Invest in ICO

[zypa]

There are 10+ coins / day. It is very difficult to actually know what coin is legit or has a future, indifferent of their spreadsheet

[1714581751]

1714581751

[1714581751]

1714581751

[1714581751]

1714581751

[billyj111]

It depends on how much you are willing to take risks. Because often promising projects without a product can give a very big profit

[marcous]

Invest in ICO that have products already ,,look at development of the roadmap,, and Read up the whitepaper,. Identify the key idea of the project and analyse if the idea will work out or make any sense.if interested in  altcoin,Making sure they are trusted people and usually handle escrow in this forum.

[Sungoku]

i want to ask will it be better to invest in an ICO that already has a product or an ICO without product not yet finished ?

I think investing in ico is the right choice to generate profit,
but must see ico is really successful

[Cixboy61]

Polybius is my first ico and maybe last one. Bounty sales are decrease the prices to half of ICO and the dev team didn't make any announcement much to increase the price o more than ICO. In my opinion bounty sales can be much profitable for some ICO's.

[chilly9876]

ICO's will get more and more difficult to make money with and returns will take longer and longer to mature. As a result more and more people will make losses.

You need to ensure you look at the road map, white paper, team. Look how similar projects have done. Hype doesn't mean much. Look at some of the most hyped tokens of the last 3 months, the majority are trading well below ICO price. On the other hand there are some coins like NEBL that had no hype, only raised 2.5m USD and are now rising and will likely continue to rise.

[kamina87]

Normally the projects have not completed their products so they have raised funds to develop the project but there are some projects they already have products and they want to develop the project more widely. To assess a project this is not enough, need to evaluate the team, the roadmap, the community, and the area of the project wants to develop.

[RieL]

On my own experience the project that already produced theur own product has a market extension phase unlike the project that havent produced their prodict yet but on those small scale project development investors can attract project with good products and also good platform that they can invest

[abcd7]

both way is ok because if you invest in ico must be REAL ONE to be prospective  and you will not loose but if you invest in the beginning profit will be more.

[SixOfFive]

ICO with already a product consider to have comparatively less risk than without product ICO. ICO Company owning a product already completed half the way to success. Moreover it will give quick return as most of the work on the product is done. On the other hand, New ICO which came into the market without any product will take ateast 1 year to develop the product and to earn revenue from it.

[Anndrianno]

Man... You cannot invest in an ICO without a product... No way- without a product ICO just has an idea... Everyone has ideas, but you are absolutely unable to make money with a project that fails to introduce AT LEAST the basic alpha version of it's product. So stay well aware of those projects which have nothing. Of course you have to think about absolutely everything concerning the team, advisors, tweeter, pr and marketing campaign, but is still the most important thing on top of the whole ICO project. That's my opinion at the very least.

[geronimo77]

90% of the ICO is a scam. In general, do not get involved in this venture.

[TE-FOOD]

Man... You cannot invest in an ICO without a product... No way- without a product ICO just has an idea... Everyone has ideas, but you are absolutely unable to make money with a project that fails to introduce AT LEAST the basic alpha version of it's product. So stay well aware of those projects which have nothing. Of course you have to think about absolutely everything concerning the team, advisors, tweeter, pr and marketing campaign, but is still the most important thing on top of the whole ICO project. That's my opinion at the very least.

I totally agree with you on what you wrote. But on the other side, you advertise an ICO in your signature, which still just an idea. Although I suppose you joined to a bounty campaign, but still it contradicts with your opinion.

What I still would like to add, that beside looking for a market fit investment target, people should also consider what help the project provides for the people. I don't say that's an exclusive requirement, but can be a legit plus.

Disclosure: Our ICO is about TE-FOOD, a ready and working food traceability solution used by 6000+ business costumers, and improves food safety in emerging countries.

[kimochidesh]

ICO with a product is more safer to invest as compare to ICO without product. These ICO's has already completed a major part of their roadmap. Revenue generation would be swift and hence changes of growing token prices would be far more than other ICO's.