Lauda, he's right or not?

[VINSIN]

I saw many topic that are going in this direction and I wasn't expected to find something like this.

I got really mad seeing that I got a red trust from the user: "lauda" . Ok I get it. He is trusted by trusted and trusted by not  so trusted. I'm not here to talk about actions that happened in past (i read the last topics).

For the first time, well i had another ocassions but nothing important, i wanted to join a bitcoin paid signature. I understand the idea of spaming tough. I can say a little I spammed (if I need to think from his/her point of view), I understand the fact the he/she has all the right to kick me out of it.

But I don't understand the idea of giving me a red trust for this.

What spam I did? I joined 2 days ago and today I made 10-15 replies to some topics, you all can read my replies. There were no one word posts or whatever.

We all know the forum trust system got to a point that really sucks and quality of posts is really down, but still I don't see the point as a DT user to destroy a person's account for this kind of reason.

Now I will try to say it like how life goes on. There are always spammers in all the areas, everyone know that they are spammers but their image is not blacked or painted like it is here. For example 5 minutes ago I wanted to do a trade with a newbie who asked me to go first because i have red trust.

I not even noticed that I am not allowed to do all the posts required in a day or whatever, i had some free time and i wanted to do all of them now, a simple message where I could be warned. I understand the point of view of a company who does accept signature campaigns but still.

Sure many of you will come with a reply haters gonna hate but at a point for a good evolution of what this forum is something must be changed.

[1713580571]

1713580571

[1713580571]

1713580571

[1713580571]

1713580571

[Lauda]

I have not tagged you because of your rubbish posts, but because of your attempted abuse of the Bitmixer Signature Campaign. I've banned a great deal of users for the very same behavior in recent times which indicates that is is likely that their accounts are sourced in the same way and/or they are related in some way (including yours).

We all know the forum trust system got to a point that really sucks and quality of posts is really down, but still I don't see the point as a DT user to destroy a person's account for this kind of reason.

The forum trust system has nothing to do with the quality of posts, nor are you in any position to judge what DT members can, can not, or should and should not do. All you ever did on this forum was spam. I've even updated the campaign thread to reflect on that.
I'm now preparing to deal with the amount of spam that you've threatened to unleash on the forum and me.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

If it were just for "burst posting", a concept that I'm a little on the fence about as far as condemning, I would say that Lauda was being a little overzealous with the neg.  But if you were abusing a sig campaign, that's another matter.  That sort of shit, combined with shitposting, does not go over well on this forum and as you can plainly see, it can earn you a big, shining red mark.  

Nothing much you can do about the trust system.  All of this stuff keeps getting brought up in dozens of threads, but it doesn't look like anything is going to change.  And Lauda is most likely right in handing you the neg, though I don't have time to research this.

I don't know why, but I have noticed a pattern which I'm not going to publicly elaborate as I may lose my advantage in combating it. There seems to be an influx of one-liner/short-posting & post-bursting in an attempt to get 1 maximum payout from Bitmixer before the account is permanently blacklisted and/or neg. rated.

Oh yeah, I totally understand.  I trust your judgement with respect to spammers & shitposters and respect what you're trying to do with blacklisting them.  Smooch.

[VINSIN]

I have not tagged you because of your rubbish posts, but because of your attempted abuse of the Bitmixer Signature Campaign. I've banned a great deal of users for the very same behavior in recent times which indicates that is is likely that their accounts are sourced in the same way and/or they are related in some way (including yours).

We all know the forum trust system got to a point that really sucks and quality of posts is really down, but still I don't see the point as a DT user to destroy a person's account for this kind of reason.

The forum trust system has nothing to do with the quality of posts, nor are you in any position to judge what DT members can, can not, or should and should not do. All you ever did on this forum was spam.
I'm now preparing to deal with the amount of spam that you've threatened to unleash on the forum and me.

Accounts credited in the same way as mine? Of course i threatened you. Your over god attitude is way useless.

Message sent to lauda:

I will stop when you will remove this thing. For FUCKING MOTHERS SAKE i use this forum for more than a year always correct with anyone i spoke or i did and now in a night when i want to get some money for a signature campaign i get a red trust for non a shitty reason?

you said i had alts? I will spend a week my free time to create accounts to show you what spam is.

Let's be both resonable and delete my negative feedback. This thing really got me mad.

Thank you

Where is the point of being a new member on this forum when you will always find users like you? I think it will be better if bitcoin community all arround the world will be fixed only to DT members.

I want a proof that there are other accounts connected with mine. I never had another account on this forum.

[Lauda]

And Lauda is most likely right in handing you the neg, though I don't have time to research this.

