[ANN] Elacoin | Released | Fair Elastic Scrypt Mining | No Premine

[Kinetic915]

how does he know how to compile on linux but not windows??

It's actually a lot easier. You can compile from a git with (I believe) 3 lines of code.

For windows, the compile process is a lot more tricky.

ah gotcha, good to know!

[Devianttwo]

Well look at that, the website is also down. COINCIDENCE! Uh-Oh! ha ha
What an absolutely retarded scam.. ha ha ha

I said the website was going to be down for a few minutes. Please read the thread. It is back up now.

What's the website's address?

bump.

BUMP! http://elacoin.org

[Hazard]

I welcome milkshake to join the thread and discuss my findings.

Perhaps create a fresh genesis block and have a legitimate release, even.

[MrWizard]

Well look at that, the website is also down. COINCIDENCE! Uh-Oh! ha ha
What an absolutely retarded scam.. ha ha ha

I said the website was going to be down for a few minutes. Please read the thread. It is back up now.

What's the website's address?

bump.

BUMP! http://elacoin.org

Thanks dude!

[fenican]

There is no proof here.  Pure FUD.  You can't just post a ZIP file and then say it is the release version from the OP.  Where's the proof ?

[Wolf Rainer]

Where i can download a binary wallet? I have no idea how to compile...

[Kinetic915]

well we still got 2 hours to go!  Milkshake hasn't responded in 4 or so hours though... comon.....

[mercSuey]

There is no proof here.  Pure FUD.  You can't just post a ZIP file and then say it is the release version from the OP.  Where's the proof ?

And yet it's been hours since OP has posted anything regarding the matter.  A couple hours before release...

[nocoin]

There is no proof here.  Pure FUD.  You can't just post a ZIP file and then say it is the release version from the OP.  Where's the proof ?

It's not  "just a ZIP file", it's a ZIP file with client WITH valid genesis block.
But yes, we still can't be sure it's from Milkshake, not from Hazard.

[saudibull]

"Milkshake...... hellooooo, are you there? Remember that coin you are about to release with 28 pages of people discussing it raising concerns that would be nice to have an answer for...... "

[fenican]

Keep in mind the OP's code has been available on Github (https://github.com/elacoin/elacoin)

Hence, anyone could have ZIP'ed it up, created a valid genesis block, and then claimed milkshake sent him it.

Here's a good litmus test.  Hazard, since you are the expert at compiling for Windows please post a working Windows client

[Kinetic915]

seems like he put a decent amount of work into making that website.

[alex_fun]

Someone is mining it using this zip file :d

[Hazard]

Keep in mind the OP's code has been available on Github (https://github.com/elacoin/elacoin)

Hence, anyone could have ZIP'ed it up, created a valid genesis block, and then claimed milkshake sent him it.

Here's a good litmus test.  Hazard, since you are the expert at compiling for Windows please post a working Windows client

I already provided the source, screenshots of the working client, and my correspondence with him. I owe you nothing more. Compile the source yourself if you are so inclined.

[nocoin]

Someone is mining it using this zip file :d

Yep 

[rosefox911]

seems like he put a decent amount of work into making that website.

It uses a bootstrap... Anyone with basic HTML/CSS knowledge could make it.

[TheSwede75]

Keep in mind the OP's code has been available on Github (https://github.com/elacoin/elacoin)

Hence, anyone could have ZIP'ed it up, created a valid genesis block, and then claimed milkshake sent him it.

Here's a good litmus test.  Hazard, since you are the expert at compiling for Windows please post a working Windows client

I already provided the source, screenshots of the working client, and my correspondence with him. I owe you nothing more. Compile the source yourself if you are so inclined.

This shit is like WAY better then CSI!

[relm9]

So uh... where's the controversy here? Premined blocks in the test client mean nothing if the client was just for that, testing purposes.

For the record, I don't care about this coin but again we are seeing rampant FUD thrown around here with no proof.

I agree but for the love of god. Why would you send the release version to a random member (not even well known) to have it compiled in advance? Why would  you claim to have a BFL miner that they 'sent you for free'? Why would you not comment on anything for 4 hours in the release thread? It's just starting to not make any damn sense.

BUT fair is fair, I will still hold my definitive opinion if OP can come up with some form of reasonable explanations to all the things mentioned.

It sure doesn't sound good. The OP's post history does bring his credibility into question too. I've little reason to doubt Hazard actually, but we'll see what the OP says.

[WindMaster]

{
    "version" : 60300,
    "protocolversion" : 60001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 0,
    "connections" : 0,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1368503911,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Hmm, depending whether Hazard's ZIP file contains the actual source from Milkshake, that seems like an awefully low starting difficulty, even if not pre-mined.

[fenican]

Keep in mind the OP's code has been available on Github (https://github.com/elacoin/elacoin)

Hence, anyone could have ZIP'ed it up, created a valid genesis block, and then claimed milkshake sent him it.

Here's a good litmus test.  Hazard, since you are the expert at compiling for Windows please post a working Windows client

I already provided the source, screenshots of the working client, and my correspondence with him. I owe you nothing more. Compile the source yourself if you are so inclined.

Maybe you mined it