List of ongoing scams

[Matthew N. Wright]

If you weren't a scammer you wouldn't have an Untrustworthy tag and an orange ignore button, stop trying to sell your shit, no-ones buying it.

Your logic is infallible. How do you feel about Roger Ver who has a criminal record for selling fireworks basically? He must be a scammer because he has a criminal record? Please post more, I'm not even kidding- it's highly entertaining, like watching a neonazi explain why jews and blacks are ruining the world, or government muppets explaining how pot is ruining America. 

[tmbp]

If you weren't a scammer you wouldn't have an Untrustworthy tag and an orange ignore button, stop trying to sell your shit, no-ones buying it.

Your logic is infallible. How do you feel about Roger Ver who has a criminal record for selling fireworks basically? He must be a scammer because he has a criminal record? Please post more, I'm not even kidding- it's highly entertaining, like watching a neonazi explain why jews and blacks are ruining the world, or government muppets explaining how pot is ruining America. 

How is morality related to legality again? Were you under the impression that we're a bunch of lawyers sitting here making cases against you?

[Matthew N. Wright]

If you weren't a scammer you wouldn't have an Untrustworthy tag and an orange ignore button, stop trying to sell your shit, no-ones buying it.

Your logic is infallible. How do you feel about Roger Ver who has a criminal record for selling fireworks basically? He must be a scammer because he has a criminal record? Please post more, I'm not even kidding- it's highly entertaining, like watching a neonazi explain why jews and blacks are ruining the world, or government muppets explaining how pot is ruining America.  

How is morality related to legality again? Were you under the impression that we're a bunch of lawyers sitting here making cases against you?

Since you missed the point, the correlation was related to generalization and misinformation. You, an anonymous sockpuppet on the forums, make uninformed blanket accusations against others, admitting that you don't do any research into them prior to making them, under the guise of "protecting people". It would seem you are your own enemy. So far you have claimed I have purchased advertising on the forum (which I never have), then instead of admitting you were wrong when asked to provide proof, you switched to "yeah, but you're probably a scammer", even though you can't provide any evidence of that *either*. Then, since you've run of out tricks you fall back on the "Well if I don't understand it, it must be wrong" thought process, which is fine since bitcointalk.org thrives on such ignorance.

Carry on "protecting" people. It's free entertainment for the rest of us.

[MPOE-PR]

Link?

That's just my personal opinion I haven't really investigated that far into my sources, I don't really spend time in gossip, I just make sure the members are protected.

Your "personal opinion" is that I have purchased advertising space (which I've never done) to scam (which I've never done) but you don't really spend time in "gossip" (which is what you're doing) and you don't look into your "sources" (other people's gossip) because you want to "protect" people?

You're more entertaining than dank.

Actually you may be on to something, he does sound a lot like dank.

[tmbp]

Since you missed the point, the correlation was related to generalization and misinformation. You, an anonymous sockpuppet on the forums, make uninformed blanket accusations against others, admitting that you don't do any research into them prior to making them, under the guise of "protecting people". It would seem you are your own enemy. So far you have claimed I have purchased advertising on the forum (which I never have), then instead of admitting you were wrong when asked to provide proof, you switched to "yeah, but you're probably a scammer", even though you can't provide any evidence of that *either*. Then, since you've run of out tricks you fall back on the "Well if I don't understand it, it must be wrong" thought process, which is fine since bitcointalk.org thrives on such ignorance.

Carry on "protecting" people. It's free entertainment for the rest of us.

I have researched all the "accusations" in my first post in the topic, you being a scammer is a matter of speculation/personal opinion, I couldn't care more to investigate, you aren't worth that much.

I don't know if you're just trying to troll me that hard without success or is really that thick-skulled.

Actually you may be on to something, he does sound a lot like dank.

Every time I post a reply or open a topic you pop up 5 minutes later, you sure you're here for the "entertainment"? 

[Inedible]

Your calling sites scammers due to the fact they can't prove their legitimacy in terms of volume (Well from what I've gathered).

Like Doog & me discussed on another thread, there is no way you can ever prove that the volume isn't faked. You may as well add every casino on your list (Along with the one your working for; Coinroll). Your wasting your time, and are yet to receive any positive feedback to your accusations. I suggest you stop wasting your time.

You assume I work for Coinroll just because Primedice is a knockoff of Coinroll and I added them?

Their standard of proof is pretty similar to yours it seems.

Not enjoying the accusation any more than the accused on your list are?

[tmbp]

Your calling sites scammers due to the fact they can't prove their legitimacy in terms of volume (Well from what I've gathered).

Like Doog & me discussed on another thread, there is no way you can ever prove that the volume isn't faked. You may as well add every casino on your list (Along with the one your working for; Coinroll). Your wasting your time, and are yet to receive any positive feedback to your accusations. I suggest you stop wasting your time.

You assume I work for Coinroll just because Primedice is a knockoff of Coinroll and I added them?

Their standard of proof is pretty similar to yours it seems.

Not enjoying the accusation any more than the accused on your list are?

Yours whose you sheep?

