Trader Steve
|
|
June 07, 2014, 11:11:15 PM |
|
BitMessage is anonymous but NOT secure. Add a layer of crypto to your messages and you may have a chance.
Can you elaborate?
|
|
|
|
FlowerMatt
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
June 08, 2014, 08:00:41 AM |
|
Pretty cool. What future plans do you have with it? A dedicated 'instance' as a tor hidden service would force anonymous readers too. The ability to publicly respond (through bitmessage) would be interesting too (or at least link-backs)
|
|
|
|
shiwendttxf6860
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
June 10, 2014, 02:59:01 AM |
|
glad to know things are still progressing fine (just a pity we haven't been able to follow the progress through CIYAM Open).
I will keep the project active.
|
|
|
|
vleroybrown
|
|
June 28, 2014, 11:57:56 PM |
|
BitMessage is anonymous but NOT secure. Add a layer of crypto to your messages and you may have a chance.
Can you elaborate? Here I am brought into this all under the idea that everything I do can be foxy.. Do you see me?
|
|
|
|
moriartybitcoin
|
|
June 29, 2014, 12:42:00 AM |
|
bitmessage is just another shining example of what can be accomplished with blockchain technology. Bitcoin itself was just the tip of the iceberg.
|
|
|
|
novacn
|
|
June 29, 2014, 01:32:44 AM |
|
Very interesting. Good to know!
|
|
|
|
TheFascistMind
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2014, 12:46:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Hunyadi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
|
|
September 18, 2014, 12:54:20 PM |
|
Damn. That's sad
|
▂▃▅▇█▓▒░B**-Cultist░▒▓█▇▅▃▂
|
|
|
mmeijeri
|
|
September 18, 2014, 01:08:29 PM |
|
I've only skimmed the linked thread, but I thought BM had a sharding mechanism of some sort (streams? channels?) to prevent this problem. Why isn't that enough to solve this problem?
|
ROI is not a verb, the term you're looking for is 'to break even'.
|
|
|
justusranvier
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009
|
|
September 18, 2014, 01:45:30 PM |
|
Why isn't that enough to solve this problem?
It is. (once it's actually implemented) Someone's just FUDing.
|
|
|
|
TheFascistMind
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:47:19 PM Last edit: September 18, 2014, 02:58:40 PM by TheFascistMind |
|
Why isn't that enough to solve this problem?
It is. (once it's actually implemented) Someone's just FUDing. If you actually READ (as in RTFM) the thread, such a grouping or streams solution is not simple as you might naively assume. And probably why it is not implemented. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-hG__keR9Nn0/UYGXHQZG2iI/AAAAAAAABMw/C2ZtkrLWqD0/s1600/rtfm_finished.pngAnyone who is actually a programmer knows the "devil is in the details". So these idiots who make proclamations based on some general rumor or conceptual idea, can't hold a candle to someone who is actually down in the trenches implementing this stuff and thus speaks from a deeper understanding of the issues involved. For the meantime, Bitmessage is dead. And bringing it back to life isn't going to be trivial. So who is trolling, as you always do. Anyone still paying attention to this "Legendary" idiot deserves the misinformation he spews.
|
|
|
|
justusranvier
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:58:48 PM |
|
So who is trolling, as you always do.
For someone who's only been around for two weeks, you have remarkably strong opinions about what's going on.
|
|
|
|
TheFascistMind
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:00:07 PM |
|
So who is trolling, as you always do.
For someone who's only been around for two weeks, you have remarkably strong opinions about what's going on. Your nemesis AnonyMint wasn't around for 2 weeks.
|
|
|
|
jabo38
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
mining is so 2012-2013
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:14:19 PM |
|
I have been playing around with Bitmessage. It looks like it doesn't work well. Messages I sent out a few days ago still aren't received. Didn't have much important to say, but still it kind of sucks.
I was noticing from what I read, Bitmessage is relying on PoW. And right now just one spammer with probably just a few computers is bringing it down. I am sad to imagine what an Asic built just to take down Bitmessage could do, if that is even possible.
|
|
|
|
Rassah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
|
|
September 18, 2014, 05:17:56 PM |
|
Seems to still work for me. Also, probably won't be an issue for this specific project, since OpenTransactions can have its own bitmessage stream separate from the rest of BitMessage (like a separate fork of bitcoin)
|
|
|
|
Sukrim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1006
|
|
September 19, 2014, 09:38:36 AM |
|
So ~1.5 years later... what exactly is still missing that OpenTransactions can finally take off?
|
|
|
|
btcwithus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2014, 11:45:57 AM |
|
I have download the bitmessage right now.it's cool!
|
|
|
|
mere-mortal
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 19, 2014, 03:36:09 PM |
|
So what do the Snr's and legends think is going to come of this tech
|
|
|
|
pikabit
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
September 19, 2014, 05:03:39 PM |
|
In my experience bit message has been somewhat buggy.
|
|
|
|
knight22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
--------------->¿?
|
|
September 19, 2014, 06:09:00 PM |
|
Isn't Bitmessage incorporated into Open Bazaar?
|
|
|
|
|