Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 09:03:52 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: BitcoinOrama Report on the KnCminer/OrSoC Open-day Mon 10/06/13 (Stockholm)  (Read 55671 times)
mvidetto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 12:23:58 AM
 #221

Anyone know if they're offering upgrades from saturn to jupiter and if so when and for how much?
dwdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


- - -Caveat Aleo- - -


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 12:26:11 AM
 #222

Great report.  I hope their results match their confidence.
dwdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


- - -Caveat Aleo- - -


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 12:37:09 AM
 #223

Anyone know if they're offering upgrades from saturn to jupiter and if so when and for how much?

As I understand it a Jupiter is just 2 Saturns stuck together. If upgrading from Saturn to Jupiter  is permitted, then what about upgrading from 1 to 2 Jupiters? I think this might be unfair to those who paid the full amount before the deadline, unless the upgraded order goes to the end of the queue. Thoughts?

ps-for full disclosure I have orders in for both types.
Bitcoinorama (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 12:38:06 AM
 #224

Great report.  I hope their results match their confidence.

Well all I can say is they sell that confidence with total conviction in person, and they are genuinely smart. I also don't believe ORSoC play casino with their 10yr old company and name.

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
Korbman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 12:50:09 AM
 #225

I agree. Fantastic write-up as always Bitcoinorama! I was disappointed when I finished reading the post, simply because I wanted to know so much more. Is there any more info coming?

Man, give me some time to listen and digest the rest, there's loads of audio, no idea what it picks up after the Q&A, hence why I typed from memory in the first post of this thread.

I won't transcribe beyond the Q&A though, nooooo way!!! My finger's are burning!

Ha, by all means take a breather and rest. I was just wondering if I can look forward to more KnC OpenDay pr0n coming up in the next few days / week..which based on your statements means "yes". Cheesy

WillMilk4Coin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 01:18:26 AM
 #226

Anyone know if they're offering upgrades from saturn to jupiter and if so when and for how much?
As I understand it a Jupiter is just 2 Saturns stuck together. If upgrading from Saturn to Jupiter  is permitted, then what about upgrading from 1 to 2 Jupiters? I think this might be unfair to those who paid the full amount before the deadline, unless the upgraded order goes to the end of the queue. Thoughts?
ps-for full disclosure I have orders in for both types.

KnC will allow for upgrades from Saturn to Jupiter while maintaining the place in queue, however, I am not aware if they'll allow the upgrade to additional units while keeping that place in line.
johnyj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012


Beyond Imagination


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 02:06:21 AM
 #227

I have not received any order payment confirmation email, only status paid showed on their website. Did anyone receive some kind of payment confirmation?

KS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 07:02:27 AM
 #228

Marcus: It's an FPGA, so you buy them off the shelf, you program them, we have proven the fastest design, possible, available is err...is running at 106ghMH/s, we get 130ghMH/s out of it. So obviously we redesign them to make them faster.

(snip)

Marcus: No, no. 48 divided by 306 multiplied by 106. Calculator. That's 5, 5.1.

FTFY^

edit: when they say they have the fastest design, do they mean "miner"? Bitfury is doing 300MH/s on a Spartan 6 (150). AFAIK *he* has the fastest design.
Xialla
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


/dev/null


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 07:33:55 AM
 #229

I have not received any order payment confirmation email, only status paid showed on their website. Did anyone receive some kind of payment confirmation?

same here, they just changed status to "paid" on my account, nothing else..
Rampion
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 07:38:45 AM
 #230

Please ask them if they already ordered the chips, if not how far are they to reach the minimum order goal.

This is crucial, any delay will be a big problem, they have a very tight schedule and tsmc is not going to hurry for any customer.

I hope KnC is not having any problem to manage and move the shitload of cash they have probably collected.

mandelmus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 07:51:03 AM
 #231

... If the "available units" on KNC's web are correct, that means that 1,000TH are still available. Considering the +150TH in Avalon chips, plus another 100TH by ASICMINER, and +400TH by BFL, that would take difficulty to at least to 200 million. Without even counting for Bitfury. ROI is going to be tough, guys. If there is someone so dumb to have asked for a loan to buy ASIC... He might better cancel his order, this is going to be a tough fight for peanuts - as mining has always been, apart from that small timeframe in which ASIC equipment supply was hyper-short, and the very lucky ones who had one unit took all the profits.

ref: http://www.bitcoinx.com/charts/

I'm trying to do some forecasting and risk analysis using the "bitcoin network vs. market linear, 30 days" charts and noticed that the "Mining Factor 100" (the USD per 24 hours at 100MHash/s) has dropped from 0.55 on May 21st to around 0.26 as of Jun 17th.  That's a drop of around 50% in 1 month ... and, that drop happened with existing ASICs (I'm guessing mostly due to ASICminer, a few avalons, and the BFL jalapenos).  At this rate, the "Mining Factor 100" could drop down to at least 0.13 by October.  Using those estimates, if KnC, BFL and others deliver by October, each 350GHash (Jupiter) miner, for example, will take, at minimum, well over 5 months to breakeven ... and, that's assuming a lot (i.e., the BTC/USD rates stay about where they are today, no new competitors, no new game-changing technology, no new ASICs added to the market, the difficulty level continues as it has over the last several months, etc.).  ... and, in order to earn the same in November 2013 as a Jupiter would earn today, I estimate that you will need to be mining with approximately 20 Jupiters by November.  Worse, if KnC can't deliver until November, the breakeven might not happen until well over 2 years later.  By March 2014, the Jupiter might be earning around 1 USD per day ... hhhmm.

