ltcnim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 914
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 29, 2017, 08:10:06 PM |
|
I would prefer the swap to be made like other coins already did: take a snapshot of the SIGT blockchain, and let ppl sign a message with their addresses, and provide a SIGT2.0 address. Then you can just send the coins there. That way everyone can still keep the SIGT 1.0 coins. This has been done by various other coins and it works simple. Also, all coins not claimed from the snap shot can be used for airdrops or whatever after a while (6 month or so).
|
|
|
|
aikuKT
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2017, 10:07:33 PM |
|
Okay. Finally got the wallet to sync - 1. backup your address somewhere safe
- 2. close wallet
- 3. go to the "C:\Users\UserName\AppData\Roaming" (replace C with your windows drive location, and UserName with your user or simply click your way there
- 4. in the "Roaming" folder find the Signatum folder and delete it (before that do step 1. and 2.
- 5. run your wallet (it will be empty but this will trigger the "Signatum" folder to show in the "Roming" folder
- 6. close the wallet again
- 7. in the "Signatum" folder replace the wallet.dat with your backed up wallet (just in case it has to be named "wallet.dat")
- 8. go to this web page https://github.com/signatumd/releases/blob/master/signatum.conf and copy all the "addnode=104.197.159.83" (just them)
- 9. open Notepad (i would suggest Notepad++) copy the nodes in it and save the file in "C:\Users\UserName\AppData\Roaming"\Signatum" as "signatum.conf"
- 10. start your wallet and wait a bit
I hope this helps someone. Oh and a note this is for "Windows" users, I'm not sure if it will work on "Linux" So if anyone is willing to donate I will really appreciate any coin given The address is in the signature
|
|
|
|
ryanlitwiller
|
|
October 29, 2017, 10:24:51 PM Last edit: October 29, 2017, 10:40:36 PM by ryanlitwiller |
|
What is the dev team of 2.0 planning to do with all the SIGT they receive from the coin swap? Why can't the holders of the original SIGT just be honored the 1/4 of SIGT 2.0 they are entitled to without having to swap? Your asking a battered coin community that has already been through a bunch of controversy to take a risk and pick a side. I've read the announcements and it seems legit, but I and many others thought the doctor sounded legit the last time we went through this. If SIGT 2.0 devs are working to release a new blockchain and have an opportunity to eliminate all risk to the community why not?
|
CRC, TZC, INN, FTC, VIVO, DSR, LUX - pool.CryptoPros.us
|
|
|
jonfrakes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:00:26 AM |
|
Why don't these devs come clean with their identities and competencies? Why hide behind pseudonyms
They have explained this. Giving their identities could jeapordize the jobs for them. Also there have been threats before. Alot of sick people in the world, and with families to care for they have decided to stay anonymous. I would have done the same if i i were part of the team. If I were an investor I wouldn't risk my investment on a project with a shady history and run by anonymous devs.
|
|
|
|
bcnaranjo
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:58:38 AM |
|
Since there is now Signatum 2.0, are we assured that our coins from the old wallet will not be lost?
|
|
|
|
Mozzus
Member
Offline
Activity: 167
Merit: 10
|
|
October 30, 2017, 11:42:39 AM |
|
OPTION 1 is most reasonable .. old sig cant stay arround it needs to be deleted ..
|
|
|
|
|
easyrimka
|
|
October 30, 2017, 11:45:42 AM |
|
woaw, very nice , 1 SIGT2.0 for 4 SIGT1.0 ... Is it a joke ??
|
|
|
|
antecrus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2017, 11:46:11 AM |
|
Yes, I also choose the 1st option.
|
|
|
|
casha
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2017, 11:50:46 AM |
|
1st option!
|
|
|
|
milac
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:02:39 PM |
|
+1 for 1st option!
|
|
|
|
Skliv
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:03:33 PM |
|
1st option!
|
|
|
|
easyrimka
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:05:19 PM |
|
1st option too
|
|
|
|
z0rn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:09:52 PM |
|
1st option!
|
|
|
|
uhro
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
Join Cashbery Coin!
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:19:41 PM |
|
Obviously the first option
Sigt V1 = no team working on it Sigt V2 = team working hard with transparency
Pretty easy choice, not sure why people would want to retain a coin at 20:1 that is essentially dead when 4:1 is an option.
As more details about the re-brand and swap come out, V1 price will rebound a bit for people wanting in on the swap.
If things stay on track for Sigt V2 I believe it can be a very successful project.
P.S. On a side note, NovaExchange is closing until it's re-opened by a new owner. Shouldn't really make a difference as most of the Sigt volume comes from YoBit. Move your coins somewhere other than Nova just to be safe.
|
|
|
|
Zarg0n
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:33:04 PM |
|
i can't vote, but 1st option for me , swap and burn!
|
|
|
|
z0rn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:34:21 PM |
|
Please make sure, that everyone here can vote. If it is not possible here, switch to another online vote tool. It's unfair for people who not posting a lot here and just read. Maybe they are more active on other channels.
|
|
|
|
coinhunter_mt2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:38:31 PM |
|
The first option for the upcoming swap sounds better. I like the 1st one. Please vote for the swap.
|
|
|
|
SmallRig
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 253
Merit: 100
SafeCoin-SAFE
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:51:51 PM |
|
POW Algo for new coin is good.. Back to mining .. And Option 1 for swap is great.. Burn that old SIGT coins.. !!!
|
|
|
|
easyrimka
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:53:00 PM |
|
what exchanges are planned for SIGT 2.0 ?
|
|
|
|
|