Vircurex: Which of these coins would you like to see on Vircurex

[baritus]

The forum is one day old, so while you are judging, we'll be over here .

[1714920098]

1714920098

[1714920098]

1714920098

[1714920098]

1714920098

[Prelude]

The forum is one day old, so while you are judging, we'll be over here .

WCF was launched yesterday, don't see your point? 

[mullick]

"None of them are of relevancy"

Going forward we will focus more on what difference the alt makes to the community, only changing reward, speed, etc won't be sufficient. Further listings of coins will require some act of innovation, something new, something that the community is looking for.

There is only one altcoin launched lately that is actualy game changer and that is YACoin. It is by all standards the most innovative altcoin since Litecoin but in a situation where 10+
other altcoins were launched, where miners were jumping on new chains almost daily and where some people invested a lot of BTC or LTC into those new altcoins, it is expectable that
YACoin won't be looked at much. Make no mistake, "something that the community is looking for" right now are future scamcoins. Start mining it early, dump it on exchange, repeat with
new altcoin tommorow. Situation is extremely complicated right now because neither bag holders want to lose all money nor miners want to lose all coins so they are spaming this forum
with absolute bullshit propaganda for every recent altcoin they invested money or hashpower. Most people are extremely biased right now and it is almost impossible to make them look
at cryptocoin scene as a whole and make rational judgements. Other people, like mr_random, daytrader420 and MaGNeT are pathetic traders that will promote or bash anything and
everything to make some extra profit. They belong to trollbox on BTC-e, with others that have no clue about anything except eventualy how to screw naive and greedy noob investors
and miners. All it takes to realise that is to check past posts of those guys.

I suggest you to add no more altcoins to Vircurex for now. I would be OK with removal of YAC, FTC, CNC and BQC as well. Situation is pretty much already out of control. If you people
running exchanges don't stop adding crapcoins and scamcoins there will be no end to "change few values and launch" or "let's revive old crapcoin or scamcoin few of us secretly mined
for months" mania.

^^ +1 for this guy

[mastadonballs]

wdc please!

[hl5460]

Put BTE on

[NWO]

We are receiving quite a number of inquiries to list additional coins. There are already 12 coins traded on Vircurex in addition to USD and Euro, thus we'ld like to better gauge the community's interest to list additional coins.

This vote is NOT a commitment to list the winner, it is purely a market research action. If the vote turns out a promising candidate we will most likely put it up for vote to the Vircurex shareholders.

No PWC? There were two separate polls for PowerCoin to be on an exchange with an outstanding rally of 'YES' votes.

[RandyMagnum]

2 obvious winners here.

[pizza]

one winner here WDC with 1GH/sec network compared to DGC 300mh/sec network, lucky coin is at 387mh/sec.

[pizza]

No offense Vircurex but your pretty fucking stupid. You put up a poll knowing that coins can fudge the numbers whereas all you have to do to look at popularity is look at hashrate.

Your two clear winners

1. WDC 1gh/sec
2. LuckyCoin 400gh/sec

The end use your brain for once its not that hard.

[clint25n]

No offense Vircurex but your pretty fucking stupid. You put up a poll knowing that coins can fudge the numbers whereas all you have to do to look at popularity is look at hashrate.

Your two clear winners

1. WDC 1gh/sec
2. LuckyCoin 400gh/sec

The end use your brain for once its not that hard.

Vircurex is wise for doing community research first.
I think BTC-e made a hasty decision adding CNC too quickly and probably kicked themselves for it later.
Adding too many altcoins may not be good for an exchange.

Though it would be nice to stay off the exchanges until the community grows some more.
All of us here would like to keep buying at .0002 for the time being.

Currently 10% the size of FeatherCoin community (after 48 hours).

[pizza]

No offense Vircurex but your pretty fucking stupid. You put up a poll knowing that coins can fudge the numbers whereas all you have to do to look at popularity is look at hashrate.

Your two clear winners

1. WDC 1gh/sec
2. LuckyCoin 400gh/sec

The end use your brain for once its not that hard.

Vircurex is wise for doing community research first.
I think BTC-e made a hasty decision adding CNC too quickly and probably kicked themselves for it later.
Adding too many altcoins may not be good for an exchange.

