SilentNotary The 1st Blockchain Notary Company in the world!

[Rabbot]

a special smart contract was deployed and everyone who wanted to receive a reward did it with its help

Thus, after the end of the bounty campaign, you introduced a new rules, one of which implied the need to spend ETH in order to receive tokens.
For example here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23687427#msg23687427
wasted 0.077527716 ETH

I think that you just hope everyone forgot about the unpaid bounty.

[1715024061]

1715024061

[1715024061]

1715024061

[1715024061]

1715024061

[examplens]

a special smart contract was deployed and everyone who wanted to receive a reward did it with its help

Thus, after the end of the bounty campaign, you introduced a new rules, one of which implied the need to spend ETH in order to receive tokens.
For example here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23687427#msg23687427
wasted 0.077527716 ETH

I think that you just hope everyone forgot about the unpaid bounty.

Now I remember where is the problem. Thanks Rabbot

Also there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23838241#msg23838241

Note that despite the fact that we failed to raise the softcap in the framework of earlier conducted the TSO and the bounty we have no obligations to participants, We tried to accrue a bounty from the share of teams.

Silent Notary project did not reach a soft cap, but I see this token in some exchanges. This project is still alive?


quoting for future reference

@Sythyn you are asking me to remove negative trust.
I know for accusations that you or Silent notary refuse to pay bounty hunters or you change rules after the bounty ended. Can you give me proof that you or your team paid yours promises, and all the people who are participated in promotion in your ICO has ben paid?
I will remove my trust mark if you provide me with valid proof of your project

Yes, of course, we are ready to provide all the proofs. I'll do it while describing the situation at the same time.

Initially, we did not reach a soft cap and under the terms of the bounty, in this case, no one should not have received anything (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg22049704#msg22049704).

But, nevertheless, we took account of the participants interests (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg22414302#msg22414302) - a special smart contract was deployed and everyone who wanted to receive a reward did it with its help - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23483477#msg23483477. We did this because the vast majority of the bounty participants turned out to be bots. All the real ones, who wanted, received a reward - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2026645.msg29225459#msg29225459, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23638811#msg23638811, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23515642#msg23515642, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23518765#msg23518765, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23532792#msg23532792, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23559174#msg23559174, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23650424#msg23650424, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23655623#msg23655623, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23747974#msg23747974, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23748247#msg23748247, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg24462632#msg24462632. Some participants who successfully received the payment even created additional instructions so that everyone could do it - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23748247#msg23748247

Moreover, we extended the bounty payment period several times, as some people were late - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23253643#msg23253643.

[Sythyn]

a special smart contract was deployed and everyone who wanted to receive a reward did it with its help

Thus, after the end of the bounty campaign, you introduced a new rules, one of which implied the need to spend ETH in order to receive tokens.
For example here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23687427#msg23687427
wasted 0.077527716 ETH

I think that you just hope everyone forgot about the unpaid bounty.

That is not a new rules. It's a method of bounty distribution among only real participants via smart contract.

"unpaid bounty" - that is untrue. Just click on links above and you'll see how many people received their bounties without problems and with a gratitude to us.

[Sythyn]

a special smart contract was deployed and everyone who wanted to receive a reward did it with its help

Thus, after the end of the bounty campaign, you introduced a new rules, one of which implied the need to spend ETH in order to receive tokens.
For example here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23687427#msg23687427
wasted 0.077527716 ETH

I think that you just hope everyone forgot about the unpaid bounty.

Now I remember where is the problem. Thanks Rabbot

Also there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23838241#msg23838241

Note that despite the fact that we failed to raise the softcap in the framework of earlier conducted the TSO and the bounty we have no obligations to participants, We tried to accrue a bounty from the share of teams.

Silent Notary project did not reach a soft cap, but I see this token in some exchanges. This project is still alive?


quoting for future reference

@Sythyn you are asking me to remove negative trust.
I know for accusations that you or Silent notary refuse to pay bounty hunters or you change rules after the bounty ended. Can you give me proof that you or your team paid yours promises, and all the people who are participated in promotion in your ICO has ben paid?
I will remove my trust mark if you provide me with valid proof of your project

Yes, of course, we are ready to provide all the proofs. I'll do it while describing the situation at the same time.

