layoutph
|
|
August 11, 2017, 02:43:49 PM |
|
The good thing about Bitcoin is, we dont need Satoshi nakamoto anymore. Bitcoin has a dozen of developers already. Unlike other coins, when their founders or developer die. Their business will pause, and its coin price drops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
claudiotiego
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 630
Merit: 154
Corl - Growth Capital on the Blockchain
|
|
August 11, 2017, 02:46:47 PM |
|
That's really cool! "It's nice that anyone with a PC can play without worrying about what video card they have, and hopefully it'll stay that way for a while"! This ship has already left.
|
|
|
|
bubblebit
|
|
August 11, 2017, 02:56:00 PM |
|
Thanks for sharing, it would likely be part of history of bitcoin. Those email sailed satoshi nakamoto as master of crypto currency. It will also be in debate for many years who really is satoshi nakamoto. Can't wait soon his identity be in public.
|
|
|
|
Kprawn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073
|
|
August 11, 2017, 03:03:21 PM |
|
I am very hesitant to accept this as "original" {unedited} emails from Satoshi, if Mike Hearn is involved. I do not trust anything where he is involved in. In the first email Satoshi says this : " 65.The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost. It never really hits a scale ceiling. If you're interested, I can go over the ways it would cope with extreme size. " ....Forward about 8 years and "scaling" is the biggest issue we had to deal with in Bitcoin. He might not have seen this coming, if he really said that.
|
|
|
|
YuginKadoya
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1169
|
|
August 11, 2017, 03:05:17 PM |
|
Well I really like the thing about the conversation of mike hearn and satoshi especially how mike started in learning what bitcoin can really do, and Satoshi started in explaining how the Visa credit card network processes about 15 million internet purchase per day and how bitcoin will top it up I can see the question mark on mike hearn's face while reading it but yeah he is now a developer, and in every interview with mike he would sai something like this "Bitcoin is an experiment and like all experiments, it can fail. So don’t invest what you can’t afford to lose". there is really a warning in giving your all to bitcoin and there is still a risk in investing it, although it became successful throughout the years.
|
|
|
|
hardforkcoin
|
|
August 11, 2017, 03:22:42 PM |
|
Wow!
This is pretty neat to see actual replies back and forth.
Are these brand new, as in nobody has ever seen them before besides Mike? Why did Mike decide to give you these anyways?
Still, very nice to read through these and we can see a glimpse into how Satoshi was and how he corresponded. That gives us all insight into how BTC was designed better and some behind the scenes extras!
|
|
|
|
freebutcaged
|
|
August 11, 2017, 03:32:03 PM |
|
Well I don't know how could Satoshi expect Bitcoin to be a replacement of Visa and other payment processors while even a 8MB block size is not
Merely enough to process %20 of the transactions Visa is processing every day. the only comments I believe are truly from Satoshi himself are the
Posts which he submitted in this forum alone, the rest could be very well forged. if you recall ever since Bitcoin's price increased past $600 there has
Been all sorts of claim, from fake claims of being Satoshi to mining Bitcoin cash with the same "Unknown" nick name to indicate that the same person
Mining under this name is the same unknown entity that mined genesis block of Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
CipherionX (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
August 11, 2017, 03:41:42 PM |
|
Wow!
This is pretty neat to see actual replies back and forth.
Are these brand new, as in nobody has ever seen them before besides Mike? Why did Mike decide to give you these anyways?
Still, very nice to read through these and we can see a glimpse into how Satoshi was and how he corresponded. That gives us all insight into how BTC was designed better and some behind the scenes extras!
Mike shared the first one publicly before ( https://bitcoinfoundation.org/forum/index.php?/topic/54-my-first-message-to-satoshi/), and has quoted bits and pieces of some of the others. He actually thought they had been published already. He had previously forwarded them to Charles Hoskinson ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191508.0), who never did anything with them. I'm learning that, even though hundreds of people have spent countless hours speculating about Satoshi, few people actually asked the original developers to share what they knew.
|
|
|
|
soul-impact
|
|
August 11, 2017, 03:44:15 PM |
|
I won't be clicking on any unknown links. I'll wait for the Satoshi movie.
