ANN [RCC] Reality Clash - First ARG Mobile Game with ERC-20 Armory

[target]

Well believe or not. People are going to look at your project to be in the bad light when you are not capable of a mutual relationship here. Just open your mind to possibilities because even if there will be a bullrun of all altcoins, this RCC will be left behind unless 0.00000001 ETH can be worth $1.

Its not about what you are promising to be realized, its about giving back now. Otherwise, people are just going to say SCAM to this project forever.

[RealityClash]

Again, I don't think you're really reading what i've said in these pages...

We did what we promised. Made the innovative AR game, created a new generation of NFTs, built a trading platform.
We also went beyond the promises. This included burning RCC, putting RCC on various exchanges and returning 50% of spent RCC to our active traders.
None of these exchanges or awards/partnerships/events/advancements in tech have caused a huge rise in the RCC price yet.
Therefore you are unhappy.

You just call a scam because you haven't made profit quick enough.
Then when I suggest how you could have made profit or helped the project, you say its on us to make it happen for you.
Even when we tried to get on bigger exchanges and posted about this, nobody seemed to pay attention here.

We'll continue to work on the AR game, the Trading Platform and NFTs. We'll continue to build partnerships and reach out to major brands.
If we see an opportunity, post-funding, to get listed on a decent exchange without paying an absurd listing fee, then we'll do it.

Until then, I can't see what 'mutual relationship' you want here, since i've explained our position so many times and you never seem to listen.
We've given back to the users who engaged with the platform that they helped create by funding, we'll continue to work for those users. I'd love to hear your constructive feedback on increasing the RCC price and project exposure, besides simply paying a huge sum for listing at a major exchange.

[Arnaud]

yeah listing is costly, where can I trade the RCC token those days ?

[RealityClash]

Forkdelta has varying volume but is still active and probably the best market for RCC right now. Sell orders/Buy orders likely to hit here but in a wide range. 

https://forkdelta.app/#!/trade/RCC-ETH

Blockex markets had paused trading but they should be coming back online soon too.
Token.store has no volume really as their user base is so low.
Token Market has recently gone offline due to an issue with their company/employees.

Talking with a few other exchanges but some of these seem to be smaller exchanges who lie about their volume (they say their exchange trades $1 billion per day and ask for 10BTC listing fee but really have low users and faked volume!)

Our applications to bittrex/binance/bigger exchanges were mostly ignored from '17-19.

[Japinat]

Talking with a few other exchanges but some of these seem to be smaller exchanges who lie about their volume (they say their exchange trades $1 billion per day and ask for 10BTC listing fee but really have low users and faked volume!)

10BTC is not worth on exchange with bad reputation because they are lying with their trading volume.
It's better if you'll wait until the market will start to be bullish while you continue to develop the project, that way, you can show some improvement and you can bet that price could rise if will be listed in good exchange.

Our applications to bittrex/binance/bigger exchanges were mostly ignored from '17-19.

What do you think are the reason why they ignore you?

[necromastery]

Forkdelta has varying volume but is still active and probably the best market for RCC right now. Sell orders/Buy orders likely to hit here but in a wide range. 

https://forkdelta.app/#!/trade/RCC-ETH

Yes still active but with a little interest, indeed we can not expect much from forkdelta, but I think the difference between buy and sell prices that so far cause people are reluctant to accommodate more, the last purchase in the history was 17 days ago, looks very risky to buy it.

[Japinat]

Forkdelta has varying volume but is still active and probably the best market for RCC right now. Sell orders/Buy orders likely to hit here but in a wide range. 

https://forkdelta.app/#!/trade/RCC-ETH

Yes still active but with a little interest, indeed we can not expect much from forkdelta, but I think the difference between buy and sell prices that so far cause people are reluctant to accommodate more, the last purchase in the history was 17 days ago, looks very risky to buy it.

Because the volume is low? that's why you think it's risky?

Actually, we can't trust forkdelta because it's a decentralized exchange with a very poor trading volume, if the team will be successful in adding this token to a new centralized exchange in the future, then maybe we might see some improvement.

There's a big risk now, but if you trust the project, you would see the opposite.

[kaneki007]

Because the volume is low? that's why you think it's risky?

Actually, we can't trust forkdelta because it's a decentralized exchange with a very poor trading volume, if the team will be successful in adding this token to a new centralized exchange in the future, then maybe we might see some improvement.

There's a big risk now, but if you trust the project, you would see the opposite.

I'm not sure the team will add another exchange because it can be seen from previous posts if there are no plans for an RCC list on another exchange. So it seems that only forkdelta can buy tokens, and it's better to invest in projects that are more visible in development. Too risky if you expect from this project for now.

[kramat]

I'm not sure the team will add another exchange because it can be seen from previous posts if there are no plans for an RCC list on another exchange. So it seems that only forkdelta can buy tokens, and it's better to invest in projects that are more visible in development. Too risky if you expect from this project for now.

yes you are right, it is very risky. maybe the team just wants to trap a lot of people after selling all the tokens they have which will then leave. this project is experiencing very poor development

[RealityClash]

Our development has always been visible and we built what we set out to build.  

You clearly only care about the listing of RCC at an exchange. Speculators like yourselves do like to think you build a foundation but then just abandon along the way because its actually just an illogical punt - as thats all you really know. Not much of a loss really for devs!

But I really don't see how you can say we have not been developing 'visibly' - have you played the game we made or traded the assets we tokenised on our marketplace?

[CryptoTech_]

Our development has always been visible and we built what we set out to build.  

