What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ?

[BitDane]

If a person is knowledgeable on sports betting then I can say, Casino bets  is far more riskier.  We all know that Casino bets like dice,  roulette and lottery are all relying on its internal setup thus we cannot mitigate risk on these games while sportsbetting,  factors that will change the course of the game can be known if we do a lot of research on the competing team.

[mobilestrike]

If a person is knowledgeable on sports betting then I can say, Casino bets  is far more riskier.  We all know that Casino bets like dice,  roulette and lottery are all relying on its internal setup thus we cannot mitigate risk on these games while sportsbetting,  factors that will change the course of the game can be known if we do a lot of research on the competing team.

I also agree with you. Sports betting can make a person to win if he have skills and knowledge while casino betting is also better but in that ot every person win but only those people win who have a very high experience in casino betting and is considered as a professional.

[Jasad]

Both are risky as you cannot be sure that you will win in either of them as the main factor to win money in gambling is luck and its very simple logic if you are lucky you will win or you will be sitting at loosing end.

They are both risky but in sports betting the risk is lesser. If you are smart enough to do some, analysis before the decision of your bets. In most of the casino best or games it is depending on the games that you are playing, there are some that are good only for luck or they are totally luck based which has higher risk.

no if you really smart and can do math to count how much the edge in sportsbetting ,
you might will have to think many times to start gamble on sports ,
just look between the lines and you will find the number for the edge ,
it gives a lot of benefit for bookmaker ! means has even bigger risk in sportsbetting no matter you have analyzing skills.

[daringdiscovered]

Both are risky as you cannot be sure that you will win in either of them as the main factor to win money in gambling is luck and its very simple logic if you are lucky you will win or you will be sitting at loosing end.

They are both risky but in sports betting the risk is lesser. If you are smart enough to do some, analysis before the decision of your bets. In most of the casino best or games it is depending on the games that you are playing, there are some that are good only for luck or they are totally luck based which has higher risk.

no if you really smart and can do math to count how much the edge in sportsbetting ,
you might will have to think many times to start gamble on sports ,
just look between the lines and you will find the number for the edge ,
it gives a lot of benefit for bookmaker ! means has even bigger risk in sportsbetting no matter you have analyzing skills.

Knowing the math doesn't assure you that you could win always, maybe sometimes, yes, but always? I don't think so. And for me, they just have the same risk, the only thing where they are different is on how you are going to lose. Also, no matter how much you are good on analyzing things in gambling, you are still going to lose because of the house.

[mirakal]

Both are risky as you cannot be sure that you will win in either of them as the main factor to win money in gambling is luck and its very simple logic if you are lucky you will win or you will be sitting at loosing end.

They are both risky but in sports betting the risk is lesser. If you are smart enough to do some, analysis before the decision of your bets. In most of the casino best or games it is depending on the games that you are playing, there are some that are good only for luck or they are totally luck based which has higher risk.

no if you really smart and can do math to count how much the edge in sportsbetting ,
you might will have to think many times to start gamble on sports ,
just look between the lines and you will find the number for the edge ,
it gives a lot of benefit for bookmaker ! means has even bigger risk in sportsbetting no matter you have analyzing skills.

Knowing the math doesn't assure you that you could win always, maybe sometimes, yes, but always? I don't think so. And for me, they just have the same risk, the only thing where they are different is on how you are going to lose. Also, no matter how much you are good on analyzing things in gambling, you are still going to lose because of the house.

That is part of the factors you need to improve when you are gambling, you have to be good in numbers but our job here is very different because we select the winner by predicting and sometimes your match is useless because statistics will not work when games are rigged.

[Janation]

I think they have the same risk.  You cannot mitigate risk on both game once you start your bet.  It is either win or lose, we cannot do lost cutting just like in trades.  Though they have different setup, they still affected by chance and possibility and that makes them (risk) the same in my point of view.

They have the same risk but for me the risk with sports betting is way lighter. In casino bets, it's hard to depend on it because most of the time the games are always depending to the house. In sports betting, you can have the advantage as the game you are betting is not that manipulated by the house.

The house edge is never manipulate anything by the way.
It is just your feeling when it comes to a provably fair games , people tend to feel unpleasant and unsatisfied with the lost.
Where in sportsbetting you did not feel like that , that is what i am feeling.

