What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ?

[Termin4tor]

Definitely casino bets. As we are not able to know the outcome of the bet by any factor, the risk is very high when compared to sport bets. In sports bet we are able to analyse a team or a player and review their performance and other factors before betting. Thus we are having an upper advantage here prior to betting. Therefore being less riskier than casino bets.

[conected]

I think casino bet gives a much higher risk than sports. Sport bet can still be predicted Because we see the game directly, while the casino bet is more to the more closed. Sport bet risk is smaller.

Casino's are riskier compare to sports betting. I find sports bet as the easiest gambling game and it's not always relying to your luck. The good thing in casino is you can win with bigger amount but don't expect that casino operators will allow you to win with bigger amount.

- Correct, casino betting is riskier than sports betting because most of the games in the casino betting is mainly based on luck, we can not win if we do not have luck. In addition, house in betting casinos are always looking to cheat, we are always in the passive and we do not know when they will cheat us, that makes us fall into dangerous situations than ever. Sports betting is quite safe because sport is fair, we do not have to face the house, we can rely on experience and analysis to increase the winning rate, not much depends on luck.

[BlackPanda]

Casinos are more risky due to the variety of games where you can play, slots machines, dice, poker and others games, while sport betting all you need is to get some information and follow some teams, and the odds to win is 33% soo with a good research you can make good results, besides those you are able to bet live if you dont wanna to search, but your income will be lower.

I think with you. sport gambling games can still be predictable and be seen directly. While the casino is more closed and the result is unpredictable. Casinos are more risky because they are closely related to luck. While sport gambling still we can analyze well.

[DeathAngel]

I think casino gambling is definitely more risky than sports gambling. Casinos have a house edge on most games there where as sports gambling at least is determined on an outside influence, not a house edge. I much prefer sports gambling.

[Monnt]

Casinos are more risky due to the variety of games where you can play, slots machines, dice, poker and others games, while sport betting all you need is to get some information and follow some teams, and the odds to win is 33% soo with a good research you can make good results, besides those you are able to bet live if you dont wanna to search, but your income will be lower.

Yes, in sports betting you go with your choice with a pre-planned idea and analysis of the both side players or teams which makes it quite easy for you to pick the one which is more favorite than the other team.

So, in the sports betting you have an edge and most of the time things works according to your planning gained from the study while the casino betting is a bit different one you never know what is going to be happen or the judgement of the casino betting is very much difficult which makes it more risky.

[Victorycoin]

Definitely casino bets. As we are not able to know the outcome of the bet by any factor, the risk is very high when compared to sport bets. In sports bet we are able to analyse a team or a player and review their performance and other factors before betting. Thus we are having an upper advantage here prior to betting. Therefore being less riskier than casino bets.

I quite agree with you, casinos are definitely riskier, because you could hardly tell what is coming, but you can easily tell between a top athletic/team and an under dog, who stands better chance of winning! That aside, cases of manipulation of outcome of games are rampant with casinos.

[Supercrypt]

Sports betting is better choice then casino games as casino games are dependent purely on luck and no skills or strategy can help you in winning but in sports betting you can adjust your bets according to the situation of the game.

In terms of entertainment, both are really fun but in terms of winning probability sports betting gives a little edge. I've heard there are sports gamblers who are making a living and they are investing in sports and does not call it gambling, they must really be good in analyzing the games.
I have more fun in sports betting because I love sports and I cannot tell it's profitable because I myself cannot prove it.

Yeah, the sports betting is usually less risky than the casino gambling, also this is true that the casino gamblers are not that much skilled and nor are they this much professionals. Most of the casino gamblers go to casino as a hobby and not for the sake of earning money. The sports betting personnel usually gamble for living. They are here to make money.

[gabmen]

Sports betting is better choice then casino games as casino games are dependent purely on luck and no skills or strategy can help you in winning but in sports betting you can adjust your bets according to the situation of the game.

In terms of entertainment, both are really fun but in terms of winning probability sports betting gives a little edge. I've heard there are sports gamblers who are making a living and they are investing in sports and does not call it gambling, they must really be good in analyzing the games.
I have more fun in sports betting because I love sports and I cannot tell it's profitable because I myself cannot prove it.

Yeah, the sports betting is usually less risky than the casino gambling, also this is true that the casino gamblers are not that much skilled and nor are they this much professionals. Most of the casino gamblers go to casino as a hobby and not for the sake of earning money. The sports betting personnel usually gamble for living. They are here to make money.

Well take for example the just concluded nba finals. If you're a fan of basketball and have been following the nba, even at the start of the series there's a pretty good chance you'll know that gsw will beat the cavs in 5 games or six. Even with the loss in game 4, i think a lot of fans didn't think the series would go back to ohio. Compare that to your chamces when you play baccarat or roulette or dice where your analytical skills would count for nothing.

