[ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine

[parker423]

Hi,

Im mining with 54 mh/s but I get only ~ 55 coins a day.

What to mine shows more is that normal ?

Also the mh/s from the workerscreen is different ?!

Calculators always show more than what you will get. If you subtract 20-40% you will be more correct, at least you won't overcalculate.

I thought that was true as well.  I was getting about 200-220 coins per day on 245 Mh/s of mining.  Then I stopped using the krnlx version of ccminer and went with the palginmod version.  Immediately things got better.  Then I signed up for the CWI beta.

On 8/16 I topped 450 coins.  When the difficulty jumped a bit I might get only 250.  Today I am already at 256 and will probably be over 300 my the time the day is over.

Ie., the 30-35% 'correction' that I was thinking was a foregone conclusion seemed to sort of vanish when I stopped using the krnlx version.  Not sure what is up with it, but if I were a suspicious person I would maybe want to see if there was any unsuspected outbound network traffic coming from it.  

I'm starting to think that closed source miners instead of making real code optimalization just change the lines where miner speed is shown to fake it to higher values,
and pools display correct values ;-)
What do you think? It's quite logical lol.

Yes, you have the point. Since the miner is closed source, it is easy for pool to display higher than actual value, I think comparing share distributed is much more accurate.

People misunderstand the hash rate calculations.

The hash rate displayed by your miner is how many hashes that your card is creating per second.
The hash rate displayed by a pool is an estimation of the hash rate it would take to submit the shares which have been submitted.

Miners do not submit hash rates, they submit shares. The pools calculate an estimation of a hash rate based on the total difficulty of shares submitted over a period; if you have a period where your cards are unlucky and don't find any shares worth submitting then your hash rate on a pool will read lower than what it is.

The hash rate calculation is made over a period of time, so it takes a little while for hash rate(s) to stabilize on a pool. When you first start a miner it will not start submitting shares instantly so it takes a while before you get the real hash rate calculations.

Now im confused.

Some people say that its because of the pool and some say its because of the miner.(the numbers are faked??)

Whats true?

Does someone have a link for a good miner (maybe palgin or sp miner?) or another good pool?

Currently im on suprnova.

BR

[seasonw]

Would it be possible for someone with 2116 Sig to kill the block chain when it gets to proof of stake?  

This is not my area of expertise, but if my numbers are within 4-5 orders of magnitude this is a critical issue.  

if interest is paid hourly, as has been stated, it must be recorded on the block chain.

Not sure interest will be paid hourly, where did you read that ?

I believe I read it somewhere on here.  Page 10 of the white paper actually says it is paid every 5 minutes.  

A 5 minute payout would be 0.0000004756 so 0.02102608 Sig per wallet, but you would only need 15,000.  15,000 * 0.02102608 + 150 = 465.3912

Main.cpp sets

Code:

nSubsidy = nCoinAge * COIN_YEAR_REWARD * 33 / (365 * 33 + 8)

From what I can tell it simplifies to "nCoinAge * 13689"  All the math is e-8, but if nCoinAge is the mature coins and it runs every 5 minutes then this is a 1400% return.  

Hopefully I am wrong.  

Edit: Fixed exponential.

I flipped the nSubsidy calculation around and for 5% return it would be 365.24242424242424242424242424224 payments, so daily payments considering leap year.  This would be the second functional error I have found in the white paper. 

So 43516 Sig used to create 4320000 addresses with 0.00007305 Sig each could flood the chain with interest transactions? 

Try to reach devs or something. I am also curious about this.

I'm also interested to know more technical calculation about this piece of code, as many other coin also apply same code on it.

[Rashkae]

Does someone have a link for a good miner (maybe palgin or sp miner?) or another good pool?

Currently im on suprnova.

BR

Suprnova is fine.

As for the miners, they've been posted about 50x each so far. tpruvot and palgin have the best free miners, sp_ charges a fee. Lots of "free" sp_ miners out there that seem to have malware.

[makomako]

is there a minimum sigt for staking?

[gurumeditation]

is there a minimum sigt for staking?

No minimum, no masternode

[RSO_]

Does someone have a link for a good miner (maybe palgin or sp miner?) or another good pool?

Currently im on suprnova.

BR

Suprnova is fine.

As for the miners, they've been posted about 50x each so far. tpruvot and palgin have the best free miners, sp_ charges a fee. Lots of "free" sp_ miners out there that seem to have malware.

Stay away from sp_mod. Despite what sp_ says, the kernal uses significantly more power than the latest tpruvot ccminer release and for me at least, is nowhere near as stable. Not to mention he's selling 'his' miner for quite a lot (0.05 BTC) when someone else has put in most of the work to build it. Not to mention after about a week it's essentially out-of-date. I'm not sure where he stands legally on reselling someone else's work that has been distributed for free - I know it has been talked about before; but even if it is somehow legal, it's still shady AF.

[TOYJJWGS]

There is no place to understand, the road map is not very clear, there is no special highlights, to be observed

[parker423]

Someone has a link to palgins mod ?

[suilow1991]

OMG.... Big news coming in 4 hours! Fasten your seatbelts!

Where is the so called 'big news'? Your birthday?

[wack slacker]

SIGT will be fly. Go to top 100 =))

[CoinratZ]

OMG.... Big news coming in 4 hours! Fasten your seatbelts!

Where is the so called 'big news'? Your birthday?

No! I'm gonna be a daddy!

[itf991]

What news? Common !!!!

[moonstruck]

Someone has a link to palgins mod ?

CCminer 2.2 has caught up on hashrate.

[sparker327]

stay away from suprnova, much people reported a lot less (20-30%) payments on suprvova VS yiimp for example on the equal rigs at the same day.

nothing wrong with supernova.. ive done my own tests between YIIMP and SUPRNOVA and don't see any 20-30% drop from either. There are other factors involved in why you may or may not be getting the same.. number of miners, blocks found, differentials, etc

getting tired of "people reported".. really, who reported? unless you have concrete data to back up your statements or you've done your own testing (as I have) then please shut up.

[sparker327]

Someone has a link to palgins mod ?

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/

second miner down

[Real_Unhooked]

Someone has a link to palgins mod ?

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/

second miner down

Tpruv is still the fastest for me. I get about 121.xx with 4 1070s

http://rig.rent/rigs/41969

[SunStruck]

Yep , been running tpruvot's since his release , so far the best.

[CoinratZ]

Slowly climbing up, doesn't seem to go below 1200 sat. Dont expect magic, but really think the only way is up from now. Lets see how far my beloved SIGT can make it...

[CoinratZ]

Until when SIGT is going to be mined? Until block 100.000 has been found? If this is true, this could take months, since we're at block 49108 at the moment.

Is there going to be next halving? Where can I find more information about this?

Thanks!

https://signatum.io/signatum_whitepaper.pdf

[jootn2kx]

brace yourself winter is coming