car1999
|
|
October 06, 2017, 04:36:27 PM |
|
can i build it against cuda9 and copy the binary to rigs with only cuda8 installed? does it run slower than cuda9 rig?
All you need is recent Nvidia driver with CUDA9 support, you won't need any toolkits installed. Great, thanks. Does the CPU of build machine matter? I have G1840, g3900 ,g4560, e3 1231, which one is better to build the binary and copy to other rig with different CPU? I use ubuntu 16, nvOC. For *nix it will be a problem (running without reboot), if you already have recent drivers installed, you can ask someone to build binary for you and just update, but if you need to update driver or want to install toolkit and build from scratch - as I know you'll need to reboot at least 1 time. If access is only remote it's quite risky, especially regarding driver module update. CPU matters, so if you want to build it for all variety of hardware you need to remove "-march=native" flag from configure.sh file. P.S: I'm not so experienced in *nix, it's just what I remember I checked the document of gcc, removing arch=native can lead performance losses, so I think build against the weakest g1840 is fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
UrsaUrsa
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 11
|
|
October 06, 2017, 05:35:20 PM |
|
So weird that the one on github does not get flagged up as a virus but this one does? (false positive, I know)
|
|
|
|
stzcze
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 1
|
|
October 06, 2017, 05:46:38 PM |
|
Good job!!! Thx
1060 tdp 70 core +150 mem -500
13,66 6x1060 6gb -i 21
latest driver, x86 cuda 9 build, w10
|
|
|
|
palgin
|
|
October 06, 2017, 05:49:44 PM |
|
So weird that the one on github does not get flagged up as a virus but this one does? (false positive, I know) It's packed, so it gets flagged.
|
BTC tips welcome: 16DHzyuqenEoHRA3w3YVGcYSDSHks7mor4
|
|
|
UrsaUrsa
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 11
|
|
October 06, 2017, 05:53:57 PM |
|
So weird that the one on github does not get flagged up as a virus but this one does? (false positive, I know) It's packed, so it gets flagged. I'm obviously not questioning your integrity but found it a bit strange. Is the one github not packed? Have you introduced a fee by any chance? Thanks for your time.
|
|
|
|
startsts
|
|
October 06, 2017, 05:56:07 PM |
|
Maximum result that I could get, seems very profitable GPU#0:MSI GTX 1060 3GB, 2178.23kH/s
|
|
|
|
Vivik
|
|
October 06, 2017, 05:56:19 PM |
|
CUDA 9.0 x86 - 8x1070 28Mh
|
|
|
|
brownfly
|
|
October 06, 2017, 06:01:08 PM |
|
anybody can tell me what I am doing wrong? When I start the miner with altminer config like this: ccminer_x86 -a xevan -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:3739 -u Vo...Z -p c=VSX Windows 10
it always gives me an error message: [2017-10-06 13:59:06] Starting on stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:3739 [2017-10-06 13:59:06] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled. [2017-10-06 13:59:06] 6 miner threads started, using 'xevan' algorithm. [2017-10-06 13:59:07] Stratum authentication failed [2017-10-06 13:59:07] ...retry after 30 seconds
WTF??? coin code is correct, wallet address is correct, startum address is correct, so why it complains???
|
|
|
|
stzcze
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 1
|
|
October 06, 2017, 06:02:31 PM |
|
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 5243.33kH/s Gigabyte GTX 1080, 3855.18kH/s
cuda 9 build x86
tdp 65 -i 21
|
|
|
|
UrsaUrsa
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 11
|
|
October 06, 2017, 06:22:16 PM |
|
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 5243.33kH/s Gigabyte GTX 1080, 3855.18kH/s
cuda 9 build x86
tdp 65 -i 21
cude 9 build x86 (thank god for windows defender...) tdp 73 -i 21 5x 1070 @ 15.28Mh/s
|
|
|
|
Vorona34
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
October 06, 2017, 08:01:23 PM |
|
Maximum result that I could get, seems very profitable GPU#0:MSI GTX 1060 3GB, 2178.23kH/s Long works? I have a miner inevitably die after 1 minute or after 5 , depending on the intensity. Dropped to 14 could not wait for fall, but normal speed not seen )))
|
|
|
|
arity
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
October 06, 2017, 08:19:46 PM |
|
On linux with CUDA 9 & compile with sm61, 6x1080ti (each power limit 170w) reported hash rate is 30Mh/s. Default intensity.