In order to stay viable and profitable, it's really in our best interest to get everyone using Bitcoins: restaurants, websites, bit-tipping via cell phones, etc.  Just like paypal is everywhere, "Pay-with-Bitcoin" needs to be everywhere.  Over the past 5 months, when I've asked about 40 of my friends (in their 20s through 30s) if they had heard of bitcoins, only 2 said they had, but didn't understand it.  So, I'm guessing there's still plenty of opportunity for Bitcoin's growth.

@Bitcoinorama: Did KnC say they plan to release all 2000 ASICs to the market at relatively the same time or spread out over several weeks?
mandelmus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 07:59:51 AM
 #232

KnC will allow for upgrades from Saturn to Jupiter while maintaining the place in queue, however, I am not aware if they'll allow the upgrade to additional units while keeping that place in line.

Why all this talk about upgrades?  Is there an order cut-off date? 

Is there a minimum number of orders KnC needs to get started?
sickpig
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 08:40:42 AM
Last edit: June 18, 2013, 09:09:09 AM by sickpig
 #233


ref: http://www.bitcoinx.com/charts/

I'm trying to do some forecasting and risk analysis using the "bitcoin network vs. market linear, 30 days" charts and noticed that the "Mining Factor 100" (the USD per 24 hours at 100MHash/s) has dropped from 0.55 on May 21st to around 0.26 as of Jun 17th.  That's a drop of around 50% in 1 month ... and, that drop happened with existing ASICs (I'm guessing mostly due to ASICminer, a few avalons, and the BFL jalapenos).  At this rate, the "Mining Factor 100" could drop down to at least 0.13 by October.  Using those estimates, if KnC, BFL and others deliver by October, each 350GHash (Jupiter) miner, for example, will take, at minimum, well over 5 months to breakeven ... and, that's assuming a lot (i.e., the BTC/USD rates stay about where they are today, no new competitors, no new game-changing technology, no new ASICs added to the market, the difficulty level continues as it has over the last several months, etc.).  ... and, in order to earn the same in November 2013 as a Jupiter would earn today, I estimate that you will need to be mining with approximately 20 Jupiters by November.  Worse, if KnC can't deliver until November, the breakeven might not happen until well over 2 years later.  By March 2014, the Jupiter might be earning around 1 USD per day ... hhhmm.


1 USD/day ?

Assuming a constant exchange rate of 100$ per BTC, you're talking about  0.01 BTC per day hence a bitcoin difficulty equals to 17.6 billion by March 2014. Am I missing something obvious ?

edit1:

just to make it a little bit more clear: to achieve 17.2 billion btc difficulty by the end of March you need a 29.7% constant growth rate every 11 days starting from now. I'm not saying it's impossible I am just trying to understand what OP is thinking.





Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
Bitcoinorama (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 09:33:58 AM
 #234

Ok, have an email from Marcus, correcting a few bits I made mistakes on. The mistakes were due to lousy audio in parts, as especially where the acronyms are concerned I kept replaying the audio at those parts and still got it wrong.

I'm going to to go back and fix the doc, but for those that have read it already, Marus sent me this at 7am;

======================================================


Marcus: No, no. 48 divided by 306. Calculator. That's 5, 5.1.

48 multiplied with 106GHash (original design) is 5.1, we wanted to show that we can run faster.

=======================================================

Marcus: They're FPGAs; Altera Stratix 4

(http://www.altera.com/devices/fpga/stratix-fpgas/stratix/stratix/stx-index.jsp)

They're FPGAs; Altera Cyclone 4

(http://www.altera.com/devices/fpga/cyclone-v-fpgas/cyv-index.jsp)

=======================================================

Marcus: Which we've already done...doing...yeah. I mean normal guys, dual ARM etc., etc. say you can never squeeze in exactly that ARM processor in the FPGA, so you will always have proportions of the design that you can't test in an FPGA, and that's when the risk goes up and you have to do a LBW...

"LBW" should be "MPW"  (Multi Project Wafer)

=======================================================

Marcus: Well it was more CGMiner...hiccup

Well it was more our CGMiner driver ....hiccup


=======================================================

Marcus: The second reason why it was that we needed something that can verify the ASIC code on, cos when...since we are going directly to ASIC and not the NPW, no prototypes from now...........