Initially, we did not reach a soft cap and under the terms of the bounty, in this case, no one should not have received anything (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg22049704#msg22049704).

But, nevertheless, we took account of the participants interests (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg22414302#msg22414302) - a special smart contract was deployed and everyone who wanted to receive a reward did it with its help - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23483477#msg23483477. We did this because the vast majority of the bounty participants turned out to be bots. All the real ones, who wanted, received a reward - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2026645.msg29225459#msg29225459, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23638811#msg23638811, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23515642#msg23515642, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23518765#msg23518765, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23532792#msg23532792, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23559174#msg23559174, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23650424#msg23650424, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23655623#msg23655623, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23747974#msg23747974, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23748247#msg23748247, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg24462632#msg24462632. Some participants who successfully received the payment even created additional instructions so that everyone could do it - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23748247#msg23748247

Moreover, we extended the bounty payment period several times, as some people were late - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.msg23253643#msg23253643.

The complaints were due to the fact that some people did not follow the instructions correctly, but all in all everyone who wanted it received all the bounties fully. We hope that you consider the fact that we extended the bounty payment period and, please, take into account all the links I posted above with the participant's gratitude about successful bounty payment.

Also, read my answer to Rabbot as well.

Yes, of course, the project is alive. We have just released our own blockchain Chain-in-Law and Ubikiri social network. You can make sure that it is working - all transactions made on the Chain-in-Law network, through the SilentNotary service and the Ubikiri social network, can be viewed using the Chain-in-Law Explorer - https://explorer.ubikiri.com/

It is true, that initially the soft cap has not been reached, accordingly we were not obliged to pay bounties. But we gave an opportunity to receive bounties, even considering that.

Our participants voted to restart, and that was done later. Moreover, on very favorable conditions for those who received bounties.

[alfredtorres]

Take a look at recently news, examplens. And you will understand that the project isn't just "still alive" but is blooming now

[IamDark]

Take a look at recently news, examplens. And you will understand that the project isn't just "still alive" but is blooming now

No wonder that he left so baseless negative review, he knows nothing about project's activity

[examplens]

--

No wonder that he left so baseless negative review, he knows nothing about project's activity

Take a look at recently news, examplens. And you will understand that the project isn't just "still alive" but is blooming now

I did not follow this project after ICO end. My feedback is not related to "scam or not scam". It's just because changed bounty rules (and refuse to pay) after they finished.


@Sythyn I'm not too much online these days, but I will look over your suggestion in next few days, you will know.

[Sythyn]

--

No wonder that he left so baseless negative review, he knows nothing about project's activity

Take a look at recently news, examplens. And you will understand that the project isn't just "still alive" but is blooming now

I did not follow this project after ICO end. My feedback is not related to "scam or not scam". It's just because changed bounty rules (and refuse to pay) after they finished.


@Sythyn I'm not too much online these days, but I will look over your suggestion in next few days, you will know.

Ok, thank you.

[Rabbot]

That is not a new rules.

It appeared after the end of the campaign, which means it is new.

bounty distribution among only real participants via smart contract.

What a nonsense!

"unpaid bounty" - that is untrue. Just click on links above and you'll see how many people received their bounties without problems and with a gratitude to us.

You paid a few participants and now post links to this, ignoring the non-payment to the rest. The spreadsheet has disappeared and you removed the project name from the title of the bounty thread.

[Sythyn]

That is not a new rules.

It appeared after the end of the campaign, which means it is new.

bounty distribution among only real participants via smart contract.

What a nonsense!

"unpaid bounty" - that is untrue. Just click on links above and you'll see how many people received their bounties without problems and with a gratitude to us.

You paid a few participants and now post links to this, ignoring the non-payment to the rest. The spreadsheet has disappeared and you removed the project name from the title of the bounty thread.

