Dyvz
Member
 Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
|
 |
November 25, 2017, 08:46:11 AM |
|
Of all others cryptonight coins i choose this coin, hope i m right! no premine and good launch are good indicators for me!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Dyvz
Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
|
|
November 26, 2017, 12:01:25 PM |
|
As for me coinsmarkets.com is much more comfortable exchange than both we have now, if listing wont cost too much - will be good to see masari there
|
|
|
|
|
jbmustaq
|
|
November 26, 2017, 09:41:01 PM |
|
As for me coinsmarkets.com is much more comfortable exchange than both we have now, if listing wont cost too much - will be good to see masari there
coinsmarkets.com does not support cryptonote. |
|
|
|
|
dtr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2017, 08:08:50 AM |
|
what's wrong with the price?
|
|
|
|
|
|
jbmustaq
|
|
November 27, 2017, 11:27:31 AM |
|
All of a sudden no orders so very low pricing.
|
|
|
|
|
Zuggcrypto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2017, 02:02:54 PM |
|
With low volume, price is so much vulnerable. Someone already used Nicehash just to harm this coin mining it then leaving for long time on hard diff.
|
|
|
|
|
maximo2121
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
November 28, 2017, 12:21:52 AM |
|
what's wrong with the price?
Manipulation! |
|
|
|
|
Zuggcrypto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
November 28, 2017, 09:25:47 AM |
|
More activity here and on discord is so much welcome. Dev is working on new features, and its hard to add bounty/airdrop since no premine, but communication is a key!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invis
|
|
November 28, 2017, 03:35:11 PM |
|
Hi guys! We have make another pool for MSR. Lets spread hashrate. Enjoy to mine tiwh us. https://msr.dark-mine.su/ 0.25% fee. |
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
November 28, 2017, 03:42:09 PM |
|
What's wrong with the DAA? Five full hours for the last 60 blocks (nominal should be two hours) and yet the difficulty gets increased.  |
|
|
|
|
thaer (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 134
Merit: 11
|
|
November 28, 2017, 04:04:18 PM
Last edit: November 28, 2017, 04:51:29 PM by thaer |
|
What's wrong with the DAA? Five full hours for the last 60 blocks (nominal should be two hours) and yet the difficulty gets increased.
the current DAA over 30 blocks (1 hour, not 2 - block maturity is 60 blocks) takes into account the median timespan (derived from Sumokoin) and not just the mean - many of the mined blocks are not in the screenshot you provided (mined from other pools) as we have a mining adversary with a private pool (hash rate is not observed in any of the public pools). This problem has gotten worse over time, and it seems like the adversary is trying to explicitly disincentivize miners with targeted attacks that take the algorithm into consideration. The attacks have gotten worse since I mentioned (on Discord) that there is a new difficulty algorithm implemented that will replace this in our next protocol upgrade (though this could just be correlation and not necessarily the cause). My initial plans were to include it with new features, which would place it near Q1, but it may be deemed necessary to push out the new DAA sooner. |
|
|
|
|
leviua
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
November 28, 2017, 06:49:06 PM |
|
Oh my, diff on main pool is jumping like mad all day long, same going with price on stocks.exchange. Large volume will bring more stable price
|
|
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
November 28, 2017, 07:04:43 PM
Last edit: November 28, 2017, 07:26:51 PM by nanona |
|
Oh my, diff on main pool is jumping like mad all day long
Well, difficulty is supposed to "jump like mad" if the hashrate "jumps like mad" too. That's the goal, to mimic the hashrate, right? It's only a problem when both jump out of sync  |
|
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
November 28, 2017, 07:08:26 PM |
|
This problem has gotten worse over time, and it seems like the adversary is trying to explicitly disincentivize miners with targeted attacks that take the algorithm into consideration.
This was my guess as well. Because the jumps were too big today, like someone trying to create a positive feedback loop. I watched only superpool blocks but I have seen the difficulty as low as sub 10M and over 200M within as little as two hours. |
|
|
|
|
dtr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2017, 08:15:06 AM |
|
The same situation was with sumokoin after 1-2 month since start. They had to urgently implement some mitigation to diff calculation code.
|
|
|
|
|
Zuggcrypto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2017, 08:54:00 AM |
|
My guess we will see the network and price rising soon, just give dev time to do what he planed. if we can make it to 1300 sat like it was after adding to stocks.exchange will be great!
|
|
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
November 29, 2017, 12:55:52 PM |
|
The same situation was with sumokoin after 1-2 month since start. They had to urgently implement some mitigation to diff calculation code.
Masari's original DAA was much worse and after appr. six weeks it HF'd to implement the Sumokoin DAA. That's the one in use now since another six weeks or so. But it is still far from perfect as we see and it will likely be fixed in the next HF. A couple of hours ago the nicehash idiot attacked again. Difficulty now over 200M and no block since two hours. With the nicehash botnet for hire, new coins today need very quick and accurate DAAs. This wasn't the case three years ago. People with large farms are not a problem. They are financially invested and act rationally. But nicehash is another story. They provide every idiot who is not invested at all with a huge gun so he can go on a rampage and wreak havoc. |
|
|
|
|
leviua
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2017, 01:28:39 PM |
|
the solution can be quite easy (in theory), just set high limit on hashpower from single miner (or single wallet recieve rewards), let it be 20% of total poll hash rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
November 29, 2017, 02:17:13 PM |
|
the solution can be quite easy (in theory), just set high limit on hashpower from single miner (or single wallet recieve rewards), let it be 20% of total poll hash rate
That would be pool-side and can't solve the problem. It could only contain it. I suggested that pools do not provide dedicated ports for the nicehash botnet. Masari.superpools provides even two dedicated nicehash ports. But even if it didn't, someone could always create a private pool for nicehash and it happened already. The solution must be network-wide on the protocol level. |
|
|
|
|
thaer (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 134
Merit: 11
|
|
November 29, 2017, 07:40:01 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