Though it would be nice to stay off the exchanges until the community grows some more.
All of us here would like to keep buying at .0002 for the time being.

Currently 10% the size of FeatherCoin community (after 48 hours).

You do research by looking at hashrate it's simple that's the ultimate test of popularity not polls, where GLD spam supporters can go and spam 10 different usernames to vote. Forgot to mention dead shit powercoin too.

[moreporknz]

But what is the average 24-48hour hashrate, these days people seem to jump from coin to coin according to mining profitability   Hashrate can give an indication but perhaps not an accurate one?

[pizza]

But what is the average 24-48hour hashrate, these days people seem to jump from coin to coin according to mining profitability  Hashrate can give an indication but perhaps not an accurate one?

most the these coins are much older than 48 hours, LuckyCoin is the newest ones, and they will probably stay steady and continue to grow. Some of these coins are weeks old. End of the day WDC and LuckyCoin have higher avgs.

[Speratom]

"None of them are of relevancy"

Going forward we will focus more on what difference the alt makes to the community, only changing reward, speed, etc won't be sufficient. Further listings of coins will require some act of innovation, something new, something that the community is looking for.

There is only one altcoin launched lately that is actualy game changer and that is YACoin. It is by all standards the most innovative altcoin since Litecoin but in a situation where 10+
other altcoins were launched, where miners were jumping on new chains almost daily and where some people invested a lot of BTC or LTC into those new altcoins, it is expectable that
YACoin won't be looked at much. Make no mistake, "something that the community is looking for" right now are future scamcoins. Start mining it early, dump it on exchange, repeat with
new altcoin tommorow. Situation is extremely complicated right now because neither bag holders want to lose all money nor miners want to lose all coins so they are spaming this forum
with absolute bullshit propaganda for every recent altcoin they invested money or hashpower. Most people are extremely biased right now and it is almost impossible to make them look
at cryptocoin scene as a whole and make rational judgements. Other people, like mr_random, daytrader420 and MaGNeT are pathetic traders that will promote or bash anything and
everything to make some extra profit. They belong to trollbox on BTC-e, with others that have no clue about anything except eventualy how to screw naive and greedy noob investors
and miners. All it takes to realise that is to check past posts of those guys.

I suggest you to add no more altcoins to Vircurex for now. I would be OK with removal of YAC, FTC, CNC and BQC as well. Situation is pretty much already out of control. If you people
running exchanges don't stop adding crapcoins and scamcoins there will be no end to "change few values and launch" or "let's revive old crapcoin or scamcoin few of us secretly mined
for months" mania.

You are right to a certain extend, greed is the short term engine and whatever coin you hold is the one you are going to defend. I though Yacoin were a good shot because of the CPU only capacities. Obviously the savage pre-mining and 5 days to release the ss3 and amx algos made a lot of people end up with scrapes while others have millions. Still the potential is enormous because anyone with a CPU can get in.

Now food for thought, say somebody comes up with a super fast bio/atom/duckfat based CPU/GPU technology and starts reigning supreme on the transactions, would that break the peer-to-peer logic?

Even more, say somebody already has a disruptive technology and is running at 1% as we speak, waiting to open the gates when the time is right?

On the other hand I wonder what would happen if we applied Peer-to-peer technology to voting. I know, it's all a big puppet show, still, e-voting is run as we speak in client server environment with proprietary systems that we all know are rigged, why isn't anybody looking into a peer-to-peer based voting sys?

There you go, I hope this wasn't to biased and opens a wider discussion on cryptocurrencies?

[bitpop]

Bytecoin

[Xmansk]

I vote DGC

[kr4x]

Can't go wrong with Gldcoin especially with the massive support community

[Hydroponica]

Can't go wrong with Gldcoin especially with the massive support community

Yeah, all three is you. Oh, and the 62 people you guys paid, to vote for your shitty coin. Best part is, you paid them with GLD, which is rapidly becoming worthless

[dotcoin.info]

now it is DGC and WDC.

list them on VIRCUREX.

[Hydroponica]

now it is DGC and WDC.

list them on VIRCUREX.

Both coins bring nothing needed on cryptocoin scene. 0 innovations, 0 new services, 0 niche markets, 0 breakthroughts. They are little more than copies of what we already have.

So, instant transactions doesn't count? Or fast diff adjusts?