Here is the list just from last week (OP is slightly better than this list): kikeda, Format.C^, loges, yueno. I don't know why, but I have noticed a pattern which I'm not going to publicly elaborate as I may lose my advantage in combating it. There seems to be an influx of one-liner/short-posting & post-bursting in an attempt to get 1 maximum payout from Bitmixer before the account is permanently blacklisted and/or neg. rated.

Accounts credited in the same way as mine? Of course i threatened you. Your over god attitude is way useless.

So you're admitting that you're threatening me now? Archived for reference: https://archive.fo/dfbss#selection-1917.43-1917.69
What's up with people throwing out threats like it's candy nowadays?

[VINSIN]

And Lauda is most likely right in handing you the neg, though I don't have time to research this.

Here is the list just from last week (OP is slightly better than this list): kikeda, Format.C^, loges, yueno. I don't know why, but I have noticed a pattern which I'm not going to publicly elaborate as I may lose my advantage in combating it. There seems to be an influx of one-liner/short-posting & post-bursting in an attempt to get 1 maximum payout from Bitmixer before the account is permanently blacklisted and/or neg. rated.

Accounts credited in the same way as mine? Of course i threatened you. Your over god attitude is way useless.

So you're admitting that you're threatening me now? Archived for reference: https://archive.fo/dfbss#selection-1917.43-1917.69
What's up with people throwing out threats like it's candy nowadays?

Go and analyse. Yes I threatened you it is right. I got nervous I even figure out at the end of pm but i never erase what I think I just keep going with my ideas.

I don't care about campaign. I just do care of my work and my account here. As I said more than year.

I do wait my trust to be removed. Check again this topic:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664

- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.

This is one of the rules of trust system, u trusted user

[Lauda]

Go and analyse. Yes I threatened you it is right. I got nervous I even figure out at the end of pm but i never erase what I think I just keep going with my ideas.

You've spammed me to the point where I already had to block your PMs, and now you're threatening me publicly as well. What is wrong with you?

I do wait my trust to be removed. Check again this topic:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664

- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.

This is one of the rules of trust system, u trusted user

I never rated you based on your post quality. That is also not a rule, it is a guideline.

I have not tagged you because of your rubbish posts, but because of your attempted abuse of the Bitmixer Signature Campaign.

I don't really see how I could withdraw it now anyways. All I can do is replace it with a new one which would reflect that you are senselessly threatening forum users.

[VINSIN]

Go and analyse. Yes I threatened you it is right. I got nervous I even figure out at the end of pm but i never erase what I think I just keep going with my ideas.

You've spammed me to the point where I already had to block your PMs, and now you're threatening me publicly as well. What is wrong with you?

I do wait my trust to be removed. Check again this topic:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664

- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.

This is one of the rules of trust system, u trusted user

I never rated you based on your post quality. That is also not a rule, it is a guideline.

I have not tagged you because of your rubbish posts, but because of your attempted abuse of the Bitmixer Signature Campaign.

I don't really see how I could withdraw it now anyways. All I can do is replace it with a new one which would reflect that you are senselessly threatening forum users.

But what about you acusing users for having alts or for being spamer or a cheater(thats what i consider when i see alt account )? What should I say in this case? Or anyone here?

Even if my quality post is down do you think yours are way better? Or maybe your narcisism has no border

It's quite clear I abused a lot of your campaign, I used your signature and did 13 posts in 1 hour and 40 minutes. I am really sorry that I do want to reach the 50 posts.And the most hilarious part is that I figure out that I was banned when I wanted to check out if their system counts the posts before going  to sleep. It is my fault that your animal brains think that my post are having the same pattern with other users ^.^ . To be clear, I'm not crying about the campaign, I'm crying about the way she/he used and uses his power over here.

[Lauda]

But what about you acusing users for having alts or for being spamers? What should I say in this case? Or anyone here?

Ahem, *possibly*. Read your rating again:

SMAS blacklist; abusing Bitmixer campaign by post bursting and possibly alts.

Even if my quality post is down do you think yours are way better? Or maybe your narcisism has no border

I'm utmost confident in my post quality being on a level not even comparable by yours. If you want to go into a debate with me about the underlying technology in cryptocurrencies, then be my guest.

It's quite clear I abused a lot of your campaign, I used your signature and did 13 posts in 1 hour and 40 minutes. I am really sorry that I do want to reach the 50 posts. It is my fault that your animal brains think that my post are having the same pattern with other users ^.^ . To be clear, I'm not crying about the campaign, I'm crying about the way she/he used and uses his power over here.

So exactly what do you want me to do? Do you even realize how quickly you cornered me? You:
1) Spammed me via PM to the point I had to block you.
2) Privately threatened me via PM.
3) Publicly admitted to threatening me.
This all happened within.. a few minutes. This kitty needs some time to think. I can't make decisions quickly, even if I wanted to.

