[ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine

[Jody2k]

I can confirm I have very good numbers on ccminer-x64 v2.2 without touching the intensity settings
1080ti ASUS STRIX OC 55-57 MH/s
1080ti ZOTAC AMP EXTREME 56-58 MH/s
1070s ASUS STRIX,PALIT GAMEROCK,GAINWARD 31-33 MH/s

I'm sure the guys who payed for non-free releases will not be very happy
Anyway, great job with this new release ! Keep up the good work !

what version of ccminer is that exactly? the 2.2 skunk version from the first post is already 3 weeks old..

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

I want to say that this 2.2 miner from tpruvot is giving low hashrate on the pool, like only half :/
going back to SP mod for now i dont trust this

i am on linux, with 2.2 i have 19.5 per gigabyte 1070, and with krnlx i got 28, so on 8 cards average is around 220m and i get same results on suprnova most of time ... if it helps ... cheers

Tpruvot miner gives me 58 mh/s and SP mod 5 gives me 55 mh/s
But on the pool is a different story:

Tpruvot 2.2 miner hashrate on the pool: average only 35 to 40 mh/s
SP mod 5 on the pool: 55 - 60 mh/s

Something is fucked with a 1080 ti with the new 2.2 ccminer from tpruvot
This also translates in my shares, i'm only getting half to 40% less shares with 2.2 miner from tpruvot

[corrado25]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2088091.0

SIGT classic ???hehehe

[pikatju]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2088091.0

SIGT classic ???hehehe

Lol what a joke.

[sundownz]

I can confirm I have very good numbers on ccminer-x64 v2.2 without touching the intensity settings
1080ti ASUS STRIX OC 55-57 MH/s
1080ti ZOTAC AMP EXTREME 56-58 MH/s
1070s ASUS STRIX,PALIT GAMEROCK,GAINWARD 31-33 MH/s

I'm sure the guys who payed for non-free releases will not be very happy
Anyway, great job with this new release ! Keep up the good work !

what version of ccminer is that exactly? the 2.2 skunk version from the first post is already 3 weeks old..

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

I want to say that this 2.2 miner from tpruvot is giving low hashrate on the pool, like only half :/
going back to SP mod for now i dont trust this

i am on linux, with 2.2 i have 19.5 per gigabyte 1070, and with krnlx i got 28, so on 8 cards average is around 220m and i get same results on suprnova most of time ... if it helps ... cheers

Tpruvot miner gives me 58 mh/s and SP mod 5 gives me 55 mh/s
But on the pool is a different story:

Tpruvot 2.2 miner hashrate on the pool: average only 35 to 40 mh/s
SP mod 5 on the pool: 55 - 60 mh/s

Something is fucked with a 1080 ti with the new 2.2 ccminer from tpruvot
This also translates in my shares, i'm only getting half to 40% less shares with 2.2 miner from tpruvot

I am testing my 1080 Ti also with ccminer 2.2 -- on the miner it shows ~10% gain from krnlx miner (55 vs. 50).

On the pool it shows lower result as well -- I am seeing only high 30s to low 40s range so far after ~40 shares.

I may let it run the rest of the day on this machine & see if that changes.

[xixou]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2088091.0

SIGT classic ???hehehe

They don't have anything better to do than messing-up with signatum?

[JayyCee]

is their a beter miner for amd other than the 1 posted on the 1st page here thanks in advance

Im using this. Went from 20 to 22 with it (version 0.6). With the new version 0.7 i actually went up to 24 according to the miner but im still testing it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2033185.0;all

[Jody2k]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2088091.0

SIGT classic ???hehehe

wtf is this lmao

[avilolo0101]

what is the best free miner I can use with?
currently I'm use plaginmod 1.1

[Jody2k]

what is the best free miner I can use with?
currently I'm use plaginmod 1.1

try krnlx ccminer

[iamnewhere]

what is the best free miner I can use with?
currently I'm use plaginmod 1.1

check CWI - i get ~ 10% more than with palagin but it's bound to their own pool where you need to deal sometimes also with bad luck but i get effective bit more a day than with palagin (tested for 24h with one rig in each config running parallel - one palagin on suprnova and one with cwi)

[corrado25]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2088091.0

SIGT classic ???hehehe

wtf is this lmao

i dont know is it true ? but i think is a bad idea

[KurtCobain]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2088091.0

SIGT classic ???hehehe

wtf is this lmao

i dont know is it true ? but i think is a bad idea

Random people can clone any coin they want to.  For example, there's many coins with the word bitcoin in it.  It's completely unrelated to us.  Someone Copy and pasted signatum and is creating a clone of it.  They won't have our marketplace, community, or exchanges.  It doesn't take away from signatum at all.  You can tell by the typos that it is not a serious project.

