What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ?

[Caladonian]

I think both of them have the same risk properties basically, i can't tell which one is more risky because both are the same depending on the luck we have. All bets things gambling has the same risk, and luck is very in priority.

Yes, they are both risky but if you do try to dig in deep and you will able to see the level of risk on both things which you can really eventually say that casino bets are more riskier than on sports betting. If you do see that sports betting is riskier then im sure you dont have an idea on how to play or make bets on it since you can able to say such thing, sports betting would be all random and riskier if you really dont know on what you are doing.

Sports bets don't involve that level of risk as casino bets have. In sports bets you can predict the winning team easily by comparing the adroitness of opponents. Sports are not random while casino bets are totally dependent on fate of players. In casino bets, if a player has a good record of winning than maybe betting on him will give positive outcomes. Because he may have been blessed with good luck!

and with casino bets you are really just relying with your luck and how you can control your emotions there's a lots of things that needed to consider when playing casino gambling unlike with sports betting the more you understand how the games works the more  chances that you can select if who's team or players that got an extra edge to beat their opponents.

[mirakal]

I think both of them have the same risk properties basically, i can't tell which one is more risky because both are the same depending on the luck we have. All bets things gambling has the same risk, and luck is very in priority.

Yes, they are both risky but if you do try to dig in deep and you will able to see the level of risk on both things which you can really eventually say that casino bets are more riskier than on sports betting. If you do see that sports betting is riskier then im sure you dont have an idea on how to play or make bets on it since you can able to say such thing, sports betting would be all random and riskier if you really dont know on what you are doing.

Sports bets don't involve that level of risk as casino bets have. In sports bets you can predict the winning team easily by comparing the adroitness of opponents. Sports are not random while casino bets are totally dependent on fate of players. In casino bets, if a player has a good record of winning than maybe betting on him will give positive outcomes. Because he may have been blessed with good luck!

and with casino bets you are really just relying with your luck and how you can control your emotions there's a lots of things that needed to consider when playing casino gambling unlike with sports betting the more you understand how the games works the more  chances that you can select if who's team or players that got an extra edge to beat their opponents.

Sports betting is good because you have a good chance to succeed in the long run but the answer is still depend on the person who is gambling, he need to love sports in order to enjoy it. Ever since I love sports betting although it did not really give me a return in terms of money but the fun is really awesome, I am not too attached now in gambling because I focus my time in trading but the fun is enough to satisfy our needs of entertainment.

[KennyR]

I think both of them have the same risk properties basically, i can't tell which one is more risky because both are the same depending on the luck we have. All bets things gambling has the same risk, and luck is very in priority.

Yes, they are both risky but if you do try to dig in deep and you will able to see the level of risk on both things which you can really eventually say that casino bets are more riskier than on sports betting. If you do see that sports betting is riskier then im sure you dont have an idea on how to play or make bets on it since you can able to say such thing, sports betting would be all random and riskier if you really dont know on what you are doing.

Sports bets don't involve that level of risk as casino bets have. In sports bets you can predict the winning team easily by comparing the adroitness of opponents. Sports are not random while casino bets are totally dependent on fate of players. In casino bets, if a player has a good record of winning than maybe betting on him will give positive outcomes. Because he may have been blessed with good luck!

and with casino bets you are really just relying with your luck and how you can control your emotions there's a lots of things that needed to consider when playing casino gambling unlike with sports betting the more you understand how the games works the more  chances that you can select if who's team or players that got an extra edge to beat their opponents.

Sports betting is good because you have a good chance to succeed in the long run but the answer is still depend on the person who is gambling, he need to love sports in order to enjoy it. Ever since I love sports betting although it did not really give me a return in terms of money but the fun is really awesome, I am not too attached now in gambling because I focus my time in trading but the fun is enough to satisfy our needs of entertainment.

As mentioned sports bet seems to be the best way of profiting. What it requires is the love towards it and need a good time to spend to analyze better about the game and the players involved into it as well the winning percentage of the concern teams. This helps make a better way of selecting odds.

