manfred (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
|
 |
June 09, 2013, 09:14:11 PM
Last edit: June 10, 2013, 10:06:39 AM by manfred |
|
 Both 9 month range peak aligned |
|
|
|
|
|
auzaar
|
|
June 09, 2013, 09:25:33 PM |
|
That is a good news, it means 2015 it will touch 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
ildubbioso
|
|
June 09, 2013, 09:27:23 PM |
|
Where are the true speculators? We have a highly volatile, almost predictable market here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
aceking
|
|
June 09, 2013, 09:58:37 PM |
|
price will stay over 100 dollars for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
Odalv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 09, 2013, 10:14:31 PM |
|
price will stay over 100 dollars for sure.
price will stay over 10,000 dollars for sure. (time frame 3 1/2 year) |
|
|
|
|
|
lucas.sev
|
|
June 09, 2013, 10:17:02 PM |
|
Bubbles, bubbles never change.
|
|
|
|
|
keewee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 09, 2013, 10:17:09 PM |
|
price will stay over 100 dollars for sure.
 |
1keewee2vRp63UWvPBynT55ZYw6SUCKDB
|
|
|
Stephen Gornick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 09, 2013, 11:03:29 PM |
|
Wow, those two fit nicely! What's interesting is that June 2013 is unlike Aug 2011 and there aren't many this time who are calling Bitcoin a failed experiment / dead. :-) [Edited: to put in dates] |
|
|
|
N12
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 09, 2013, 11:05:07 PM |
|
Wow, those two fit nicely! What's interesting in there are few who are calling Bitcoin dead this time. :-) People didn't start calling Bitcoin dead until Oct./Nov. Sentiment extreme occurs only near the bottom. |
|
|
|
|
chriswilmer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 09, 2013, 11:07:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
chriswilmer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 09, 2013, 11:13:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
|
|
June 09, 2013, 11:15:06 PM |
|
iirc Bitcoin prices weren't negative before May 2013. If they were negative I would have snapped them indefinitely and stored the associated fiat in a warehouse  |
|
|
|
|
manfred (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
|
|
June 10, 2013, 06:53:50 AM |
|
iirc Bitcoin prices weren't negative before May 2013. If they were negative I would have snapped them indefinitely and stored the associated fiat in a warehouse Its a simple patten overlay and the 2013 price is not shown only the flow pattern. Current price isn't 12 either. Very elementary and simple to understand, but i guess still to technical for some. |
|
|
|
|
|
Crypt_Current
|
|
June 10, 2013, 07:13:57 AM |
|
I'm seeing a lot of comparison of our current situation to both 2011 and the August 2012 fiasco that was due mostly to PirateAt40's scam ... The 2011 situation was caused by all-out massacre consisting mostly of rampant hacks and horrid press: Blood flowed through the streets. August 2012 was not so bloody at all, and I think there is not much blood here either. So, question is (mostly for bears -- always needing the answer to that "Why?"): Who's behind the "scam" this time :-D ? The posting of a picture of a fake (and inaccurately dated) Gox email by notorious BTC-e user "fontas" is an interesting theory... |
|
|
|
mmortal03
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1762
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 10, 2013, 07:24:07 AM |
|
The end of October 2012, at the end of your chart there, was the last time before yesterday that we went below the 100 day SMA. Just an important point in market psychology. Here it is from then until now:  |
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 10, 2013, 12:26:00 PM |
|
iirc Bitcoin prices weren't negative before May 2013. If they were negative I would have snapped them indefinitely and stored the associated fiat in a warehouse Its a simple patten overlay and the 2013 price is not shown only the flow pattern. Current price isn't 12 either. Very elementary and simple to understand, but i guess still to technical for some. That's the problem. There is no valid technical explanation for this plot. It is an arbitrary alignment of two different data series. What's the reason you didn't align the beginning of the run up? Let me guess, you tried that but it didn't support your point well enough. |
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
|
|
June 10, 2013, 01:05:53 PM |
|
iirc Bitcoin prices weren't negative before May 2013. If they were negative I would have snapped them indefinitely and stored the associated fiat in a warehouse Its a simple patten overlay and the 2013 price is not shown only the flow pattern. Current price isn't 12 either. Very elementary and simple to understand, but i guess still to technical for some. No it's not too technical. I was trying to tell you this is complete bullshit in a less direct, more subtle manner. |
|
|
|
|
manfred (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
|
|
June 10, 2013, 01:58:38 PM |
|
 Aligned with beginning of run-up, not peak |
|
|
|
|
|
naphto
|
|
June 10, 2013, 02:06:39 PM |
|
That is a good news, it means 2015 it will touch 2000
Does not even mean that it will ever be possible to be > 300 usd. |
|
|
|
|
Jozzaboy
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 10, 2013, 02:19:37 PM |
|
Aligned with beginning of run-up, not peak So the price will run up to 120 then crash. Got it. Buy now and sell later |
BTC: 16whd9eNR8WY9nVhUUevNYMbQB2eS1jtYF I also accept precious metals, no paper money please. |
|
|
|
