games like dice are more risky than sports betting. Dice games, casinos often rely heavily on luck, only a few need skills. If you are lucky you will get a lot of money but if you are unlucky you can lose everything. So its risk ratio is quite high. Sports betting seems less risky, but you need to have some knowledge of sports, the ability to analyze the game to make the best choice, minimize risk and be profitable. If you bet blindly, the risk of sports betting is similar to dice

I am pretty sure that it depends on the Gambling Casino if their Dice games and other gambling games are riskier than Sports Betting. The gamblers that already know the Dice algorithm within the Casino could make money from it, that result will be the same if they even had a small part of the gambling algorithm.
Sports Betting could get rigged as well so the odds are not set in place like how people usually think it is.

the dice and other games like that may benefit if they choose the good one but still it is the most risky way to gamble as it is not all depend on the experience or skill f the person but it all depend on the luck of the gambler. Sports bet also having some sort of risk especially if the gambler do not know about the sports and bet on that.

Dice and casino gambling is mostly depend on luck and skill or good one site wont give you much profit, but in sports betting you can do analyse of the match between which teams are going to play as you can track their previous records and analyse that what next result will be their in their next meetup

[passwordnow]

Gambling is always risky.  But you can always find some safer bets with sports than you can in just casino bets.

The only time that risk is being involved is when you think that you are not able to earn on those ways. And if you will bet more money, that is going to be riskier, whether you play sports or casino's, it doesn't matter because for me they are both risky.

[MinerHQ]

Gambling is always risky.  But you can always find some safer bets with sports than you can in just casino bets.

The only time that risk is being involved is when you think that you are not able to earn on those ways. And if you will bet more money, that is going to be riskier, whether you play sports or casino's, it doesn't matter because for me they are both risky.

Yes, both are very risky if one gamble only to make a profit. Because in both we should be lucky to make money on a regular basis. But if one is gambling only for fun sometimes then it depends on individual interest. For me, I like to bet on cricket games because I get more excitement while watches these matches after small bet. But I bet this small amount not to make a profit so I can enjoy the match without any worries.

[boyptc]

Betting in a casino is more risky, because in fact there is no strategy. In sports, you can win something, but if you carefully examine the players.

It is the advantage of betting with sports, you can do something just to win. You can do background checking for the teams involve and you can make your own choice on where you are comfortable to do so. In casino games, most of them are luck based except those card games that you can join, well there's a lot of choice of it, choose where you are good at.

[bhadz]

Gambling is always risky.  But you can always find some safer bets with sports than you can in just casino bets.

But for me casino bets are riskier because everything there is automated and the house will always have the advantage if you will gamble there. I find sports betting as safer way of gambling just like you said. Because you can have the advantage on it by doing some analysis and the house will doesn't have control for each game.

They had both high risk but I can say that casino bets are more riskier since we are using our barehands on it and sometimes we are not pretty lucky to hit those winnings while in sportbetting we should need to spot on who is the most advantages guys and who are the underdogs so that we could win. And we if we are a fan kid on sports we are betting on well we can truly earn from that since we have great knowledge on what we are betting on.

Choosing on what you think you had the advantage I guess is better. Because most of us here are saying that casino bets are riskier and sports betting is easier. But there are people that are luckily playing through casino's and will love to choose casino bets to be the best way of gambling for them, we do really have our own preferences.

[terrific]

I don't have an idea on what is riskier. For me they are all the same, sports bet or casino bets. They are all types of wagering, and if there's a wagering, that can be very risky for all of us.

[kpcian]

In my opinion, both are risky.
But the casino is more the riskier of the two. If you are able to analyze properly, then you can get profit from sports betting, but casino is totally dependent on luck.

[ethereumhunter]

I don't have an idea on what is riskier. For me they are all the same, sports bet or casino bets. They are all types of wagering, and if there's a wagering, that can be very risky for all of us.

i agree that they are all the same but with different risk. the more money you add in those bets, the more risk that you can gets. so if you want to play safe, you should only use small until medium money that you can afford to loss and if you are really getting loss, you don't have to loss in big money, you can stop the games in the right time.

[EdenHazard]

I don't have an idea on what is riskier. For me they are all the same, sports bet or casino bets. They are all types of wagering, and if there's a wagering, that can be very risky for all of us.

i agree that they are all the same but with different risk. the more money you add in those bets, the more risk that you can gets. so if you want to play safe, you should only use small until medium money that you can afford to loss and if you are really getting loss, you don't have to loss in big money, you can stop the games in the right time.

same in term of stake money to get additional value , just the matter how much the house edge , how much the bookmaker/casino owner take profit from each bet. and based on calculation / math , sportsbetting have higher house edge compared to casino games.

it is just the feeling that telling you when you know well about sports you will have bigger chance to win , but actually it is not.