If you think that there's no manipulation that is being done by the house. When it comes to the favor, almost all the favor from the luck based games are coming from them. So if you know what I'm saying about that, you'll get it and yes, it is my feeling when it comes to provably fair games.

There is no manipulation that is being done by the house, we must not think like that because we are ruining their names and the worst is, we don't know if it's true or not. If you do not trust a gambling site, or a casino without any basis, you must not say it to other people that gambles in the same place. We are ruining the them without them knowing what they have done.

[RedX]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

In my opinion casino games are more risky than sportbetting. There's a lot of evidence that  casino games are manipulated. While on sportsbetting, analyzing the team or the player can be a success on winning and the results are live.

[EdenHazard]

If a person is knowledgeable on sports betting then I can say, Casino bets  is far more riskier.  We all know that Casino bets like dice,  roulette and lottery are all relying on its internal setup thus we cannot mitigate risk on these games while sportsbetting,  factors that will change the course of the game can be known if we do a lot of research on the competing team.

I also agree with you. Sports betting can make a person to win if he have skills and knowledge while casino betting is also better but in that ot every person win but only those people win who have a very high experience in casino betting and is considered as a professional.

looks like we never heard about a professional blackjack player , a professional dice player or maybe a professional slot machine player right? why? clearly it is because nobody leave casino in profit when you do it regularly , pretty different with skill based games.

there is pro sportsbettor and pro poker player! simply means sportsbetting are better choice.

[boyptc]

In my opinion casino games are more risky than sportbetting. There's a lot of evidence that  casino games are manipulated. While on sportsbetting, analyzing the team or the player can be a success on winning and the results are live.

I agree that casino games are riskier when it comes on comparing them with sports betting. And there's no advantage on it if you want to earn good amount with it. But with sports betting as you said there is a way that you can have some advantage against the house by simply doing analyzing each bets that you will make.

[bhadz]

Both are risky as you cannot be sure that you will win in either of them as the main factor to win money in gambling is luck and its very simple logic if you are lucky you will win or you will be sitting at loosing end.

They are both risky but in sports betting the risk is lesser. If you are smart enough to do some, analysis before the decision of your bets. In most of the casino best or games it is depending on the games that you are playing, there are some that are good only for luck or they are totally luck based which has higher risk.

no if you really smart and can do math to count how much the edge in sportsbetting ,
you might will have to think many times to start gamble on sports ,
just look between the lines and you will find the number for the edge ,
it gives a lot of benefit for bookmaker ! means has even bigger risk in sportsbetting no matter you have analyzing skills.

Yes you need to adjust with the edge and specifically with the odds per bets. But you need to consider on what bet you are going to excel and just choose the best out of it. And for me, the best thing is that you should really choose only the games that you know how to play and for me I'll go with sports betting and will avoid casino bets.

[ViceOfBTC21]

Both are risky as you cannot be sure that you will win in either of them as the main factor to win money in gambling is luck and its very simple logic if you are lucky you will win or you will be sitting at loosing end.

They are both risky but in sports betting the risk is lesser. If you are smart enough to do some, analysis before the decision of your bets. In most of the casino best or games it is depending on the games that you are playing, there are some that are good only for luck or they are totally luck based which has higher risk.

no if you really smart and can do math to count how much the edge in sportsbetting ,
you might will have to think many times to start gamble on sports ,
just look between the lines and you will find the number for the edge ,
it gives a lot of benefit for bookmaker ! means has even bigger risk in sportsbetting no matter you have analyzing skills.

Yes you need to adjust with the edge and specifically with the odds per bets. But you need to consider on what bet you are going to excel and just choose the best out of it. And for me, the best thing is that you should really choose only the games that you know how to play and for me I'll go with sports betting and will avoid casino bets.

You can be good at sportsbetting and still lose due to shitty odds, bookmaker cheating and disapperaing in one night. But it's little safer and smarter than casino betting but smart people don't gamble (or they are doing it for fun).

[Kevin77]

It is casino bets that most risky than sports bet.Because in sports bet you can use some skill and analysis,but in casino it is pure luck and you have no option to use skill or analysis.

You have a valid point. In general, the whole Casino betting is pretty tough to strategize if  the system is not known already. Since most Casino games could get configured into a game that anyone could learn then win a whole bunch of money it is pretty safe to say that the casino games are usually rigged to be against the average gambler.

