[ANN] Credits(CRDS): CPU-only mining | Argon2d PoW - Masternodes

[JuanPabloCuervo]

Hi, what is real official website: crds.co or crds.io?

why did you ask this question ,is there some scam website right now?
i find it  on OP , this is official website https://crds.co/

Did you check https://crds.io
2 website have a little different

When trying to download the Windows version gives a 404 error.
Link redirects to:
https://github.com/credits-crds/credits/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/Credits-Windows-x64-v1.0.0.0-Setup.exe

.io is harmless & outdated.
.co should take over .io, because .co is a country as well.
.io is more common in the eCoin world.

[1715392206]

1715392206

[1715392206]

1715392206

[1715392206]

1715392206

[ronnylov]

Hi, what is real official website: crds.co or crds.io?

why did you ask this question ,is there some scam website right now?
i find it  on OP , this is official website https://crds.co/

Did you check https://crds.io
2 website have a little different

When trying to download the Windows version gives a 404 error.
Link redirects to:
https://github.com/credits-crds/credits/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/Credits-Windows-x64-v1.0.0.0-Setup.exe

.io is harmless & outdated.
.co should take over .io, because .co is a country as well.
.io is more common in the eCoin world.

https://crds.co/#download
https://github.com/CRDS/Credits/releases

It looks to me that official website has the download links correct. You have probably got wrong link from the old website that is outdated and no longer valid. I know it is confusing and have done the same mistake myself. Original developer left early and someone else took over with no control of old website so they had to create a new website and new github. Problem is that old ones can not be removed. The link to website on first page in this thread is the correct one.

[minercui]

Hi, what is real official website: crds.co or crds.io?

why did you ask this question ,is there some scam website right now?
i find it  on OP , this is official website https://crds.co/

Did you check https://crds.io
2 website have a little different

When trying to download the Windows version gives a 404 error.
Link redirects to:
https://github.com/credits-crds/credits/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/Credits-Windows-x64-v1.0.0.0-Setup.exe

.io is harmless & outdated.
.co should take over .io, because .co is a country as well.
.io is more common in the eCoin world.

I got, but the final release is v1.1.1

[ronnylov]

Hi, what is real official website: crds.co or crds.io?

why did you ask this question ,is there some scam website right now?
i find it  on OP , this is official website https://crds.co/

Did you check https://crds.io
2 website have a little different

When trying to download the Windows version gives a 404 error.
Link redirects to:
https://github.com/credits-crds/credits/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/Credits-Windows-x64-v1.0.0.0-Setup.exe

.io is harmless & outdated.
.co should take over .io, because .co is a country as well.
.io is more common in the eCoin world.

I got, but the final release is v1.1.1

You get v1.1.1 on https://crds.co/#download

Edit: At least according to file name. I don't use Windows and compile from source so I have actually not installed precompiled versions.

[sud]

Download from the official gitHub site - https://github.com/CRDS/Credits/releases/tag/v1.1.1.0 . It's always the safest place to get coin wallets of all kind. Correct and latest update is credits-1.1.1-win64-setup.exe.

[JuanPabloCuervo]

some minor suggestions to http://beastpool.com

on the top right corner:
Next Payout: 22:51 UTC

"space UTC" should:
#1. UTC Letters be White.
#2. Space and Letter Background should be Cyan, like CRDS logo.
#3. UTC Letters should be Clickable, and open a New Tab/Window to: https://time.is/UTC or similar.

[JuanPabloCuervo]

And sorry to annoy...I've been looking around for some time now, but I cannot find any USP on that coin. I mean, website and specs look really serious, but what is your real-world USP (except POW and GPU resistance) that makes CRDS better than other coins?

call me ignorant but i don´t know what USP is.

but i want to answer your question with another question.

What makes CRDS better than other coins "except POW Algorithm"?

that´s called the Engine. CRDS Engine.

let me ask you:
¿what makes Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porshe, Bugatti, Maserati & McLaren better?

LOL. Jajajajaja

[ronnylov]

USP = Unique Selling Point

I think CPU mining only in combination with masternodes is special.
But I am also interested in what future plans are to make this coin more useful in real world.
I mean it works well and everything is nice but I guess a lot of marketing and real world use cases are needed to make this a success.

[NetZero]

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap.  Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

[sud]

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap.  Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

[sylph93]

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap.  Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.

[minercui]

We're offering 0.025 BTC or 2500 CRDS to anybody that can find what causes the std::bad_alloc error that also corrupts the wallet when sending CRDS to a multisig address.

Hi Sycube, I fixed this error this cause by wrong pointer.

[J0HN3F1V3]

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap.  Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.

I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it

[ronnylov]

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap.  Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.

I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it

Rebranding could also reduce the confusion between the old and the new website and also confusion between old and new github.

[sud]

Looks like community is mostly in favor of rebranding. Would be good to hear what devs think about this idea, because after all Credits is their project.

[Natalya]

well,I think CRDS does not need rebranding

[erdnapa]

well,I think CRDS does not need rebranding

Agree, no rebranding needed.

[erdnapa]

How susceptible is CRDS to a 51% attack? Pool is mining way over that limit.

[sylph93]

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap.  Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.

I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it

Rebranding could also reduce the confusion between the old and the new website and also confusion between old and new github.

This is crucial. Now there are confusion between old and new credits fork as well as confusion between credits coin and credits token.
The purpose of marketing is make people remember the brand clearly. The name 'credits' is just not enough than the potential credits has.l

[NetZero]

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap.  Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.

I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it

Rebranding could also reduce the confusion between the old and the new website and also confusion between old and new github.

This is crucial. Now there are confusion between old and new credits fork as well as confusion between credits coin and credits token.
The purpose of marketing is make people remember the brand clearly. The name 'credits' is just not enough than the potential credits has.l

I agree with this as well however I believe some publicity on this could balance things out. Ah heck maybe changing the name and re-announcing might be for the best.  
I was looking at the signatures on the bounties thread and saw the incorrect websites linked.  Just seems like quite a bit of confusion with CRDS.
Maybe just change the name and keep the logo and designs?