[ANN] Lucyd - Welcome to Lucyd, the new Augmented Reality World

[MrKurh]

Token here performs the function of collecting money for the development of product more than it has any real need for the functioning of the ecosystem. Even if the token will work as intended, its future looks hazy

Therefore, the price for the token of such a project will be low. Therefore, it would be right for the team to buy out tokens and burn the net profit from the sales of their product.

Yes it was, it would be a great solution, for investors and people supporting this project. But will this be done in the future? That is the question. And there will be a token used to buy applications, for devices, as it is said in white paper?

[YuryK.]

Token here performs the function of collecting money for the development of product more than it has any real need for the functioning of the ecosystem. Even if the token will work as intended, its future looks hazy

Therefore, the price for the token of such a project will be low. Therefore, it would be right for the team to buy out tokens and burn the net profit from the sales of their product.

Yes it was, it would be a great solution, for investors and people supporting this project. But will this be done in the future? That is the question. And there will be a token used to buy applications, for devices, as it is said in white paper?

Most likely, they realize the opportunity to buy apps and devices for tokens, but I don't think it will be much in demand. Price volatility of token will be this will interfere

[Celendion]

Token here performs the function of collecting money for the development of product more than it has any real need for the functioning of the ecosystem. Even if the token will work as intended, its future looks hazy

Therefore, the price for the token of such a project will be low. Therefore, it would be right for the team to buy out tokens and burn the net profit from the sales of their product.

Yes it was, it would be a great solution, for investors and people supporting this project. But will this be done in the future? That is the question. And there will be a token used to buy applications, for devices, as it is said in white paper?

Most likely, they realize the opportunity to buy apps and devices for tokens, but I don't think it will be much in demand. Price volatility of token will be this will interfere

And indeed, volatility will interfere. This means that they will sell for tokens, but at a stable dollar price, at the current exchange rate. The other way, to the mind,  does not come.

[AlloM]

When this token will get listed on big exchange to become visible on Coinmarketcap. On current exchange it has no interest from people and volume is also very bad this need good marketing campaign to make more people in it.

[YuryK.]

When this token will get listed on big exchange to become visible on Coinmarketcap. On current exchange it has no interest from people and volume is also very bad this need good marketing campaign to make more people in it.

Developers made it clear from the very beginning that it is important for them to develop a product, and not profit from the increase in the value of the token. Exchanges for them are not an important component now

[vendorLazy]

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit  

[miningguru]

will you explain difference between your project and other similar projects ?

No need to explain, you can judge by yourself, I suggest you read on their website then notice their vision, mission, and differentiate with other projects.

People without knowledge will always try to read and study more about the company before investing. People don't have much about these things and I think team vision is very much interesting factor.

[mr.willson4293]

This is a very impressive project, i also like the fact that the developers are serious, keep it up guys

[suhardi3899]

will you explain difference between your project and other similar projects ?

No need to explain, you can judge by yourself, I suggest you read on their website then notice their vision, mission, and differentiate with other projects.

People without knowledge will always try to read and study more about the company before investing. People don't have much about these things and I think team vision is very much interesting factor.

Good I like your way of thinking I feel that Trina_Jeffr6554 does not really want to ask, the evidence after posting he just disappeared without a trace.That's not good views.

[taibas]

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit  

It is likely that more should be concentrated on the project's development, and hope that the team will be able to produce what they have conceived. Otherwise, it will not profit, not us not them. For this reason, I am waiting for their product. Until then this all has not a definite form.

[comradepay]

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit  

It is likely that more should be concentrated on the project's development, and hope that the team will be able to produce what they have conceived. Otherwise, it will not profit, not us not them. For this reason, I am waiting for their product. Until then this all has not a definite form.

The finished product - it is good. But we all already understand that the current economy of the token is not optimal. The team already needs to think about how to improve it

[scolary23]

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit  

It is likely that more should be concentrated on the project's development, and hope that the team will be able to produce what they have conceived. Otherwise, it will not profit, not us not them. For this reason, I am waiting for their product. Until then this all has not a definite form.

The finished product - it is good. But we all already understand that the current economy of the token is not optimal. The team already needs to think about how to improve it

Yes it is. But I'm afraid that these are mainly the problems of investors. The team raised funds for their production. However, in white paper, the use of their token is stipulated. I do not think that they will deviate from the documents that they themselves provided. If everything is will do as planned, the token will function. To know this for sure, we need to see the product.

[comradepay]

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit  

It is likely that more should be concentrated on the project's development, and hope that the team will be able to produce what they have conceived. Otherwise, it will not profit, not us not them. For this reason, I am waiting for their product. Until then this all has not a definite form.

The finished product - it is good. But we all already understand that the current economy of the token is not optimal. The team already needs to think about how to improve it

Yes it is. But I'm afraid that these are mainly the problems of investors. The team raised funds for their production. However, in white paper, the use of their token is stipulated. I do not think that they will deviate from the documents that they themselves provided. If everything is will do as planned, the token will function. To know this for sure, we need to see the product.