[sundownz]

I can confirm I have very good numbers on ccminer-x64 v2.2 without touching the intensity settings
1080ti ASUS STRIX OC 55-57 MH/s
1080ti ZOTAC AMP EXTREME 56-58 MH/s
1070s ASUS STRIX,PALIT GAMEROCK,GAINWARD 31-33 MH/s

I'm sure the guys who payed for non-free releases will not be very happy
Anyway, great job with this new release ! Keep up the good work !

what version of ccminer is that exactly? the 2.2 skunk version from the first post is already 3 weeks old..

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

I want to say that this 2.2 miner from tpruvot is giving low hashrate on the pool, like only half :/
going back to SP mod for now i dont trust this

i am on linux, with 2.2 i have 19.5 per gigabyte 1070, and with krnlx i got 28, so on 8 cards average is around 220m and i get same results on suprnova most of time ... if it helps ... cheers

Tpruvot miner gives me 58 mh/s and SP mod 5 gives me 55 mh/s
But on the pool is a different story:

Tpruvot 2.2 miner hashrate on the pool: average only 35 to 40 mh/s
SP mod 5 on the pool: 55 - 60 mh/s

Something is fucked with a 1080 ti with the new 2.2 ccminer from tpruvot
This also translates in my shares, i'm only getting half to 40% less shares with 2.2 miner from tpruvot

I am testing my 1080 Ti also with ccminer 2.2 -- on the miner it shows ~10% gain from krnlx miner (55 vs. 50).

On the pool it shows lower result as well -- I am seeing only high 30s to low 40s range so far after ~40 shares.

I may let it run the rest of the day on this machine & see if that changes.

Small update so far... logged back into pool after ~200 shares and I am actually seeing high 40s to low 60s reported on the pool with ccminer 2.2 -- so maybe it just takes time to settle ?

[gyrbo]

Small update so far... logged back into pool after ~200 shares and I am actually seeing high 40s to low 60s reported on the pool with ccminer 2.2 -- so maybe it just takes time to settle ?

How can you tell your exact hash rate on the pool? My miner program reports ~50MH/s.

[Jody2k]

I can confirm I have very good numbers on ccminer-x64 v2.2 without touching the intensity settings
1080ti ASUS STRIX OC 55-57 MH/s
1080ti ZOTAC AMP EXTREME 56-58 MH/s
1070s ASUS STRIX,PALIT GAMEROCK,GAINWARD 31-33 MH/s

I'm sure the guys who payed for non-free releases will not be very happy
Anyway, great job with this new release ! Keep up the good work !

what version of ccminer is that exactly? the 2.2 skunk version from the first post is already 3 weeks old..

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

I want to say that this 2.2 miner from tpruvot is giving low hashrate on the pool, like only half :/
going back to SP mod for now i dont trust this

i am on linux, with 2.2 i have 19.5 per gigabyte 1070, and with krnlx i got 28, so on 8 cards average is around 220m and i get same results on suprnova most of time ... if it helps ... cheers

Tpruvot miner gives me 58 mh/s and SP mod 5 gives me 55 mh/s
But on the pool is a different story:

Tpruvot 2.2 miner hashrate on the pool: average only 35 to 40 mh/s
SP mod 5 on the pool: 55 - 60 mh/s

Something is fucked with a 1080 ti with the new 2.2 ccminer from tpruvot
This also translates in my shares, i'm only getting half to 40% less shares with 2.2 miner from tpruvot

I am testing my 1080 Ti also with ccminer 2.2 -- on the miner it shows ~10% gain from krnlx miner (55 vs. 50).

On the pool it shows lower result as well -- I am seeing only high 30s to low 40s range so far after ~40 shares.

I may let it run the rest of the day on this machine & see if that changes.

Small update so far... logged back into pool after ~200 shares and I am actually seeing high 40s to low 60s reported on the pool with ccminer 2.2 -- so maybe it just takes time to settle ?

The thing is current rate with SPmod 5 is about 60 - 70 mh/s on suprnova pool, so compared to this its still lower
There might be something going on with the 2.2 version i'm staying with SPmod

[Gongolo]

Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova:  lower hashrate.
- @yiimp:  correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn:  correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?

[Gongolo]

There might be something going on with the 2.2 version i'm staying with SPmod

Try with a different pool: do you still get lower hashrate?
I switched to another pool and my hashrate looks correct.

[yunihuni]

Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova:  lower hashrate.
- @yiimp:  correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn:  correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?

Where are you @ocminer?? 

[Gongolo]

Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova:  lower hashrate.
- @yiimp:  correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn:  correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?

Where are you @ocminer?? 

Yeah, since I am strongly using suprnova. 

[Jody2k]

Well, this is my results with new ccminer 2.2:
- @suprnova:  lower hashrate.
- @yiimp:  correct hashrate.
- @pool.mn:  correct hashrate.
Maybe something wrong @suprnova?

I don't know last time i used yiimp they stole about 30% of my shares, its reported as a scampool
Hows your experience with it lately?