What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ?

[Winner]

It is casino bets that most risky than sports bet.Because in sports bet you can use some skill and analysis,but in casino it is pure luck and you have no option to use skill or analysis.

You have a valid point. In general, the whole Casino betting is pretty tough to strategize if  the system is not known already. Since most Casino games could get configured into a game that anyone could learn then win a whole bunch of money it is pretty safe to say that the casino games are usually rigged to be against the average gambler.

Sports Betting is much easier to see if there is any rigging going on because most players have signs that they show when they aren't into the match.

[1714669200]

1714669200

[1714669200]

1714669200

[1714669200]

1714669200

[LeoEspansq]

It is casino bets that most risky than sports bet.Because in sports bet you can use some skill and analysis,but in casino it is pure luck and you have no option to use skill or analysis.

You have a valid point. In general, the whole Casino betting is pretty tough to strategize if  the system is not known already. Since most Casino games could get configured into a game that anyone could learn then win a whole bunch of money it is pretty safe to say that the casino games are usually rigged to be against the average gambler.

Sports Betting is much easier to see if there is any rigging going on because most players have signs that they show when they aren't into the match.

Of course sports betting is easier to predict, but only there is an accurate information about the players, and not rumors on the Internet.

[kpcian]

In my point of view, both are equally risky​. But if you want to more specify then I strongly believe that casino is the more risky of the two thing.
You can predict more or less about the result of the game but you can't predict about the result of casino. So observation is that casino leads a risky way.

[Astargath]

There are professional bettors on sports, there are no professional gamblers at dice or roulette, the only people that ever made money on casino games like those are people who cheated.

[Shinpako09]

Both have a 95% chance of win but I guess dice still more risky. Your fate in sportsbetting was depending on the player. Depends on your observation, you can almost predict the outcome. While dice is depending on a system where the result is completely random so you really have no idea if it will give you a high number or not.

[salmanahmedone]

In my point of view, both are equally risky​. But if you want to more specify then I strongly believe that casino is the more risky of the two thing.
You can predict more or less about the result of the game but you can't predict about the result of casino. So observation is that casino leads a risky way.

Think on it and you will see Sports bets are less risky as you have something in your mind to think about a sport and then bet on it. But still you need knowledge on it to see which sports team is better.

[raven7886]

In my point of view, both are equally risky​. But if you want to more specify then I strongly believe that casino is the more risky of the two thing.
You can predict more or less about the result of the game but you can't predict about the result of casino. So observation is that casino leads a risky way.

No one can say that bets are less risky than casino. I have seen people losing on sports betting even they are sure about the winning team. People think the the team who is strong on paper will win, but it is the team which is good on the field on a particular day wins. So for me both casino and sports bet are equally risky.

But if you ask me to choose only one, then I too will go with sports betting. Because it is indirectly house edge free whereas house edge is the biggest deciding factor on how much risk we are facing in gambling games.

[Astargath]

Both have a 95% chance of win but I guess dice still more risky. Your fate in sportsbetting was depending on the player. Depends on your observation, you can almost predict the outcome. While dice is depending on a system where the result is completely random so you really have no idea if it will give you a high number or not.

What do you mean both have 95% chance of winning? Dice is guaranteed to make you lose, the odds are there to make you lose, there is no way around it. The odds in sports betting are not the same kind of odds as in casino betting, you are not guaranteed to lose in the long run.

[freebutcaged]

Forget dice and forget casinos, only sport betting because unlike casinos there is no house edge and you don't bet against a computer program but you are betting on real world events and their outcomes.

There is no future in gambling unless they are provably fair and have 0 or very small house edge then sure I'd like to gamble with dice and slots.

I'd say dice is more risky than sports betting but that's just my opinion, yet I have won many times playing dice and have lost many times betting on sports.

[Skarner21]

Forget dice and forget casinos, only sport betting because unlike casinos there is no house edge and you don't bet against a computer program but you are betting on real world events and their outcomes.

There is no future in gambling unless they are provably fair and have 0 or very small house edge then sure I'd like to gamble with dice and slots.

I'd say dice is more risky than sports betting but that's just my opinion, yet I have won many times playing dice and have lost many times betting on sports.