The token will function, but will not give the expected profit to investors. The token economy is very poorly developed. It needs to be improved. I don't think investors will mind that

[Celendion]

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit  

It is likely that more should be concentrated on the project's development, and hope that the team will be able to produce what they have conceived. Otherwise, it will not profit, not us not them. For this reason, I am waiting for their product. Until then this all has not a definite form.

The finished product - it is good. But we all already understand that the current economy of the token is not optimal. The team already needs to think about how to improve it

Yes it is. But I'm afraid that these are mainly the problems of investors. The team raised funds for their production. However, in white paper, the use of their token is stipulated. I do not think that they will deviate from the documents that they themselves provided. If everything is will do as planned, the token will function. To know this for sure, we need to see the product.

The token will function, but will not give the expected profit to investors. The token economy is very poorly developed. It needs to be improved. I don't think investors will mind that

100%, that investors will not object, against the expansion of the functionality of the token. 
But it is unlikely that they will do this. Without expanding the activity of the token, the dev do not violate anything.

[Bakscher]

Who knows, there is still a chance to get a reward for participating in social networks?For a long time this whole process drags on,the bounty has ended a couple of months ago and payments have never been seen

[taibas]

Who knows, there is still a chance to get a reward for participating in social networks?For a long time this whole process drags on,the bounty has ended a couple of months ago and payments have never been seen

As far as I know, this week, hunters should already be happy. But still, I do not expect to expect a good price, before the prototype comes out, I think.

[comradepay]

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit  

It is likely that more should be concentrated on the project's development, and hope that the team will be able to produce what they have conceived. Otherwise, it will not profit, not us not them. For this reason, I am waiting for their product. Until then this all has not a definite form.

The finished product - it is good. But we all already understand that the current economy of the token is not optimal. The team already needs to think about how to improve it

Yes it is. But I'm afraid that these are mainly the problems of investors. The team raised funds for their production. However, in white paper, the use of their token is stipulated. I do not think that they will deviate from the documents that they themselves provided. If everything is will do as planned, the token will function. To know this for sure, we need to see the product.

The token will function, but will not give the expected profit to investors. The token economy is very poorly developed. It needs to be improved. I don't think investors will mind that

100%, that investors will not object, against the expansion of the functionality of the token. 
But it is unlikely that they will do this. Without expanding the activity of the token, the dev do not violate anything.

For the team, it would be over easier to leave it as it is, but if the project will bring losses to investors, then its reputation will not be good

[scolary23]

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit  

It is likely that more should be concentrated on the project's development, and hope that the team will be able to produce what they have conceived. Otherwise, it will not profit, not us not them. For this reason, I am waiting for their product. Until then this all has not a definite form.

The finished product - it is good. But we all already understand that the current economy of the token is not optimal. The team already needs to think about how to improve it

Yes it is. But I'm afraid that these are mainly the problems of investors. The team raised funds for their production. However, in white paper, the use of their token is stipulated. I do not think that they will deviate from the documents that they themselves provided. If everything is will do as planned, the token will function. To know this for sure, we need to see the product.

The token will function, but will not give the expected profit to investors. The token economy is very poorly developed. It needs to be improved. I don't think investors will mind that

100%, that investors will not object, against the expansion of the functionality of the token. 
But it is unlikely that they will do this. Without expanding the activity of the token, the dev do not violate anything.

For the team, it would be over easier to leave it as it is, but if the project will bring losses to investors, then its reputation will not be good

The project itself consists in the production of a certain product. If the team succeeds in this, then their reputation will be pretty strong. And if they do not violate the terms of white paper, then who will be able to show them any claims.
But we do not know yet whether the scope of using the token is sufficient. Maybe that will be enough.                                 
Although at first glance this is not enough.

[comradepay]

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit  

It is likely that more should be concentrated on the project's development, and hope that the team will be able to produce what they have conceived. Otherwise, it will not profit, not us not them. For this reason, I am waiting for their product. Until then this all has not a definite form.

The finished product - it is good. But we all already understand that the current economy of the token is not optimal. The team already needs to think about how to improve it

Yes it is. But I'm afraid that these are mainly the problems of investors. The team raised funds for their production. However, in white paper, the use of their token is stipulated. I do not think that they will deviate from the documents that they themselves provided. If everything is will do as planned, the token will function. To know this for sure, we need to see the product.

The token will function, but will not give the expected profit to investors. The token economy is very poorly developed. It needs to be improved. I don't think investors will mind that

100%, that investors will not object, against the expansion of the functionality of the token. 
But it is unlikely that they will do this. Without expanding the activity of the token, the dev do not violate anything.

For the team, it would be over easier to leave it as it is, but if the project will bring losses to investors, then its reputation will not be good

The project itself consists in the production of a certain product. If the team succeeds in this, then their reputation will be pretty strong. And if they do not violate the terms of white paper, then who will be able to show them any claims.
But we do not know yet whether the scope of using the token is sufficient. Maybe that will be enough.                                 
Although at first glance this is not enough.

If they do everything according to the whitepaper, of course there will be no claims to them, but it is already clear that the economy of the token needs to be improved

[scolary23]

I agree with you @comradepay, which would be cool if the team will expand the functionality of the token. But this is only advice that we can offer.
I can not open white paper. Remind someone to me when they will have a prototype.