Antminer Monitor

[mikeywith]

Hey OP , thanks for the app , it's light and  handy.  would be great if you add a restart function  

and btw there are a few typos in your readme that probably will stop many from installing your software as not everyone will be able to go through the py file to check for the spelling.

Code:

python manage.py create_db

should be replaced with

Code:

python manage.py create-db

Code:

python manage.py create_admin

should be replaced with

Code:

python manage.py create-admin

i think you should also mention that it's not compatible with python 2.7 on windows. works with previous and later versions ( on windows ) based on my test.

Good luck and thanks.

[anselal]

Hi there,

There is a recent issue on Github about that problem. The thing is that I cannot reproduce the error because on my machines it works with underscores.
I can update the README and add a troubleshooting section mentioning this kind of things. Thanks for the heads up !!!

And as always, donations are welcome.

[messjuk]

Hello. And happy new year to you. I have just install your soft of Antminer monitoring. But I have problem.. I login intro web page by local host:5000 and when I wrote ip of miner then next line is: mode select the option.. and there is nothing.. no any options I can’t see any list so I can’t chose any of model and I can’t add any of my miner.. can you please help. Thanks


Oh I just update the dB and now all is fine. But how I can add auto miner detect? Also all my miners is in all local are but all they have different wi if router so they have different ip range some have 192.169.88.... some 192.168.0.... and some 192.168.31.... so some miners can’t be added on the monitoring. How it can be fixed without modifying the network settings of local area. Thanks

[mikeywith]

Also all my miners is in all local are but all they have different wi if router so they have different ip range some have 192.169.88.... some 192.168.0.... and some 192.168.31.... so some miners can’t be added on the monitoring. How it can be fixed without modifying the network settings of local area. Thanks

this a network problem , how do you expect the software to solve it?

you have different subnets( regions), the PC you using has a different gateway from the miner's gateway, it will drop the packet immediately. this is like sending expecting a dog to talk to a fish, it doesn't work.

PC on subnet 1 can add all asics on subnet 1
PC on subnet 1 can NOT add asics on subnet 2/3/4

you probably have a switch of layer 2 and not a router, it's commercially called a router but if it does not transmit packets between different subnets then it's simply a switch.

in order to do whatever you want to do, you will need some networking skills, you need to have all of your subnet under a single VLAN, you need to teach your router how to route packets coming and going among different subnets, this will require some work and a device that is capable of doing so, and if not done perfectly the congestion on your network will be ATH.

the easier way to go about this is to have only 1 router that acts as a router, and the other "routers" must act as a bridge only, 1 router will handle all the traffics, even if your devices were thousands miles apart, as long as they are under the same subnet you will not have to do anything advance to have them all accessed from a single host.

[Artemis3]

Oh I just update the dB and now all is fine. But how I can add auto miner detect? Also all my miners is in all local are but all they have different wi if router so they have different ip range some have 192.169.88.... some 192.168.0.... and some 192.168.31.... so some miners can’t be added on the monitoring. How it can be fixed without modifying the network settings of local area. Thanks

The 192.169 sounds strange, but in case you meant 192.168.* ALL you have to do is change your network mask from 255.255.255.0 to 255.255.0.0

[messjuk]

Hi all. Is there any possible to made auto restart from this monitoring? I mean if some of miner have problem with plates for example some of xxx, or low hash rate, can this monitoring made restart of this miner? Thanks

[mikeywith]

The 192.169 sounds strange, but in case you meant 192.168.* ALL you have to do is change your network mask from 255.255.255.0 to 255.255.0.0

why use a class B that can accommodate 65000 hosts when you only need a few ips ? this is a very lazy workaround, putting a small subnets into a large subnet is not the best thing to do, he is better of using a single router and a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0

[Artemis3]

why use a class B that can accommodate 65000 hosts when you only need a few ips ? this is a very lazy workaround, putting a small subnets into a large subnet is not the best thing to do, he is better of using a single router and a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0

Why not?

It really doesn't matter, if they want to organize it better with it or something. They are private IPs, you are wasting nothing if you'd rather use a class A because 10.1.5.11 might mean area 1, isle 5, computer 11 or something like that.

[mikeywith]

first of all i would imagine the guy does not have managed switch, depending on the "routers" he has, using a class B might slow down the network.

using your example

10.1.5.11

let's assume 10 = country 1 = state = 5 = city  11 = house

using a class B means every packet has to broadcast to

city> house

this increases traffic and creates longer routing tables.

using a class C means every packet has to be broadcast to

> house only.

going from city to home is not as bad as i might have described  it, it could be too "irrelevant" to consider, I have seen many networks drop in performance after migrating from class C to class B without a the proper setup.

these problems are solved using actual routers that are capable of VLAN flags for example, they sort of "memorize" every "home" location so they don't actually have to search through "city" for every traffic , but i am pretty certain this is not the case with the OP network.

in theory , there is nothing wrong with using a whole school bus to send 1 kid to school, it will still get him there, the better question is "why" not "why not".

your suggestion is in fact a brilliant one for a quick-work around , but it's just not the best , given the fact that he can simply switch from
router<>router<>router > large subnet
to bridge>router>bridge > small subnet.

[JFoxOne]

...all my miners is in all local are but all they have different wi if router so they have different ip range some have 192.169.88.... some 192.168.0.... and some 192.168.31....

If you have hard time locating ASICs on your network you can try with Locator.

You don't have to be minerstat user to use Locator. It is free to use for everyone.