[ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine

[Mikanoshi]

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

[zero_sight]

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

Im getting pretty much exactly what whattomine calculates with this

[jimboscott]

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

Im getting pretty much exactly what whattomine calculates with this

Now that I have switched to the palginmod version of ccminer I am getting what the calculator says.  Of course, I only switched to it a little less than 4 hours ago.

Let me further quantify what I have seen.  My last 8 payouts of 50 coins took the following minutes to accomplish.  All were with the KRNLX version.  Top being the more recent figures.

335 minutes with KRNLX_170810
331 minutes with KRNLX_170810
329 minutes with KRNLX_170810
340 minutes with KRNLX_170810
360 minutes with KRNLX-80
362 minutes with KRNLX-80
392 minutes with KRNLX (some down time for tinkering)
383 minutes KRNLX (maybe some minor down time here too)

All of these were with reported hashrates from the miner of between 245 and 257 Mh/s.

I have now been running the NON-KRNLX palingmod ccminer, reporting 227 Mh/s for exactly 240 minutes and am 5 coins shy of 50.  I should come in on this next 50 coins in about 265 minutes.  That's 4 hours and 25 minutes versus an average above that is closer to 6 hours.  And, that 4 hours 25 minutes is almost exactly what the calculator projected while ALL of the previous 50 coin segments took 30-35% longer than what they should have.

I am not trying to do anything here but help.  Been reading for days about the strange discrepancies in calculated earnings versus real earnings.  Just trying to parse it all out in an open and transparent manner.  Everyone is looking for the best way to do this and I think something odd is going on here.  

[huyhoang]

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

you are totally right, more miner in CWI more benefit for all...

[jimboscott]

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

you are totally right, more miner in CWI more benefit for all...

I wanted to try that myself but is it out of beta yet? 

[jootn2kx]

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

Im getting pretty much exactly what whattomine calculates with this

Now that I have switched to the palginmod version of ccminer I am getting what the calculator says.  Of course, I only switched to it a little less than 4 hours ago.

Let me further quantify what I have seen.  My last 8 payouts of 50 coins took the following minutes to accomplish.  All were with the KRNLX version.  Top being the more recent figures.

335 minutes with KRNLX_170810
331 minutes with KRNLX_170810
329 minutes with KRNLX_170810
340 minutes with KRNLX_170810
360 minutes with KRNLX-80
362 minutes with KRNLX-80
392 minutes with KRNLX (some down time for tinkering)
383 minutes KRNLX (maybe some minor down time here too)

All of these were with reported hashrates from the miner of between 245 and 257 Mh/s.

I have now been running the NON-KRNLX palingmod ccminer, reporting 227 Mh/s for exactly 240 minutes and am 5 coins shy of 50.  I should come in on this next 50 coins in about 265 minutes.  That's 4 hours and 25 minutes versus an average above that is closer to 6 hours.  And, that 4 hours 25 minutes is almost exactly what the calculator projected while ALL of the previous 50 coin segments took 30-35% longer than what they should have.

I am not trying to do anything here but help.  Been reading for days about the strange discrepancies in calculated earnings versus real earnings.  Just trying to parse it all out in an open and transparent manner.  Everyone is looking for the best way to do this and I think something odd is going on here.  

Interesting thanks for your research, could you compare the normal original tweaked skunk ccminer vs the SP- mod version?

i'm having the feeling the skunk raptor algoritm doesn't feel comfortable with boosted hashrates. it's only a theory maybe thats the main reason?

[mmo4me001]

If SIGT is indeed dying...

1. Why all the discussion of it?  Ideas that die are not talked about.  Products that die are not attacked OR defended.

2. If it is 'dying' then how is it that it is within ~5% of the profitability of one of the MOST LIVING coins... ETH?  Right now, with similar Nvidia setups, ETH is giving me about 22.00/day while the DYING SIGT is in its 'death throes' while STILL delivering 20.86 per day while in a really bad SIGT/USD slump?

I thought dead things not only stopped breathing, they stopped moving, they stopped EVERYTHING.

Dead?  I don't think so.

I agree w you, best time to buy sigt

[zero_sight]

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

Im getting pretty much exactly what whattomine calculates with this

Now that I have switched to the palginmod version of ccminer I am getting what the calculator says.  Of course, I only switched to it a little less than 4 hours ago.

Let me further quantify what I have seen.  My last 8 payouts of 50 coins took the following minutes to accomplish.  All were with the KRNLX version.  Top being the more recent figures.

335 minutes with KRNLX_170810
331 minutes with KRNLX_170810
329 minutes with KRNLX_170810
340 minutes with KRNLX_170810
360 minutes with KRNLX-80
362 minutes with KRNLX-80
392 minutes with KRNLX (some down time for tinkering)
383 minutes KRNLX (maybe some minor down time here too)

All of these were with reported hashrates from the miner of between 245 and 257 Mh/s.

I have now been running the NON-KRNLX palingmod ccminer, reporting 227 Mh/s for exactly 240 minutes and am 5 coins shy of 50.  I should come in on this next 50 coins in about 265 minutes.  That's 4 hours and 25 minutes versus an average above that is closer to 6 hours.  And, that 4 hours 25 minutes is almost exactly what the calculator projected while ALL of the previous 50 coin segments took 30-35% longer than what they should have.

