Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team

[Symphonized]

Is it private information about how much they paid to buy the stake.com domain?

I don't have any answer on those questions, but im sure if you search for that domain at some specific domain site seller you'll find out.

First domains are always cheap like ~10$ because it's new and not known from anyone. After some time meanwhile having visitors domains worth more due to how much known it becomes. (SEO)

[1714818383]

1714818383

[1714818383]

1714818383

[Real14Hero]

This thread and stake.com in general seem very active. Good sign for business and community.

I saw this post from Aengus in the Betking thread, it shows Aengus as: "Edward Miroslav - Primedice & Stake Founder". Even though Betking would have been somewhat of a competitor to Stake and Primedice it was clear Aengus genuinely congratulated Dean Nolan by saying this: "Best of luck Dean. Hope this works out for you!".

Check out his kind message here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2150057.msg21519026#msg21519026, Dean Nolan did not even bother to reply. Petty, disgraceful and shameful behaviour by Dean Nolan to ignore a wonderful gesture of congratulations and confidence-boosting by Aengus.




A little while ago I received this PM from Dean Nolan. Seems like he does not have any respect for the devs, owners and team behind Stake and Primedice. Dean Nolan has basically falsely accused the owners of Stake and Primedice of paying money to make posts about Betking. Disgusting little worm that Dean Nolan is.

I dont beleive in the opinion that at this stage pd / stake needs to pay someone so that they can benefit from it. The popularity and confidence of users on both these sites is paramount.

Also here dean doesnt seem to seriously "accuse" edward of paying up money for stuff. He was just making a wild shot in order to just make a point.

[slaman29]

Guys, enough of the conversations around PD or BetKing or whatever a. This is the Stake thread so we can talk about Stake.

And especially, stop using the word scam all around, open 1 thread and make your accusations, and then leave it there for people to take care of. I can respect and understand what happened to some players but they shouldn't be dragging other sites into this mess. Now PD and Stake are accused of being used to make posts about Betking? These are some of the nicest guys around. Let's keep this all about gambling right?

[JollyGood]

Is it private information about how much they paid to buy the stake.com domain?

I don't have any answer on those questions, but im sure if you search for that domain at some specific domain site seller you'll find out.

First domains are always cheap like ~10$ because it's new and not known from anyone. After some time meanwhile having visitors domains worth more due to how much known it becomes. (SEO)

Yes you are right domain actually cost less than $10 from many registrars. The domain name stake.com itself is a fantastic one so people would be curious about how much it cost because the crypto.com domain was purchased recently at a cost of millions it was reported. Anyway as nobody seems to want to declare that information no problem.

[MICRO]

This thread and stake.com in general seem very active. Good sign for business and community.

I saw this post from Aengus in the Betking thread, it shows Aengus as: "Edward Miroslav - Primedice & Stake Founder". Even though Betking would have been somewhat of a competitor to Stake and Primedice it was clear Aengus genuinely congratulated Dean Nolan by saying this: "Best of luck Dean. Hope this works out for you!".

Check out his kind message here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2150057.msg21519026#msg21519026, Dean Nolan did not even bother to reply. Petty, disgraceful and shameful behaviour by Dean Nolan to ignore a wonderful gesture of congratulations and confidence-boosting by Aengus.




A little while ago I received this PM from Dean Nolan. Seems like he does not have any respect for the devs, owners and team behind Stake and Primedice. Dean Nolan has basically falsely accused the owners of Stake and Primedice of paying money to make posts about Betking. Disgusting little worm that Dean Nolan is.

Dean as far as i know him is pretty good guy and yes its true that we/me have very good relationship with him and well most of the competition. Atleast we try to have healthy competition.

As for his remark about being paid by pd / stake , i dont think he meant paid for basing betking or something i think he knows we would never do such thing.

He probably meant for our sometimes bad decisions to who we pay to promote our sites. We did indeed had some "brand managers" that we paid to promote our site and they did it in very bad way. Like spam and other marketing strategies that we dont use like attacking our competition .

That being said i hate ICOs and what they did there.

[MICRO]

Is it private information about how much they paid to buy the stake.com domain?

I don't have any answer on those questions, but im sure if you search for that domain at some specific domain site seller you'll find out.

First domains are always cheap like ~10$ because it's new and not known from anyone. After some time meanwhile having visitors domains worth more due to how much known it becomes. (SEO)

Yes you are right domain actually cost less than $10 from many registrars. The domain name stake.com itself is a fantastic one so people would be curious about how much it cost because the crypto.com domain was purchased recently at a cost of millions it was reported. Anyway as nobody seems to want to declare that information no problem.

Tbh i dont even know how much we paid for stake.com lol. It was not much thats for sure.

We first wanted one different rly rly sick domain unfortunately it was not worth buying.

[BetKing.io]

As for his remark about being paid by pd / stake , i dont think he meant paid for basing betking or something i think he knows we would never do such thing.

