Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 09:01:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 107 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] ♬ Opus - Beta-Ready Decentralized Music Sharing; Running on IPFS and ETH ♬  (Read 108570 times)
NewbCoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 09:17:46 AM
 #281

Hi Opus team,

Can you give comparison of your platform to existing decentralized service like Muse, Voise, Library, etc? I read your replies earlier in the thread and you give good answer to compare to Voise, but what about Muse and Library? Do other platforms use IPFS or only Opus? I need to see novel innovation to take over the space.

Thanks.
xingzhankwe
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 21, 2017, 09:46:36 AM
 #282

There are not many teams that can really do things now. That's one, but the only drawback is that the total amount of the issue is too large

I think the total amount is too big is not a problem, because the music is the world are popular, so I think opus development is very good, there will be a lot of people to buy it.
Omnicide24
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 273



View Profile
July 21, 2017, 10:02:51 AM
 #283

Hi Opus team,

Can you give comparison of your platform to existing decentralized service like Muse, Voise, Library, etc? I read your replies earlier in the thread and you give good answer to compare to Voise, but what about Muse and Library? Do other platforms use IPFS or only Opus? I need to see novel innovation to take over the space.

Thanks.
You must read the Whitepaper to understand the difference.
NewbCoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 10:39:37 AM
 #284

You must read the Whitepaper to understand the difference.

Yes I read it already. There is no comparison to other decentralized music blockchains in Opus white paper. That's why I question. The white paper always compare to legacy systems but not other blockchains. Opus team address Voise in this thread, but not Muse or Library. They didn't mention concept and technical detail that make them different from everyone else.
jeanpierre
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 100


The All-in-One Cryptocurrency Exchange


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 10:43:16 AM
 #285

I joined the signature campaign, I think this project have a lot of potential !

Also they already have an actual product unlike other ICO


「   B e a x y   」   THE ALL-IN-ONE CRYPTOCURRENCY EXCHANGE
[ WHITEPAPER ]               Instant Deposit                   24/7 Support                    Referral Program               [ LIGHTPAPER ]
ANN THREAD     ●     BOUNTY THREAD     ●     FACEBOOK     ●     TWITTER     ●     TELEGRAM
obszoenling
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 21, 2017, 11:21:36 AM
 #286

Interesting project. With a commendable beta!

★ ★ ★ ★ ★   DeepOnion    Anonymous and Untraceable Cryptocurrency    TOR INTEGRATED & SECURED   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
› › › › ›  JOIN THE NEW AIRDROP ✈️        VERIFIED WITH DEEPVAULT  ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬   ANN  WHITEPAPER  FACEBOOK  TWITTER  YOUTUBE  FORUM   ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Murza13
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 154


Chromia - Relational Blockchain


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2017, 12:13:36 PM
 #287

How will be establishing price for track? Will be same price for all of them or will be registered by artist?
The price for every track is up to artists theirself. They have right to decide its price.

Price for track on platform be in OPT or will be used fiat money? I means if i want to buy a track first of all i need buy opt or i may pay in usd?
The price for every track will be in OPT, however the team will integrate payment processor before mainstream release.

How will an artist apply his/her song in the library? Is it going to be free?
Do you mean to sell their song? Once they purchased the decryption keys, yeah it's free and they have right to decide the price of their song.
another interesting question: imagine that i'm an anonymous underground artist who is popular in the definite community, so opus users willingly buy my tracks, and there is a question: how will the taxation procedure be integrated into these particular market relations between an artist and the platform?

♠️ Facebook: http://facebook.com/ChromiaStudios                 ♥️ Webpage: http://chromiastudios.com
♦️ LinkedIn:  http://linkedin.com/company/chromiastudios      ♣️ Reddit: http://reddit.com/r/ChromiaStudios                    
♥️ Twitter:    https://twitter.com/teamchromia                        ♦️  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChromaWay
************************************************************************************************
Omnicide24
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 273



View Profile
July 21, 2017, 12:17:14 PM
 #288

You must read the Whitepaper to understand the difference.

Yes I read it already. There is no comparison to other decentralized music blockchains in Opus white paper. That's why I question. The white paper always compare to legacy systems but not other blockchains. Opus team address Voise in this thread, but not Muse or Library. They didn't mention concept and technical detail that make them different from everyone else.
I only know about the Voise, a very weak project compared to Opus. And about Muse or Library, I can't say anything, because I do not know.
om9
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 12:33:13 PM
 #289

twitter url                 : https://twitter.com/gintas_z
follower                   : 710

Tweet:

https://twitter.com/gintas_z/status/888363590729838593
https://twitter.com/gintas_z/status/888363279617282048
https://twitter.com/gintas_z/status/888363088881364992

Retweet:

https://twitter.com/opusfoundation/status/886913895679619076
https://twitter.com/opusfoundation/status/886812073048645633
https://twitter.com/opusfoundation/status/886761093569413121
https://twitter.com/opusfoundation/status/886338248565547008
Murza13
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 154


Chromia - Relational Blockchain


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2017, 12:41:19 PM
 #290

You must read the Whitepaper to understand the difference.