You are talking the same things again and again without any proofs. It's logical enough that the distribution method appeared after the end of the campaign, it's just an instruction of how to receive tokens.

"You paid a few participants...ignoring the non-payment to the rest" - another baseless accusations. There are dozen, not few, links to the proofs of the successful bounty payment. It is easy to count.

The spreadsheet is not working now, because the bounty campaign has happened two years ago. It's logical enough too. Even an ordinary website usually stop working in one year because of the expired hosting, what to say about a spreadsheet.

It's not a reason to blame us in scam if our name is not spelled out in the topic title, while we keep posting a link to it without problems and do not refuse to confirm that this is our bounty topic.

We appreciate your interest in the project, but we ask you to evaluate it judiciously. And not only we - as I see, several participants have already expressed concerns about your accusations.

[Rabbot]

It's logical enough that the distribution method appeared after the end of the campaign, it's just an instruction of how to receive tokens.

"You paid a few participants...ignoring the non-payment to the rest" - another baseless accusations. There are dozen, not few

So you admit that you changed the conditions of the campaign after the end and paid only to a "dozen" participants. This is about 1% of the total.
By this, you have confirmed that it is fair to call you a scammer.

[Sythyn]

It's logical enough that the distribution method appeared after the end of the campaign, it's just an instruction of how to receive tokens.

"You paid a few participants...ignoring the non-payment to the rest" - another baseless accusations. There are dozen, not few

So you admit that you changed the conditions of the campaign after the end and paid only to a "dozen" participants. This is about 1% of the total.
By this, you have confirmed that it is fair to call you a scammer.

Please, do not continue to take all my words out of context and just re-read what I said in previous post carefully.

We have provided all the proofs, and it's pity to say that you don't see it. Or don't want to see.

I didn't say that words at all. That is what have been said:

"you admit that you changed the conditions of the campaign" = "It's logical enough that the distribution method appeared after the end of the campaign, it's just an instruction of how to receive tokens." That are not conditions. All conditions has not been changed. It's a guide of how to receive tokens.

"you admit that you paid only to a "dozen" participants" = "There are dozen, not few, LINKS to the proofs of the successful bounty payment."  Links - is a key word. Dozen links to the proof, not dozen payments. Obviously, as always, not all of people wrote that they have received tokens. As a rule only small part of people write about that, others have received it and decide not ot write about that (lack of time, needlessness of this action in their opinion etc.).

[SpoonTwist]

Is it still possible to swap SNTR to LAW? Or it's too late?

[Sythyn]

Is it still possible to swap SNTR to LAW? Or it's too late?

For now all two swap rounds are sucessfully over.

[Rabbot]

"you admit that you changed the conditions of the campaign" = "It's logical enough that the distribution method appeared after the end of the campaign, it's just an instruction of how to receive tokens." That are not conditions. All conditions has not been changed. It's a guide of how to receive tokens.

Wrong, it's not just a guide. Among other things, it required to spend ETH to get the bounty.

Obviously, as always, not all of people wrote that they have received tokens. As a rule only small part of people write about that, others have received it and decide not ot write about that

Mostly everyone wrote that they got nothing.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.620
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016357.800
The last pages contain a huge amount of evidence. Perhaps this is why you removed the project name from the title.
And now you are trying to say that you are not a scammer because you paid some participants.

[Sythyn]

"you admit that you changed the conditions of the campaign" = "It's logical enough that the distribution method appeared after the end of the campaign, it's just an instruction of how to receive tokens." That are not conditions. All conditions has not been changed. It's a guide of how to receive tokens.

Wrong, it's not just a guide. Among other things, it required to spend ETH to get the bounty.

Obviously, as always, not all of people wrote that they have received tokens. As a rule only small part of people write about that, others have received it and decide not ot write about that

Mostly everyone wrote that they got nothing.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016468.620
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2016357.800
The last pages contain a huge amount of evidence. Perhaps this is why you removed the project name from the title.
And now you are trying to say that you are not a scammer because you paid some participants.