According to whattomine that hash rate should yield about 1.47 BSD per hour, but the actual shown on pool earning is only 0.8 BSD. Tested on suprnova pool.
|
|
|
|
th3.r00t
|
|
October 06, 2017, 08:29:03 PM |
|
anybody can tell me what I am doing wrong? When I start the miner with altminer config like this: ccminer_x86 -a xevan -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:3739 -u Vo...Z -p c=VSX Windows 10
it always gives me an error message: [2017-10-06 13:59:06] Starting on stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:3739 [2017-10-06 13:59:06] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled. [2017-10-06 13:59:06] 6 miner threads started, using 'xevan' algorithm. [2017-10-06 13:59:07] Stratum authentication failed [2017-10-06 13:59:07] ...retry after 30 seconds
WTF??? coin code is correct, wallet address is correct, startum address is correct, so why it complains??? Did you set the intensity manually? UPD. For 1060 cards intensity sets up incorrectly - you must adjust it with -i param. -i 20 is best for 1070, 1080ti As far as I see the answer is no. There may be your problem.
|
|
|
|
buzzkillb
|
|
October 06, 2017, 08:37:17 PM |
|
1080 hashrate. not ti. [S/A/T]: 0/151/151, diff: 0.065, 3794.39kH/s yes! [S/A/T]: 0/152/152, diff: 0.020, 3794.27kH/s yes! GPU#0:EVGA GTX 1080, 3799.83kH/s
|
|
|
|
integrale
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
Eager to learn
|
|
October 06, 2017, 08:40:12 PM |
|
Your great Work resulted : Xubuntu 16.04 LTS Cuda 9 Nv 384.90 i=20.25 [2017-10-06 22:35:34] GPU#0:NONCE FOUND [2017-10-06 22:35:34] GPU#0:MSI GTX 1050, 1113.18kH/s [2017-10-06 22:35:34] GPU#0:MSI GTX 1050, 0.018MH/W, 0.00063MH/Mhz [2017-10-06 22:35:34] GPU#0:MSI GTX 1050, 62C(F:56%) 1766/3504MHz(63W) [2017-10-06 22:35:34] GPU#0:target 0 22c92492 1c9 [2017-10-06 22:35:34] GPU#0:target 1c922c92492 [2017-10-06 22:35:34] [S/A/T]: 0/78/80, diff: 0.004, 1110.65kH/s yes!
thx Guys for The Miner
|
AltCoin-Mining @ Xubuntu 16.04 LTS
|
|
|
blackhorse7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
October 06, 2017, 08:47:34 PM |
|
Windows x64 version, EVGA GTX 1060 + 80 / + 500 / 84% tdp (I didnt change intensity, worked on default = 20): 2240kh/s in benchmark mode. It works, thank you
|
|
|
|
buzzkillb
|
|
October 06, 2017, 11:20:29 PM |
|
It's alexis78 base, optimised for cuda 7.5, so it should be faster. Try x86 build, it's generally faster in CUDA8 not specifically optimised case, or build your own binaries, experiment No, I love those wattage and temp monitoring in x64 builds so x86 build is not for me )) And my binary is only 20mb ... yours is 37 ... why? How do you check wattage and temp on ccminer?
|
|
|
|
brownfly
|
|
October 06, 2017, 11:43:06 PM Last edit: October 07, 2017, 12:00:59 AM by brownfly |
|
Did you set the intensity manually? UPD. For 1060 cards intensity sets up incorrectly - you must adjust it with -i param. -i 20 is best for 1070, 1080ti As far as I see the answer is no. There may be your problem. yes, I did: ccminer -a xevan -i 20 -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:3739 -u Vo...Z -p c=VSX the same result. I use 1070. Update: something wrong with my wallet. If I use the wallet id from any recorded transaction, it works! but any addresses from my wallet - they look like invalid for the pool. Any ideas??? I use VSYNC wallet v1.2.3.0-g32a928e Update: crap, apparently there are two VSYNCs! Downloaded another VSync v 1.0.0.1 and synchronizing...
|
|
|
|
spider703
|
|
October 06, 2017, 11:57:26 PM |
|
hi, i runing your miner on algo myriadgroestl, he gives me 3 Gh and no seach blocks
|
BTC 1Hof999zuqUKpifmzrSABv7tNr4nRaoJKM LTC Lf2L6DTBr2gXT38d7cVRqDQiHMndtXQyNW or write me in https://t.me/spider703
|
|
|
brownfly
|
|
October 07, 2017, 12:24:43 AM |
|
finally... the wallet has been synchronized and the miner does work. 6 x 1070 ~ 20 MH/s Profitability is about like for BTX/VIVO. Not too bad, but still less than my favorite coin
|
|
|
|
|