Yes I read it already. There is no comparison to other decentralized music blockchains in Opus white paper. That's why I question. The white paper always compare to legacy systems but not other blockchains. Opus team address Voise in this thread, but not Muse or Library. They didn't mention concept and technical detail that make them different from everyone else.
general theses and conception are clear, music market has limitless potential and space for actions, furthermore under these conditions, like any other sphere of social life, it requires cardinal alterations, we need more honest game which is brought to us with blockchain technology . I'll wait for the whirepaper in Russian to learn the project more and to participate if it's possible

♠️ Facebook: http://facebook.com/ChromiaStudios                 ♥️ Webpage: http://chromiastudios.com
♦️ LinkedIn:  http://linkedin.com/company/chromiastudios      ♣️ Reddit: http://reddit.com/r/ChromiaStudios                    
♥️ Twitter:    https://twitter.com/teamchromia                        ♦️  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChromaWay
************************************************************************************************
rijaljun
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 267



View Profile
July 21, 2017, 12:54:05 PM
 #291

general theses and conception are clear, music market has limitless potential and space for actions, furthermore under these conditions, like any other sphere of social life, it requires cardinal alterations, we need more honest game which is brought to us with blockchain technology . I'll wait for the whirepaper in Russian to learn the project more and to participate if it's possible
Russian whitepaper? Here you go https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5JFVPKyT8UsWExGR2JnR3VpTTg/view
Kindly join the Slack channel to get closer with the team man  Wink

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
.
1xBit.com  sports
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
███████████████████████████
████████▀▀       ▀▀████████
█████▀  ▄▄▄▀███▀▄▄▄  ▀█████
████  ▄█████▄ ▄█████▄  ████
███  █ █████▀ ▀█████ █  ███
██  ▄██ ▀▀▀▄███▄▀▀▀ ██▄  ██
██  █▀▄██ ███████ ██▄▀█  ██
██   █████ █████ █████   ██
███  █████▀▄▄▄▄▄▀█████  ███
████  ▀▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄▀  ████
█████▄  ▀▀█ ███ █▀▀  ▄█████
████████▄▄       ▄▄████████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████
▀▀       ▀▀████████
 ▄▄  ▀  ▄▄   ▀█████
 ▀    ▀█████▄  ████
   ▀█▄   ▀▀██▄  ███
 █▄  ▀██▄▄  ▀█▄  ██
  ▀█▄  ▀███▄  ▀  ██
█  ▀██▄  ▀███▄   ██
██  ▀███▄  ▀█▀  ███
███  ▀████▄    ████
 ▀▀█▄  ▀▀▀   ▄█████
▄▄       ▄▄████████
███████████████████
███████████████████
███▀▀         ▀▀███
▀   ▄▄██▄  ▀█▄  ▀██
 ▄████████▄  ▀█  ██
██████▄▀  ██▄    ██
████▄▀  ▄▀████▄  ██
██▄▀  ▄▀██████  ▄██
▄▀  ▄▀███████  ▄███
█▄▄▀███████▀  ▄████
▀████████▀  ▄██████
  ▀██▀▀   ▄████████
      ▄▄███████████
███████████████████
1mBTC
x 3 WINNERS
BET
MULTIPLIERS
█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
.
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
coin_1122
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 102


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 01:04:52 PM
 #292

You must read the Whitepaper to understand the difference.

Yes I read it already. There is no comparison to other decentralized music blockchains in Opus white paper. That's why I question. The white paper always compare to legacy systems but not other blockchains. Opus team address Voise in this thread, but not Muse or Library. They didn't mention concept and technical detail that make them different from everyone else.

May be these people are using a different platform for this Voice, May be the will explain in details about the difference between other and Opus.
I think white they almost discussed the technical details about the Opus only.
Mushrooms
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 309


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 01:29:48 PM
 #293

How will an artist apply his/her song in the library? Is it going to be free?

I think so because now it looks like in common Opus give more profit to artist then regular user
Kanoe_Yuuko
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 01:48:17 PM
 #294


It's one of those great, very detailed, and well-planned projects, hopefully to be the latest breakthrough project, the best innovative I've ever met, good luck and excellent run
xingzhankwe
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 21, 2017, 02:31:24 PM
 #295


I only know about the Voise, a very weak project compared to Opus. And about Muse or Library, I can't say anything, because I do not know.
[/quote]The voice did not see, I think the music on the project, this is a good thing, the concept of this project is very good, the team is also very hard. So I support it very much
YIz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 502


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 02:37:55 PM
 #296

Opus is going to be adopted very quickly after the initial release is out.
yayat
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 102


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 03:22:03 PM
 #297

First I appreciate and support this project because I am a person who loves music.
Good concept, I think this project will improve the quality of world music.
Just the one i want to ask:
Is security strong enough to resist piracy? As we know today music creators are starting to fret over the sheer number of music piracy.
Pap0u
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 03:56:14 PM
 #298

This project looks absolutely amazing. Very well put together, amazing potential and they look like they beat their competitors by a long shot in tech and professionalism. Count me in.

Pfizer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 21, 2017, 04:19:16 PM
 #299

First I appreciate and support this project because I am a person who loves music.
Good concept, I think this project will improve the quality of world music.
Just the one i want to ask:
Is security strong enough to resist piracy? As we know today music creators are starting to fret over the sheer number of music piracy.

Another thing is that the platform will never be legit? How can it be legit my sharing songs and music without getting its rights from the singer/group?

Can somebody clarify this?
Murza13
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 154


Chromia - Relational Blockchain


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2017, 04:20:21 PM
 #300

general theses and conception are clear, music market has limitless potential and space for actions, furthermore under these conditions, like any other sphere of social life, it requires cardinal alterations, we need more honest game which is brought to us with blockchain technology . I'll wait for the whirepaper in Russian to learn the project more and to participate if it's possible
Russian whitepaper? Here you go https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5JFVPKyT8UsWExGR2JnR3VpTTg/view
Kindly join the Slack channel to get closer with the team man  Wink
thank you friend,i will immediately get acquainted with this!

♠️ Facebook: http://facebook.com/ChromiaStudios                 ♥️ Webpage: http://chromiastudios.com
♦️ LinkedIn:  http://linkedin.com/company/chromiastudios      ♣️ Reddit: http://reddit.com/r/ChromiaStudios                    
♥️ Twitter:    https://twitter.com/teamchromia                        ♦️  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChromaWay
************************************************************************************************
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 107 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!