[VINSIN]

So exactly what do you want me to do? You cornered me in a few minutes. You:
1) Spammed me via PM to the point I had to block you.
2) Privately threatened me via PM.
3) Publicly admitted to threatening me.

This all happened within.. a few minutes. This kitty needs some time to think. Undecided

Nice said.

I want the trust deleted from my profile. It is unfair and illegit.

Even if I threatened you, sorry for that but I will keep my promise.

And about technology of blockchain alts and so on, neah, you're too newbie

[actmyname]

I want the trust deleted from my profile. It is unfair and illegit.

Interesting combination of "illegal" and "illicit" to create a new word.

And about technology of blockchain alts and so on, neah, you're too newbie

Wait, what?


Don't even need to go through more than one post to show why you are considered a spammer.

Ok, 3.5 BTC sounds good to you ? (I'd have to pay approx. 12 EUR)

I just can't believe what I'm seeing here. 2 ebooks sold for 3.5 BTC. If I could teleporte myself in past to tell to all these guys what is going to happen with bitcoin

@op if you will ever check out this thread again please do send to me 3.5 BTC , sorry for off topic or for making this thread alive again

The post before yours was from 2012. There is no sense in reviving such an old thread to comment on the trade. It is simply useless and does not contribute anything.


That being said... I just want to bring this post to light. It entertained me and I hope it will entertain a lot more people.

I remember when I was mining with my phone 3-4 years ago. These days even a powerfull rig can mine 0.001/day at maximum.

In my opinion mining bitcoin got to a dead end.

[VINSIN]

I want the trust deleted from my profile. It is unfair and illegit.

Interesting combination of "illegal" and "illicit" to create a new word.

And about technology of blockchain alts and so on, neah, you're too newbie

Wait, what?


Don't even need to go through more than one post to show why you are considered a spammer.

Ok, 3.5 BTC sounds good to you ? (I'd have to pay approx. 12 EUR)

I just can't believe what I'm seeing here. 2 ebooks sold for 3.5 BTC. If I could teleporte myself in past to tell to all these guys what is going to happen with bitcoin

@op if you will ever check out this thread again please do send to me 3.5 BTC , sorry for off topic or for making this thread alive again

The post before yours was from 2012. There is no sense in reviving such an old thread to comment on the trade. It is simply useless and does not contribute anything.

Oh great. Almost 5 am, i write wrong a letter.

Actually your reply is off-topic.

[actmyname]

Oh great. Almost 5 am, i write wrong a letter.

Actually your reply is off-topic.

What spam I did?

So you're in GMT+5, [or +4 if you consider 40 mins almost the next hour] huh? (not Arizona, US as your profile indicates)

Also, holy shit that's a lot of Games & Rounds posts. Let it be known that of your 575 posts, 534 of them lie in the Games & Rounds section and at the start of your posting career you consecutively posted in the section, spanning many pages. Only 7% of your posts are outside of Games & Rounds. Let that sink in for a moment.


Since trust is unmoderated and merely just a system to see who trusts whom, I could give you negative feedback indicating that I find you a spammer and a very unseemly individual. Likewise, Lauda has the very same opportunity, though their feedback is considered trusted by default. Of course, your own personal trust settings can be tweaked and in fact, you could exclude their rating, keeping a trust level of 0.


In fact, I think I'll leave just a neutral for now.

[VINSIN]

Oh great. Almost 5 am, i write wrong a letter.

Actually your reply is off-topic.

What spam I did?

So you're in GMT+5, [or +4 if you consider 40 mins almost the next hour] huh? (not Arizona, US as your profile indicates)

Also, holy shit that's a lot of Games & Rounds posts. Let it be known that of your 575 posts, 534 of them lie in the Games & Rounds section and at the start of your posting career you consecutively posted in the section, spanning many pages. Only 7% of your posts are outside of Games & Rounds. Let that sink in for a moment.


Since trust is unmoderated and merely just a system to see who trusts whom, I could give you negative feedback indicating that I find you a spammer and a very unseemly individual. Likewise, Lauda has the very same opportunity, though their feedback is considered trusted by default. Of course, your own personal trust settings can be tweaked and in fact, you could exclude their rating, keeping a trust level of 0.


In fact, I think I'll leave just a neutral for now.

for real ur idiot but nvm, life sucks i know.

posting in games and rounds doesnt mean ur a spammer, but nvm that's your brain stuff. i don't threaten the forum, just this guy, lauda.

that's ur biggest problem my time zone. But what if i tell you i am from arizona, us and i do live in other time zone? huh? surprise idiot

we're  going off topic again

[actmyname]

for real ur idiot but nvm, life sucks i know.

posting in games and rounds doesnt mean ur a spammer, but nvm that's your brain stuff. i don't threaten the forum, just this guy, lauda.