"NPW" should be "MPW"


--
______________________________________________

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
dan99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 09:59:19 AM
 #235

... If the "available units" on KNC's web are correct, that means that 1,000TH are still available. Considering the +150TH in Avalon chips, plus another 100TH by ASICMINER, and +400TH by BFL, that would take difficulty to at least to 200 million. Without even counting for Bitfury. ROI is going to be tough, guys. If there is someone so dumb to have asked for a loan to buy ASIC... He might better cancel his order, this is going to be a tough fight for peanuts - as mining has always been, apart from that small timeframe in which ASIC equipment supply was hyper-short, and the very lucky ones who had one unit took all the profits.

ref: http://www.bitcoinx.com/charts/

I'm trying to do some forecasting and risk analysis using the "bitcoin network vs. market linear, 30 days" charts and noticed that the "Mining Factor 100" (the USD per 24 hours at 100MHash/s) has dropped from 0.55 on May 21st to around 0.26 as of Jun 17th.  That's a drop of around 50% in 1 month ... and, that drop happened with existing ASICs (I'm guessing mostly due to ASICminer, a few avalons, and the BFL jalapenos).  At this rate, the "Mining Factor 100" could drop down to at least 0.13 by October.  Using those estimates, if KnC, BFL and others deliver by October, each 350GHash (Jupiter) miner, for example, will take, at minimum, well over 5 months to breakeven ... and, that's assuming a lot (i.e., the BTC/USD rates stay about where they are today, no new competitors, no new game-changing technology, no new ASICs added to the market, the difficulty level continues as it has over the last several months, etc.).  ... and, in order to earn the same in November 2013 as a Jupiter would earn today, I estimate that you will need to be mining with approximately 20 Jupiters by November.  Worse, if KnC can't deliver until November, the breakeven might not happen until well over 2 years later.  By March 2014, the Jupiter might be earning around 1 USD per day ... hhhmm.

In order to stay viable and profitable, it's really in our best interest to get everyone using Bitcoins: restaurants, websites, bit-tipping via cell phones, etc.  Just like paypal is everywhere, "Pay-with-Bitcoin" needs to be everywhere.  Over the past 5 months, when I've asked about 40 of my friends (in their 20s through 30s) if they had heard of bitcoins, only 2 said they had, but didn't understand it.  So, I'm guessing there's still plenty of opportunity for Bitcoin's growth.

@Bitcoinorama: Did KnC say they plan to release all 2000 ASICs to the market at relatively the same time or spread out over several weeks?

A street preacher with 18 posts ... how much credibility can he gets and out of the blue he comes here preaching, he probably would do the same last year before avalon launched their asic miner.
Bitcoinorama (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 10:40:03 AM
 #236

Please ask them if they already ordered the chips, if not how far are they to reach the minimum order goal.

This is crucial, any delay will be a big problem, they have a very tight schedule and tsmc is not going to hurry for any customer.

I hope KnC is not having any problem to manage and move the shitload of cash they have probably collected.

As I said KnC mentioned some novel solutions I cannot repeat, certainly they have all other parts on standby and multiple manufacturers in case there is a fault with one, but I will ask if they have ordered chips...

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
titomane
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 389
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 11:23:09 AM
 #237


If used Cyclone IV to Mars they told me. By saving costs.
Why Stratix now want to pass? I just hope that the order of the chips this and paid as of today.
Minimum is 12 weeks, this is second to third week in August

J35st3r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 12:05:24 PM
 #238

A street preacher with 18 posts ... how much credibility can he gets and out of the blue he comes here preaching, he probably would do the same last year before avalon launched their asic miner.

Ad hom. Play the ball, not the man  Angry

1Jest66T6Jw1gSVpvYpYLXR6qgnch6QYU1 NumberOfTheBeast ... go on, give it a try Grin
Bitcoinorama (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 12:12:40 PM
 #239


@Bitcoinorama: Did KnC say they plan to release all 2000 ASICs to the market at relatively the same time or spread out over several weeks?

They said they could feasibly ramp up production to the levels needed to cope with demand.

They said they could only sell products that gave their customers a return on investment and that; "We have a few things that we can do to make sure our customers get a return on investment."

Not sure if that answers your question, but that's alls i's got currently...

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
KS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 12:25:00 PM
 #240

Ok, have an email from Marcus, correcting a few bits I made mistakes on. The mistakes were due to lousy audio in parts, as especially where the acronyms are concerned I kept replaying the audio at those parts and still got it wrong.

I'm going to to go back and fix the doc, but for those that have read it already, Marus sent me this at 7am;

======================================================


Marcus: No, no. 48 divided by 306. Calculator. That's 5, 5.1.

48 multiplied with 106GHashMH/s (original design) is 5.1, we wanted to show that we can run faster.

=======================================================


Still not GH/s for the FPGAs, only MH/s.

48 x 106 MH/s ≃ 5.1 GH/s
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!