Krnlx Nvidia xevan miner - 3.3+ mh on 1070, ~6mh on 80ti FREE, OPENSOURCE

[Thebestis7950]

when will we see windows version
i cant do linux im not very smart

[sickofscamcoins]

Dear Palgin & krnlx (and Alexis & Epsylon),

Thank you so much for your work, I see great things for ccminer dev scene with you guys.  You guys have not forgotten the childlike wonder and excitement in tinkering.  Don't ever become like sp_ -- and don't ever let his toxicity scare you guys off.  You guys are assets to CUDA mining scene.  I am amateur crypto farmer, big enough to benefit from small gains but too small to afford every new sp_ bin.  It's not all about money -- yes, we are all here to make money -- but some also enjoy the hobbyist aspect of this stuff too.  I play around with ccminer code too for fun, and just bought two books on CUDA development.  Maybe one day I can join you guys.  sp_ sits all day in his little safe zone thumping his dick against the kitchen table about how great he is, and comes here to piss on others with his "oh it's 30 minute job" -- if it is 30 minute job, then contribute or fuck off.  How do you think people become as "great" as you?  They put their nose to the grindstone and work hard.  

  WindowsWalletDev  

p.s. sp_ when exactly did you realize you liked men

[ZenFr]

it works fine with cuda8, ubuntu16,suprnova, gtx1080ti get  5.6m @core clock+100, 200watts.

Compilation with no problem under Ubuntu 16.04 and Cuda 8.
But, when I start the ccminer, he ask me for the Cuda 7.5 library...
How do you make to use the Cuda 8 library (Cuda 7.5 is not installed on this new RIG installation) ?

Check /usr/local  for cuda folders. Default coming in configure.sh is cuda 7.5

Thank you.
I made the update of my paths (i forgot that was an old USB key with Cuda 7.5 previously installed :-)).
Works fine, thank you dev.

[CH0DE]

When a team of wallet developers are competing with kernel developers, you usually end up with non profitable shitcode. To beat a grandmaster, you need to become a grandmaster.

SP I am so sorry you feel this way.  I mean your miner mods are very mediocre in hash improvement.  They also overheat my gpus and I need to wear earplugs around the house.  I actually bought some because of your over compensation of gpu power which ends up costing me more anyway.  SleepSoft by Alpine, great reusable earplugs.  I highly recommend them when using an SP mod.  I also accuse you of a very minor but noticeable hash stealing code in one or two of your miners.  I will look into it more and let the community know of your blatant rascality and theft.

[antantti]

Wow, I must have missed something, sp_ why are you megatrolling in krnlx's thread? Why are you so pissed off?

[tazmako]

Thank

[maxmad_x]

LOL this whole thread..

All the hard work was done by original developers such as Palgin, krnlx, Alexis & Epsylon

sp_ is just a cheap hooker profiting off their hard work!

[NameTaken]

I checked pool API and why is one miner getting such high rejection?

Code:

    {
      "version": "ccminer/krnlx-xevan",
      "password": "c=BTC,id=miner2",
      "ID": "",
      "algo": "xevan",
      "difficulty": 26,
      "subscribe": 1,
      "accepted": 17867034.631,
      "rejected": 0
    },
    {
      "version": "ccminer/krnlx-xevan",
      "password": "c=BTC,id=miner3",
      "ID": "",
      "algo": "xevan",
      "difficulty": 46,
      "subscribe": 1,
      "accepted": 28976764.001,
      "rejected": 14660155.037
    },

[ZenFr]

I checked pool API and why is one miner getting such high rejection?

Code:

    {
      "version": "ccminer/krnlx-xevan",
      "password": "c=BTC,id=miner2",
      "ID": "",
      "algo": "xevan",
      "difficulty": 26,
      "subscribe": 1,
      "accepted": 17867034.631,
      "rejected": 0
    },
    {
      "version": "ccminer/krnlx-xevan",
      "password": "c=BTC,id=miner3",
      "ID": "",
      "algo": "xevan",
      "difficulty": 46,
      "subscribe": 1,
      "accepted": 28976764.001,
      "rejected": 14660155.037
    },

Perhaps because the difficulty of your second miner : "difficulty" : 46.
46 is a wrong value for CCMiner.
26 is a accepted value, but huge : what is this RIG ?

[ZenFr]

Anybody can remember me where and the syntax, in the command line, I can manage the difficulty (not the intensity, it is done) ?
Is there a "=" in the syntax or not ?
I think I have not the correct share rate...