I think even they have 0 house edge its impossible to win in dice game except if you are lucky..
But for me if i want to gamble i just still gamble for dice game just sometimes trying luck and for fun purposes.. and more on sports betting because i can make a good profit there due to easy to predict if what team who will win..

[btcjoin14]

There are professional bettors on sports, there are no professional gamblers at dice or roulette, the only people that ever made money on casino games like those are people who cheated.

It’s pretty easy to manipulate the Casino games that are out now because most people like to use a single Host Protection provider. The Cloudbleed hack was one of the things that allowed people to get theirs opened on that fact.
If people could see the back-end of a gambling website then they would also notice that the Casino gambling website algo is really easy to hack.

Sports betting is the wisest choice if you want to make money on something where you’ll feel like you have a chance of winning.

[noodle_dam]

I find the casino bets are a bit more risky as with sports bets you have a lot of different options and way s to choose your bets on predicting the outcome.
Which is a lot more leeway then if you were to just play a casino game like roulette or poker.

[vella85]

I also find casino gambling a lot more risky then sports betting because casinos can rig the games to be in their favor, well they already are in favor when you start gambling there. Sports betting is a lot less risky in my opinion because if you know the sport your are betting on well enough and have knowledge of the game then you would have more of a chance at winning. But of course it doesn't mean sports bettors when every time but people just need to control them self and have a good strategy in play when they bet.

[klf]

I find the casino bets are a bit more risky as with sports bets you have a lot of different options and way s to choose your bets on predicting the outcome.
Which is a lot more leeway then if you were to just play a casino game like roulette or poker.

Even in sports betting many matches are fixed so you can't just guess based on their past performance all the matches. So as per me both casino bets and other skill based games bets are almost have same risks. So in gambling, there are no such things called no risk. Better always gamble with a small amount and enjoy your games.

[reuschman]

from my perspective, the casino is risky than sports betting, you can predict more or less about the result by judging teams strength and weakness, so you can make a bet either winner or loser team. but in the casino, you don't have any clue to predict the result, so I always prefer sports betting to the casino. 

[noictib]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

Since both of them is much risky , and also I tried my luck in both these types of the gambling and lost much amount also for making profit .
But here it would be mandatory to think that we are making money in the sports gambling in small amounts ( if we have control at our willing to become rich with the gambling ) .
So we can say that sports gambling is less risk ( if you have experience in that game for the prediction for the particular team to win or lose ) .
But in the casino games with the more risk there exists House edge factor .
So here I will recommend everyone for the gambling in the sports games and Don't make casino gambling because of this is much risky .

[nakisama]

casino is way harder.

at least in sports you might be able to predict a safe bet.
no such thing with casino bets

[kodes88]

from my perspective, the casino is risky than sports betting, you can predict more or less about the result by judging teams strength and weakness, so you can make a bet either winner or loser team. but in the casino, you don't have any clue to predict the result, so I always prefer sports betting to the casino. 

That's the advantage we have in sport betting. We make more accurate predictions by seeing who will play. We can know which team is weak and which team is strong. We can know which team is in good condition and which are in bad condition. So our prediction can be more accurate. The rest is the luck that plays a role.

[xIIImaL]

from my perspective, the casino is risky than sports betting, you can predict more or less about the result by judging teams strength and weakness, so you can make a bet either winner or loser team. but in the casino, you don't have any clue to predict the result, so I always prefer sports betting to the casino. 

That's the advantage we have in sport betting. We make more accurate predictions by seeing who will play. We can know which team is weak and which team is strong. We can know which team is in good condition and which are in bad condition. So our prediction can be more accurate. The rest is the luck that plays a role.

Correct, Sports betting would be easier option for everyone do gambling because you no need to worry for all your bettings. If you know the concern football or any sports team is strong you will be easily make decent bitcoin so easily.
But dice you will not be aware of where is the winning luck is there. You should completely depend on luck factor only.

[Chachacoin17]

For my opinion i think the more risky is the casino, because the casino you cannot predict the result. Actually im not going in casino  but i heared it in my neighbor because they always wanted to go in the casino and they always lossing their money in betting the game.