What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ?

[gentlem3n]

I would say casino bets, Sports do have higher juice than the regular dice site (but about the same as for slots and BJ) but the interesting and convincing thing is that the match is actually played hence verification is easier.
Some people like casino's and some like sportbetting..

[shintosai]

I would say casino bets, Sports do have higher juice than the regular dice site (but about the same as for slots and BJ) but the interesting and convincing thing is that the match is actually played hence verification is easier.
Some people like casino's and some like sportbetting..

its just the type of games but still a gamble anyway inside dice or any casino games you can win easy double as well if you have your lucky day
with sports betting you have your time to review incoming games and assess to make some edge regarding to your picks decision will be vary
with some statistics though.

[grim007]

I would say casino bets, Sports do have higher juice than the regular dice site (but about the same as for slots and BJ) but the interesting and convincing thing is that the match is actually played hence verification is easier.
Some people like casino's and some like sportbetting..

its just the type of games but still a gamble anyway inside dice or any casino games you can win easy double as well if you have your lucky day
with sports betting you have your time to review incoming games and assess to make some edge regarding to your picks decision will be vary
with some statistics though.

Sports betting is the only game wherein we can use analysis and we can do research. We can't rely on casino gambling since its hard to predict will win or not.

[Proton2233]

I would say casino bets, Sports do have higher juice than the regular dice site (but about the same as for slots and BJ) but the interesting and convincing thing is that the match is actually played hence verification is easier.
Some people like casino's and some like sportbetting..

its just the type of games but still a gamble anyway inside dice or any casino games you can win easy double as well if you have your lucky day
with sports betting you have your time to review incoming games and assess to make some edge regarding to your picks decision will be vary
with some statistics though.

Sports betting is the only game wherein we can use analysis and we can do research. We can't rely on casino gambling since its hard to predict will win or not.

You do not know about the existence of contractual matches? It seems to me that wherever there is a financial interest is very difficult to rely on logic and analysis. So sports betting is no less risky than betting in a casino.

[Xavofat]

I would say casino bets, Sports do have higher juice than the regular dice site (but about the same as for slots and BJ) but the interesting and convincing thing is that the match is actually played hence verification is easier.
Some people like casino's and some like sportbetting..

its just the type of games but still a gamble anyway inside dice or any casino games you can win easy double as well if you have your lucky day
with sports betting you have your time to review incoming games and assess to make some edge regarding to your picks decision will be vary
with some statistics though.

Sports betting is the only game wherein we can use analysis and we can do research. We can't rely on casino gambling since its hard to predict will win or not.

You do not know about the existence of contractual matches? It seems to me that wherever there is a financial interest is very difficult to rely on logic and analysis. So sports betting is no less risky than betting in a casino.

These financial interests only exist some of the time though, whereas when you're betting with a casino there's a 100% chance of a house edge and a 100% chance of losing your money in the long term (if you bet often).

[raymond541]

sports bet is less risky than casino bet.on sports bet you can analysis and do research which team can be win and most of the time your research will correct but on casino bet you can not do analysis and research you just need to depends on your luck.sports bet need experience but casino bet you need luck,without luck its impossible to win in casino bet.

[beantownsox87]

Following the trend because its the obvious answer. On sports you have research, knowledge etc.. you can pour that on to your selection giving the wagerer (if smart) an edge. In online or in person casinos, the house ALWAYS has the edge. The worst mistake a smart sports bettor can make is to keep their casino running while playing sports. You'll end up giving back any winnings right away.

[virasog]

I would say casino bets, Sports do have higher juice than the regular dice site (but about the same as for slots and BJ) but the interesting and convincing thing is that the match is actually played hence verification is easier.
Some people like casino's and some like sportbetting..

Both of them are risky and there is no grantee of wins in either sports betting and Casino games. Just Sports betting has a edge that since the result is based on the outcome of the sports, a site cannot cheat on the results.  However in Casnio games online, you never know if the bot is designed so as to make you lose always. House edge does matter but you cant see if the claimed house edge by the site is actually implemented at the backend.

[BCTBF]

I would say casino bets, Sports do have higher juice than the regular dice site (but about the same as for slots and BJ) but the interesting and convincing thing is that the match is actually played hence verification is easier.
Some people like casino's and some like sportbetting..

Both of them are risky and there is no grantee of wins in either sports betting and Casino games. Juts Sports betting has a edge that since the result is based on the outcome of the sports, a site cannot cheat on the results.  However in Casnio games online, you never know if the bot is designed so as to make you lose always. House edge does matter but you cant see if the claimed house edge by the site is actually implemented at the backend.

Yes agree casino bets are more risky when compared to sports betting, because at casino we do not know if we are cheated by bot that have been designed in such a way, but I also have thoughts on sports betting there are mafia score behind it that we do not know its existence. So, my opinion all gambling has the same risk and we as gambling users only need to look for more in-depth information before playing gambling at certain sites so we can avoid cheating by bot and mafia score.

[jossiel]

sports bet is less risky than casino bet.on sports bet you can analysis and do research which team can be win and most of the time your research will correct but on casino bet you can not do analysis and research you just need to depends on your luck.sports bet need experience but casino bet you need luck,without luck its impossible to win in casino bet.

I find also sports betting is less riskier than casino bets. The way or strategy that you will do in sports betting is given by doing some analysis.