[NameTaken]

I checked pool API and why is one miner getting such high rejection?

Code:

    {
      "version": "ccminer/krnlx-xevan",
      "password": "c=BTC,id=miner2",
      "ID": "",
      "algo": "xevan",
      "difficulty": 26,
      "subscribe": 1,
      "accepted": 17867034.631,
      "rejected": 0
    },
    {
      "version": "ccminer/krnlx-xevan",
      "password": "c=BTC,id=miner3",
      "ID": "",
      "algo": "xevan",
      "difficulty": 46,
      "subscribe": 1,
      "accepted": 28976764.001,
      "rejected": 14660155.037
    },

Perhaps because the difficulty of your second miner : "difficulty" : 46.
46 is a wrong value for CCMiner.
26 is a accepted value, but huge : what is this RIG ?

So I should add d=26 in the passwords field?

[Amph]

no windows build yet?

[ZenFr]

I checked pool API and why is one miner getting such high rejection?

Code:

    {
      "version": "ccminer/krnlx-xevan",
      "password": "c=BTC,id=miner2",
      "ID": "",
      "algo": "xevan",
      "difficulty": 26,
      "subscribe": 1,
      "accepted": 17867034.631,
      "rejected": 0
    },
    {
      "version": "ccminer/krnlx-xevan",
      "password": "c=BTC,id=miner3",
      "ID": "",
      "algo": "xevan",
      "difficulty": 46,
      "subscribe": 1,
      "accepted": 28976764.001,
      "rejected": 14660155.037
    },

Perhaps because the difficulty of your second miner : "difficulty" : 46.
46 is a wrong value for CCMiner.
26 is a accepted value, but huge : what is this RIG ?

So I should add d=26 in the passwords field?

I don't know.
Making the difficulty in the password field is working for some specifics configurations like MiningRigRentals, but I don't know if it is OK with this Xevan version of CCMiner.
You/We have to try...
On which pool are you ?

[palgin]

no windows build yet?

No, krnlx is quite busy, I'm off home on holiday trip with only remote access to dev machine, _sp is only trolling  
Debugging is ongoing, but it's quite slow in present conditions.

UPDATE: OK, hope I've fixed it, it's **** Win weirdo syntax problem, now it seems that the rest is on yiimp side (difficulty problem mentioned above).

Proof:


https://imgur.com/tojeKaN.png

It's very pre-alfa build and I won't release it, I'll send source and binaries to krnlx for him to claim bounties.

[konqueror]

It's clear from the output that resulting hashes from CPU and GPU are completely different.

The krlx kernel is just another alxis rippoff. Change a few lines of gpl code, and claim the 0.5 btc bounty. The bounty should go to the developers of the alexei miner. 0.5 btc just for changing a few padding bytes??? Really? and not even capable of creating a working windows binary.

The same way you are not even capable of creating a linux binary but suggesting wine

[anorganix]

no windows build yet?

No, krnlx is quite busy, I'm off home on holiday trip with only remote access to dev machine, _sp is only trolling  
Debugging is ongoing, but it's quite slow in present conditions.

UPDATE: OK, hope I've fixed it, it's **** Win weirdo syntax problem, now it seems that the rest is on yiimp side (difficulty problem mentioned above).

Proof:


https://imgur.com/tojeKaN.png

It's very pre-alfa build and I won't release it, I'll send source and binaries to krnlx for him to claim bounties.

Great news, thanks for the effort!

[palgin]

Great news, thanks for the effort!

Another error showed up, so keep digging code

[ZenFr]

Who know how many time/blocks for the confirmation block with BitSend ?
More than 10 hours and still no block confirmed for me...

[foldingextra]

Nice to know finally xevan algo for nvidia. I will compile it in linux and waiting to try out mining the new solaris soon.

[cryptojai]

no windows build yet?

No, krnlx is quite busy, I'm off home on holiday trip with only remote access to dev machine, _sp is only trolling  
Debugging is ongoing, but it's quite slow in present conditions.

UPDATE: OK, hope I've fixed it, it's **** Win weirdo syntax problem, now it seems that the rest is on yiimp side (difficulty problem mentioned above).

Proof:


https://imgur.com/tojeKaN.png

It's very pre-alfa build and I won't release it, I'll send source and binaries to krnlx for him to claim bounties.

Appreciate your honesty and help for the community . Hope we will at least have a beta build before solaris' new network goes live.