Yes, you have the right choice, we should not trust any email. They can be fake ones. In this world, there are many bad guys trying to take advantage of us. Be sober!
|
|
|
|
jak3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
|
|
August 11, 2017, 03:50:11 PM |
|
glad that these messages still safe I remember seeing those emails when I just joined the Bitcoin system. it was back on 2011.i trust Pastebin links so relax there are no virus or infection in those texts. if anyone spends a little time reading those conversations between Satoshi then they can get a clear picture of what kind of stuff is implemented into bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
gmaxwell
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4172
Merit: 8419
|
|
August 11, 2017, 05:39:33 PM |
|
Shameful. Shameful if they're legit, shameful if they're edited. Here was my response to "CipherionX"'s attempts at getting leaks. Publishing someone's private messages without their consent is generally considered unethical. In some situations it is less of a big deal and may be excusable, in others it is a really big deal.
Satoshi didn't make those emails public and I think it's not really anyone elses right to do so. If he wanted them public, presumably he would have made them public or would make them public now. Breaking his trust is a disrespect to the great contribution he made to the world.
Publication of his private emails may create personal risk of theft or physical harm for him and his family. The damage created from a loss of privacy can't be undone and it may not be obvious from even careful analysis what elements of a message may be revealing. Even the smallest of details could be potentially identifying. Disclosure of his private correspondence may have terrible consequences, far worse than publishing most other person's private emails.
From message which have previously been leaked, we know that Satoshi complained about the fixating and focusing on him and his identity. Too bad the people he complained about doing this did not respect his wishes.
His private messages have also been utilized by scammers to aid their inept impersonations.
Obsession with Bitcoin's creator detracts from the greatness of his accomplishment: he built a system where it doesn't matter who created it or why-- because we don't have to trust it or each other.
I hope that people will delete private messages they have and forever protect them from disclosure rather than publish them.
I have done so, and whatever I have or find I will not disclose and will continue to endeavor to secure so that I cannot disclose it through error or future weakness. Perhaps if you sit back and consider this some you will realize that there is some merit to these points, and you'll choose to abandon this project. I hope you do.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
slaveforanunnak1
|
|
August 11, 2017, 05:50:07 PM |
|
I am very hesitant to accept this as "original" {unedited} emails from Satoshi, if Mike Hearn is involved. I do not trust anything where he is involved in. In the first email Satoshi says this : " 65.The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost. It never really hits a scale ceiling. If you're interested, I can go over the ways it would cope with extreme size. " ....Forward about 8 years and "scaling" is the biggest issue we had to deal with in Bitcoin. He might not have seen this coming, if he really said that. THIS! I don't buy this for a millisecond! there is no way to prove that any of these transcripts are authentic. Specially coming from someone like Mike. Sorry, but we already have Nakamoto institute where all of satoshi's actual provable conversations are available for everyone to read. Anything "personal" I'm going to pass on it. If you guys want, give me a few week and i'll find the conversation I had with satoshi myself! It's a great read.
|
|
|
|
slaveforanunnak1
|
|
August 11, 2017, 05:52:57 PM |
|
Wow!
This is pretty neat to see actual replies back and forth.
Are these brand new, as in nobody has ever seen them before besides Mike? Why did Mike decide to give you these anyways?
Still, very nice to read through these and we can see a glimpse into how Satoshi was and how he corresponded. That gives us all insight into how BTC was designed better and some behind the scenes extras!
Mike shared the first one publicly before ( https://bitcoinfoundation.org/forum/index.php?/topic/54-my-first-message-to-satoshi/), and has quoted bits and pieces of some of the others. He actually thought they had been published already. He had previously forwarded them to Charles Hoskinson ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191508.0), who never did anything with them. I'm learning that, even though hundreds of people have spent countless hours speculating about Satoshi, few people actually asked the original developers to share what they knew. >He had previously forwarded them to Charles Hoskinson Charles. Hoskinson. Another red flag! Now I know this is BS.
|
|
|
|
Andre_Goldman
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 253
Property1of1OU
|
|
August 11, 2017, 05:53:51 PM |
|
Shameful. Here was my response to "CipherionX"'s attempts at getting leaks. Publishing someone's private messages without their consent is generally considered unethical. In some situations it is less of a big deal and may be excusable, in others it is a really big deal.