And it's like also a luck base game if you will not going to try to do some research but there will be only 2 choices plus the odds.

So I guess less riskier will always crowned to sports betting rather than choosing casino bets.

[coinits]

Here is an ICO coming. I'm not for or against it and I am not trying to earn any bounty. My sig costs 25 BTC so it will take deep pockets to make me a paid coin pimp...

I am thinking about dropping some profits into it though....


WAGERR - ico starts in a little over a day. Place your bets on the blockchain - I think...

http://www.wagerr.com/

https://twitter.com/wagerrx

ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1911583.0

[eann014]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

I guess it is more risky in casino games we may not know what the percentage of winning in both game really is, because in sports game I think it is more on analyzing, so if we know who will going to win in a team then we will going to win. But in casino games this are more risky because you need a lot of money or bitcoins, I think you can lose more money here because you get the victory.

[illaslli]

I think they are equally as risky, except sports bets makes u feel like your choice will actually affect the outcome, in reality the odds are set so that 99.999% of people will never earn on average from sports betting. Its how they fool you into thinking experience or skill matters.

[Ziskinberg]

I think they are equally as risky, except sports bets makes u feel like your choice will actually affect the outcome, in reality the odds are set so that 99.999% of people will never earn on average from sports betting. Its how they fool you into thinking experience or skill matters.

I'm not fooled because I believe experience is really important, what you see is what you get but I'm seeing a different reality as well, people can make money in sports betting because it possible although the probability to win is low. There are sports gamblers who are investing on their skills and they are smart enough to win that's why it makes them confident to put a big bankroll to gain more.

[uneng]

I think they are equally as risky, except sports bets makes u feel like your choice will actually affect the outcome, in reality the odds are set so that 99.999% of people will never earn on average from sports betting. Its how they fool you into thinking experience or skill matters.

I'm not fooled because I believe experience is really important, what you see is what you get but I'm seeing a different reality as well, people can make money in sports betting because it possible although the probability to win is low. There are sports gamblers who are investing on their skills and they are smart enough to win that's why it makes them confident to put a big bankroll to gain more.

For these skilled gamblers putting effort into sports betting, the risk is lower for them to lose while betting in this gambling style, but for who doesn't have skills in sports, it's much more risky than casino bets.
Gambling chances are better for skilled gamblers, and skilled gamblers play only sports betting, as casino betting is pure luck.

[Schuyler]

I think they are equally as risky, except sports bets makes u feel like your choice will actually affect the outcome, in reality the odds are set so that 99.999% of people will never earn on average from sports betting. Its how they fool you into thinking experience or skill matters.

I'm not fooled because I believe experience is really important, what you see is what you get but I'm seeing a different reality as well, people can make money in sports betting because it possible although the probability to win is low. There are sports gamblers who are investing on their skills and they are smart enough to win that's why it makes them confident to put a big bankroll to gain more.

For these skilled gamblers putting effort into sports betting, the risk is lower for them to lose while betting in this gambling style, but for who doesn't have skills in sports, it's much more risky than casino bets.
Gambling chances are better for skilled gamblers, and skilled gamblers play only sports betting, as casino betting is pure luck.

It is less risky to bet on sports rather than on casinos especially if you know the odds on what you are betting on. In sports betting, you can even do your research and a bit of analysis that will be the basis of your bet. But with casino, luck would be the best weapon you can have.

[emberbekas]

it's a matter of choice. people who familiar and love to follow sports events tend to risk their money at sports betting while the other people will pick different type of games. But to be honest, all gambling games are equal, they are risky no matter how fluent you on a specific game.

[CoinFoxs]

Casinos bets are more risky than sport betting because in sport betting you place a bet on a team and then wait for match to end but in case of casinos you place bet and you have no idea what will gonna happen and mostly people lost their bets while sports betting you have some knowledge that which team is better and which team will help you to win your bets. So for me casinos are more risky.

[pinggoki]

Casinos bets are more risky than sport betting because in sport betting you place a bet on a team and then wait for match to end but in case of casinos you place bet and you have no idea what will gonna happen and mostly people lost their bets while sports betting you have some knowledge that which team is better and which team will help you to win your bets. So for me casinos are more risky.

We have the same thoughts, I guess casinos bets is more risky than sport betting because on sport betting you can analyze the team that you think will win. Yet, it is easy to identify which team is better unlike casinos has a low chance for you to win. Aside from that I guess casinos have some tricks under their sleeve.

[geoffreyqp]

casino bets more risky. both losing plays for the most part. difference is a sports bet take an hour or 2. casino bets take a minute. by volume you will have more at risk over time playing the casino and lose faster.

let's say you bet on a sports team that's -110 odds. (50/50). let's say you bet $100. when you win you win +$90. when you lose it's -$100. net -$5 per game in the long run. each game is 2 hours on average. so that's -$2.50 per hour. you lose 2.5% of your bet every hour.

to come up with a unit figure let's pretend $10 bets? and 2 minutes per hand depending on the game roulette/blackjack/bacaratte. if you play optimally it's close to 5% house edge. so you are losing 50 cents per hand. multiply by 30. and that's give or take -$15 per hour depending on which casino game u play. you lose 150% of your bet every hour!!

that's a huge difference.