[kodes88]

I think both of them have the same risk properties basically, i can't tell which one is more risky because both are the same depending on the luck we have. All bets things gambling has the same risk, and luck is very in priority.

Yes, they are both risky but if you do try to dig in deep and you will able to see the level of risk on both things which you can really eventually say that casino bets are more riskier than on sports betting. If you do see that sports betting is riskier then im sure you dont have an idea on how to play or make bets on it since you can able to say such thing, sports betting would be all random and riskier if you really dont know on what you are doing.

Sports bets don't involve that level of risk as casino bets have. In sports bets you can predict the winning team easily by comparing the adroitness of opponents. Sports are not random while casino bets are totally dependent on fate of players. In casino bets, if a player has a good record of winning than maybe betting on him will give positive outcomes. Because he may have been blessed with good luck!

and with casino bets you are really just relying with your luck and how you can control your emotions there's a lots of things that needed to consider when playing casino gambling unlike with sports betting the more you understand how the games works the more  chances that you can select if who's team or players that got an extra edge to beat their opponents.

and in sport bets, We can predict well by looking back, looking at the player's last appearance, looking at the stats that exist between the player and the other players. We have enough time to think well in order to produce the perfect prediction possible.

[mware]

Both are very risky. But in the bet you have a better chance of winning. In sports betting rarely people will choose 1.05 odds because it is too small. It looks 99% we will win our bet but when if we lose on this odds it is a big loss for us

[Kava]

The game in the casino is based only on luck and it is accordingly more risky than sports betting. At the rates you can get a good profit if you follow the game closely.

[Bezobraznike]

   I bet on sports for years and I have success, I tried casino few times and I lost each time. Casino is far more riskier then betting on sports,
it is not just my conclusion, this can be backed up with facts.
   In casino betting you play against casino, and house always wins. In sports you choose your own teams and your own bets, you can bet
on goals, winners, losers, and if you follow couple teams and you know their performances you can easily predict outcome. In roulette or
slots you can do that, you just place bets and you hope that you will win.

[boris singer]

The game in the casino is based only on luck and it is accordingly more risky than sports betting. At the rates you can get a good profit if you follow the game closely.

There are many types of gambling in casinos, but sports betting is far more risky than a card because it only bet the score and see the game directly, I prefer to gamble directly so that its analysis can grow and more accurate, this condition is much different from sports betting

[blackhawkeye1912]

They're both risky but if you are familiar very well in this games it will become less risk for you anyhow.  But those games was  also needs analysis to win and loose the opponents, just simple as that

[ibuddy122505]

The game in the casino is based only on luck and it is accordingly more risky than sports betting. At the rates you can get a good profit if you follow the game closely.

Theoretically, there none one gambling is risk-free. I eventually do sports betting as mine sport betting most popular than any others. Most often betting on numerous sports when getting some free time. I treat sports bets safer than casino bets.

[kpcian]

for me, the casino is riskier than sports betting. because in the casino you don't have any control on it, but in sports betting you have to choose the better side. it is easily predictable that stronger team would be the winner so that sports betting is less risky than a casino. on the other hand, in the casino, you just have to depend on luck. if your luck doesn't support you then you can never get anything.

[btcprospecter]

Both are equally risky although sports betting is more controlled than gambling in a casino the whole business plan of a casino is to keep you there and keep your money. Where as sports betting your bet generally lasts longer than a roll of the dice.

[jamids]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

It would be the casino game because in a basketball game, you still have time to study the team base on it s previous matches while in casino it would depend if you will be lucky or not so it would be riskier because you don't have an idea of the outcome. In the basketball game, you can still have an edge if you didn't depend on luck alone because you have a basis on what team you will put your bet beforehand.

[Ziskinberg]

Both are equally risky although sports betting is more controlled than gambling in a casino the whole business plan of a casino is to keep you there and keep your money. Where as sports betting your bet generally lasts longer than a roll of the dice.