Satoshi didn't make those emails public and I think it's not really anyone elses right to do so. If he wanted them public, presumably he would have made them public or would make them public now. Breaking his trust is a disrespect to the great contribution he made to the world.
Publication of his private emails may create personal risk of theft or physical harm for him and his family. The damage created from a loss of privacy can't be undone and it may not be obvious from even careful analysis what elements of a message may be revealing. Even the smallest of details could be potentially identifying. Disclosure of his private correspondence may have terrible consequences, far worse than publishing most other person's private emails.
From message which have previously been leaked, we know that Satoshi complained about the fixating and focusing on him and his identity. Too bad the people he complained about doing this did not respect his wishes.
His private messages have also been utilized by scammers to aid their inept impersonations.
Obsession with Bitcoin's creator detracts from the greatness of his accomplishment: he built a system where it doesn't matter who created it or why-- because we don't have to trust it or each other.
I hope that people will delete private messages they have and forever protect them from disclosure rather than publish them.
I have done so, and whatever I have or find I will not disclose and will continue to endeavor to secure so that I cannot disclose it through error or future weakness. Perhaps if you sit back and consider this some you will realize that there is some merit to these points, and you'll choose to abandon this project. I hope you do.
Cheers,
That is an interesting point from the Privacy Perspective ... I am doing some research on protected health information (PHI) and reading some HIPAA rules ... there is an interest debate on how to share medical information without share personal information (De/RE-identification problem) http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0218488502001648
|
Patent1number: ****-****
|
|
|
CipherionX (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
August 11, 2017, 06:09:48 PM |
|
Shameful. Shameful if they're legit, shameful if they're edited. ...
I appreciate your perspective, Greg. I had these e-mails for a couple of weeks now, and I took the time to analyze each sentence closely before sharing. I was unable to find anything that points in one person's direction, although that's not to say there isn't something there. There's just so much history in these e-mails that I really didn't want to disappear.
|
|
|
|
Similificator
|
|
August 11, 2017, 06:44:49 PM |
|
Wow, thanks op. Once again i proved to myself how stupid i am when it comes to these things. But damn! I also realized how smart/intelligent a human can really be, not just because he managed to make bitcoins but also by the way he addresses questions and answer them appropriately wow, just wow, and also mike is really amazing he was so eager to learn and you can see that he is really sincere on his questions.. this right here is pure gold. Even if I didn't understand a lot of what they were talking about, i could sense the importance of this convo in the history of btc.. i hope a lot of people will also be able to get to read this convo between satoshi amd mike.. Thanks again op for sharing this very important part of history..
|
|
|
|
maeusi
|
|
August 11, 2017, 07:05:15 PM |
|
Thank you very much. It is very interesting to learn from original and beginning on. Now I am beginning to understand the technical aspects of bitcoin and blockchain. Was also not aware, that also ripple existed already.
|
|
|
|
The One
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 11, 2017, 08:20:40 PM |
|
|
| ..................... ........What is C?......... .............. | ...........ICO Dec 1st – Dec 30th............ ............Open Dec 1st- Dec 30th............ ...................ANN thread Bounty....................
|
|
|
|
Andre_Goldman
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 253
Property1of1OU
|
|
August 11, 2017, 09:18:06 PM |
|
honestly ... cypher punks mail list ... who invented that ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.; dkim=pass header. http://www.dkim.org/
|
Patent1number: ****-****
|
|
|
Kaller
|
|
August 11, 2017, 09:19:28 PM |
|
I have a feeling this will be an historic thread. We haven't seen anything from Satoshi in 7 years and suddenly this? Someone should post this on Reddit I think it will go viral.
|
|
|
|
|