He probably meant for our sometimes bad decisions to who we pay to promote our sites. We did indeed had some "brand managers" that we paid to promote our site and they did it in very bad way. Like spam and other marketing strategies that we dont use like attacking our competition .

That being said i hate ICOs and what they did there.

I meant via affiliate or something. Good indications that in his real life he is trying to learn SEO.

I assume he was paid by another site (won't mention the name but they are not a member of the CGF ) to directly slate me because surely no one can post multiple times every day for over a month and go to the lengths of writing programs to monitor my threads without being paid for it all while choosing to ignore any answers to his questions

I doubt any actual players of any bitcoin gabling site actually listen to him though so it's not like he's doing any actual damage to BetKing.

[JollyGood]

Dean as far as i know him is pretty good guy and yes its true that we/me have very good relationship with him and well most of the competition. Atleast we try to have healthy competition.

As for his remark about being paid by pd / stake , i dont think he meant paid for basing betking or something i think he knows we would never do such thing.

He probably meant for our sometimes bad decisions to who we pay to promote our sites. We did indeed had some "brand managers" that we paid to promote our site and they did it in very bad way. Like spam and other marketing strategies that we dont use like attacking our competition .

That being said i hate ICOs and what they did there.

I do not hate ICOs on the contrary I believe if they make perfect business sense then they are perfectly appropriate but only if certain conditions are met (ie investors have a high chance to make a decent profit on their investment, lots of transparency for accounts and expenditure, adhering to the whitepaper proposals and milestones as best etc). I do dislike the Betking ICO and what Dean Nolan did with a view to simply making himself rich using investors money. He never thought I would expose his PM comments so he quickly came and posted here to show it was a non-comment, a tongue-in-cheek comment but he did not like how someone could make positive posts about Stake and Primedice while making negative posts about Betking so he assumed the one getting positive posts must be paying for them.

I can see how generous, kind and genuine all those representing Stake and Primedice are and how you would never stoop so low to make nasty comments about Dean Nolan or Betking or any other site. What you see as healthy competition and good relationships with competitors is seen as jealousy by people such as Dean Nolan and their ilk.

Both websites Stake and Primedice have excellent reputations. Not a bad review in sight about them. When users raise concerns or report issues a friendly post comes along saying they are looking in to it. Stake and Primedice did not have an ICO as it was not imperative. Betking and Dean Nolan should have taken a page out of your book but in his haste to get rich quick after failing to sell his Betking site he decided to go out all guns blazing with bounty participants to pull in investors and then made the disgusting comment "investors are to blame, they should have applied due-diligence". I doubt Stake and Primedice would ever write something like that to their investors.

I also doubt very much that you would try to fool users to play a 50 BTC Jackpot dice game (such as what Dean Nolan and Betking did to "celebrate" the "relaunch" of the same identical Betking website post ICO) but that Jackpot was never really there in the first place with odds of 10 billion to one. Provably fair? Probably scam more like.

[MICRO]

Dean as far as i know him is pretty good guy and yes its true that we/me have very good relationship with him and well most of the competition. Atleast we try to have healthy competition.

As for his remark about being paid by pd / stake , i dont think he meant paid for basing betking or something i think he knows we would never do such thing.

He probably meant for our sometimes bad decisions to who we pay to promote our sites. We did indeed had some "brand managers" that we paid to promote our site and they did it in very bad way. Like spam and other marketing strategies that we dont use like attacking our competition .

That being said i hate ICOs and what they did there.

I do not hate ICOs on the contrary I believe if they make perfect business sense then they are perfectly appropriate but only if certain conditions are met (ie investors have a high chance to make a decent profit on their investment, lots of transparency for accounts and expenditure, adhering to the whitepaper proposals and milestones as best etc). I do dislike the Betking ICO and what Dean Nolan did with a view to simply making himself rich using investors money. He never thought I would expose his PM comments so he quickly came and posted here to show it was a non-comment, a tongue-in-cheek comment but he did not like how someone could make positive posts about Stake and Primedice while making negative posts about Betking so he assumed the one getting positive posts must be paying for them.

I can see how generous, kind and genuine all those representing Stake and Primedice are and how you would never stoop so low to make nasty comments about Dean Nolan or Betking or any other site. What you see as healthy competition and good relationships with competitors is seen as jealousy by people such as Dean Nolan and their ilk.

Both websites Stake and Primedice have excellent reputations. Not a bad review in sight about them. When users raise concerns or report issues a friendly post comes along saying they are looking in to it. Stake and Primedice did not have an ICO as it was not imperative. Betking and Dean Nolan should have taken a page out of your book but in his haste to get rich quick after failing to sell his Betking site he decided to go out all guns blazing with bounty participants to pull in investors and then made the disgusting comment "investors are to blame, they should have applied due-diligence". I doubt Stake and Primedice would ever write something like that to their investors.

Now i think we are paying you to say to many nice things about us. LOL

Anyways we are getting to far away from this Stake topic so lets stop talking about betking on stake topic.

