djeZo
|
|
May 09, 2017, 09:33:18 AM |
|
What you most likely did to achieve high speed is to make buckets smaller. This can of course greatly speed up everything, and displayed iterations are high, but on pool, you will get slow speed. These buckets sizes are there for a reason and not something you can simply shed off and benefit.
I also don't understand why would you have pool issues; equihash protocol is standardized, every pool works if it follows official zcash stratum specifications.
Also, we have released the source under GPL v3 and you are obligated to disclose full source when distributing the bins...
Yes, you're right, that's exactly what I've done and found that won't work the right way, I'm still learning and practicing my skills, sorry for practicing on your work, which is highly appreciated by me. I've already removed the bins, think it's time to try to write my own kernels from the scratch, SKL and MKL versions. I don't mind you work on my work, in fact, I encourage it. Sadly, nobody picked up yet. But what I don't like is people breaking the license we put in with a purpose. You can mod as much as you like, but you have to disclose the source.
|
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 09, 2017, 09:33:39 AM |
|
timetravel-algo seems to be broken got "booo" (low difficulty share) with palgin`s mod ccminer only
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 09, 2017, 09:41:56 AM |
|
I don't mind you work on my work, in fact, I encourage it. Sadly, nobody picked up yet. But what I don't like is people breaking the license we put in with a purpose. You can mod as much as you like, but you have to disclose the source.
Why don't you opensource the latest changes in excavegator. The opensource nheqminer is 10% slower..
|
|
|
|
palgin (OP)
|
|
May 09, 2017, 10:28:59 AM |
|
timetravel-algo seems to be broken got "booo" (low difficulty share) with palgin`s mod ccminer only Did you choose -a option correctly? In my mod -a timetravel is original one and -a timetravel10 is for BitCore...
|
BTC tips welcome: 16DHzyuqenEoHRA3w3YVGcYSDSHks7mor4
|
|
|
OZR
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 281
Merit: 250
You're in my wonderland!
|
|
May 09, 2017, 10:49:31 AM Last edit: May 09, 2017, 01:02:53 PM by OZR |
|
This is key gap in GPL. Instead of being a single standard (like BSD-Sockets or POSIX), most programmers are forced to write a new solution from scratch every time. Year after year. Because a lot of opensource stuff can be only "GPL opensource stuff". Religion fanatic wars for "freedom", where not freedom. Not public domain license.
I ask once again to think each programmer over licensing wars and stop writing the GPL. And start write Public Domain stuff for each human. Otherwise, we will continue to write shit code for decades (Just for fun!) without achieving a good result, while having hundreds of weak solutions.
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
May 09, 2017, 10:58:35 AM |
|
This is key gap in GPL. Instead of being a single standard (like BSD-Sockets or POSIX), most programmers are forced to write a new solution from scratch every time. Year after year. Because a lot of opensource stuff can be only "GPL opensource stuff". Religion fanatic wars for "freedom", where not freedom. Not public domain license.
I ask once again to think each programmer over licensing wars and stop writing the GPL. And start write Public Domain stuff for each human. Otherwise, we will continue to write shit code for decades (Just for fan!) without achieving a good result, while having hundreds of weak solutions.
I don't see what's wrong with "I publish my work with sources for free and want others, who build upon it, do the same". Otherwise, people would just sell open work with little or no modifications. If everybody publishes the sources, there is no violation and everybody is free to do what they want.
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 09, 2017, 01:08:28 PM |
|
Otherwise, people would just sell open work with little or no modifications.
Nobody want's to buy if the speed isn't improved. When you optimize you often you need to try 10 different approaches to gain speed, so a few lines of code can take 100hours to make. because the 9 first attempts didn't work.
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
May 09, 2017, 01:19:19 PM |
|
Otherwise, people would just sell open work with little or no modifications.
Nobody want's to buy if the speed isn't improved. When you optimize you often you need to try 10 different approaches to gain speed, so a few lines of code can take 100hours to make. because the 9 first attempts didn't work. It wasn't directed to you: you know how much you worked on the code, I don't need to teach you anything. Still, the license is the license.
|
|
|
|
djeZo
|
|
May 09, 2017, 01:21:24 PM |
|
I don't mind you work on my work, in fact, I encourage it. Sadly, nobody picked up yet. But what I don't like is people breaking the license we put in with a purpose. You can mod as much as you like, but you have to disclose the source.
Why don't you opensource the latest changes in excavegator. The opensource nheqminer is 10% slower.. I think you easily know which changes I did, no need to pretend something...
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 09, 2017, 01:31:14 PM |
|
I think you easily know which changes I did, no need to pretend something...
Did you implement the todo: in the code?
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
May 09, 2017, 04:22:05 PM |
|
In case anyone is interested, i've added support on suprnova (currently ZEC & KMD) for this miner variant as well...
Is it still available for download ?
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
May 09, 2017, 07:20:44 PM |
|
In case anyone is interested, i've added support on suprnova (currently ZEC & KMD) for this miner variant as well...
Is it still available for download ?
THE BINARIES HAVE BEEN REMOVED-- Palgin may revisit the project later. He stated from the start that it was a test project. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
|
ntym
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
August 18, 2017, 05:49:43 PM |
|
I got "Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?" on latest release 1.1.1 Never got that before, previous release is ok.
|
|
|
|
startsts
|
|
September 19, 2017, 06:02:28 AM |
|
Could be a great project, if it supports so many algos, but currently has lower hashrate than "ccminer alexis"
|
|
|
|
Etherion
|
|
October 21, 2017, 02:20:51 AM |
|
keep up the good work!
|
|
|
|
BitBoyHH
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2017, 12:50:07 PM |
|
Does anyone have a copy of palgins mod? Cant find it on github any more
Thx
|
|
|
|
Tikilou
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2017, 01:58:03 PM Last edit: May 03, 2018, 02:25:29 AM by Tikilou |
|
...
|
|
|
|
BitBoyHH
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2017, 10:38:21 PM |
|
Is there also a Windows version?
|
|
|
|
splat1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2017, 10:42:27 PM |
|
Is there also a Windows version?
Interested in this as well.
|
|
|
|
|