[Inedible]

Yours whose you sheep?

I'm not sure I follow.

[tmbp]

Yours whose you sheep?

I'm not sure I follow.

You refer to some casino as "yours", I don't remember pledging allegiance.

P.S. I am not related to any casino either

[bit777]

tmbp you are a scammer. You are scamming the users of this forum out of their own trust to the listed sites on this thread (including us)  

Prove it that you are not, otherwise you are.

Either show some proof of your accusations, or delete the thread as this is becoming ridiculous.

[Matthew N. Wright]

tmbp you are a scammer. You are scamming the users of this forum out of their own trust to the listed sites on this thread (including us)  

Prove it that you are not, otherwise you are.

Either show some proof of your accusations, or delete the thread as this is becoming ridiculous.

Nah, he's not a scammer. He's just sloppy and ignorant. Give it time, once the initial shock of how he has lived this long has worn down, people will stop reading this thread again.

[tmbp]

tmbp you are a scammer. You are scamming the users of this forum out of their own trust to the listed sites on this thread (including us)  

Prove it that you are not, otherwise you are.

Either show some proof of your accusations, or delete the thread as this is becoming ridiculous.

Wow, you claiming I'm a scammer after I have announced you are one, how very mature.

[bit777]

tmbp you are a scammer. You are scamming the users of this forum out of their own trust to the listed sites on this thread (including us)  

Prove it that you are not, otherwise you are.

Either show some proof of your accusations, or delete the thread as this is becoming ridiculous.

Wow, you claiming I'm a scammer after I have announced you are one, how very mature.

Indeed.   

[Inedible]

tmbp you are a scammer. You are scamming the users of this forum out of their own trust to the listed sites on this thread (including us)  

Prove it that you are not, otherwise you are.

Either show some proof of your accusations, or delete the thread as this is becoming ridiculous.

Nah, he's not a scammer. He's just sloppy and ignorant. Give it time, once the initial shock of how he has lived this long has worn down, people will stop reading this thread again.

I think you might have missed the sarcasm in his post.

[Inedible]

tmbp you are a scammer. You are scamming the users of this forum out of their own trust to the listed sites on this thread (including us)  

Prove it that you are not, otherwise you are.

Either show some proof of your accusations, or delete the thread as this is becoming ridiculous.

Wow, you claiming I'm a scammer after I have announced you are one, how very mature.

You're being accused of being a scammer just like you've accused others of the same.

I guess if you don't get it then you're left with hypocrisy as your remaining position.

[tmbp]

tmbp you are a scammer. You are scamming the users of this forum out of their own trust to the listed sites on this thread (including us)  

Prove it that you are not, otherwise you are.

Either show some proof of your accusations, or delete the thread as this is becoming ridiculous.

Wow, you claiming I'm a scammer after I have announced you are one, how very mature.

You're being accused of being a scammer just like you've accused others of the same.

I guess if you don't get it then you're left with hypocrisy as your remaining position.

No see if I was stopped by a police officer and refused to provide identification upon request I would be arrested, same thing with businesses that fail to provide transparency (or even worse, hide it deliberately)

[Inedible]

No see if I was stopped by a police officer and refused to provide identification upon request I would be arrested, same thing with businesses that fail to provide transparency (or even worse, hide it deliberately)

By that argument it'll mean you're a scammer if you don't provide identification.

Please identify yourself so that we can confirm your accusations are legitimate and aren't the work of a competitor/troll/someone with an axe to grind against these companies.








Don't worry, you don't have to identify yourself. I wouldn't want you to have to play by your own rules.

[tmbp]

No see if I was stopped by a police officer and refused to provide identification upon request I would be arrested, same thing with businesses that fail to provide transparency (or even worse, hide it deliberately)

By that argument it'll mean you're a scammer if you don't provide identification.

Please identify yourself so that we can confirm your accusations are legitimate and aren't the work of a competitor/troll/someone with an axe to grind against these companies.








Don't worry, you don't have to identify yourself. I wouldn't want you to have to play by your own rules.

See if I had my casino, I WOULD provide a layer of transparency IN ADDITION to fair play, unlike all the scammers (aka the people you defend so much).

[crumbcake]

One more to add:
User:buyer, established sockpuppet account, running a self-moderated thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=224763.msg2400890#msg2400890
promoting this site:http://sellbitcoinforcash.com/MPOut.php
The site is a scam, though, fortunately, the user can't code his way out of a paper bag, see screencap:
http://s16.postimg.org/hb05qbqf9/Capture.jpg

[Inedible]

See if I had my casino, I WOULD provide a layer of transparency IN ADDITION to fair play, unlike all the scammers (aka the people you defend so much).

You must have mistaken me for someone else.

I'm not defending them. I have no idea if their businesses are legitimate or not, much like I don't know if you're legitimate or not.

I just don't see why you shouldn't have to do as you do seeing as you're asking everyone for their trust that you're legitimate.

You're making a claim that these people are scammers.

You kinda need to stand behind that or I would trust you as much as I trust the organisations you're accusing.

What you fail to see here is that you're in the same camp.

Edited: For clarity