Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 07:49:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Do we need Soldo Fork to keep initial mining curves?
Yes - 20 (66.7%)
No - 10 (33.3%)
Total Voters: 30

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [SLD] Soldo - easy CPU mining / modified Cryptonote PoW / BlockChain Lottery  (Read 56861 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (2 posts by 1+ user deleted.)
Perog2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 11

Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.


View Profile WWW
April 11, 2018, 08:20:24 AM
 #701

1. Decrease total supply of Soldo to 5.000.000
then supply will end in a year ... what will happen next?

SHELLS - Experimental utility token. Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.

TOPIC ON BITCOINTALK
1714160981
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714160981

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714160981
Reply with quote  #2

1714160981
Report to moderator
1714160981
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714160981

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714160981
Reply with quote  #2

1714160981
Report to moderator
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714160981
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714160981

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714160981
Reply with quote  #2

1714160981
Report to moderator
1714160981
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714160981

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714160981
Reply with quote  #2

1714160981
Report to moderator
1714160981
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714160981

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714160981
Reply with quote  #2

1714160981
Report to moderator
Neosmokecrypt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 11, 2018, 08:34:42 AM
 #702

Hello, i have a question.

I'am mining with two Pc's, 1 pc works perfect i found some blocks but the other pc find 9 blocks but no transaction in the wallet ( i use the same wallet address),  i created a new wallet and i found a block but no transaction.  I give the command Incomming in the wallet and i see this:

INCOMING TRANSFERS:

b5c2ae8c18a88bc0568b1c7cc55fcba2b6af705acd064d94f74596216e5ae1ff @ 1969-12-31 16:00:00 =        2.00000000

It's a weird date, does someone knows whats wrong?

sorry for my bad english


Slonik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 11, 2018, 08:44:07 AM
 #703

Hello, i have a question.

I'am mining with two Pc's, 1 pc works perfect i found some blocks but the other pc find 9 blocks but no transaction in the wallet ( i use the same wallet address),  i created a new wallet and i found a block but no transaction.  I give the command Incomming in the wallet and i see this:

INCOMING TRANSFERS:

b5c2ae8c18a88bc0568b1c7cc55fcba2b6af705acd064d94f74596216e5ae1ff @ 1969-12-31 16:00:00 =        2.00000000

It's a weird date, does someone knows whats wrong?

sorry for my bad english




try to command in wallet -  "reset      -    Discard cache data and start synchronizing from the start"
Neosmokecrypt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 11, 2018, 08:51:20 AM
 #704

Hello, i have a question.

I'am mining with two Pc's, 1 pc works perfect i found some blocks but the other pc find 9 blocks but no transaction in the wallet ( i use the same wallet address),  i created a new wallet and i found a block but no transaction.  I give the command Incomming in the wallet and i see this:

INCOMING TRANSFERS:

b5c2ae8c18a88bc0568b1c7cc55fcba2b6af705acd064d94f74596216e5ae1ff @ 1969-12-31 16:00:00 =        2.00000000

It's a weird date, does someone knows whats wrong?

sorry for my bad english




try to command in wallet -  "reset      -    Discard cache data and start synchronizing from the start"


i tried but no effect,  i going to resync the blockchain, maybe that will fix the problem
Perog2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 11

Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.


View Profile WWW
April 11, 2018, 09:10:02 AM
 #705

i tried but no effect,  i going to resync the blockchain, maybe that will fix the problem
you connect each miner to a separate daemon or 2 miners work on 1 daemon? and have you synchronized the time in the operating system settings?

SHELLS - Experimental utility token. Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.

TOPIC ON BITCOINTALK
Neosmokecrypt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 11, 2018, 09:35:51 AM
 #706

i tried but no effect,  i going to resync the blockchain, maybe that will fix the problem
you connect each miner to a separate daemon or 2 miners work on 1 daemon? and have you synchronized the time in the operating system settings?

I connect each miner to a separate daemon, and i use 1 wallet, i see the timezone is different then the other machine who works perfect (the wallet is running on this machine), i changed it,  maybe this will work... now i must wait when i find a block ;-)

Perog2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 11

Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.


View Profile WWW
April 11, 2018, 10:23:17 AM
 #707


I connect each miner to a separate daemon, and i use 1 wallet, i see the timezone is different then the other machine who works perfect (the wallet is running on this machine), i changed it,  maybe this will work... now i must wait when i find a block ;-)

time should be set automatically - this is a critical parameter

SHELLS - Experimental utility token. Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.