[MICRO]

As for his remark about being paid by pd / stake , i dont think he meant paid for basing betking or something i think he knows we would never do such thing.

He probably meant for our sometimes bad decisions to who we pay to promote our sites. We did indeed had some "brand managers" that we paid to promote our site and they did it in very bad way. Like spam and other marketing strategies that we dont use like attacking our competition .

That being said i hate ICOs and what they did there.

I meant via affiliate or something. Good indications that in his real life he is trying to learn SEO.

I assume he was paid by another site (won't mention the name but they are not a member of the CGF ) to directly slate me because surely no one can post multiple times every day for over a month and go to the lengths of writing programs to monitor my threads without being paid for it all while choosing to ignore any answers to his questions

I doubt any actual players of any bitcoin gabling site actually listen to him though so it's not like he's doing any actual damage to BetKing.

Thanks for clarification.

Cheers Dean.

[JollyGood]

Tbh i dont even know how much we paid for stake.com lol. It was not much thats for sure.

We first wanted one different rly rly sick domain unfortunately it was not worth buying.

Well either way congratulations, both have great UIs but Stake more so than Primedice looks fantastic and the domain, well you can hardly go wrong with it. In times when domains are being bought and sold for millions you guys did very well without the need for ICOs. The one you really, really wanted  but was not worth buying - well it is the sellers loss since you guys have done great without it

[BetKing.io]

He never thought I would expose his PM comments

Of course I did, people do it to me all the time. There's no privacy in pms on this board. I pmd you as it was better than bumping your thread.

...
I do dislike the Betking ICO and what Dean Nolan did with a view to simply making himself rich using investors money.
...

Micro and most people on this forum know I was rich before the ICO AND that the person who put the most into the BK ICO was me.

Anyways we are getting to far away from this Stake topic so lets stop talking about betking on stake topic.

Exactly. Back on topic

[JollyGood]

That being said i hate ICOs and what they did there.

That comment regarding Betking and its ICO speaks volumes. Enough said...

[Symphonized]

$250 dollar giveaway! 50 winners will receive $5 each!

Rules to enter:
1. Follow us @Stake
2. Retweet this post: https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1038041362061508608
3. Join our discord (giveaways every 20 minutes here): https://discord.gg/G8vmNev  

Winners will be announced 9/9 10:30 pm (GMT +10)

[Radiante]

3. Join our discord (giveaways every 20 minutes here): https://discord.gg/G8vmNev  

Ah!, the discord changed once again! I hope the new one can stay online for longer.

[Stunna]

Stake is down for unexpected maintenance. All balances are safe, we will be patching up a game related bug and then back up! Sorry for any inconvenience

[game-protect]

Stake is down for unexpected maintenance. All balances are safe, we will be patching up a game related bug and then back up! Sorry for any inconvenience

Save in your pocket?

What happened with this "safe" 34 BTC?

This user in question was linked by fingerprint to a user who defrauded PD out of a significant sum of money. Given that, their account had a flag on it before they even made a deposit. We asked for ID and the user provided an identity we believed wasn’t theirs. We wanted to have a phone call with them to try and clear this up and after many delays they agreed. It was clear they had found a non-involved girl talk to us who didn’t seem to know anything about primedice or bitcoin. That violated our terms but obviously that isn't why we held the withdrawal, we held it for the reason originally stated.

I'd like to stop this right here and make clear that this is not a matter of money but rather a matter of principle. I'm happy to donate at minimum the funds involved in this claim to a charity of the community's choosing. The trust of this community is not something we take for granted and is why we elected to post here to further explain this unusual situation.

[Radiante]

Save in your pocket?

What happened with this "safe" 34 BTC?

Haha, common man, don't you ever rest?

[Symphonized]

Chartbet House Edge reduced from 2.0% -> 0.5%!

If you have played our Chartbet before you will love it even more!
New into Chartbet? You have started in the best possible time!
Good luck with your climbings

[Radiante]

Mission Impossible Challenge!
Ends: 17/09/18 @ Midday (12pm) GMT

Can you achieve the impossible? Well maybe not impossible, but definitely not easy! This week on HiLo we are looking for anyone who can reveal 10 or more cards in one bet. This includes the opening card, so you would need technically a streak of 9. All players who achieve the challenge in the next 7 days, will get a share in the prize pool! There is no limit to the amount of winners, and the more players who get involved the higher the prize pool! So if you get more players involved, then you win more!


Requirement

    Reveal 10 cards in HiLo with a winning bet. (First card included)
    Minimum bet is 100 satoshi bitcoin or 1200 ether ethereum.
    Bets must have been made after the commencement of this promotion.
    Ghost mode must be disabled.
    10+ Post count on forum.


Prize Pool(s) (based on amount of unique players)

    Minimum prize pool: 0.01 BTC
    If over 30 participants: 0.03 BTC
    If over 40 participants: 0.05 BTC
    If over 50 participants: 0.08 BTC

https://forum.stake.com/topic/12644-%F0%9F%8F%86-008-btc-mission-impossible-hilo-challenge/