It's a step-by-step guide only. Just re-read it please. Like other things that we have mentioned and proved during our discussion. Because, unfortunately, you keep talking the same things again and again while ignoring all the facts and proofs.

"Mostly everyone... got nothing", "paid some participants" - and again you are talking such a "loud" things without any proofs. As we said before, there were some problems during the payment period (some people did not follow instructions correctly), that's why such messages appeared, but, as a result, all payments were successfully provided. You have about ten links to make sure of that. It's just a quick proof from our side. Let me repeat - as always, not all the people write about it. It's an obvious fact.

[Rabbot]

for the record.

this translated german ANN thread has not been paid yet.

several emails and pm to bounty manager sythyn plus questions in the bounty thread - unanswered.
entry on spreadsheet - deleted.

next step: if this would not be settled until end of october - open scam accusation and neg trust, report to mods

So sad to say that i was joining this bounty in my facebook and twitter i did not recieve the payment just follow all the intruction but still i did not recieve my bounty payment.

So, another scam?   It's a pity, looks like it was nice idea.. 

Payments on the bounty completed.

Despite the fact that softcap was not assembled we paid a bounty to those who followed the updates of the branch and followed the instructions.

We do not accept complaints and do not pay anything to anyone.

Thank you for participating.

The branch can be closed.

How easy to say that, You got free work from participants and getting not payment!!! just WOW!

OMG I follow the instruction but  I did not received the  reward bounty, I saw my ether wallet in the list of reward, myether deducted fees on my balance ,, why you make it hard for as to claim why not sendng to our wallet???

it's not a new cases, silent notary don't paid bounty reward or maybe just paid a few bounty hunter only, check back November 2017 Ann post, we ask them resolve the issue and they still don't paid our reward, we've have doing all the requirement, send our eth address to them, finally ... ignored us ... same as tokenpay company 

[Sythyn]

for the record.

this translated german ANN thread has not been paid yet.

several emails and pm to bounty manager sythyn plus questions in the bounty thread - unanswered.
entry on spreadsheet - deleted.

next step: if this would not be settled until end of october - open scam accusation and neg trust, report to mods

So sad to say that i was joining this bounty in my facebook and twitter i did not recieve the payment just follow all the intruction but still i did not recieve my bounty payment.

So, another scam?   It's a pity, looks like it was nice idea.. 

Payments on the bounty completed.

Despite the fact that softcap was not assembled we paid a bounty to those who followed the updates of the branch and followed the instructions.

We do not accept complaints and do not pay anything to anyone.

Thank you for participating.

The branch can be closed.

How easy to say that, You got free work from participants and getting not payment!!! just WOW!

OMG I follow the instruction but  I did not received the  reward bounty, I saw my ether wallet in the list of reward, myether deducted fees on my balance ,, why you make it hard for as to claim why not sendng to our wallet???

it's not a new cases, silent notary don't paid bounty reward or maybe just paid a few bounty hunter only, check back November 2017 Ann post, we ask them resolve the issue and they still don't paid our reward, we've have doing all the requirement, send our eth address to them, finally ... ignored us ... same as tokenpay company 

As you can verify by yourself, half of the complaints of those that you sent were posted before the payments were made. After all, the message "Payments on the bounty completed" is dated November 12, and complaints of non-payment were sent earlier than this deadline, that is quite logical.

About another ones, you can also read above an explanation - "Despite the fact that softcap was not assembled we paid a bounty to those who followed the updates of the branch and followed the instructions."

"Followed the instruction" is the main phrase. Every bounty has some rules that participants must adhere. And every bounty has a right not to pay if even one rule is violated. That bounty can not be named a scam. Again, I want to repeat, that we checked each participant and paid bounty fully to people who followed the instructions correctly.

[Goyebiw]

I haven't expected such long reads here about bounty and etc but it's pretty interesting to follow your discussion guys 

[Zeta0S]

Silent Notary, everyday an new All Time Low Day...