palmface
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
August 10, 2013, 02:00:59 AM Last edit: August 10, 2013, 03:07:22 AM by palmface |
|
My Nibble client randomly decides it is going to sync to the Litecoin blockchain. Any idea on how i can stop this from happening? Edit: Here is a screenie of what I am talking about... https://i.imgur.com/MYWlkh1.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
ISAWHIM
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:26:20 AM |
|
My Nibble client randomly decides it is going to sync to the Litecoin blockchain. Any idea on how i can stop this from happening?
You have a bad node on your list... Use this config info... (You may have to delete the block info and peer info files. Everything except the wallet.dat and your config file.) splash=0 server=1 gen=0 testnet=0 daemon=1 maxconnections=10 listen=1 addnode=106.187.94.209 addnode=70.79.24.157 addnode=109.80.94.251 addnode=95.110.156.138 addnode=99.132.231.140 addnode=72.11.149.185 addnode=207.12.89.2 addnode=46.39.246.24 addnode=54.244.198.104 addnode=72.78.100.3 addnode=71.59.225.19 Just be aware that there only seems to be 4 connections alive, including my own connection, at the moment. The top four are all I can connect to. The rest fail to connect.
|
|
|
|
ISAWHIM
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:28:09 AM |
|
Also note, I am the one who found the last two blocks... though I found 2, I got only 1... Both were accepted, there is no-one else to be orphaning... something ate one of my blocks. It even updated the network with my block, but it never made it into my wallet. Only the block after the first block I found. (Unless it doesn't give us credit for the block just found, until the next block is found. Which makes sense, sort-of...)
Nice to know I am not the only one mining now. I don't mind earning all the coins for myself... but I am effectively 99% of the network at the moment, by the stats. lol... screw 51% attack, I'm gonna 99% attack! JK
BTW, do you have the new client? I have not seen that since the old client.
|
|
|
|
palmface
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:46:25 AM |
|
Also note, I am the one who found the last two blocks... though I found 2, I got only 1... Both were accepted, there is no-one else to be orphaning... something ate one of my blocks. It even updated the network with my block, but it never made it into my wallet. Only the block after the first block I found. (Unless it doesn't give us credit for the block just found, until the next block is found. Which makes sense, sort-of...)
Nice to know I am not the only one mining now. I don't mind earning all the coins for myself... but I am effectively 99% of the network at the moment, by the stats. lol... screw 51% attack, I'm gonna 99% attack! JK
BTW, do you have the new client? I have not seen that since the old client.
I am running the latest greatest from the OP in this thread. I have been having the Litecoin sync issue on every version of the client since it came out. I mined 28361 and 28363, the latter of which must have orphaned the one you are missing sorry bout that! As for the bad node, I am trying to check my peers when the client tries to sync up with LTC, and I noticed that 1 peer had a starting height of ~64k and a weird port number.
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:48:32 AM |
|
My Nibble client randomly decides it is going to sync to the Litecoin blockchain. Any idea on how i can stop this from happening?
Edit: Here is a screenie of what I am talking about...
yes I've look at this this is due to the IRC Node fallback - we may even take this out of the code , but its not a Client error if you put the Connect node in your list also. let me double check but have you guys got this in there connect=nblnode.digitalindustry.info
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
palmface
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
August 10, 2013, 04:03:08 AM |
|
This is what I have in my .conf at the moment: addnode=106.187.94.209 addnode=70.79.24.157 addnode=109.80.94.251 addnode=95.110.156.138 connect=nblnode.digitalindustry.info This gives me 5 working nodes
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 10, 2013, 06:40:28 AM |
|
great to see - i don't want to blow our own horn here but we have had a solid node built in since 6.5
We have one of the most switched on Devs working with us , Caps has only just decided to build in nodes in 4.1 i believe.
**
I like Caps a lot they have done interesting things with he re-target , but i'm not convinced that all the Forking isn't due to that in some way either, but they have taken the rough road and hopefully it will pay off , i respect that in the same way we refuse to bend to the "latest" and change our parameters either.
history will judge us.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 11, 2013, 01:18:53 PM |
|
This is what I have in my .conf at the moment: addnode=106.187.94.209 addnode=70.79.24.157 addnode=109.80.94.251 addnode=95.110.156.138 connect=nblnode.digitalindustry.info This gives me 5 working nodes he mate thanks for that info glad you got it working i may update that in the OP cheers.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 11, 2013, 01:20:29 PM |
|
anyone else with good nodes don't hesitate to send though cheers .
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 12, 2013, 11:55:05 AM |
|
updated some logos for our core of Nibble investors on the forum here.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
philipkdick
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
August 16, 2013, 12:50:33 PM |
|
updated some logos for our core of Nibble investors on the forum here.
Great I really like the way nibble is progressing .
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 17, 2013, 05:20:53 AM |
|
Cheers looking to institute a few more minor changes soon , in our evolution and for our investors .
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
perhan007
|
|
August 17, 2013, 12:22:08 PM |
|
Im a nibble fan too :-)
Good to see that you take care of it!
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 17, 2013, 01:14:20 PM Last edit: August 17, 2013, 01:35:16 PM by digitalindustry |
|
Im a nibble fan too :-)
Good to see that you take care of it!
thanks mate i know you have been a miner and investor from the start , hopefully we can all evolve this , the first equitable cryptocurrency of the GPU era into what it's legacy should be. and that is that ; when most benefit the market benefits . we will keep working to that end. : D
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 23, 2013, 04:20:36 AM |
|
Well that would certainly be an issue , let me check it out ....
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
smeagol
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1005
|
|
August 23, 2013, 04:28:17 AM |
|
Well that would certainly be an issue , let me check it out ....
This may be a bit late, but scrypt-salsa is different from Jane and regular scrypt in what ways?
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 23, 2013, 04:35:02 AM |
|
Oh yes I seem to have been able to discover the problem , the file seems to be missing...
How unfortunate for it , what I will try to do is ring around , make a few calls , and see if I can't locate it ...
I will zip down and put up couple of posters and see if I get any calls about this missing file .
In the meantime I will try to locate a complete and perfect copy and put it in its place but perhaps at a different download location hopefully that will suffice ..
If anyone sees this file wandering aimlessly or looking lost/ begging for Nybble on the street please contact me.
Don't aapproach this wild file.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 23, 2013, 04:43:04 AM |
|
Well that would certainly be an issue , let me check it out ....
This may be a bit late, but scrypt-salsa is different from Jane and regular scrypt in what ways? I wouldn't be the top or highest authority on that matter , but. Salsa is the hash derived from Colin Percival , it made up sCrypt the most popular now hash type , started with some previous currency but breaking popularity with LTC. SCrypt- Jane was touted as a " cpu only " type of hash , but that is spurious at best and proved incorrect . As to the details I haven't found the need to look into them , as they did not derive any special benefit as I could see. But you could look at sCrypt-Jane politically as an attempt to do what LTC did but with a pre mine aspect as the coders probably had a GPU miner before the " public" as was recently suggest that LTC had done so . Without any further evidence to the contrary , that's what I would assume if I was you, but as it turns out I'm not.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 23, 2013, 05:55:26 AM |
|
What i will do now, is carefully go over the source and get it recompiled , i will not use a compiled version i have as if a PC has been compromised that file would also be .
that would be nasty business indeed ...
I will bang a fresh new client up from the source, and hopefully all will be well and good.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|