[Lorilikes]

It's clear that all bets are risky but I think sortable data in sports makes it likely to win based on habits and patterns of fathe predictable nature of humans and animals. Slots are just a shot in the dark.  Good luck !

[goinmerry]

Well take for example the just concluded nba finals. If you're a fan of basketball and have been following the nba, even at the start of the series there's a pretty good chance you'll know that gsw will beat the cavs in 5 games or six. Even with the loss in game 4, i think a lot of fans didn't think the series would go back to ohio. Compare that to your chamces when you play baccarat or roulette or dice where your analytical skills would count for nothing.

Analyzations really help in sports betting. No way we can only relied on "LUCK" in doing this kind of gambling. Of course we need luck but are we allowing just our luck to come without any force to push it to us? That is the role of doing analyzation, it increases the chances of winning therefore we are increasing also the chances of being a lucky one.

If gamblers will just rely on luck while playing on sports betting then it's no different from random betting that is applied to gambling games with house edges.

[EdenHazard]

Sports betting is better choice then casino games as casino games are dependent purely on luck and no skills or strategy can help you in winning but in sports betting you can adjust your bets according to the situation of the game.

In terms of entertainment, both are really fun but in terms of winning probability sports betting gives a little edge. I've heard there are sports gamblers who are making a living and they are investing in sports and does not call it gambling, they must really be good in analyzing the games.
I have more fun in sports betting because I love sports and I cannot tell it's profitable because I myself cannot prove it.

Yeah, the sports betting is usually less risky than the casino gambling, also this is true that the casino gamblers are not that much skilled and nor are they this much professionals. Most of the casino gamblers go to casino as a hobby and not for the sake of earning money. The sports betting personnel usually gamble for living. They are here to make money.

not really true , when there is a match between the favorites and the underdogs but then the event ended up with the underdogs won it unexpectedly that time the house edge in sportsbetting work , so there is no big difference when you gamble on sports or casino mathematically.

the propability games always work with that way , people have to understand about this basic thing.

[terrific]

It's clear that all bets are risky but I think sortable data in sports makes it likely to win based on habits and patterns of fathe predictable nature of humans and animals. Slots are just a shot in the dark.  Good luck !

Yes all of them are risky whether you choose sports or casino bets. But when it comes to the weight of risk, I'll go with casino bets.
Though both of it has the house advantage, in casino bets you will mostly be bankrupted by the house while in sports bet, you can still have the chance to win good amount.

[ActiveP]

With casino games, the built in house edge is obvious. eg  in roulette, the green pocket is the sole reason why they make money from that game. It gives the casino a statistical advantage with each spin. However, with sports betting, this isn’t as clear but rest assured there still is a profit margin.

[phaddie]

I actually prefer sports betting, with that, you can analyse and pick the type of bet and team you want and with this info you have a 80% chance of winning a bet, but with casino the odds of winning a bet is low and dont forget the saying that the house always wins when it comes to betting.

[daringdiscovered]

I actually prefer sports betting, with that, you can analyse and pick the type of bet and team you want and with this info you have a 80% chance of winning a bet, but with casino the odds of winning a bet is low and dont forget the saying that the house always wins when it comes to betting.

Yeah, but still it is all about luck because sports betting is all about predictions, and this predictions is also the same with luck, since we didn't know what to happen then for me sports betting and online casino is just the same stuff. And the house is the real problem around here because just like what you have said, the house always win no matter what.

[pinkpanther03]

Sports and casino are both risky,this is depending on the player in gambling site on how are they gonna handle it. But it is much good to play in sports betting than casino
betting.

[roadbits]

Sports and casino are both risky,this is depending on the player in gambling site on how are they gonna handle it. But it is much good to play in sports betting than casino
betting.

Both have risk, but both are not same. Casino games are too risky games here we can not guess we will win our bet or not. But in sports betting, we can analyse the situation based on players performance and team strategy. This is quite better to compare casino games. You can able to win a couple of bets. You can not get the long run loss. But in casino games sometimes your bad luck you will get continued loss.

[michaelch]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

This really depends on the different games and odds. It is possible to structure the bets so that you win most of the time, but still lose some money in the end. Or vice versa.

[michellee]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

This really depends on the different games and odds. It is possible to structure the bets so that you win most of the time, but still lose some money in the end. Or vice versa.

both have same risky and we have big opportunity to lose our money but as long as we can handle our self to not being greedy, then we can avoid to lose all of our money. we need knowledge when we want to place a bets in sport bets and in casino bets, we need to have a skills so we can win the games. but I think the casino bets is having big risk than sport betting.

[Frost]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

Both are at the same risk of bad luck because I have experienced it and it is very unlucky. I think it is 99% win but if you are unlucky, you will lose with a sick heart.