|
strasboug (OP)
|
 |
May 17, 2017, 08:21:14 AM |
|
looks like now the chain is converging to the good one. Looks like there was a possible unsuccessful attack on block 27732, trying to grab the sweepstake. I will find out more details later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vaccinus
|
|
May 17, 2017, 08:28:27 AM |
|
looks like now the chain is converging to the good one. Looks like there was a possible unsuccessful attack on block 27732, trying to grab the sweepstake. I will find out more details later.
why anyone in his right mind would attack with the current very low sweppstake reward? the reward is below 100k coins, it make no sense to attack for such reward when two days ago the reward was 16 millions and none have attacked it, it's more probable that some users are still running the old client and created their own fork after the 26000° block |
|
|
|
classicly
Member
 Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
May 17, 2017, 08:30:13 AM |
|
Just find this project and I will follow this thread.
I will try to mine some coins for staking. Good luck
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velgelm
|
|
May 17, 2017, 09:44:19 AM |
|
some problems with current chain.We need to corrent chain and list of nodes.   |
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
May 17, 2017, 10:28:53 AM |
|
Can't sync the wallet. It shows that wallet synced but blockcount is 29220, but current block is 30865 on pool
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
May 17, 2017, 10:49:13 AM |
|
Can't sync the wallet. It shows that wallet synced but blockcount is 29220, but current block is 30865 on pool
Block explorer also isn't working |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
May 17, 2017, 10:53:51 AM |
|
Can't sync the wallet. It shows that wallet synced but blockcount is 29220, but current block is 30865 on pool
Block explorer also isn't working And transfer from suprnova pool to coinsmarkets exchange isn' working too. Nothing is working Anyone knows whats going on? |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
Cra5t
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 1
|
|
May 17, 2017, 11:01:09 AM |
|
Can't sync the wallet. It shows that wallet synced but blockcount is 29220, but current block is 30865 on pool
Block explorer also isn't working And transfer from suprnova pool to coinsmarkets exchange isn' working too. Nothing is working Anyone knows whats going on? The blockchain was separated. |
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
May 17, 2017, 11:05:00 AM |
|
The blockchain was separated.
Thanks, it seems should not move coins from pool or wallet to anywhere until the problem will be fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
|
MCMK
|
|
May 17, 2017, 01:49:06 PM |
|
My wallet would not sync until I added the nodes listed in the thread. Can someone confirm the correct nodes?
|
|
|
|
|
duxa11
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
May 17, 2017, 02:39:45 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCMK
|
|
May 17, 2017, 02:42:50 PM |
|
Fork = RIP?
|
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
May 17, 2017, 03:01:00 PM |
|
The blockcount in local wallet increases but it still less than block number on suprnova pool by 1600-1700.
Any information, dev?
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
|
MCMK
|
|
May 17, 2017, 03:08:06 PM |
|
Seems there are two chains. One the pool is on and one that people are solo mining on.
I have moved on to something else. Probably my fault this happened, was out of the game since 2014 this is the first coin I tried solo mining since then because I like the algorithm so I jinxed it lol.
|
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
May 17, 2017, 03:12:02 PM |
|
Seems there are two chains. One the pool is on and one that people are solo mining on.
...
But Suprnova doesn't include transaction to any block:  Blockexplorer and site not working looks not good for so young coin |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
|
psihotoc
|
|
May 17, 2017, 03:51:27 PM |
|
Why no payout from the pool ? For 2000 coins then I lost them.
Please check with the pool owner. Tried solo mining a little since I have not done that in a long time. I got the wallet (1.1), let it catch up to the chain, all good. Made the config file and pointed my miner to my local machine and everything seemed fine until I noticed I was solving more blocks then I imagined I would. Did some comparing and it seems I am over 1000 blocks behind what the explorer says. Am I mining on a fork? Not to sure what is going on. http://imgur.com/tUzg6BOhttp://imgur.com/VdylfV7Cheers /edit tried to clear the setting under appdata and reload a new copy of the wallet but it still seems over 1000 blocks behind. The address it created for me and that i mined into locally does not show up on the explorer. Tried mining at Supernova into the wallet created locally and after a couple payments the wallet address showed up on the explorer but with only the small payments from the pool. Seems I am unable to get on the correct blockchain using the current wallet that is available. this is weird, suprnova should be on the right chain. The tenth time was sync  The coins came with the pool  I would also like to clarify why none of my logo in the list for voting? sorry, what is your logo? I may have missed it. On page 15 look at the bottom green leprechaun |
|
|
|
|
MCMK
|
|
May 17, 2017, 05:11:50 PM |
|
Seems there are two chains. One the pool is on and one that people are solo mining on.
...
But Suprnova doesn't include transaction to any block: Blockexplorer and site not working looks not good for so young coin Starting to wonder if the dev is going to chime in here or if they bailed. |
|
|
|
|
|
strasboug (OP)
|
|
May 17, 2017, 06:32:48 PM |
|
Seems there are two chains. One the pool is on and one that people are solo mining on.
...
But Suprnova doesn't include transaction to any block: Blockexplorer and site not working looks not good for so young coin Starting to wonder if the dev is going to chime in here or if they bailed. There are two chains now forked at block 27733. This is due to an attempt of attack at block 27732. The dev team is still determining which chain is the right one. We'll inform the community soon and release a patch. For now, please try don't transfer coins around. |
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
May 17, 2017, 07:02:26 PM |
|
.... .... .... .... There are two chains now forked at block 27733. This is due to an attempt of attack at block 27732. The dev team is still determining which chain is the right one. We'll inform the community soon and release a patch. For now, please try don't transfer coins around. Thanks for an information, the first transaction on the screenshot is succesfully recieved on Coinsmarket exchange. But the second is still missing Waiting for a good news |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
|
MCMK
|
|
May 17, 2017, 07:14:43 PM |
|
The longer this goes on the more trust the coin will lose. In crypto the value of the coin is directly related to its trust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