The risk of losing is their so both are risky, that depend on the gambler itself because if he good in casino but he bet in sports betting than sports betting is more risky to him. What we choose is based on our interest and we believe we can win because we have that skills that would help us but that would not erase the risk as no gambler wins all the time, the fact that most gamblers are losing then we are at big risk of losing as well.

[agustina2]

Both are equally risky although sports betting is more controlled than gambling in a casino the whole business plan of a casino is to keep you there and keep your money. Where as sports betting your bet generally lasts longer than a roll of the dice.

Disagree. They don't have an equal risks since you already said that in sports betting it's more manageable so meaning we can minimize the risks in sports betting. If the risks is controllable and can play with, it's not consider as same risks with the thing that has an obvious risks.

Sports betting has been profitable to me since the beginning. That's why until today, Im a regular sports bettor.

[kodes88]

The game in the casino is based only on luck and it is accordingly more risky than sports betting. At the rates you can get a good profit if you follow the game closely.

There are many types of gambling in casinos, but sports betting is far more risky than a card because it only bet the score and see the game directly, I prefer to gamble directly so that its analysis can grow and more accurate, this condition is much different from sports betting

Sport bet does not run as simple as that, sport bet more often run in accordance with existing statistics, so if we analyze well, sport bet very profitable for us. If the results do not match, you're in bad luck, but as far as I know, the sport bet is always easy to predict.

[crwth]

The game in the casino is based only on luck and it is accordingly more risky than sports betting. At the rates you can get a good profit if you follow the game closely.

There are many types of gambling in casinos, but sports betting is far more risky than a card because it only bet the score and see the game directly, I prefer to gamble directly so that its analysis can grow and more accurate, this condition is much different from sports betting

Sport bet does not run as simple as that, sport bet more often run in accordance with existing statistics, so if we analyze well, sport bet very profitable for us. If the results do not match, you're in bad luck, but as far as I know, the sport bet is always easy to predict.

That's being a smart person if you base your decisions in statistics. You know that you could do a lot with that information and especially if you know what to do with that information.  It's not easily predicted but your chances can be improved.

[ethereumhunter]

The game in the casino is based only on luck and it is accordingly more risky than sports betting. At the rates you can get a good profit if you follow the game closely.

There are many types of gambling in casinos, but sports betting is far more risky than a card because it only bet the score and see the game directly, I prefer to gamble directly so that its analysis can grow and more accurate, this condition is much different from sports betting

Sport bet does not run as simple as that, sport bet more often run in accordance with existing statistics, so if we analyze well, sport bet very profitable for us. If the results do not match, you're in bad luck, but as far as I know, the sport bet is always easy to predict.

but for me, both sport and casino bets have the same risk and its including high risk for me but so far, i don't place a bets by myself so i am not too thinking about the risk. i always asked my friend to help me for placing the bets in sports bet, my money was combined with my friend so we can place a big bets and he said that with doing this, the chance to win the big money is wide.

[BlockEye]

Both are equally risky although sports betting is more controlled than gambling in a casino the whole business plan of a casino is to keep you there and keep your money. Where as sports betting your bet generally lasts longer than a roll of the dice.

Disagree. They don't have an equal risks since you already said that in sports betting it's more manageable so meaning we can minimize the risks in sports betting. If the risks is controllable and can play with, it's not consider as same risks with the thing that has an obvious risks.

Sports betting has been profitable to me since the beginning. That's why until today, Im a regular sports bettor.

There are more chance to earn in betting sports than in casinos, atleast at sports we can do analysis well as well as support team we wanted to win we just need to keep updated on sports status.

[gameK]

I voted for casino bets. The 21st century has brought with it many changes and opportunities which show us many kinds of gambling are now available. But with me casino is better. You didn't have to wait for hours for results. Results and Prizes are instantly and that's why most people come to casino bets instead of sports.