Wallet version is 1.1.0.0
Does this mean that about two months ago the blockchain started anew? Without taking into account the old chain of blocks? If so then this is a very strange solution of the developer. How can you trust currency in this way?
We have updated not only the chain, we have switched to a new algorithm. Since the old algorithm had fatal errors for POS.
There was a vote in the community, most members of the community chose the skunk algorithm.
After accepting the new algorithm, there was a currency exchange from the old purse to a new one, which also lasted long enough to hold an exchange ..
Who submitted the application and received the same number of coins.
All members of the community who are interested in the development of this coin are following its fate and history.
Even then we appeared on the stock exchange. First on stocks.exchange, then a little later on yobit.net
That's when the coin became not 10 satos, but more. Here and began to appear who wanted to make an exchange, but it's too late.
You will forgive me but this will not happen. Coins that were on the old algorithm so there and left.
This is my personal opinion and if it does not suit you this is your personal business. We have a united community and we try to help everyone.
You have an interesting logic.
1. The developer made a mistake when choosing an algorithm that led to the collapse of POS
2. The developer did not bother with a full fork (with the preservation of the history of transactions)
3. The developer envisaged a "manual" method of transferring coins from an old wallet to a new wallet which also limited time.
4. And now he accuses me that I do not keep track of the history and fate of the coin and therefore did not have time to make an exchange.
I put the time and resources into mining your coin. This is the essence of POW mining. If at the same time I can lose what I dug up as a result of the fact that I did not follow the forum, then why such a coin? What will prevent you from changing the base conditions next time? This approach, in the opinion of the person who invested resources in mining, is no better than throwing a coin after the first pump.