[ANN] [ICO] nametoken (NAT) - the first decentralized domain eco system

[Jens79]

Another news for december to give you an update how everything is going:

https://www.nametoken.io/2017/12/11/nametoken-december-news/

[1715296498]

1715296498

[1715296498]

1715296498

[1715296498]

1715296498

[tukagero]

Another news for december to give you an update how everything is going:

https://www.nametoken.io/2017/12/11/nametoken-december-news/

thanks for updating us jens79. I thought thelis project is over but with these update i admit that i was wrong.
Hoping the success of the project and waiting for an exchange.

[RonMank]

At least some updates. Seems they looking for a decent exchange and dont wanna list it on etherdelta.

[Jens79]

If you have any tips for exchanges or contacts or whatever, I would be glad if you could contact me at jens@nametoken.io.
I'm doing my best to get NAT on an exchange.

BR
Jens

[QueenOfCryptos]

Very curious how all this will be evolving...
Not so a big fan now from this project. Hope everything will be ok very soon.

Keep the community updated!

[tukagero]

Why not list it on coinexchange or livecoin. Token holders need a exchange even it is low volume . I think those two is a good option for nametoken to start.

[Slappyjoez]

I will actively promote your project if I could get my LTC investment back.   

[Rigorous]

Am I reading this correctly that the team is now just Jens Peterssen and the whole Menze family has bailed?

If the project required a certain amount of money you should have set a minimum cap. You did not reach your imaginary minimum cap, which means a) people did not believe in your project and b) most of the team cannot be paid. Investors did not pay for a one man show.

IMHO this project is dead and buried and investors should be refunded.

[nugrama]

Am I reading this correctly that the team is now just Jens Peterssen and the whole Menze family has bailed?

If the project required a certain amount of money you should have set a minimum cap. You did not reach your imaginary minimum cap, which means a) people did not believe in your project and b) most of the team cannot be paid. Investors did not pay for a one man show.

IMHO this project is dead and buried and investors should be refunded.

Nice teamnya actually experienced in the trade domain, and in developing applications are also different. the success or failure of the project depends on people who are in it, we can just wait for her for token exchanger only.

[Slappyjoez]

I'm seeing a bunch of different opinions in this thread, also on twitter. I've made an online poll, just to see what the public wants. In the end the decision is up to the NAT team, but this might help with the choice.

http://www.poll-maker.com/poll1973812x69Ad4199-51

The results can be viewed here:
http://www.poll-maker.com/results1973812xEDC6B9aD-51

[Jens79]

Am I reading this correctly that the team is now just Jens Peterssen and the whole Menze family has bailed?

If the project required a certain amount of money you should have set a minimum cap. You did not reach your imaginary minimum cap, which means a) people did not believe in your project and b) most of the team cannot be paid. Investors did not pay for a one man show.

IMHO this project is dead and buried and investors should be refunded.

not bailed. We are still working together and all people are operating as advisors.
Me and my development team is still active and working on the project.
This has nothing to do with not being able to pay people. This has something to do with reducing operating costs, so that we can build this project. The team is still strong enough in order to get everything done. I would have thought that this would be good for you, since we are not willed to spend investment money on unessecary things.

[coin-investor]

Am I reading this correctly that the team is now just Jens Peterssen and the whole Menze family has bailed?

If the project required a certain amount of money you should have set a minimum cap. You did not reach your imaginary minimum cap, which means a) people did not believe in your project and b) most of the team cannot be paid. Investors did not pay for a one man show.

IMHO this project is dead and buried and investors should be refunded.

not bailed. We are still working together and all people are operating as advisors.
Me and my development team is still active and working on the project.
This has nothing to do with not being able to pay people. This has something to do with reducing operating costs, so that we can build this project. The team is still strong enough in order to get everything done. I would have thought that this would be good for you, since we are not willed to spend investment money on unessecary things.

Have voted for the project to continue and get in exchange, maybe if you did not reach your goal the exchange can give you a boost of income there is no way but to proceed now, I think refunding is a bad option if you have a good roadmap to implement.

[kewlc3s]

Am I reading this correctly that the team is now just Jens Peterssen and the whole Menze family has bailed?

If the project required a certain amount of money you should have set a minimum cap. You did not reach your imaginary minimum cap, which means a) people did not believe in your project and b) most of the team cannot be paid. Investors did not pay for a one man show.

IMHO this project is dead and buried and investors should be refunded.

not bailed. We are still working together and all people are operating as advisors.
Me and my development team is still active and working on the project.
This has nothing to do with not being able to pay people. This has something to do with reducing operating costs, so that we can build this project. The team is still strong enough in order to get everything done. I would have thought that this would be good for you, since we are not willed to spend investment money on unessecary things.

Have voted for the project to continue and get in exchange, maybe if you did not reach your goal the exchange can give you a boost of income there is no way but to proceed now, I think refunding is a bad option if you have a good roadmap to implement.

Fully agree, vote for project to continue! Just get an exchange and you will see. Price most definitely will be lower than ICO price for a first time.. but in few months I believe price will go up together with all cryptomarket. You had a good idea and team, so continue, don´t give up! We trust in you!

[zikabra]

Why would any exchange list nametoken? How many tokens do you hold and how many investors?
You can always list it on etherdelta, but your story sounds like you are trying to find good exchange to dump all your tokens.

[AlexSimion]

I'm more curious on the fact why my 780 Nat , have magically turned into 0.0000000000000078 Nat !! , I haven't touched these coins as there's no use for them , so how did this happen ?

[munichcrypto]

Gents, I do not have any remaining faith in this project and would prefer to receive the investment back (even if it is just 50% of the initial volume).

[urikmarkov]

what will be the domain addresses ? io ?

[indika]

I'm more curious on the fact why my 780 Nat , have magically turned into 0.0000000000000078 Nat !! , I haven't touched these coins as there's no use for them , so how did this happen ?

same thing happened to me i got signature bounty 14148  nat and after few days it magically tern in to 0.000000000000014148 NAT what f*** is happened and i lost my time .cost of my work this is name as a Spam and should delete this thread too

[Jens79]

If you add a custom token, please use decimals = 0, then the correct amount of NAT will appear. You can double check this with myetherwallet.

[RonMank]

Seriously, i dont know where is the problem to make the Tokens transferable, so it would be listed automatically on Etherdelta.