[BossMacko]

I saw many topic that are going in this direction and I wasn't expected to find something like this.

I got really mad seeing that I got a red trust from the user: "lauda" . Ok I get it. He is trusted by trusted and trusted by not  so trusted. I'm not here to talk about actions that happened in past (i read the last topics).

For the first time, well i had another ocassions but nothing important, i wanted to join a bitcoin paid signature. I understand the idea of spaming tough. I can say a little I spammed (if I need to think from his/her point of view), I understand the fact the he/she has all the right to kick me out of it.

But I don't understand the idea of giving me a red trust for this.

What spam I did? I joined 2 days ago and today I made 10-15 replies to some topics, you all can read my replies. There were no one word posts or whatever.

We all know the forum trust system got to a point that really sucks and quality of posts is really down, but still I don't see the point as a DT user to destroy a person's account for this kind of reason.

Now I will try to say it like how life goes on. There are always spammers in all the areas, everyone know that they are spammers but their image is not blacked or painted like it is here. For example 5 minutes ago I wanted to do a trade with a newbie who asked me to go first because i have red trust.

I not even noticed that I am not allowed to do all the posts required in a day or whatever, i had some free time and i wanted to do all of them now, a simple message where I could be warned. I understand the point of view of a company who does accept signature campaigns but still.

Sure many of you will come with a reply haters gonna hate but at a point for a good evolution of what this forum is something must be changed.

As a campaign manager he is right to blacklist you if he see you spamming or doing post bursting. I think you got the red flag because you challenge him that you'll create new accounts to see how spam works. I got banned also in one of his campaign but i didn't whined, i only ask him once or twice to re-review my account and when he review i am not still eligible to get unbanned still i understand and i didn't whine and challenge him, so if you will check my account i am still banned but i don't have a red trust. I can't join his campaign but i can still trade and post the same. I think you can settle this negative trust someday, also be polite.

[kiklo]

But what about you acusing users for having alts or for being spamers? What should I say in this case? Or anyone here?

Ahem, *possibly*. Read your rating again:

SMAS blacklist; abusing Bitmixer campaign by post bursting and possibly alts.

Even if my quality post is down do you think yours are way better? Or maybe your narcisism has no border

I'm utmost confident in my post quality being on a level not even comparable by yours. If you want to go into a debate with me about the underlying technology in cryptocurrencies, then be my guest.

It's quite clear I abused a lot of your campaign, I used your signature and did 13 posts in 1 hour and 40 minutes. I am really sorry that I do want to reach the 50 posts. It is my fault that your animal brains think that my post are having the same pattern with other users ^.^ . To be clear, I'm not crying about the campaign, I'm crying about the way she/he used and uses his power over here.

So exactly what do you want me to do? Do you even realize how quickly you cornered me? You:
1) Spammed me via PM to the point I had to block you.
2) Privately threatened me via PM.
3) Publicly admitted to threatening me.
This all happened within.. a few minutes. This kitty needs some time to think. I can't make decisions quickly, even if I wanted to.

Lauda is a known Liar and extortionist.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/duplicates/5pbgr3/bitcointalk_staff_member_lauda_is_attempting_to/

Do Not Trust!!!!

* This Disclaimer will now follow all of its posts to protect the unaware. *

 

[VINSIN]

Still have a red trust just because this user thought i have some alts, but here were no proofs.

Maybe my last night attitude wasn't the best but I desearve to find any proof that are agaisnt me.

[kiklo]

Still have a red trust just because this user thought i have some alts, but here were no proofs.

Maybe my last night attitude wasn't the best but I desearve to find any proof that are agaisnt me.

Lauda goes around hitting people with Fake Negative Feedback , once my lawsuit against Lauda begins, I will put up a post for anyone else that wants to take part.
It has nothing to do with you personally.  She is just corrupt and would have been permabanned herself if she was not close friends with the mods.


 

FYI:
She is a known Liar & Extortionist.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/duplicates/5pbgr3/bitcointalk_staff_member_lauda_is_attempting_to/

[Lauda]

Still have a red trust just because this user thought i have some alts, but here were no proofs.

Wrong. Stop trying to twist the story. You were neg. rated for abusing Bitmixer and subsequently for threatening me both privately and publicly. It has nothing to do with alts.

Maybe my last night attitude wasn't the best but I desearve to find any proof that are agaisnt me.

Proof has been posted in this thread and you've admitted to doing it anyways.

for real ur idiot but nvm, life sucks i know.

There you have it, actmyname. This guy is learning to be the next Satoshi by spamming Games & Rounds.
Until you get some proper sense and manners (start by not calling other people idiots and threatening them), we have nothing to talk about. I have removed this thread from my watch list.

Cheerio,
Cat.