You clearly only care about the listing of RCC at an exchange. Speculators like yourselves do like to think you build a foundation but then just abandon along the way because its actually just an illogical punt - as thats all you really know. Not much of a loss really for devs!

But I really don't see how you can say we have not been developing 'visibly' - have you played the game we made or traded the assets we tokenised on our marketplace?

Of course the listing is important, you made an ERC20 token, if only for collection I think you made the wrong token type. ERC20 is usually a token that can be traded. While the token for collection is ERC721.
If you can list your tokens at an exchange, of course this is good so that more people know about your project.

[RealityClash]

The purpose of the ERC20 RCC was so that backers could get their ERC721 items and use them in the AR game or trade them with others. With RCC distribution, we got the funding needed to build the tokenisation/trading platform and develop innovative NFTs, then we built the mobile game.

You can trade now these NFTs on multiple marketplaces such as RC.store or the biggest 3rd party marketplace - opensea as well as others such as Silica Nexus and Nagemon.

These items can become valuable collectibles over time, as the market has proven in non-blockchain and blockchain games. We have traders who have been happy and active in this respect, making profits and looking forward to the future for the game. The blockchain game market is currently tiny with so few users, but this is gradually improving and so the future looks good for collectibles associated to a good quality game.  

The purpose of RCC was not for speculation on the token itself. If it was, then all efforts would have gone into paying a LOT of money to get on exchanges, using scammy influencers and pump n' dumpin the markets. instead, we did what we said we would do in the whitepaper.

If you're hugely disappointed then its probably because you got involved to speculate solely on the price of a utility token, even when it was literally written in front of you that it wouldn't be a speculative currency.

[cabron]

I have to recover my password today. Got it now. but I got in again because I saw in the telegram you are giving away weapons. I can't see it anywhere in which weapons were distributed.

These free weapons I guess will be the new marketing for the project.

[RealityClash]

I have to recover my password today. Got it now. but I got in again because I saw in the telegram you are giving away weapons. I can't see it anywhere in which weapons were distributed.

These free weapons I guess will be the new marketing for the project.

Hi Cabron, glad you've got access to your account again.

Yes, like many projects, we have some promotional NFTs to give away, in the hopes that it will bring  new users to the platform and will raise the profile of the game/trading platform. These promotional NFTs are unlimited in number, so there isn't much market downside for our other NFT holders.

Did you sign up for the Virtual Blockchain Week? There has been some great talks so far and registering for that event is how you can get a series of promotional NFTs AND be in the prize draw for a Crypto ATM!

https://virtualblockchainweek.com/register/

[Branko]

This is pretty old project by blockchain standards, is there a reason
why there is no data about it on CMC, Coingecko etc (market cap, circulating and max supply etc)?

[khiholangkang]

This is pretty old project by blockchain standards, is there a reason
why there is no data about it on CMC, Coingecko etc (market cap, circulating and max supply etc)?

Because the token is not registered on any exchange, and dev does not intend to register it to exchange.

[terciduk123]

Because the volume is low? that's why you think it's risky?

Actually, we can't trust forkdelta because it's a decentralized exchange with a very poor trading volume, if the team will be successful in adding this token to a new centralized exchange in the future, then maybe we might see some improvement.

There's a big risk now, but if you trust the project, you would see the opposite.

I'm not sure the team will add another exchange because it can be seen from previous posts if there are no plans for an RCC list on another exchange. So it seems that only forkdelta can buy tokens, and it's better to invest in projects that are more visible in development. Too risky if you expect from this project for now.

Yes, i agree with you. if we want to invest, it's better to look for other projects that pay more attention to their tokens and investors. This project has been running for more than 2 years, but there is no good development with their tokens, and when we talk about the Reality Clash game, we can see it on Google Play:
Updated: January 15, 2020
Installs: 10,000+

[Provok]

Installs: 10,000+

It have pretty high hardware requirements.

[RealityClash]

The current game is an MVP, the point of this is to deliver a product and test it with consumers. We've had over 50,000 registered players so far. Not bad with the relatively high specs required and a small amount of marketing.

The next stage for the game is reducing filesize, improving gameplay, introducing better maps and more competitive elements. Then we relaunch the game with a major marketing campaign. Thats when the game aims to hit big user numbers.

This is the standard process for developing games, especially from smaller studios.

[RealityClash]

[/quote]
Yes, i agree with you. if we want to invest, it's better to look for other projects that pay more attention to their tokens and investors. This project has been running for more than 2 years, but there is no good development with their tokens, and when we talk about the Reality Clash game, we can see it on Google Play:
Updated: January 15, 2020
Installs: 10,000+
[/quote]

The project has been running for two years in which:

We've developed an innovative AR game from inception to MVP release with 50,000+ downloads with a limited budget for marketing.
We designed and tokenised unique NFTs which are available to trade on multiple exchanges and have utility.
We've built a decentralised trading platform for these tokenised assets.
Set up RCC on multiple exchanges which were legitimate and did not charge ludicrous fees.
We've designed and implemented a bridge between our game and the Ethereum blockchain.

We continue to develop new use cases for NFTs, we are still planning and working on the RC economy plus we continue to develop the mobile game and take it to the next stage - mass market.

Unfortunately, a few of the exchanges we were listed on have gone offline or are rebuilding following the bear market. Also we were not in a position to pay a huge price (250,000- 1 million USD) for a listing fee at a major exchange in the past two years. To most speculators, this counts as a project failure since they haven't yet made big money by doing nothing but waiting. What a shame.