I am not trying to do anything here but help.  Been reading for days about the strange discrepancies in calculated earnings versus real earnings.  Just trying to parse it all out in an open and transparent manner.  Everyone is looking for the best way to do this and I think something odd is going on here.  

Interesting thanks for your research, could you compare the normal original tweaked skunk ccminer vs the SP- mod version?

i'm having the feeling the skunk raptor algoritm doesn't feel comfortable with boosted hashrates. it's only a theory maybe thats the main reason?

IMO your using too short a time frame to judge and compare when so much luck as well as DGW Difficulty adjusments

[pikatju]

You should use CWI 0.9.8 to mine SIGT, no exceptions)

Im getting pretty much exactly what whattomine calculates with this

Now that I have switched to the palginmod version of ccminer I am getting what the calculator says.  Of course, I only switched to it a little less than 4 hours ago.

Let me further quantify what I have seen.  My last 8 payouts of 50 coins took the following minutes to accomplish.  All were with the KRNLX version.  Top being the more recent figures.

335 minutes with KRNLX_170810
331 minutes with KRNLX_170810
329 minutes with KRNLX_170810
340 minutes with KRNLX_170810
360 minutes with KRNLX-80
362 minutes with KRNLX-80
392 minutes with KRNLX (some down time for tinkering)
383 minutes KRNLX (maybe some minor down time here too)

All of these were with reported hashrates from the miner of between 245 and 257 Mh/s.

I have now been running the NON-KRNLX palingmod ccminer, reporting 227 Mh/s for exactly 240 minutes and am 5 coins shy of 50.  I should come in on this next 50 coins in about 265 minutes.  That's 4 hours and 25 minutes versus an average above that is closer to 6 hours.  And, that 4 hours 25 minutes is almost exactly what the calculator projected while ALL of the previous 50 coin segments took 30-35% longer than what they should have.

I am not trying to do anything here but help.  Been reading for days about the strange discrepancies in calculated earnings versus real earnings.  Just trying to parse it all out in an open and transparent manner.  Everyone is looking for the best way to do this and I think something odd is going on here.  

Although your timeframe is a bit short, i think its safe to say you get better results with palginmod.
I find CWI even better than palgin though. Get yourself the beta access and help testing out. See more here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2054431.0

Cheers

[yunihuni]

Just seen your Facebook profile, don't think it is right to mock you anymore, my apologies, hope you figure out what gender you are.

I'm ok with that. There were too many reactions.
But still mining SIGT dude, i'm not hater or fud things.
I just said my thoughts. Of course I do not want this coin to die.

[vikingchild]

Kids - stop fighting here. Go to 4chan if so

[altfinance]

That's strange. If one thinks SIGT is dying, he/she shouldn't be here. He/she shouldn't even be mining this coin.

It's a coin that is barely a month. Has been profitable so far for miners, has a good community and will deliver it's first project (SIGT market) by next week. How's that for a month old coin?

[mitch8128]

That's strange. If one thinks SIGT is dying, he/she shouldn't be here. He/she shouldn't even be mining this coin.

It's a coin that is barely a month. Has been profitable so far for miners, has a good community and will deliver it's first project (SIGT market) by next week. How's that for a month old coin?

sorry if this has been answered here already, but how do you know market will go live next week? i hope it does!

[kimoice]

Which is better Verge, Z cash, Cloak, or Signatum for anonymity and anything else? How many coins do you think will be needed for a masternode? And is there a way to mine Sig on a macbook air?

[jootn2kx]

Which is better Verge, Z cash, Cloak, or Signatum for anonymity and anything else? How many coins do you think will be needed for a masternode? And is there a way to mine Sig on a macbook air?

Just mine sigt and hold them until its getting right price, price is going down now due alot of FUD and no news from the dev

[maxmad_x]

BTC goes up.. alts go down. then one day alt come up.. So just HODL.. and you will be happy

[abant]

there are massive slumps on many coins. from digibyte to zec or doge. you name it. investors once holding these  altcoins selling them to hop on moving bitcoin train which is around 4200 usd now.

[Strebba90]

patience guy.
pos will start at 100.000; 45-50 days from now.
the price is dropping because a retracement is healty and btc is growing hard. more people go out from alts to btc. 
on sigt there are more buy than sell. you just wait a new rise.

[MarcusDe]

I see long talk about miners and sites showing calculated profits.

Funny is that all of those show you will get MORE that you you actually get.

More funny is that if you get f.e. ethereum calculators difference is close to none.
BTW, for 1060 you will earn more mining ethereum lol.

[altfinance]

That's strange. If one thinks SIGT is dying, he/she shouldn't be here. He/she shouldn't even be mining this coin.

It's a coin that is barely a month. Has been profitable so far for miners, has a good community and will deliver it's first project (SIGT market) by next week. How's that for a month old coin?

sorry if this has been answered here already, but how do you know market will go live next week? i hope it does!

The team leader Crowetic, mentioned it in the SIGT discord channel. I read this information in another FB group. I hope that information is accurate. You can verify it in the SIGT Discord channel.