TOPIC ON BITCOINTALK
Neosmokecrypt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 11, 2018, 11:51:12 AM
 #708


I connect each miner to a separate daemon, and i use 1 wallet, i see the timezone is different then the other machine who works perfect (the wallet is running on this machine), i changed it,  maybe this will work... now i must wait when i find a block ;-)

time should be set automatically - this is a critical parameter

I set it to automatic it wasn't enabled, but i can't test it anymore the remote machine crashed, its has some heat issues :-) i post the results tomorrow,


thank you in advance

abudfv2008
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 106


View Profile
April 11, 2018, 01:02:09 PM
 #709

At the moment everything is fine!
The rate is problem.
Its should be x30 more now.

But nobody want to invest while so much free new coins so we need to restrict fresh supply to make buy support.
To invest there should be clear roadmap with some kind of reallife usage. Without that - soldo is just another pure speculative coin without any real purpose.
Then, for buy support it should be normal exchange at least small but good one like coinexchange or maybe cryptobridge.

Limiting the total supply has no sence at all. Making 0.01 reward is totally useless because with todays price that would mean extremely small ammount of miners.
Perog2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 11

Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.


View Profile WWW
April 11, 2018, 01:25:12 PM
 #710

To invest there should be clear roadmap with some kind of reallife usage. Without that - soldo is just another pure speculative coin without any real purpose.
Then, for buy support it should be normal exchange at least small but good one like coinexchange or maybe cryptobridge.

Limiting the total supply has no sence at all. Making 0.01 reward is totally useless because with todays price that would mean extremely small ammount of miners.
A road map in white paper describes in some detail the future ecosystem. These two exchanges do not work with kryptonite coins. In addition, in my opinion, the current stock exchanges are more worthy.

The emission curve should be with a gradual decrease in the reward. This is good for investors and future miners.

SHELLS - Experimental utility token. Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.

TOPIC ON BITCOINTALK
(Y)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 11, 2018, 01:52:25 PM
 #711

Hello, i have a question.

I'am mining with two Pc's, 1 pc works perfect i found some blocks but the other pc find 9 blocks but no transaction in the wallet ( i use the same wallet address),  i created a new wallet and i found a block but no transaction.  I give the command Incomming in the wallet and i see this:

INCOMING TRANSFERS:

b5c2ae8c18a88bc0568b1c7cc55fcba2b6af705acd064d94f74596216e5ae1ff @ 1969-12-31 16:00:00 =        2.00000000

It's a weird date, does someone knows whats wrong?

sorry for my bad english




I had this exact problem before, I did not figure out the exact reason why, but I ended up reinstalling windows on the machine and did not have the issue any more.
_Art_
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 2


View Profile
April 12, 2018, 02:49:16 AM
 #712

-1  Cheesy Decrease total supply of Soldo to 2.500.000


Neosmokecrypt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 12, 2018, 07:27:55 AM
 #713


I connect each miner to a separate daemon, and i use 1 wallet, i see the timezone is different then the other machine who works perfect (the wallet is running on this machine), i changed it,  maybe this will work... now i must wait when i find a block ;-)

time should be set automatically - this is a critical parameter

Hello,

I found a block and i received it in my wallet! It was a time problem and this was the solution, everyone tnx for the help!
eeX (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 961
Merit: 500


Soldo.IN [SLD]


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2018, 08:08:33 AM
 #714

Guys,

I just added the poll at the top of the topic.
Vote now and choose Soldo destiny.

Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
Perog2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 11

Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2018, 08:18:45 AM
 #715

There is no option of gradual reduction of reward  Sad

SHELLS - Experimental utility token. Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.

TOPIC ON BITCOINTALK
eeX (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 961
Merit: 500


Soldo.IN [SLD]


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2018, 08:23:22 AM
 #716

There is no option of gradual reduction of reward  Sad
Every Cryptonote shit has it.
Not our way Smiley

Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
Perog2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 11

Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2018, 08:26:08 AM
 #717

There is no option of gradual reduction of reward  Sad
Every Cryptonote shit has it.
Not our way Smiley
ok sir

how to change the answer in the vote?))

SHELLS - Experimental utility token. Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.

TOPIC ON BITCOINTALK
Slonik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 12, 2018, 08:26:36 AM
 #718

I can't vote  but my voice is for:

2.5M and 10M to 0.1 SLD and keep lottery
muhamati
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 12, 2018, 08:27:33 AM
 #719

Please keep it as it is. Coin will get time to develop a real life purpose, trust and a long term target.

( btw: how to vote? it's not clickable. )
Slonik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 12, 2018, 08:31:32 AM
 #720

Please keep it as it is. Coin will get time to develop a real life purpose, trust and a long term target.

( btw: how to vote? it's not clickable. )

restrictions for beginners Cry
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!