Sports Betting is much easier to see if there is any rigging going on because most players have signs that they show when they aren't into the match.

Sports betting is much harder to chest since you have to get the whole team in in it and thst won't be so easy. There is nothing like thst with s cheating casino. Its sad though thst we even have to worry a out these things. Games should be played for fun and if you going to bet on thst fun it should be fair too.

Well match fixing is a rare event and generally comparing both the scenarios I would quite gladly say that sports betting is way better and more profitable while dice is a fun based game, with quick results and wins/losses but mathematically you can never win with dice unless you cheat somehow. In sports you can trade the odds at various intervals and juice some profits.

[iluvbitcoins]

Well match fixing is a rare event and generally comparing both the scenarios I would quite gladly say that sports betting is way better and more profitable while dice is a fun based game, with quick results and wins/losses but mathematically you can never win with dice unless you cheat somehow. In sports you can trade the odds at various intervals and juice some profits.

It might be rare, but it happens at big odds.
Which means you were playing a "safe" bet and it fu**s you up completely.
You can do matched betting which is no-risk betting basically 

[Diced90]

Both are risky as you cannot be sure that you will win in either of them as the main factor to win money in gambling is luck and its very simple logic if you are lucky you will win or you will be sitting at loosing end.

They are both risky but in sports betting the risk is lesser. If you are smart enough to do some, analysis before the decision of your bets. In most of the casino best or games it is depending on the games that you are playing, there are some that are good only for luck or they are totally luck based which has higher risk.

no if you really smart and can do math to count how much the edge in sportsbetting ,
you might will have to think many times to start gamble on sports ,
just look between the lines and you will find the number for the edge ,
it gives a lot of benefit for bookmaker ! means has even bigger risk in sportsbetting no matter you have analyzing skills.

Yes you need to adjust with the edge and specifically with the odds per bets. But you need to consider on what bet you are going to excel and just choose the best out of it. And for me, the best thing is that you should really choose only the games that you know how to play and for me I'll go with sports betting and will avoid casino bets.

You can be good at sportsbetting and still lose due to shitty odds, bookmaker cheating and disapperaing in one night. But it's little safer and smarter than casino betting but smart people don't gamble (or they are doing it for fun).

you will equally lose money on dice or any other games on shitty odds just like sport betting.
Its also difficult to to stop people from cheating on either types of gambling but you will have a much better chance of winning with sports
because you always watch and see how teams perform..otherwise we just have to accept casinos are all about fun

[ModGirl]

Both are risky as you cannot be sure that you will win in either of them as the main factor to win money in gambling is luck and its very simple logic if you are lucky you will win or you will be sitting at loosing end.

They are both risky but in sports betting the risk is lesser. If you are smart enough to do some, analysis before the decision of your bets. In most of the casino best or games it is depending on the games that you are playing, there are some that are good only for luck or they are totally luck based which has higher risk.

no if you really smart and can do math to count how much the edge in sportsbetting ,
you might will have to think many times to start gamble on sports ,
just look between the lines and you will find the number for the edge ,
it gives a lot of benefit for bookmaker ! means has even bigger risk in sportsbetting no matter you have analyzing skills.

Yes you need to adjust with the edge and specifically with the odds per bets. But you need to consider on what bet you are going to excel and just choose the best out of it. And for me, the best thing is that you should really choose only the games that you know how to play and for me I'll go with sports betting and will avoid casino bets.

You can be good at sportsbetting and still lose due to shitty odds, bookmaker cheating and disapperaing in one night. But it's little safer and smarter than casino betting but smart people don't gamble (or they are doing it for fun).

you will equally lose money on dice or any other games on shitty odds just like sport betting.
Its also difficult to to stop people from cheating on either types of gambling but you will have a much better chance of winning with sports
because you always watch and see how teams perform..otherwise we just have to accept casinos are all about fun

If we all accept that casino and gambling in then is all about fun then it will make our life better as then we will not spend our capital of our business on gambling and we will not spend the money of the needs of our family on gambling and we will spend only the money which we will afford to spend for fun only.

[cryp24x]

That is part of the factors you need to improve when you are gambling, you have to be good in numbers but our job here is very different because we select the winner by predicting and sometimes your match is useless because statistics will not work when games are rigged.

I agree this is the sad part in sports betting.  We do not know if the game is rigged or not.  And if the game is rigged then all our research and analyzation won't work.  If this thing happens then I can say sports betting and Casino bets have the same risk because they both rely on chance or luck now.

[iluvbitcoins]

That is part of the factors you need to improve when you are gambling, you have to be good in numbers but our job here is very different because we select the winner by predicting and sometimes your match is useless because statistics will not work when games are rigged.

I agree this is the sad part in sports betting.  We do not know if the game is rigged or not.  And if the game is rigged then all our research and analyzation won't work.  If this thing happens then I can say sports betting and Casino bets have the same risk because they both rely on chance or luck now.

As I said previously, bet on the important matches, as league of champions or the world cup, not on lower league competitions and the games you play most likely won't be rigged

Fortunately soon UEFA will introduce technology to football and rigging will be impossible.

[passwordnow]

I think they have the same risk.  You cannot mitigate risk on both game once you start your bet.  It is either win or lose, we cannot do lost cutting just like in trades.  Though they have different setup, they still affected by chance and possibility and that makes them (risk) the same in my point of view.

They have the same risk but for me the risk with sports betting is way lighter. In casino bets, it's hard to depend on it because most of the time the games are always depending to the house. In sports betting, you can have the advantage as the game you are betting is not that manipulated by the house.

The house edge is never manipulate anything by the way.
It is just your feeling when it comes to a provably fair games , people tend to feel unpleasant and unsatisfied with the lost.
Where in sportsbetting you did not feel like that , that is what i am feeling.

If you think that there's no manipulation that is being done by the house. When it comes to the favor, almost all the favor from the luck based games are coming from them. So if you know what I'm saying about that, you'll get it and yes, it is my feeling when it comes to provably fair games.

There is no manipulation that is being done by the house, we must not think like that because we are ruining their names and the worst is, we don't know if it's true or not. If you do not trust a gambling site, or a casino without any basis, you must not say it to other people that gambles in the same place. We are ruining the them without them knowing what they have done.

It's up to you if you think saying things about those casino's will ruin their name. I don't think by just giving out your opinion will ruin their names. There are gamblers that are even keep on complaining without proper proof but the only thing and reason they are complaining is that they lose a lot from those casino's.

[mobilestrike]

Both are risky as you cannot be sure that you will win in either of them as the main factor to win money in gambling is luck and its very simple logic if you are lucky you will win or you will be sitting at loosing end.

They are both risky but in sports betting the risk is lesser. If you are smart enough to do some, analysis before the decision of your bets. In most of the casino best or games it is depending on the games that you are playing, there are some that are good only for luck or they are totally luck based which has higher risk.

no if you really smart and can do math to count how much the edge in sportsbetting ,
you might will have to think many times to start gamble on sports ,
just look between the lines and you will find the number for the edge ,
it gives a lot of benefit for bookmaker ! means has even bigger risk in sportsbetting no matter you have analyzing skills.

Yes you need to adjust with the edge and specifically with the odds per bets. But you need to consider on what bet you are going to excel and just choose the best out of it. And for me, the best thing is that you should really choose only the games that you know how to play and for me I'll go with sports betting and will avoid casino bets.

You can be good at sportsbetting and still lose due to shitty odds, bookmaker cheating and disapperaing in one night. But it's little safer and smarter than casino betting but smart people don't gamble (or they are doing it for fun).

Smart people also gamble but they gamble for fun as you said and if it come to sport bet then in there it is also possible that the gambler get the chance to win a good profit. Sports betting is a better option for those who want less risk for winning the bet.

[Jewell]

In my opinion casino games are more risky than sportbetting. There's a lot of evidence that  casino games are manipulated. While on sportsbetting, analyzing the team or the player can be a success on winning and the results are live.

I agree that casino games are riskier when it comes on comparing them with sports betting. And there's no advantage on it if you want to earn good amount with it. But with sports betting as you said there is a way that you can have some advantage against the house by simply doing analyzing each bets that you will make.

casino games are risky where we totally depend on our luck. while in sports games we have the opportunity to use our  previous experience and skill. therefore to me casino gambling is more risky, we must keep it in our mind that even the sports betting are nor free from our luck. we aldo depend on our luck here but here we have a little advantage of using our mind and experience which are increasing the chances of our win in sports gambling.